Online Submission Form for
Supplemental Evidence and Data for Systematic Reviews for the
Evidence-based Practice Center Program
Reinstatement without change of a previously approved
collection
No
Regular
10/20/2022
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
200
0
50
0
0
0
This is an ongoing activity of AHRQ’s
Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Program. AHRQ’s EPC Program
develops evidence reports and technology assessments on topics
relevant to clinical and other health care organization and
delivery issues—specifically those that are common, expensive,
and/or significant for the Medicare and Medicaid populations. For
example, recent reviews have focused on clinical conditions, such
as “Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases” ; health delivery
topics, such as “Transitions of Care From Pediatric to Adult
Services for Children With Special Healthcare Needs” ; and specific
technologies, such as “Telehealth for Women’s Preventive Services.”
These evidence reports include systematic reviews, technical
briefs, and rapid reviews; and provide an essential foundation from
which to understand what we know from existing research and what
critical research gaps remain. These reports, reviews, and
technology assessments are based on rigorous, comprehensive
syntheses and analyses of the scientific literature on topics. EPC
reports and assessments emphasize explicit and detailed
documentation of methods, rationale, and assumptions. EPC reports
are conducted in accordance with an established policy on financial
and nonfinancial interests. These scientific syntheses may include
meta-analyses and cost analyses. The EPC Program supports AHRQ’s
mission by synthesizing and disseminating the available research as
a “science partner” with private and public organizations in their
efforts to improve the quality, effectiveness, and appropriateness
of health care. The EPC Program is a trusted source of rigorous,
comprehensive, and unbiased evidence reviews for stakeholders. The
resulting evidence reports and technology assessments are used by
Federal and State agencies, private-sector professional societies,
health delivery systems, providers, payers, and others committed to
evidence-based health care. These end-users may use EPC Program
evidence reports to inform policy decisions, clinical practice
guidelines, and other healthcare decisions. This research has the
following goals: o Use research methods to gather knowledge on the
effectiveness and harms of certain treatments and healthcare
delivery processes and models for medical conditions, both
published and unpublished, to evaluate the quality of research
studies and the evidence from these studies. o Promote the use of
evidence in healthcare decision making to improve healthcare and
health. o Identify research gaps to inform future research
investments.
US Code:
42 USC Sec. 299 Name of Law: Healthcare and Research Quality
Act of 1999
Each SEADS portal is a new
collection. The nature of systematic reviews is to secure
comparable evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of numerous
treatments for health related diseases and disorders. These reviews
aim to inform healthcare decision-making by clinicians and
consumers, and inform guidance on clinical practice. The findings
of these reviews are intended to help clinicians and consumers make
the best decisions in their particular circumstances. In general,
the goal for these reports is to be completed within a year. The
steps that go into each review therefore are on a tight schedule
and are not ongoing in order to fulfill their purpose. Thus, there
are no ongoing collections of information from study sponsors and
industry stakeholders for the same topic.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.