sub-study for Landis Award Nomination

LandisAward_2022_SubstudyTemplate_0925-0766.docx

Generic Clearance for NIH Citizen Science and Crowdsourcing Projects (OD)

sub-study for Landis Award Nomination

OMB: 0925-0766

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf


Request for Approval under the “Generic Clearance for NIH Citizen Science and Crowdsourcing Projects”

(OMB#: 0925-0766 Exp., date: 04/2023)

Shape1 TITLE OF INFORMATION COLLECTION: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Landis Award for Outstanding Mentorship - Nominations


PURPOSE:

The purpose of this information collection is to collect nominations from current or former research trainees of NINDS-supported investigators for the NINDS Landis Award for Outstanding Mentorship, and to collect additional information from eligible nominees. This program leverages the direct experience of current and former trainees and empowers them to participate in NINDS support and recognition for outstanding research mentorship.


NINDS solicits nominations for the Landis award once each year. The online nomination form will collect information about the nominators, including their name, current position, institution, the nominee’s name and their relationship to the nominee, as well as a description of why the nominee is an exceptional mentor. The collected information will be used by NINDS to select eligible nominees for the mentorship award. NINDS will then send an email request for additional information from eligible nominees who wish to be considered for the award. The additional information includes a statement of the nominee’s mentoring approach and philosophy, a CV, a list of current and former trainees and descriptions of their accomplishments, and letters of recommendation. This additional information will help NINDS make award recommendations to the National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NANDS) Council and select final awardees.


DESCRIPTION OF RESPONDENTS:

1) “Nominators” – Respondents to the nomination form are researchers who have or have had mentors who are supported by NINDS research grants. They are undergraduate students, post-bacs, graduate students, post-doc researchers, or early-stage investigators in neuroscience research. 2) “Nominees” – Respondents to the email request for additional supporting information are a small pool of eligible nominees who have been nominated for the mentorship award by two or more former or current trainees. These respondents are tenure-track or equivalent faculty members supported by an active NINDS grant.


TYPE OF COLLECTION: (Check one)


[ ] Data Catalogue [ ] Repository of Tools and Best Practices

[ ] Recommendations of scientific reviewers [ ] Resources

[X] Call for Nominations [ ] Other: ______________________



CERTIFICATION:


I certify the following to be true:

  1. The collection is voluntary.

  2. The collection is low-burden for respondents and low-cost for the Federal Government.

  3. The collection is non-controversial and does not raise issues of concern to other federal agencies.

  4. Information gathered will not be used for the purpose of substantially informing influential policy decisions.

  5. The collection is targeted to the solicitation of opinions from respondents who have experience with the program or may have experience with the program in the future.


Name: Cara Long Ph.D., Health Science Policy Analyst, NINDS OSPP



To assist review, please provide answers to the following question:


Personally Identifiable Information:

  1. Is personally identifiable information (PII) collected? [X ] Yes [ ] No

  2. If Yes, is the information that will be collected included in records that are subject to the Privacy Act of 1974? [ X] Yes [ ] No

  3. If Applicable, has a System or Records Notice been published? [X ] Yes [ ] No



Gifts or Payments:

Is an incentive (e.g., money or reimbursement of expenses, token of appreciation) provided to participants? [ ] Yes [X] No




ESTIMATED BURDEN HOURS and COSTS


Category of Respondent

No. of Respondents

No. of Responses per Respondent

Time per

Response

(in hours)

Total Burden

Hours

Individuals/ “nominators”

200

1

15/60

50

Individuals who are “nominees”

50

1

45/60

38

Totals


250


88


COST TO RESPONDENT


Category of Respondent


Total Burden

Hours

Hourly Wage Rate*

Total Burden Cost

Individuals

88

$ 43.27

$ 3,808





Totals



$ 3,808

*Hourly wage rate, 19-1029 Biologic Scientist (http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes191029.htm)




FEDERAL COST: The estimated annual cost to the Federal government is __$7,690_______

Staff


Grade/Step

Salary*

% of Effort

Fringe (if applicable)

Total Cost to Gov’t

Federal Oversight






NINDS Training Office staff

GS-15/Step 10

$176,300

1%


$1,763

NINDS ONCE staff

GS-14/Step 3

$134,649

1%


$1,346

NINDS Training Office staff

GS-12/Step 3

$95,824

1%


$958

NINDS Program Director

GS-15/Step 1

$148,484

0.75%


$1,113

NINDS Program Director

GS-14/Step 5


$143,064

0.75%


$1,073

NINDS Program Director

GS-14/Step 5

$143,064

0.75%


$1,073

Contractor Cost






Web management team


$36,400

1%


$364

Travel






Other Cost












Total





$7,690

*Salary is cited from https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2022/general-schedule/




If you are conducting a focus group, survey, or plan to employ statistical methods, please provide answers to the following questions:


The selection of your targeted respondents

  1. Do you have a customer list or something similar that defines the universe of potential respondents and do you have a sampling plan for selecting from this universe? [X] Yes [] No


If the answer is yes, please provide a description of both below (or attach the sampling plan)? If the answer is no, please provide a description of how you plan to identify your potential group of respondents and how you will select them?


Respondents to the nomination form are undergraduate students, post-bacs, graduate students, post-doc researchers, or early-stage investigators in neuroscience research who currently are working or used to work for the nominee. The call for nominations for the NINDS Landis Award for Outstanding Mentorship will be widely advertised to the neuroscience research community and published as a notice. NINDS will also send an email out to a list of trainees supported by NINDS research training grants, as well as the contact PIs for active NINDS institutional training grants to advertise the NINDS Landis Award and invite them to nominate exceptional mentors. NINDS will then identify eligible nominees who have been nominated for the mentorship award by two or more former or current trainees and ask them to submit additional information via email. The respondents to the email are tenure-track or equivalent faculty members who have been nominated more than once, and are supported by an active NINDS R01, R35, U01, U54, P01, DP1, or DP2 research grant with at least one year left on the grant at the time of award.


We will not sample the respondent population. Instead, only those who wish to nominate mentors will fill out the nomination form, and only nominees who are nominated twice or more will have the choice to submit additional information via email. For each annual call for nominations, we estimate that about 200 nominators will respond, and we estimate that about 50 eligible nominees will submit additional information.


Administration of the Instrument

  1. How will you collect the information? (Check all that apply)

[ X ] Web-based or other forms of Social Media

[ ] Telephone

[ ] In-person

[ ] Mail

[ ] Other, Explain


  1. Will interviewers or facilitators be used? [ ] Yes [ X ] No

Please make sure that all instruments, instructions, and scripts are submitted with the request.




6

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleGeneric Clearance Submission Template
SubjectGeneric Clearance Submission Template
AuthorOD/USER
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2023-08-29

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy