CONSOLIDATED STATE PERFORMANCE REPORT
[manual entry sections only]
School Years 2022-23, 2023-24, 2024-25
Due Date: TBD
The Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) is a summary overview of the data required to be reported annually by each State, the Bureau of Indian Education, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico as authorized under Section 8303 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015(ESSA). All citations to the ESEA in this document are to the ESEA, as amended by the ESSA.
Section 8303 states:
SEC.8303. Consolidated Reporting – (a) In general: In order to simplify reporting requirements and reduce reporting burdens, the Secretary shall establish procedures and criteria under which a State educational agency, in consultation with the Governor of the State, may submit a consolidated State annual report. (b) Contents: The report shall contain information about the programs included in the report, including the performance of the State under those programs, and other matters as the Secretary determines are necessary, such as monitoring activities. (c) Replacement: The report shall replace separate individual annual reports for the programs included in the consolidated State annual report.
The CSPR compiles summary data from the following sources: EDFacts data files and manual entry data reported by states.
Unless an EDFacts file specification is noted (e.g., FS185/DG588) the data were reported to the Department using the manual entry CSPR tool. Much of the data in the CSPR are available at a greater level of detail in public data files on the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education’s ED Data Express (https://eddataexpress.ed.gov/).
For more information on how manual entry data are defined and reported, go to: https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-administration/about-us/consolidated-state-performance-reports/
For more information on how EDFacts data are defined and reported, go to: https://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/edfacts/file-specifications.html
In cases where an Education Unit Total is reported, it is possible that it may not equal aggregated race/ethnicity, age/grade, or sex values. This may be due to differences in how the state reports the data in accordance with the state’s approved accountability plan or due to data quality issues.
The CSPR contains some fields that have been calculated using data reported by states. In those instances, the field is marked as “Calculated” in the CSPR template.
The “Asian or Pacific Islander” counts and rates are either those reported by the State for the Asian/Pacific Islander subgroup or are calculated by combining the counts and rates reported separately for the following subgroups: “Asian,” “Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander,” and (where applicable) “Filipino.” Note that Filipino counts and rates are not reported separately in the CSPR and are only included in the “Asian or Pacific Islander” counts and rates.
The Hispanic or Latino counts and rates are either those reported by the State for the Hispanic/Latino subgroup or are calculated by combining counts and rates reported separately for the following subgroups: “Hispanic (not Puerto Rican)” and “Puerto Rican.”
State education agencies report data to ED via the CSPR manual entry tool and the EDFacts file submission system. All data in the CSPR are as of the due date or the final resubmission date. States may release data on their own state education data sites that may have a different “as of” date or may have gone through additional data quality/reconciliation processes.
Narrative responses are limited to 5000 characters.
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1810-0724. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 35.00 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain a benefit under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).
If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4537. If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission of this form, write directly to: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202.
Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic/Latino Aggregations 2
Differences between ED and State Data 2
1.1 Student Academic Achievement and Participation in State Assessments 6
1.1.4 Alternate Assessment Participation for Children with Disabilities 6
1.1.7 Grants for State Assessments and Related Activities 6
1.3 Title III and Language Instructional Programs 8
Table 1.3.2 Languages of Instruction by LIEP Type 8
1.3.2.1 Description of the use of “Other” types of LIEPs in the table above 8
1.3.4 Teacher Information and Professional Development 8
1.3.4.1 Teachers Working in LIEPs 9
1.3.5 Activities of Subgrantees Related to the Teaching and Learning of ELs 9
1.3.5.1 Required activities serving ELs in LEAs receiving Title III, Part A funds 9
1.3.5.2 Optional activities serving ELs in LEAs receiving Title III, Part A funds 10
1.3.8 State Subgrant Activities 11
1.3.9 Title III Subgrantees – Termination of Title III, Part A Programs or Activities 12
1.5 Education for Homeless Children and Youths Program 13
1.5.1 LEAs receiving McKinney-Vento subgrants and reporting data 13
1.5.4 ARP-Homeless I Subgrantees 13
1.5.5 ARP-Homeless II Subgrantees 13
1.5.6 Subgrantees Awarded Funds through ARP-Homeless I and II 13
1.6 Education of Migratory Children 13
1.6.1 Migratory Child Counts 14
1.6.2 Migratory Child Count (Eligible Migratory Children) 14
1.6.3 Eligible Migratory Children Served by the MEP During the Summer/ Intersession Term 15
1.6.4 Quality Control Processes and Prospective Re-Interviewing 16
1.6.4.1 Indication of whether the State collects all required National COE data elements 16
1.6.4.2 Prospective Re-Interviewing Procedures 16
1.6.4.3 Prospective Re-Interviewing Results 17
This section collects data on student academic achievement and participation in the State assessments.
Note: States are not required to report these data by the racial/ethnic groups shown in the table below; instead, they are required to report these data by the major racial and ethnic groups that align with their accountability system.
This section contains information on children with disabilities’ participation in alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards in mathematics, reading/language arts, and science.
The data in the table below should include participation data from all children with disabilities (IDEA) as defined under the IDEA. Students covered only under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 are not included.
Academic Subject |
Response (Yes or No) |
Mathematics |
Manual Entry |
Reading/Language Arts |
Manual Entry |
Science |
Manual Entry |
This section contains information on your State’s use of funds under Section 1201 of ESEA.
Purpose |
Percentage (rounded to the nearest ten percent) |
To pay the costs of the development of the State assessments and standards required by Section 1111(b) of the ESEA |
Manual Entry |
To administer assessments required by Section 1111(b) of the ESEA or to carry out other activities described in Section 1201 of the ESEA |
Manual Entry |
Purpose |
Used for Purpose (yes/no) |
Administering assessments required by Section 1111(b) of the ESEA |
Manual Entry |
Ensuring the provision of appropriate accommodations available to ELs and children with disabilities to improve the rates of inclusion in regular assessments of such children, including professional development activities to improve the implementation of such accommodations in instructional practice. |
Manual Entry |
Developing challenging State academic standards and aligned assessments in academic subjects for which standards and assessments are not required under Section 1111(b) of the ESEA. |
Manual Entry |
Developing or improving assessments of ELs, including assessments of ELP as required under Section 1111(b)(2)(G) of the ESEA and academic assessments in languages other than English to meet the State’s obligations under Section 1111(b)(2)(F) of the ESEA. |
Manual Entry |
Ensuring the continued validity and reliability of State assessments. |
Manual Entry |
Refining State assessments to ensure their continued alignment with challenging academic standards and to improve the alignment of curricula and instructional materials. |
Manual Entry |
Developing or improving balanced assessment systems that include summative, interim, and formative assessments, including supporting local educational agencies in developing and improving such assessments. |
Manual Entry |
At the discretion of the State, refining science assessments required under Section 1111(b)(2) of the ESEA in order to integrate engineering design skills and practices into such assessments. |
Manual Entry |
Developing or improving models to measure and assess student progress or student growth on State assessments under Section 1111(b)(2) of the ESEA and other assessments not required under Section 1111(b)(2) of the ESEA. |
Manual Entry |
Developing or improving assessments for children with disabilities, including alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities described in Section 1111(b)(2)(D) of the ESEA, and using the principles of universal design for learning. |
Manual Entry |
Allowing for collaboration with institutions of higher education, other research institutions, or other organizations to improve the quality, validity, and reliability of State academic assessments beyond the requirements for such assessments described in Section 1111(b)(2) of the ESEA. |
Manual Entry |
Measuring student academic achievement using multiple measures of student academic achievement from multiple sources. |
Manual Entry |
Evaluating student academic achievement through the development of comprehensive academic assessment instruments (such as performance and technology based academic assessments, computer adaptive assessments, projects, or extended performance task assessments) that emphasize the mastery of standards and aligned competencies in a competency-based education model. |
Manual Entry |
Designing report cards and reports under Section 1111(h) of the ESEA in an easily accessible, user-friendly manner that cross-tabulates student information by any category the State determines appropriate, as long as such cross-tabulations (i) does not reveal personally identifiable information about an individual student, and (ii) is derived from existing State and local reporting requirements. |
Manual Entry |
Other |
Manual Entry |
Table 1.3.2 Languages of Instruction by LIEP Type
LIEPs |
Language(s) of instruction (if applicable) |
Number of ELs served in LIEPs |
Transitional Bilingual |
Manual Entry |
FS116/DG849 |
Dual Language or Two-way Immersion |
Manual Entry |
FS116/DG849 |
English as Second language (ESL) or English Language Development (ELD) |
Manual Entry |
FS116/DG849 |
Content Classes with integrated ESL support |
Manual Entry |
FS116/DG849 |
Newcomer programs |
Manual Entry |
FS116/DG849 |
Other |
Manual Entry |
FS116/DG849 |
1.3.2.1 Description of the use of “Other” types of LIEPs in the table above
Manual Entry |
1.3.4 Teacher Information and Professional Development
The table below should reflect the unduplicated headcount of teachers who are working in LIEPs as defined under section 3201(7) of the ESEA and reported in CSPR Section 1.3.1 (LIEPs). All teachers who meet this description are included, whether or not they are paid with Title III, Part A funds received by the LEA.
The estimated number should be the total additional EL certified or licensed teachers of English learners needed for the next five years, not the number needed for each year. The number of teachers currently working in LIEPs in LEAs receiving Title III, Part A funds are not included.
Number of teachers serving in LIEPs (including core content reading, math, science and social studies) in LEAs receiving Title III, Part A funds |
Number of EL certified or licensed teachers of English learners in LIEPs in LEAs receiving Title III, Part A funds* |
Five Year Estimated number of additional EL certified or licensed teachers of English learners needed**
|
FS067/DG422 |
FS067/DG422 |
Manual Entry |
* When reporting “the number of EL certified or licensed teachers”, if specific EL certification or licensure is not required in the State, the SEA should report the number of teachers with the highest level of certification or licensure required by the State to teach ELs in LIEPs.
**This number should be the total additional teachers needed for the next 5 years, not the number needed for each year. Do not include the number of teachers currently working in LIEPs in LEAs receiving Title III, Part A funds.
1.3.4.2 Description of State’s specific EL certification and licensure requirements or, if the State does not require EL certification or licensure, a description of the highest level of certification or licensure required by the State for which a teacher is considered “fully certified or licensed” to teach ELs in an LIEP
Manual Entry |
1.3.5 Activities of Subgrantees Related to the Teaching and Learning of ELs
1.3.5.1 Required activities serving ELs in LEAs receiving Title III, Part A funds
Required Activities |
Number of LEAs that conducted activity |
Support the development and implementation of LIEPs (as required under section 3115(c)(1)). |
Manual Entry |
Provide professional development to teachers and other personnel serving ELs (as required under section 3115(c)(2)). |
Manual Entry |
Provide parent, family, and community engagement activities (as required under section 3115(c)(3)(A)). |
Manual Entry |
If applicable, other activities and strategies that enhance or supplement LIEPs, including coordination and alignment across programs (as required under section 3115(c)(3)(B). (States are not required to enter counts for the last row if the State reports counts for 3115(c)(3)(A).)). |
Manual Entry |
1.3.5.2 Optional activities serving ELs in LEAs receiving Title III, Part A funds
Optional Activities |
Number of LEAs that conducted activity |
Upgrade program objectives and instructional strategies (section 3115(d)(1)). |
Manual Entry |
Improve instruction for ELs through curricula, instructional materials, software, and assessment procedures (3115(d)(2)). |
Manual Entry |
Provide tutorials, career and technical education (section 3115(d)(3)(A)). |
Manual Entry |
Provide intensified supplemental instruction, including translated materials, interpreters, and translators (section 3115(d)(3)(B)). |
Manual Entry |
Support LIEPs for preschool programs (section 3115(d)(4)). |
Manual Entry |
Implement strategies to improve ELP and academic achievement for ELs (section 3115(d)(5)). |
Manual Entry |
Provide parent, family, and community engagement activities to support the education of ELs (section 3115(d)(6)). |
Manual Entry |
Provide resources, including educational technology, electronic networks for materials, training, and communication, and incorporation of these resources into curricula and programs, to improve the instruction of ELs (section 3115(d)(7)). |
Manual Entry |
Offer programs to help ELs achieve success in postsecondary education (section 3115(d)(8)). |
Manual Entry |
Improve the instruction of ELs with disabilities (section 3115(d)(9)). |
Manual Entry |
Other (section 3115(d)(9)). |
Manual Entry |
1.3.5.2.1 Description of the use of “Other” for the optional activities conducted during the reported year in the table above
Manual Entry |
1.3.6 State-level activities under 3111(b)(2)(D) (i.e., Title III-funded technical assistance and other forms of assistance provided by the SEA to LEAs that are receiving Title III, Part A subgrants)
Activities |
Response (Yes or No) |
Identifying and implementing effective LIEPs and curricula for teaching English learners |
Manual Entry |
Helping ELs meet the same challenging State academic standards that all children are expected to meet |
Manual Entry |
Identifying or developing, and implementing, measures of English proficiency |
Manual Entry |
Strengthening and increasing parent, family, and community engagement in programs that serve ELs |
Manual Entry |
Other |
Manual Entry |
1.3.6.1 Description of use of “Other” in the above table for the types of assistance provided by the SEA to LEAs that are not captured by the first four types of activities in the table
Manual Entry |
1.3.7 The unduplicated number of immigrant students enrolled in schools in the State, the number of immigrant students in LEAs receiving funds under Section 3114(d) of the ESEA, and the number of 3114(d)(1) subgrants
Number of Immigrant Students Enrolled |
Number of Immigrant Students in LEAs receiving funds under Section 3114(d) |
Number of 3114(d)(1) Subgrants |
FS045/DG519 |
FS045/DG519 |
Manual Entry |
1.3.7.1 Explanation of state reporting zero students in LEAs receiving funds under Section 3114(d) of the ESEA or zero (0) subgrants
Manual Entry |
1.3.8 State Subgrant Activities
1.3.8.1 Date when the State received the Title III, Part A allocation from the U.S. Department of Education (ED) and the average date when the State made these funds available for obligation to subgrantees for the intended school year
Date State Received Allocation |
Average Date Funds Available for Obligation to Subgrantees |
Number of Days from Allocation to Average Date of Fund Availability |
Manual Entry |
Manual Entry |
(Calculated) |
1.3.8.2 Description of how the State can shorten the process of distributing Title III, Part A funds to subgrantees.
Manual Entry |
1.3.9 Title III Subgrantees – Termination of Title III, Part A Programs or Activities
Termination of Title III, Part A Programs or Activities |
Response |
Were any Title III language instruction educational programs or activities terminated for failure to reach program goals? |
Yes or No |
If yes, provide the number of language instruction educational programs or activities terminated. |
This section contains data on homeless children and youth and the McKinney-Vento grant program.
The table below provides information about the number of LEAs in the State who reported data on homeless children and youth and the McKinney-Vento program.
LEA Type |
Count of LEAs |
Count of LEAs Reporting Required McKinney-Vento Data |
With subgrants |
FS170/DG754 |
Manual Entry |
Without subgrants |
FS170/DG754 |
Manual Entry |
Total |
(Calculated) |
(Calculated) |
|
# LEAs |
How many LEAs received subgrants with ARP-Homeless I funds including those participating in consortia? |
|
|
# LEAs |
How many LEAs received subgrants with ARP-Homeless II funds including those participating in consortia? |
|
Please list the NCES LEA ID and name of each LEA that received ARP-Homeless funds and the amount each received. For consortia, list all the LEAs participating in them and assign the total ARP Homeless I or II award amount to the lead LEA. This information will be collected from SEAs outside of the CSPR collection tool.
NCES LEA ID |
LEA Name |
ARP-Homeless I Award Amount |
ARP-Homeless II Award Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This section contains data on the Title I, Part C - Migrant Education Program (MEP).
NOTE: In submitting this information, the Authorizing State Official must certify that, to the best of his/her knowledge, the State has taken action to ensure that the child counts and information contained in the report are true, reliable, and valid and that any false Statement provided is subject to fine or imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1001.
Each State Educational Agency (SEA) must have implemented sufficient procedures and internal controls to ensure that it is counting only those children who are eligible for the MEP. Such procedures are important to protecting the integrity of the program because they ensure that only eligible migratory children are counted for funding purposes and are served.
Note: In submitting this information, the Authorizing State Official must certify that, to the best of his/her knowledge, the State has taken action to ensure that the child counts and information contained in the report are true, reliable, and valid and that any false Statement provided is subject to fine or imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1001.
Manual Entry |
The table below displays the unduplicated Statewide number of eligible migratory children age birth through 21 who, within three years of making a qualifying move, resided in the State for one or more days during the performance period. This figure includes all eligible migratory children who may or may not have received MEP services.
Age/Grade |
Eligible Migratory Children |
Priority for Services (PFS) |
English Learners (ELs) |
Children with Disabilities (IDEA) |
Qualifying Arrival Date (QAD) |
Age Birth through 2 |
MSIX |
N/A |
N/A |
MSIX |
MSIX |
Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten) |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
K |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
1 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
2 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
3 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
4 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
5 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
6 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
7 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
8 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
9 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
10 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
11 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
12 |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
Ungraded |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
Out-of-school |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
Total |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
MSIX |
Manual Entry |
The table below displays the unduplicated Statewide number of eligible migratory children age birth through 21 who were served for one or more days in a MEP-funded project conducted during either the summer term or during intersession periods that occurred within the performance period. A child who moved from one age/grade level to another during the performance period is reported only once in the age/grade category in which s/he spent the majority of his/her time while residing in the State, during the performance period. Children who moved to different schools within the State and who were served in both traditional summer and year-round school intersession programs are reported only once.
Note: Children who received only referred (non-MEP funded) services are not included in this table.
Age/Grade |
Eligible Migratory Children Served by the MEP During the Summer/Intersession Term |
Age Birth through 2 |
MSIX |
Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten) |
MSIX |
K |
MSIX |
1 |
MSIX |
2 |
MSIX |
3 |
MSIX |
4 |
MSIX |
5 |
MSIX |
6 |
MSIX |
7 |
MSIX |
8 |
MSIX |
9 |
MSIX |
10 |
MSIX |
11 |
MSIX |
12 |
MSIX |
Ungraded |
MSIX |
Out-of-school |
MSIX |
Total |
MSIX |
Manual Entry |
Does the State collect all the required data elements and data sections on the National COE? (Yes or No) |
Manual Entry |
The tables below focus on information about prospective re-interviews conducted during the performance period to test the accuracy of the State’s MEP eligibility determinations.
Prospective Re-interviewing Procedures |
Response (Yes or No) |
Were re-interviews conducted during this performance period? |
Manual Entry |
Were children randomly selected for re-interviews? |
Manual Entry |
Was the re-interview sample drawn from children whose MEP eligibility was determined during the performance reporting period (i.e., prior to calculating annual migratory child counts)? |
Manual Entry |
Were re-interviews conducted face-to-face? |
Manual Entry |
Were re-interviews conducted remotely (virtually or by phone)? |
Manual Entry |
Did the State ensure re-interviewers did not work on the initial eligibility determinations being tested? |
Manual Entry |
Did the State ensure that all children determined to be ineligible for the MEP as a result of re-interviews were removed from both the State’s migrant database and MSIX prior to reporting migratory child counts to ED? |
Manual Entry |
Prospective Re-interviewing Results |
Number |
Number of eligibility determinations sampled |
Manual Entry |
Number of eligibility determinations sampled for which a re-interview was completed |
Manual Entry |
Number of eligibility determinations sampled for which a re-interview was completed, and the child was found ineligible |
Manual Entry |
Manual Entry |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Melissa Wilks |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2023-11-20 |