Project Code ??? QID ????? |
||||
Sequence Number: ______ |
FORM Q-2: QUALITY CONTROL - SIZING WALNUT OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT SURVEY 20xx |
|
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE
California Department of Food and Agriculture |
Supervisor Name: |
|
Date Checked by Supervisor: |
|
Survey Code |
Year
(XX) |
BLOCK IDENTIFICATION CODE |
Tree Number |
Sizer Code
(XXXXXX) |
Date Sampled
(MM DD) |
Date Sized
(MM DD) |
||||
County (XXX) |
Variety (XXX) |
Parcel No. (XXXXX) |
Block No. (XX) |
Sample No. (XX) |
||||||
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ _ _ _ |
_ _ _ _ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuts Received |
Total Nut Count |
In-Hull |
In-Shell |
Nuts Sized |
Time End: |
|||||
Number |
Weight |
Number |
Weight |
Time Start: |
||||||
|
|
|
. |
|
. |
|
Minutes: |
|
YES |
NO |
A. Did the sizer correctly transfer identification information from the Random Path? |
|
|
B. Does number of nuts received = number of nuts weighed in-hull? |
|
|
C. Does number of nuts sized = 10 (if nuts received at least equal to 10)? |
|
|
D. Does number of nuts weighed in-shell = 5 (if number of sound nuts at least equal to 5)? |
|
|
E. Did the sizer correctly record: |
|
|
1. Weight to the nearest tenth? |
|
|
2. Measurements to the nearest tenth? |
|
|
3. A grade code for all graded nuts? |
|
|
4. A comment for nuts graded as "5 - Other"? |
|
|
F. Do nut weights and measurements look reasonable? |
|
|
|
|
|
If you answered NO to any of the above questions, make necessary corrections to the size card and discuss with enumerator. Check box to indicate completion.
|
|
|
|
||
Comments about unusual conditions/reasons why data might not be comparable with enumerator data: |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
Revised 02/07/2008
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | FORM Q-2: ALMOND O |
Author | Taylho |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2024-07-27 |