Appendix E11 Serious Deficiency, Suspension, & Appeals for State Agencies & Sponsoring Organizations - A CACFP Handbook

OMB #0584-0055
Expiration Date xx/xx/20xx

Appendix E11. Serious Deficiency, Suspension, &
Appeals for State Agencies & Sponsoring Organizations –
A CACFP Handbook

This information is being collected from local government agencies and businesses (institutions)
to enable institutions wishing to participate in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)
to submit applications to the administering agencies, execute agreements with those agencies,
and claim the reimbursement to which they are entitled by law. Section 17 of the National School
Lunch Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1766), authorizes the CACFP. This collection is required to
obtain or retain benefits and the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) uses the information
collected to conduct reviews that determine whether or not institutions are observing the
requirements of the Program established by regulations and statute. In addition, the information
collection is necessary for administering agencies to monitor Program operations to ensure
compliance with legislative and regulatory requirements. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any
personally identifying information obtained will be kept private to the extent of the law.
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The valid OMB control number for this
information collection is 0584-0055. The time required to complete this information collection is
estimated to average 36 hours per response. This burden consists of the time it takes to review all
instructions and handbooks issued by FNS and the Department to clarify or explain existing
regulations. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection
of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, Office of Policy Support, 1320 Braddock Place,
Alexandria, VA 22314, ATTN: PRA (0584-0055). Do not return a completed form to this
address.

OMB
#0584-0055
Expiration Date
xx/xx/20xx

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, & Appeals for
State Agencies & Sponsoring Organizations
A Child and Adult Care Food Program Handbook

U.S. Department of Agriculture
Food and Nutrition Service
February 2015
USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Significant changes/revisions are highlighted in yellow.

Policy Memoranda
References have been made to numbered memoranda issued
by the Food and Nutrition Service National Office. The
numbering system may differ from your State agency or FNS
Regional Office.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees,
and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex,
gender identify, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial
or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any
public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or
activity conducted or funded by the Department (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all
programs and/or employment activities.)
If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA
Program Discrimination Complain Form, found online at
http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html
or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter
containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or
letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, by fax (202) 690-7442 or email at
[email protected].
Individuals who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have speech disabilities may contact USDA
through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339; or (800) 845-6136 (Spanish).
USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 3

Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7
Historical Background of the CACFP Serious Deficiency Process .................................. 7
Who Administers the Program? ...................................................................................... 8
About this Guidance ........................................................................................................ 8
PART 1. Serious Deficiency Process for Institutions ................................................... 10
A. Serious Deficiency Process ............................................................................................10
B. Serious Deficiencies for New and Participating Institutions .............................................10
C. Serious Deficiency Notification and Corrective Action Procedures ..................................14
D. Responsible Principals and Responsible Individuals .......................................................16
E. Corrective Action ............................................................................................................16
F. Timeframes .....................................................................................................................19
G. Long-term Corrective Action Plans ..................................................................................20
H. Successful Corrective Action ..........................................................................................20
I.

Unsuccessful Corrective Action.......................................................................................21

J.

Agreement Termination and Disqualification ...................................................................23

K. Outcomes of the Serious Deficiency Process..................................................................24
L.

Program Payment during the Serious Deficiency Process ..............................................24

M. Questions & Answers......................................................................................................25

PART 2. Serious Deficiency Process for Day Care Homes......................................... 34
A. Serious Deficiency Process for DCHs ..............................................................................34
B. Identifying Serious Deficiencies for DCHs ........................................................................34
C. Serious Deficiency Notification and Corrective Action Procedures for DCHs ....................36
D. Corrective Action Plans for DCHs ....................................................................................37
E. Successful Corrective Action of a DCH ............................................................................39
F. Unsuccessful Corrective Action of a DCH.........................................................................40
G. Agreement Termination and Disqualification of a DCH ....................................................40
H. Outcomes of the Serious Deficiency Process for DCHs ...................................................41
I. Program Payments during Serious Deficiency Process for DCHs ......................................41
J. Questions & Answers .......................................................................................................42

PART 3. Serious Deficiency Process for Unaffiliated Centers..................................... 44
PART 4. Suspension Process for Institutions .............................................................. 44
A. Suspension Process for Institutions..................................................................................44
B. Notice of Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Proposed Termination Procedures..........44
1)

Imminent Threat to Health and Safety .........................................................................45

2)

Submission of False or Fraudulent Claims ..................................................................47

C. Suspension Review – Suspension Appeal ......................................................................48

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 4

D. Agreement Termination and Disqualification ....................................................................50
E. Program Payments during a Suspension .........................................................................50
F. Questions & Answers .......................................................................................................52

PART 5. Suspension Process for Day Care Homes .................................................... 56
A. Suspension Process for DCHs .........................................................................................56
B. Notice of Serious Deficiency, Suspension and Proposed Termination Procedures for
DCHs.....................................................................................................................................56
C. Agreement Termination and Disqualification of a DCH.....................................................57
D. Program Payments during the Suspension of a DCH .......................................................58
E. Questions & Answers .......................................................................................................58

PART 6. Suspension Process for Unaffiliated Centers................................................ 60
PART 7. Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures for Institutions in the Serious
Deficiency Process ........................................................................................................ 60
A. Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures.....................................................................60
B. Actions Subject to Administrative Review (Appeal) ..........................................................63
C. Actions Not Subject to Administrative Reviews (Appeal) ..................................................66
D. Providing the Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures to Institutions .........................68
E. Abbreviated Administrative Review ..................................................................................68
F. Program Payments during the Administrative Review (Appeal) Process ..........................69
G. Question and Answer ......................................................................................................69

PART 8. Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures for Day Care Home Providers 71
A. Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures for DCHs .....................................................71
B. Actions Subject to Administrative Review (Appeal) - DCH................................................72
C. Actions Not Subject to Administrative Review (Appeal) - DCH .........................................72
D. Providing Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures to DCHs ......................................72
E. Program Payments during the Administrative Review Process for DCHs ........................72
F. Questions & Answers .......................................................................................................73

PART 9. Administrative Review (Appeals) Procedures for Unaffiliated Centers ........ 74
PART 10. State Agency List and National Disqualified List ........................................ 74
A. Maintenance of the State Agency List .............................................................................74
B. The Purpose of the State Agency List ..............................................................................74
C. Required Information for the State Agency List ................................................................75
D. Placement on the National Disqualified List .....................................................................75
E. Removal from the National Disqualified List .....................................................................76
F. Early Removal from the National Disqualified List – Documented Corrective Action and
Debt Payment........................................................................................................................77
G. Debt Collection ................................................................................................................79
H. Questions & Answers .......................................................................................................81

PART 11. Acronyms .................................................................................................... 83
Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 5

PART 12. Resource Materials ..................................................................................... 84
A. Memoranda Issued by FNS Relating to the CACFP Serious Deficiency Process ............84
B. References .....................................................................................................................84
C. CACFP Handbooks.........................................................................................................85
D. Attachments ....................................................................................................................85

PART 13. Prototype Letters ........................................................................................ 92
A. List of Prototypes - Institutions .........................................................................................92
B. List of Prototypes - Day Care Homes ...............................................................................93
C. List of Prototypes - Unaffiliated Centers ...........................................................................94
D. Prototype Letters - Institutions...........................................................................................95
E. Prototype Letters – Day Care Homes ..............................................................................132
F. Prototype Letters – Unaffiliated Centers ..........................................................................155

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 6

Introduction
The serious deficiency process of the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) was
established to ensure compliance with U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) regulations and guidance. It offers State agencies, sponsoring
organizations, and FNS the right to terminate for cause centers or Day care Homes (DCH) that
are not in compliance with Federal regulations.

Historical Background of the CACFP Serious Deficiency Process
The serious deficiency process was first established in 1978. Below is a brief overview of the
laws that Congress has passed that have expanded the process over the years.
1978: The Child Nutrition Amendments of 1978 (Public Law 95-627)
•
•

Established the serious deficiency process.
Established the termination process for institutions.

2000: The Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-224)
•
•
•
•

Required USDA to maintain a National Disqualified List (NDL) for institutions, DCHs,
providers, and individuals that have been terminated or otherwise disqualified from
participation in the CACFP.
Established the termination, suspension, and appeals procedures for institutions and
homes.
Established fund recovery procedures.
Established the termination of day DCH care homes.

2000: The Grain Standards and Warehouse Improvement Act, 2000 (Public Law 106-472)
•

Established the suspension process for false and fraudulent claims.

2002: Child and Adult Care Food Program: Improving Management and Program Integrity
(1st Interim rule)
•

Established the abbreviated appeals process.

2004: Child and Adult Care Food Program: Improving Management and Program Integrity
(2nd Interim rule)
•

Established that State agencies must check the NDL before approving an application for
participation.

2011: Child and Adult Care Food Program: Improving Management and Program Integrity
(Final Rule)
•

Established the temporary deferment of serious deficiency status.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 7

2011: USDA, Office of Inspector General Audit Report #14-2012 Review of Management
Controls (#27601-0012-SF).
•
•

Develop submission forms for State agencies to use when requesting an institution,
responsible principals or individuals (RP/I) or facility, requiring entries to be complete.
Require that program application materials and NDL submittals include (1) full legal
names and (2) any names formerly used.

Who Administers the Program?
The USDA’s FNS administers CACFP at the national level. Within each State, the Program is
administered by the State Department of Education or another agency designated by the State.
Locally, State agencies enter into agreements with independent centers and public or private
nonprofit, or for-profit sponsoring organizations of centers or DCH providers. For-profit centers
may participate in CACFP as independent centers or under a nonprofit sponsor, provided that
25 percent of the children in care (enrolled or licensed capacity, whichever is less) are either
eligible for free or reduced price meals or receiving Title XX funds. For-profit sponsoring
organizations may sponsor only their own affiliated centers and may not sponsor DCH providers
Independent centers and sponsoring organizations are responsible for overseeing the Program
at their center or at the facilities that they sponsor. These institutions receive Federal
reimbursement through the State agency to assist in the administrative and operating costs of
preparing and serving meals to eligible children at their Program sites.

About this Guidance
This guidance provides detailed information on the implementation of the serious deficiency
process by State agencies and sponsoring organizations, which helps ensure that the Program
is operated properly and that centers and DCHs receive the support and technical assistance
they need. In this guidance, you will find information about:
•

The serious deficiency process for institutions and for DCHs;

•

Suspension process for institutions and for
facilities;

•

Appeals process for institutions and for facilities;
and

•

State agency lists and the NDL.

State agencies and sponsoring organizations can also
use the information in this guidance to develop internal
policies and procedures for their oversight and
implementation of the serious deficiency process.

Remember
Institutions (independent
centers and sponsoring
organizations) enter into
agreements with the State
agency.
Facilities (DCH providers or
sponsored centers) enter into
agreements with a sponsor.

Part 1 of this guidance provides information on the serious deficiency process to be used by
State agencies to address issues identified in institutions including procedures, corrective

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 8

action, termination and disqualification, and Program payments during the serious deficiency
process. The serious deficiency process for DCH providers is covered in Part 2 of this guidance.
While this guidance is in effect for adult day care centers as well as child care centers, it
mentions only child care centers for ease of reference, other than reference to Title XIX benefits
that are specific to adult day care.
The serious deficiency process for sponsored, unaffiliated centers is not yet regulatory;
however, the Integrity Rule encouraged States to develop their own procedures following the
procedures for DCH providers since sponsored unaffiliated centers are also facilities.
DCH or Provider?
The terms “DCH” and “provider” are used interchangeably
in CACFP regulations, FNS handbooks, policy and the
CACFP Handbooks.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 9

PART 1. Serious Deficiency Process for Institutions
A. Serious Deficiency Process
CACFP regulations define seriously deficient as the status of an institution or a day care home
that has been determined to be non-compliant in one or more aspects in its operation of the
Program [7 CFR 226.2]. The serious deficiency process offers a systematic way for State
agencies to take actions allowing institutions to correct serious Program problems and ensures
due process. If institutions are unwilling or incapable of correcting serious problems, the serious
deficiency process protects Program integrity by removing the institution from the Program and
preventing the institution and RP/Is from returning to the Program until the approval to reapply
for participation is granted by FNS.
The serious deficiency process has six steps that start when a State agency identifies a serious
deficiency. The resolution will be either the correction of the problem and the issuance of a
temporary deferment of the serious deficiency, or the institution’s termination and
disqualification from the Program.
The six steps in the serious deficiency process are:

1. Identify the serious deficiencies;
2. Issue a notice of serious deficiency;
3. Receive and assess the institution’s written corrective action plan (CAP) for adequacy;
4. Issue a notice of temporary deferral of the serious deficiency if the CAP is approved, or
issue a notice of proposed termination and disqualification, including appeal procedures,
if the CAP is not adequate (or if no CAP plan is received);

5. Provide an appeal review (appeal hearing, administrative review), if requested, of the
proposed termination and disqualification; and

6. Issue a notice of final termination and disqualification if the appeal is upheld or if the
timeframe for requesting an appeal has passed, or issue a notice of temporary deferral if
the appeal is overturned.
Each of these steps is described in detail in this guidance. For a graphic chart of the steps,
reference Part 12, Attachment A.

B. Serious Deficiencies for New and Participating Institutions
An institution may be declared seriously deficient if the State agency finds serious Program
violations or issues of noncompliance with CACFP requirements at any time during the
institution’s participation. Serious deficiencies that are not fully and permanently corrected will
result in the proposed termination and disqualification of the institution and it’s RP/Is.
However, if the serious deficiencies involve the submission of a false or fraudulent claim for
reimbursement, or pose an imminent threat to the health or safety of Program participants or the

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 10

public, the State agency must follow the procedures outlined in Part 4 of this guidance. State
agencies should become familiar with the serious deficiencies by type, as there are some
differences between serious deficiencies for new and participating institutions. The following are
examples of noncompliance issues that rise to the level of a serious deficiency as described in
the CACFP regulations.
New institutions
1. Submission of false information on the institution’s application, including but not limited
to, a determination that the institution’s RP/Is have concealed a conviction for any
activity that occurred during the past seven years and that indicates a lack of business
integrity. A lack of business integrity includes deception, antitrust violations,
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false
statements, receiving stolen property, making false claims, obstruction of justice, or any
other activity indicating a lack of business integrity as defined by the State agency; or
2. Any other action affecting the institution’s ability to administer the Program in
accordance with Program requirements [7 Code of Regulations (CFR) 226.6(c)(1)].
Institutions at application renewal
1. Submission of false information on the institution’s application, including but not limited
to, a determination that the institution has concealed a conviction for any activity that
occurred during the past seven years and that indicates a lack of business integrity. A
lack of business integrity includes deception, antitrust violations, embezzlement, theft,
forgery, bribery, fraud or destruction of records, making false statements, receiving
stolen property, making false claims, obstruction of justice, or any other activity
indicating a lack of business integrity as defined by the State agency;
2. Failure to operate the Program in conformance with the performance standards set forth
in 7 CFR 226.6(b)(1)(xviii); (b)(2)(vii);
3. Failure to comply with the bid procedures and contract requirements of applicable
Federal procurement regulations;
4. Use of a food service management company that is in violation of health codes;
5. Failure by a sponsoring organization to properly classify DCHs as tier I or tier II in
accordance with 7 CFR 226.15(f);
6. Failure by a sponsoring organization to properly train or monitor sponsored facilities in
accordance with7 CFR 226.16(d);
7. Failure to perform any of the other required financial and administrative responsibilities;
8. Failure to properly implement and administer the DCH termination and administrative
review provisions set forth in 7 CFR 226.16(l); or
9. Any other action affecting the institution’s ability to administer the Program in
accordance with Program requirements [7 CFR 226.6(c)(2)].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 11

Participating institutions
1. Submission of false information on the institution’s application, including but not limited
to a determination that the institution’s RP/Is have concealed a conviction for any activity
that occurred during the past seven years and that indicates a lack of business integrity.
A lack of business integrity includes deception, antitrust violations, embezzlement, theft,
forgery, bribery, fraud or destruction of records, making false statements, receiving
stolen property, making false claims, obstruction of justice, or any other activity
indicating a lack of business integrity as defined by the State agency;
2. Permitting an individual who is on the NDL to serve in a principal capacity with the
institution, or, if a sponsoring organization, permitting such an individual to serve as a
principal in a sponsored center or as a DCH provider;
3. Failure to operate the Program in conformance with the performance standards set forth
in paragraphs 7 CFR 226.6(b)(1)(xviii); (b)(2)(vii);
4. Failure to comply with the bid procedures and contract requirements of applicable
Federal procurement regulations;
5. Failure to return to the State agency any advance payments that exceeded the amount
earned for serving eligible meals, or failure to return disallowed start-up or expansion
payments;
6. Failure to maintain adequate records;
7. Failure to adjust meal orders to conform to variations in the number of participants;
8. Claiming reimbursement for meals not served to participants;
9. Claiming reimbursement for a significant number of meals that do not meet Program
requirements;
10. Use of a food service management company that is in violation of health codes;
11. Failure of a sponsoring organization to disburse payments to its facilities in accordance
with the regulations at 7 CFR 226.16(g)-(h) or in accordance with its management plan;
12. Claiming reimbursement for meals served by a for-profit child care center or a for-profit
outside-school-hours-care center during a calendar month in which less than 25 percent
of the children (enrolled or licensed capacity, whichever is less) were eligible for free or
reduced-price meals or were Title XX beneficiaries;
13. Claiming reimbursement for meals served by a for-profit adult day care center during a
calendar month in which less than 25 percent of is enrolled adult participants were Title
XIX or Title XX beneficiaries;
14. Failure by a sponsoring organization to properly classify DCHs as tier I or tier II in
accordance with 7 CFR 226.15(f);
15. Failure by a sponsoring organization to properly train or monitor sponsored DCHs in
accordance with 7 CFR 226.16(d);

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 12

16. Use of DCH reimbursement by a sponsoring organization to pay for the sponsoring
organization’s administrative expenses;
17. Failure to perform any of the other required financial and administrative responsibilities;
18. Failure to properly implement and administer the DCH provider termination and
administrative review provisions set forth at 7 CFR 226.16(l);
19. Ineligibility of the institution or any of the institution’s principals for any other publicly
funded Program by reason of violating that Program’s requirements. However, this
prohibition does not apply if the institution or the principal has been fully reinstated in, or
is now eligible to participate in that Program, including the payment of any debts owed;
20. Conviction of any of in institution’s principals for any activity that occurred during the past
seven years and that indicates a lack of business integrity. A lack of business integrity
includes fraud, antitrust violations, embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or
destruction of records, making false statements, receiving stolen property, making false
claims, obstruction of justice, or any other activity indicating a lack of business integrity
as defined by the State agency; or
21. Any other action affecting the institution’s ability to administer the Program in
accordance with Program requirements [7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)].
These lists should not be considered to be all-inclusive.

Determining Serious Deficiencies
A State agency has the authority to determine when a violation rises to the level of a serious
deficiency. In deciding whether a Program violation is a serious deficiency, State agencies
should consider, but not limit themselves to the following criteria:
•

The severity of the problem. Is the noncompliance on a minor or substantial scale?
Are the violations indicative of a systemic problem at the institution, or is the problem
truly an isolated event? Even minor problems may be serious if systemic. Some
problems are serious even though they have occurred only once.
EXAMPLE: Missing menu items for one day out of a month would require
technical assistance, while a second review with the same issue or numerous
menu problems on an initial review could rise to the level of a serious deficiency.

•

The degree of responsibility attributable to the institution. To the extent that
evidence is available, can the State agency determine whether the violations were
inadvertent errors of an otherwise responsible institution? Is there evidence of
negligence or a conscious indifference to regulatory requirements? Or, even worse, is
there evidence of deception?

•

The institution’s history of participation in the Program. Is this the first time the
institution is having problems or has noncompliance occurred frequently at the same
institution?

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 13

•

The nature of the requirements that relate to the problem. Are the institution’s
actions a clear violation of Program requirements? Has the institution incorporated the
new policies correctly?

•

The degree to which the problem impacts Program integrity. Are the violations
undermining the intent or purpose of the CACFP such as misuse of funds for nonProgram purposes, or simply an administrative error [7 CFR 226.6(b)(1)(xviii); (b)(2)(vii),
and CACFP 30-2006, Questions and Answers #19 and #20, November 7, 2005]?

C. Serious Deficiency Notification and Corrective Action Procedures
Once a State agency has determined that a serious deficiency has occurred, it must begin the
serious deficiency process.
A critical step in the serious deficiency process is when the State agency prepares and issues
the formal notice of serious deficiency. After the State agency thoroughly investigates and
documents any serious deficiencies, the State agency must issue a notice of serious deficiency.
It is vitally important that the serious deficiency notice is written in a way that will clearly explain
the State agency’s action to the institution staff and to the hearing official in the event that the
institution later appeals. A well-written notice of serious deficiency will:
•

Provide a detailed explanation of each serious deficiency;

•

List appropriate regulatory citations to support the serious deficiency notice;

•

Provide a clear description of the actions required in order to fully and permanently
correct the serious deficiencies; and

•

Provide a definite and appropriate time limit for the corrective action.

A State agency should be careful to include all findings
identified during a review. Minor findings that do not
rise to the level of a serious deficiency must still be
documented and reported to the institution and the
institution is required to correct the problems. This
documentation of minor findings also assists the State
agency, in future State agency monitoring efforts, in
identifying frequency of a finding.

For-Profit Institutions
A for-profit institution will not
generally have a board of
directors so the notice is sent to
the owner(s).

The State agency must notify the institution’s executive director and chairman of the board of
directors that the institution has been determined seriously deficient. When the institution is a
school, the school administrator who signed the Program agreement and/or application
materials is the executive. The notice must identify the RP/Is and must be sent to those persons
as well.
For a new institution, the notice must also specify:
•

The serious deficiencies, including appropriate citations from the CACFP regulations;

•

The actions to be taken to correct the serious deficiencies;

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 14

•

The time allotted to correct the serious deficiencies; (see F. Timeframes in this Part)

•

That the serious deficiency determination is not subject to administrative review
(appeal);

•

That failure to fully and permanently correct the serious deficiencies within the allotted
time will result in the denial of the institution’s application and the proposed
disqualification and termination of the institution and the RP/Is;

•

That the State agency will not pay any claims for reimbursement for eligible meals
served or allowable administrative expenses incurred until the State agency has
approved the institution’s application and the institution has signed a Program
agreement;

•

That the institution’s voluntary withdrawal of its application after being notified of the
serious deficiency determination will still result in the institution and RP/Is formal
disqualification and placement on the NDL; and

•

That, if the State agency does not
possess the date of birth for any
individual named as a RP/I in the
serious deficiency notice, the
submission of that person’s date of birth
is a condition of corrective action for the
institution and/or individual [7 CFR
26.6(c)(1)(iii)(A)].

For a participating institution, the notice must
specify:
•

The serious deficiencies, including
appropriate citations from the CACFP
regulations;

•

The actions to be taken to correct the
serious deficiencies;

•

The time allotted to correct the serious
deficiency; (see F. Timeframes, in this
Part)

What Constitutes Notice?
Notice means a letter sent by certified
mail, return receipt (or the equivalent
private delivery service), by fax, or by
email, that describes an action proposed
or taken by the State agency with regard
to an institution’s, responsible principal’s,
or responsible individual’s Program
participation [7 CFR 226.2].
A notice is considered received by the
institution or responsible principal or
responsible individual five days after
being sent to the addressee’s last known
mailing address, fax number, or email
address. Any timeframes associated with
a given notice start with the earliest form
of transmission.
It is a best practice to get proof of the
delivery of the notice.

•

That the serious deficiency
determination is not subject to appeal;

•

That failure to fully and permanently correct the serious deficiencies within the allotted
time will result in the State agency’s proposed termination of the institution’s agreement,
and the proposed disqualification of the institution and the RP/Is; and

•

That the institution’s voluntary termination of its agreement with the State agency after
having been notified that it is seriously deficient will still result in the institution’s formal
termination by the State agency and placement of the institution and its RP/Is on the
NDL [7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(iii)(A)].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 15

Note: Any reference in this Guidance to the “number of days” always means calendar days.
At the same time a notice is issued, the State agency must also add the institution and RP/Is to
the State agency list (see Part 10 of this guidance for a description of the State agency list) and
provide a copy of the notice to the appropriate FNS Regional Office.
Refer to Prototype Letter 1: Notice of Serious Deficiency for Institutions. A copy of the
letter sent to the institution must be sent to the FNS Regional Office at the same time it is sent
to the institution. See Part 12. Attachment E for a sample Documentation List.

D. Responsible Principals and Responsible Individuals
An institution can never be seriously deficient without some improper action by a person. The
regulations require that, in every instance, both the chairperson of the institution’s board of
directors, as well as the executive director or owner, or other person responsible for the CACFP,
be determined seriously deficient and receive the notice of serious deficiency, as well as any
other principals or individuals named as responsible for the institution’s serious deficiencies. In
general, the State agency should name as “responsible principals” those institution officials who,
by virtue of their management position, bear responsibility for the institution’s serious
deficiencies. These management officials also bear responsibility for the poor performance of
non-supervisory employees who may have caused the serious deficiency.
A responsible individual is any non-principal associated with the institution’s operation of the
Program. Non-supervisory employees, including contractors and unpaid staff, should be named
as responsible individuals only when they have been directly involved in Program violations,
such as filing false reports or otherwise actively participating with institution principals to
mismanage the Program.
EXAMPLE: A cook who has been made responsible for menu planning and food service
recordkeeping is a responsible individual. If he or she continually fails to maintain the
required menu records, he or she would be declared seriously deficient.
An RP/I may be a current or former employee. Though no longer employed by the institution, an
individual may still be responsible for the serious deficiencies by his or her actions prior to
leaving the institution [7 CFR 226.2 and CACFP 14-2012, Child and Adult Care Food Program
Guidance on the Serious Deficiency Process and Acceptable Corrective Action Plans, National
Disqualified List Procedures and Debt Collection, May 1, 2012].
It is important for State agencies to carefully identify all RP/Is in the serious deficiency notice;
the identification of all RP/Is is the only way to prevent such individuals from participating in the
CACFP in another institution or State if successful corrective action is not achieved.

E. Corrective Action
In response to the serious deficiency notice, an institution must submit in writing, what corrective
action it has taken. This correspondence details the internal controls implemented to ensure that
the serious deficiencies are fully and permanently corrected. The State agency will evaluate the
CAP and determine whether adequate internal controls have been put into place to fully and
permanently correct the deficiencies. An acceptable CAP must include the following information:

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 16

•

Names of the institution’s executive director and chairman of the board of directors or
other RP/Is associated with the serious deficiencies;

•

Address of the institution;

•

Dates of birth for all RP/Is associated with the serious deficiencies; and

•

Details of the serious deficiencies.
o

What are the serious deficiencies and the procedures that were implemented to
address the serious deficiencies?

o

Who addressed the serious deficiencies? List personnel responsible for this
task.

o

When was the procedure for addressing the serious deficiencies implemented?
Provide a timeline for implementing the procedure (i.e., will the procedure be
done daily, weekly, monthly, or annually, and when did implementation of the
plan begin)?

o

Where is the CAP documentation retained?

o

How were staff and if applicable, facilities or providers informed of the new
policies and procedures (e.g., handbooks, training, website, emails, etc.,) [7 CFR
226.6(c)(1)(iii)(B); (c)(2)(iii)(B); (c)(3)(iii)(B), and CACFP 14-2012, Child and Adult
Care Food Program Guidance on the Serious Deficiency Process and
Acceptable Corrective Action Plans, National Disqualified List Procedures and
Debt Collection, May 1, 2012, and examples in Part 12. Attachments C and D
Serious Deficiency Corrective Action Plan].

Additional supporting documentation must be submitted with the CAP to document that
corrective actions have occurred; this might include copies of income eligibility forms, enrollment
rosters, staff training documentation, site monitoring reports, menus, Child Nutrition Labels or
manufacturers’ product analysis sheets or recipes, attendance records, meal count forms,
itemized food receipts, etc.
EXAMPLE: During an administrative review, a State agency discovers that ABC-DEF
Daycare Center has severe recordkeeping violations. Complete and current enrollment
records were not on file for 25 percent of the children, and half of the household
applications for free and reduced-price meals were either incomplete or incorrectly
categorized. The State agency issues a serious deficiency notice to the institution
requesting a written CAP. The institution responds that they will ‘re-train staff and in the
future they will comply with all CACFP recordkeeping requirements’. This is not an
acceptable CAP.
As described below, an acceptable CAP for the serious deficiencies must answer the questions
what, who, when, where, and how. The following corrective action would be acceptable.

May 20, 2013
Noah Bannister, Director

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 17

Helpful State Agency
7890 State Street
City, State, Zip
Re: ABC-DEF Daycare Center

Diane Smith, Owner, DOB: 11/6/59
Carl Jones, Center Director, DOB: 6/23/73
Dear Mr. Bannister:
This letter serves as our corrective action plan required by the Notice of Serious
Deficiency we received on May 1, 2013.
Serious Deficiency: Incomplete Enrollment Records
ABC-DEF Daycare Center has changed its procedures in order to ensure that complete
and current enrollment records are on file for each enrolled child. Within one week of a
child’s enrollment in the center, the parent must have returned a complete enrollment
form to the center. Assistant Director Shana Franklin will review each new child’s folder
at the end of the first week to ensure that the form has been completed. If a complete
and correct enrollment form is not on file, Ms. Franklin will issue the child’s parent or
guardian a notice stating that the form must be submitted or an administrative charge will
be added to their account.
Ms. Franklin is responsible for ensuring that all required records are in the child’s folder
within three weeks of the child’s enrollment in the center. Center Director Carl Jones will
review the records of newly enrolled children monthly to ensure that all enrollment
records are complete and current. Carl Jones trained Ms. Franklin on this new procedure
on May 16, 2013. Additionally, on May 16, 2013, this procedure was added to the ABCDEF Daycare Center Administrative Procedures Manual that is provided to all
employees. On May 18, 2013, a notice was sent home with all parents notifying them
that this procedure has been implemented and will also apply to renewals each
September. On May 22, 2013, Mr. Carl Jones verified that all currently enrolled children
have complete and current enrollment records on file.
Serious Deficiency: Household Eligibility Applications Incomplete or Incorrectly
Categorized
ABC-DEF Daycare Center has implemented a new procedure regarding review and
approval of applications for free and reduced price meals:
Within one week of a child’s enrollment in the center, the parent must have
returned a household eligibility application. Assistant Director Shana Franklin will
review each new child’s folder at the end of the first week to ensure that the form
has been received. If the parent does not wish to complete a household
application for free or reduced price meals, Ms. Franklin will make a note in the
child’s folder that the parent does not wish to complete the application and
therefore this child will be classified as “paid.” At the end of each week, Ms.
Franklin will review the applications for completeness. If required information is
missing from the form, Ms. Franklin will contact the parent to correct the form.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 18

Ms. Franklin will review all completed free and reduced price meal applications, and
mark the appropriate category, free, reduced or paid. Ms. Franklin will then place the
applications in the appropriate in box of Center Director Carl Jones for second party
review. Mr. Jones will verify whether the application is complete and correctly classified,
then will sign and date the application and update the master roster. Mr. Jones will
conduct spot checks monthly of children’s files to ensure that all documentation is
complete and current.
On May 16, 2013, Mr. Jones trained Ms. Franklin on the new procedure. Additionally, on
May 16, 2013, this procedure was added to the ABC-DEF Daycare Center
Administrative Procedures Manual that is provided to all employees. On May 22, 2013,
Center Director Carl Jones verified that all currently enrolled children are correctly
categorized in the Master Roster as verified from the household applications.
The procedures described above and the amendments to the ABC-DEF Daycare Center
Administrative Procedures Manual were presented to the Board of Directors for vote on
June 1, 2013, and were approved by the Board.
Please find attached the following supporting documents:
a) Copy of the training agenda held on May 16, 2013 between Mr. Jones and Ms.
Franklin;
b) Copy of the updated ABC-DEF Daycare Center Administrative Procedures
Manual containing the revised procedures for enrollment records and household
applications; and
c) Copy of the ABC-DEF Daycare Center’s Board of Director minutes from the June
1, 2013 meeting approving the procedures and updates to the ABC-DEF
Daycare Center Administrative Procedures Manual.
Sincerely,

Diane Smith, Owner
Carl Jones, Center Director
Attachments: ABC-DEF Daycare Center Administrative Procedures Manual
May 16, 2013 Training agenda

This CAP has enough detail explaining what will be done, how it will be done, when it will be
done, and by whom it will be done, for the State agency to make an assessment regarding its
effectiveness in fully and permanently correcting the serious deficiencies. The CAP also
describes where the changes will be housed – maintained in the ABC-DEF Daycare Center
Administrative Procedures Manual and in the minutes to the June 1, 2012 Board of Directors
meeting.

F. Timeframes

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 19

Corrective action must be taken by the institution within reasonable timeframes. If the State
agency determines that the institution has engaged in unlawful practices, has submitted false or
fraudulent claims or other information to the State agency, or has been convicted of or
concealed a criminal background, the State agency is prohibited from allowing more than 30
days for corrective action. State agencies are prohibited from allowing more than 90 days for
corrective action from the date the institution receives the serious deficiency notice, except for
long-term changes described below.
Although the regulations set these maximum timeframes, State agencies may establish shorter
timeframes for corrective action. State agencies should tailor timeframes for corrective actions
to the type of serious deficiencies found [7 CFR 226.6(c)(4)(i)].
EXAMPLE: The State agency may set a one-day required corrective action timeframe
for an independent center to correct its failure to include the appropriate milk choices
during meal services and three days to correct the computerized menu, but a 30-day
corrective action timeframe for the center to train its staff on meal pattern requirements
and accurate time of service counting processes. The CAP submitted to the State
agency by the independent center would include documentation to show that it had
already corrected the milk service within one day of receiving the review report, updated
computerized menus within three days to show milk on the menus, and documentation
of training within 30 days.

G. Long-term Corrective Action Plans
Some serious deficiencies require long-term revision of management systems or processes,
such as the purchase and implementation of new claims payment software, or a major
reorganization of CACFP management duties that will require action by the board of directors.
In this type of CAP, the State agency may permit more than 90 days to complete the corrective
action as long as a CAP is submitted to and approved by the State agency within 90 days (or
shorter deadline established by the State agency). The corrective action must include
milestones and a definite completion date.
The State agency must monitor full implementation of the plan. The determination of serious
deficiency will remain in effect until the State agency determines that the serious deficiencies
have been fully and permanently corrected within the allotted time [7 CFR 226.6(c)(4)(iii)].

H. Successful Corrective Action
If the institution submits a CAP that corrects the serious deficiencies to the State agency’s
satisfaction within the allotted timeframe, the serious deficiency determination will be temporarily
deferred. The State agency must:
•

Notify the institution’s executive director and chairman of the board of directors and any
other RP/Is, that the State agency has temporarily deferred its serious deficiency
determination; and

•

Remind all parties that the corrective action must be permanent or the State agency
must immediately issue a notice of proposed termination and disqualification.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 20

•

Additionally, if this was a serious deficiency for a new institution in which the State
agency has denied the application, the State agency must offer the institution the
opportunity to resubmit its application [7 CFR 226.6(c)(1)(iii)(B); (c)(2)(iii)(B)].

If corrective action is complete for some but not for all of the findings, the institution is still
seriously deficient and the State agency must:
•

Continue with the actions against the parties that have not completed corrective action;
and

•

Temporarily defer the serious deficiency for the parties that have completed corrective
action.
EXAMPLE: The person responsible for evaluating and approving income applications
has attended training and has completed the evaluation process correctly as per the
State’s review of the submitted corrective action, but the cook, who had long-term
responsibility for all food service duties, has not corrected the menus missing many
components. This situation would require the State agency to continue the serious
deficiency process for the finding regarding the menus and maintain the cook’s name on
the serious deficiency, but defer the serious deficiency for the RP/I who approves
income applications. The institutions and responsible principals (by nature of their
positions) would remain seriously deficient until all corrective action items have been
submitted and approved.

At the same time the deferment notice is issued, the State agency must also update the State
agency list to indicate which serious deficiencies have been corrected and provide a copy of the
notice to the appropriate FNS Regional Office [7 CFR 226.6(c)(1)(iii)(B); (c)(2)(iii)(B);
(c)(3)(iii)(B)]. See Part 10 of this guidance for information on the State Agency List.
Refer to Prototype Letter 2: Notice of Successful Corrective Action and Temporary
Deferment of Serious Deficiency for Institutions. A copy of the letter must be sent to the
FNS Regional Office at the same time it is sent to the institution.

I.

Unsuccessful Corrective Action

If the institution fails to implement timely corrective action to fully and permanently correct the
serious deficiencies cited, the State agency must notify the institution and RP/Is that the State
agency is proposing to terminate the institution’s agreement and to disqualify the institution and
the RP/Is.
For a newly-applying institution, the notice must specify:
•

That the institution’s application has been denied;

•

That the State agency is proposing to disqualify the institution and the RP/Is;

•

The basis for the actions (including regulation citations); and

•

The procedures for seeking an appeal of the application denial and proposed
disqualifications [7 CFR 226.6(c)(1)(iii)(C)].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 21

For a participating institution renewing its application, the notice must specify:
•

That the institution’s application has been denied;

•

That the State agency is proposing to terminate the institution’s agreement and to
disqualify the institution and the RP/Is;

•

The basis for the actions (including regulation citations);

•

That, if the institution voluntarily terminates its agreement after receiving the notice of the
proposed termination, the institution and the RP/Is will be disqualified and placed on the
NDL;

•

The procedures for seeking an appeal of the denial of the application renewal and
proposed disqualifications; and

•

That the institution may continue to participate in the Program and receive Program
reimbursement for eligible meals served and allowable administrative costs incurred until
its appeal/administrative review is completed.

If the application renewal process occurs before the time allotted for an institution to provide
corrective action and/or the conclusion of any administrative review requested by the
participating institution, the State agency must temporarily extend its agreement with that
institution in accordance with paragraph 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(iii)(D).
For a participating institution, the notice must specify:
•

That the State agency is proposing to terminate the institution’s agreement and to
disqualify the institution and the RP/I;

•

The basis for the actions (including regulation citations);

•

That if the institution voluntarily terminates its agreement after receiving the notice of
proposed termination, the institution and the RP/Is will still be terminated and disqualified
and placed on the NDL;

•

The procedures for seeking an appeal; and

•

That the institution may continue to participate and receive Program reimbursement for
eligible meals served and allowable administrative expenses incurred until its
appeal/administrative review is completed [7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(iii)(C)(3)].

At the same time the notice is issued, the State agency must also update the State agency list
and provide a copy of the notice to the appropriate FNS Regional Office.
Refer to Prototype Letter 3: Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification of
Institutions. A copy of the letter must be sent to the FNS Regional Office at the same time it is
sent to the institution.
If an appeal is requested, the State agency must follow its appeal procedures which must match
FNS’s requirements for appeal procedures in Part 7 of this guidance.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 22

J.

Agreement Termination and Disqualification

When the time for requesting an appeal expires or when the appeal official upholds the State
agency’s proposed termination and disqualifications, the State agency must immediately:
•

Notify the institution and its executive director/owner and chairman of the board of
directors, and any other RP/Is, that the institution’s agreement has been terminated (or
will be terminated on a specific date) and that the institution and the RP/Is have been
disqualified (or will be disqualified on a specific date);

•

Update the State agency list at the time such notice is issued; and

•

Provide a copy of the notice, the mailing address, and date of birth for each RP/I, with
the full amount of any determined debt associated with both the institution and/or RP/Is,
to the appropriate FNS Regional Office for inclusion on the NDL. Note that the
termination and disqualification is not appealable [7 CFR 226.6(c)(1)(iii)(E); (c)(2)(iii)(E);
(c)(3)(iii)(E)].

The State agency may establish the termination date as the date that the determination letter is
sent, the date the appeals determination is made, or the date the appeal timeframe expired
when the organization did not appeal. The State’s policy should be consistently applied.
Refer to Prototype Letter 4: Notice of Termination and Disqualification - Institution does
not appeal. A copy of the letter must be sent to the FNS Regional Office at the same time it is
sent to the institution.
Refer to Prototype Letter 5: Notice of Termination and Disqualification - State agency
prevails in appeal. A copy of the letter must be sent to the FNS Regional Office at the same
time it is sent to the institution.
Refer to Prototype Letter 6: Notice of Temporary Deferment of Serious Deficiency,
Proposed Termination and Proposed Disqualification for Institutions - Institution prevails
in appeal. A copy of the letter must be sent to the FNS Regional Office at the same time it is
sent to the institution.
If the institution and its RP/Is fail to implement successful corrective action, both will be
terminated and placed on the NDL. Once on the NDL, the institution is ineligible to participate in
the CACFP in any State as an institution, or as a facility under a sponsoring organization, and
RP/Is become ineligible to participate in the CACFP as part of a different institution, as
institution or center facility principals, or as DCH providers. If the complete serious
deficiency/termination process is not completed (resulting in inclusion in the NDL or for the
serious deficiency to be corrected and deferred), the individuals responsible for the serious
deficiency in one institution may, because they have not been disqualified, simply re-incorporate
under a new name and be admitted to participate in the Program in another State.
If the institution corrects the serious deficiency by removing the RP/I from a position associated
with the CACFP and pays off all institutional debts owed, the institution may be removed from
the NDL.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 23

K. Outcomes of the Serious Deficiency Process
CACFP regulations allow only two possible outcomes of the serious deficiency process: the
correction of the serious deficiency to the State agency’s satisfaction within stated timeframes,
or the State agency’s proposed termination of the agreement and disqualification of the
institution and its RP/Is. Program regulations do not allow any other outcome, including
“warnings”, “probation periods”, or the use of “settlement agreements or negotiated settlements”
for institutions that have been declared seriously deficient, or that have been issued a notice of
proposed termination and disqualification.
The issuance of the proposed termination and disqualification does not mean that the institution
should stop working on corrective action. In fact, the State agency can accept corrective action
at any point up until the hearing begins. If the institution submits documented evidence which
convinces the State agency that the institution has fully and permanently corrected the serious
deficiency, the State agency may accept the institution’s corrective action and temporarily defer
the proposed termination. This is not considered a “settlement agreement” because it would be
acceptable corrective action. Note, again, that if the institution later fails to maintain this
corrective action, the State must immediately re-issue its notice of proposed termination and
disqualification. (See Q&A #9 in this Part for exceptions.)
However, corrective action may not be submitted to the hearing official once the hearing begins.
In order to be considered, all parties, including the State agency, must submit any written
documentation to the hearing official not later than 30 days after receipt of the notice of
action [7 CFR 226.6(k)(5)(v)].

L. Program Payment during the Serious Deficiency Process
During the serious deficiency process, State agencies must continue to pay an institution’s valid
claims. The only time that an institution’s Program payments may be suspended by the State
agency is when the State agency initiates the suspension process for imminent threat to the
health and safety of participants or the public, or for submission of false or fraudulent claims
[7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)]. The suspension process for institutions is discussed in Part 4 of this
guidance.
While a State agency must pay valid claims during the serious deficiency process, it is
prohibited from paying invalid claims, or that portion of a claim that the State agency knows to
be invalid. Under certain circumstances, a State agency may determine that an entire claim is
invalid.
EXAMPLE: If a State agency determined that an independent center had improperly
claimed meals for an extended period of time by failing to take meal counts, the State
agency would declare the center seriously deficient and provide an appropriate period of
time for the completion of corrective action. If the State agency learned during a followup review that the center had failed to institute a valid meal counting system as required
in the CAP, no part of the claim for that period (the period of corrective action) could be
considered valid, and, therefore, no portion of the claim could be reimbursed.
Denial of all or part of a claim for reimbursement is subject to appeal [7 CFR 226.6(k)(2)(ix)].
The State agency must notify the institution in writing what portion of the claim is being denied
and provide them appeal rights in accordance with the procedures outlined in Part 7 of this

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 24

guidance [7 CFR 226.6(k)(5)]. While this is a separate action from the determination of being
seriously deficient, which is not appealable, the notices can be combined.

M. Questions & Answers
1. What does it mean that, ‘The determination of being seriously deficient is not subject
to administrative review’?
The actual determination that an institution is seriously deficient is not subject to appeal.
However, the State agency must provide appeal rights to institutions when they take actions
subject to appeal, as required by 7 CFR 226.6(k)(2), such as: application denial, claim
denial, overpayment demands, or other actions affecting an institution’s participation or its
claim for reimbursement. If a State agency sends a notice of serious deficiency to an
institution that requires the payment of an overclaim due to disallowed meals, the
determination of serious deficiency is not appealable, but the assessment of the overclaim is
appealable. The State agency should discuss any questions or concerns it may have with its
FNS Regional Office.
2. If a State agency denies the application of a newly-applying institution because the
institution does not demonstrate that it is capable of meeting the performance
standards - that is, VCA, must the State agency also declare the institution seriously
deficient?
If the State agency determines that a new institution is not capable of meeting the
performance standards, the application must be denied, without making a serious deficiency
determination. The institution would be granted the opportunity to correct. If the State
agency determines that the institution still does not meet Viability Capability and
Accountability (VCA), the application would be denied and appeal rights granted.
3. How do the procedures described above differ from a State agency’s determination
that a renewing is not meeting the performance standards?
The result for a renewing institution is different from that of a new institution. Normally, a
State agency would discover that a participating institution is not operating in conformance
with the performance standards during a review. In that case, the State agency must take
immediate action to initiate a process that could ultimately lead to the termination of the
institution’s agreement, including declaration of serious deficiency and the opportunity to
take corrective action. However, on occasion a State agency might not detect such a failure
until a renewing institution submits its application. Again, the State agency must initiate
action to deny the renewal application, including declaration of serious deficiency and the
opportunity to take corrective action.
4. What is the difference between an institution making administrative errors and an
institution that is seriously deficient?
To understand how and when a determination of serious deficiency is made, State agencies
must establish procedures to distinguish between administrative errors and ‘‘serious
deficiencies’’ because, once an institution is determined to be seriously deficient, the
process can culminate in only one of two outcomes: the correction of the serious deficiency
to the State agency’s satisfaction within stated timeframes, or the State agency’s proposed
termination of the institution’s agreement.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 25

In monitoring institutions, State agencies routinely discover management problems that
warrant various types of responses. If, for example, the State agency discovers that child
care facilities are serving meals that meet the Program’s meal pattern but lack variety,
the State agency would suggest ways for the sponsor to help facilities have greater variety
in their menus. Similarly, if a State agency discovered that the institution made occasional
recordkeeping errors, it would require correction of the procedures giving rise to these
errors, or additional training of the staff making the errors. Neither of these examples would
warrant determining the institution seriously deficient. There is, however, a point at which
institutions experiencing continued problems of this sort indicate serious mismanagement
and therefore a serious deficiency. Problems that initially appear manageable may become
serious deficiencies if not corrected within a reasonable period of time.
5. Is there any room for the exercise of discretion by the State agency in deciding
whether an institution is seriously deficient?
Yes. A State agency should differentiate between occasional administrative errors and
systemic management problems. A single instance of some of the actions listed as serious
deficiencies in this rule (for example, the misclassification of several tier II homes when the
sponsor administers 500 or 1,000 homes) would not be a basis for a determination of
serious deficiency, whereas a single occurrence of other actions (for example, submission of
a false claim) would be. A State agency must consider both the type and the magnitude of
the problem when deciding whether it warrants determining the institution to be seriously
deficient. Similarly, when reviewing an incomplete renewal application, a State agency
would generally request the submission of more or better information to complete the
application or to demonstrate that the institution was VCA. If the renewing institution proved
unable to document its compliance with one or more aspect of the performance standards,
then the State agency would make a determination that the institution is seriously deficient.
6. What is the role and requirements of administrative review (hearing) officials?
CACFP 02-2015, November 21, 2014, clarifies that the role of the administrative review
(hearing) official is to: 1) assess the State agency’s or sponsoring organization’s action to
propose termination; 2) determine whether the actions taken by the State agency, institution,
RPIs, and providers followed Federal regulations, policies, and procedures governing the
CACFP; and 3) base his/her decisions on the information presented by the State agency,
the institution, RPIs, or providers and Federal and State laws regulations, policies, and
procedures.
The memo further emphasizes that the authority of the administrative review official does not
include: 1) interpreting the intent or expanding the meaning of Federal regulations; 2)
validating the serious deficiency determination; 3) verifying whether corrective actions
submitted by RPIs fully and permanently corrects Program violations; or 4) establishing
settlement of demands for overpayments.
7. When State agencies develop criteria for determining institutions seriously deficient,
are those criteria considered ‘additional State requirements’ that must therefore gain
FNS approval prior to implementing?
These criteria are not considered additional State agency requirements. However, FNS will
review these criteria and their use by the State agency during Management Evaluations.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 26

8. What should a State agency do if it discovers a newly-applying institution, one of its
principals, a facility or one of the facility’s principals is on the NDL?
If the institution or one of its principals is on the NDL, the State agency must deny the
institution’s application and provide the opportunity for an abbreviated administrative review;
i.e., the appellant would not have an opportunity for an in-person hearing [7 CFR
226(k)(9)(i)].
If a facility or one of a facility’s principals in on the NDL, the State agency must deny the
facility’s application, but would continue its review of the institution’s application.
9. If an independent center has a permanent agreement and fails to reapply, should the
State agency initiate the serious deficiency process?
If an independent center that is in good standing (not seriously deficient) chooses not to
reapply, the State agency would simply terminate its permanent agreement with the center,
and no further action would be necessary. In essence, this would amount to a “termination
for convenience” and the center would be eligible to reapply as a new institution at any time
in the future. There would be no need to offer appeal rights.
10. If an independent center reapplies, but is denied approval, for example, for failing to
submit all renewal documents timely, what action must the State agency take?
If a participating center reapplies but its renewal application is denied, and the application
denial is not due to a serious deficiency, the State agency would simply inform the center of
the denial, provide an opportunity to appeal in accordance with 7 CFR 226.6(k)(2)(i), and if
the institution failed to appeal or the State agency prevailed on appeal, terminate the
Program agreement. If the denial of the participating center’s renewal application was due to
one or more serious deficiencies in its application, then procedures of 7 CFR 226.6(c)(2)
must be followed.
11. Should a DCH sponsoring organization that has been declared seriously deficient be
allowed to continue to add DCHs?
It depends on the nature of the serious deficiency. In most cases, adding more DCHs would
only intensify the sponsor’s serious deficiency, and the potential misuse or loss of Program
funds. In other cases, the nature of the serious deficiency might be such that adding DCHs
would not exacerbate existing problems (e.g., the sponsor’s serious deficiency involved a
specific staff member’s caseload).
If the State agency chooses to restrict a sponsor’s addition of DCHs, the sponsoring
organization would be able to appeal the action.
12. Is it a serious deficiency if a private nonprofit organization has its tax exempt status
revoked by the Internal Revenue Service for failing to satisfy its filing requirements?
Tax exemption is a condition of eligibility for most CACFP institutions and required for
participation. Therefore, revocation of tax exemption is considered a serious deficiency
requiring corrective action or termination, because it affects the institution’s eligibility to
participate [CACFP 24-2011, Automatic Revocation of Tax Exempt Status, July 25, 2011].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 27

13. Is there a maximum amount of time that a State agency has between identifying a
serious deficiency and sending the notice of serious deficiency to an institution?
There is no established deadline for the State agency to issue a serious deficiency notice.
By definition, a serious deficiency involves Program management problems. The State
agency must take prompt action, including issuing the formal notice of serious deficiency, to
ensure that the institution corrects the serious deficiency, or has its agreement terminated
for cause, as expeditiously as possible. Therefore, State agencies are strongly encouraged
to take steps to minimize the amount of time that elapses between a review and the
issuance of a serious deficiency notice.
14. What is “permanent” corrective action?
Defining permanent corrective action depends on a number of factors, including the nature
of the original problem, the amount of time that has elapsed between the accepted
corrective action and the next review, changes in the institution’s personnel, and the
availability of records documenting the original noncompliance.
It is reasonable for the State agency to decide that too much time has elapsed to simply
reinstate the proposed termination, in which case it would restart the process by issuing a
new notice of serious deficiency [CACFP 03-2006, Questions and Answers #19 and #20,
November 7, 2005].
However, this policy was not intended to allow State agencies to issue a new notice of
serious deficiency simply because there has been a time lapse or because there has been
staff turnover; the institution must have procedures in place that will train and support
successful operations over time and regardless of staffing changes. Please consult your
FNS Regional Office for advice on this issue.
15. Is a follow-up review required before the State agency issues the temporary deferral?
Federal regulations do not require this step prior to the State agency determining that a
serious deficiency can be deferred. In fact, the regulations outline the serious deficiency
procedures by using the institution’s (appropriate) corrective action plan as justification for
temporary deferral.
16. How can a State agency tell if an institution’s corrective action will “fully and
permanently” correct the serious deficiency?
The State agency must thoroughly review documentation (who, what, when, where, and
how) submitted by the institution that demonstrates the serious deficiency has been
corrected in such a manner that it is unlikely to recur. If the corrective action is acceptable,
the State agency must temporarily defer the serious deficiency determination.
Some corrective actions “look good on paper” but do not permanently resolve the
problem(s) which resulted in the serious deficiency. Therefore, often, the State agency will
have to conduct an onsite visit to verify and evaluate an institution’s implementation of the
corrective action. If the State agency decided to conduct an onsite visit, the visit would be
conducted after approval of the corrective action plan and temporary deferral of the serious
deficiency determination.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 28

17. An institution was declared seriously deficient for altering the expiration date on a
license so that the license appeared current. What is acceptable corrective action for
this institution?
By altering the expiration date of the license, the institution has submitted false information.
Acceptable corrective action would require the institution to show evidence that the
allegation is not true, or that the State agency has otherwise made an administrative error.
An appeal of a proposed termination resulting from the submission of false information
would be abbreviated; i.e., the appellant would not have an opportunity for an in-person
hearing [7 CFR 226.6(k)(9)(i)].
18. What if the State agency determines that a renewing institution’s corrective action is
inadequate just before the institution’s application expires? Couldn’t the State
agency simply allow the existing application to expire regardless of whether the
institution chooses to pursue an appeal?
No. This would not be consistent with the requirement that an institution have the
opportunity for an appeal prior to the termination of its agreement. Nor would it be
consistent with the regulatory requirement that, once an institution is declared seriously
deficient, it must either correct the deficiency or be terminated and placed on the National
Disqualified list. The State agency must provide a short-term extension of the existing
application, pending the outcome of the appeal. Allowing the existing application to simply
“expire” means the institution and the responsible principals and individuals are never
placed on the NDL.
19. Can the State agency accept an institution’s corrective action and defer the serious
deficiency after a notice of proposed termination has been issued? Should corrective
action be accepted if it is received after the deadline in the notice of serious
deficiency?
If the State agency has received documented evidence that the institution has fully and
permanently corrected the serious deficiency, the State agency may (but is not required
to) accept the institution’s corrective action and defer the proposed termination at any point
up until the institution’s appeal is held or a decision is rendered by the hearing official.
20. If a State agency determines that a seriously deficient institution’s corrective action is
not complete and permanent, may the institution appeal the State agency’s decision?
The State agency’s determination that corrective action is not complete and permanent is
not an appealable action. An institution may appeal the proposed termination and proposed
disqualification but not the State agency’s determination that the institution’s corrective
action was unsuccessful. Appeal of the notice of propose to terminate and disqualify is the
one and only appeal allowed during the serious deficiency process, unless the institution
has been suspended.
21. Is there a time limit between the expiration of the time allowed for corrective action
and the issuance of a notice of proposed termination?
There is no set time limit. However, by this point in the process, the institution has already
failed to take successful corrective action and its ability to manage the Program has been
called into question. Although the regulations do not specify a deadline, the notice of intent
to terminate should be issued very shortly after the expiration of the time allowed for
corrective action.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 29

22. What if a State agency finds more serious deficiencies for an institution after the
institution has already been disqualified and placed on the NDL, such as, when an
audit report obtained a year later includes serious deficiencies?
There may be instances when a State agency finds that additional serious deficiencies
should have been included in the serious deficiency notification to the institution and RP/Is
prior to their termination. In these situations, the State agency should update the State
agency list to include the additional serious deficiencies so that they can ensure that the
institution and/or RP/Is provide corrective action for the additional serious deficiencies prior
to being removed from the NDL if early removal is requested.
23. Are all “principals” responsible?
Not all principals are considered to be “responsible principals”. At a minimum, by virtue of
their position, two principals are usually held responsible for the serious deficiency:
•
•

The institution’s Executive Director/Director, and
The Chairman of the Board.

These are the two positions that represent the “institution” and to whom the serious
deficiency notice is sent. One of these key principals will usually be the person who signs
the application. For a public entity, it might also include that person’s supervisor or
Department head. For a for-profit organization this will include the owner.
24. Who is a “responsible” individual?
A responsible individual is any non-principal
associated with the institution’s operation of
the Program who bears responsibility for a
serious deficiency.

What is Their Role?
Responsible individuals are defined
by their functions.

A responsible individual can be:
•
•
•

An employee;
A contractor who receives compensation; or
Someone who is not compensated by the institution, such as a family member who
“volunteers” his or her time to the institution.

These non-management staff must be declared seriously deficient when they have been
“responsible individuals” and directly involved in causing Program noncompliance, such as a
teacher who fails to maintain meal counts. If the meal counts are inaccurate to the extent of
being determined a serious deficiency, the teacher would also be declared seriously
deficient as a responsible individual.
25. May an individual who is no longer employed at the time of the serious deficiency
determination or an individual who is fired after the serious deficiency determination
be named as an RP/I?
Yes. Program regulations require that RP/Is be placed on the NDL. In each of the cases
below, the individual is still responsible for the serious deficiency and must be named in the
notice, placed on the State agency list, terminated and disqualified, and placed on the NDL.
If only institution or facility names are placed on the list, those responsible for the serious

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 30

deficiency can just create a new corporation or become principals in another institution,
sponsoring organization or DCH and continue mismanaging the Program.
A serious deficiency notice is sent by certified mail return receipt (or equivalent private
delivery), by fax, or by email to the institution, all identified RP/Is or providers. State
agencies must send the notices to all RP/Is to the last known address. In most cases, that
will be the address of the institution or facility. The notice must include the deficiencies,
noting the RP/I, and a request for a CAP.
For RP/Is who have been terminated or principals/individuals who are no longer employed
at the time of serious deficiency determination, the notice being sent fulfills the State
agency’s obligation of providing an opportunity to take corrective action. An RP/I who quits
after the serious deficiency determination is similar to an institution’s voluntary termination –
the State agency must send a Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification and
proceed with the serious deficiency process.
26. May an institution be placed on the NDL without naming any RP/Is?
No. If only institutions are placed on the list, then those people responsible for the serious
deficiency can just create a new corporation or become principals in another institution and
continue to mismanage the Program. Placing individuals on the NDL prevents them from
returning to participate in the Program as principals in another institution, principals in a
sponsored center, or as day care providers.
27. If an institution or RP/I is placed on the NDL, how long will they remain on the list?
Institutions and RP/Is will remain on the list until seven years have elapsed since they were
disqualified from participation or until the State agency, in consultation with FNS,
determines that the serious deficiencies that led to their placement on the list have been
corrected and all debts owed under the Program by the institution or RP/Is have been
repaid.
28. When a specific RP/I is determined to be at fault for Program findings, and they are
not fired but are removed from CACFP duties, how can the State agency include that
RP/I on the NDL so they may not slip back into CACFP duties without record of their
inappropriate actions being kept?
The State agency should continue the serious deficiency process on the RP/I, though the
process will be temporarily deferred for the institution for its correction.
29. What if an Institution participating in more than one State is disqualified by FNS or
another State agency?
If an institution participates in the Program in more than one State and is disqualified from
the Program then any State agency holding an agreement with the institution must also
terminate the institution’s agreement. The second State agency must send a notice of
termination to the institution within 45 days of the date of the first State agency’s
disqualification [7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(i)].
Note: Because the institution will have already had the opportunity for an appeal
covering the failure to correct the serious deficiencies that led to the initial

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 31

disqualification, other State agencies are prohibited from offering the institution an
appeal of the disqualification and termination in each State.
Note: State agencies which declare a multi-State institution seriously deficient will need
to alert its FNS Regional Office promptly so that the other affected State agencies in
which the institution operates can be apprised of the findings of noncompliance.
30. Can the State agency deny an application for participation if the institution or RP/I is
on the NDL, or must the State agency go through the whole application approval
process before denying the application?
Yes. If an institution or one of its principals is on the NDL and submits an application, the
State agency may not approve the application. There is no requirement to complete the
whole application approval process. However, the State must offer the institution an
opportunity to appeal. Program regulations require that the institution be given an
abbreviated administrative review which means that the review is limited to a review of the
written submissions concerning the accuracy of the State agency’s determination [7 CFR
226.6(k)(9)].
31. Can the State agency refuse to allow an institution to apply to the Program
(presumably because there are concerns of serious deficiency)?
No. The institution must be allowed to submit an application for participation. The State
agency may deny the application if it can be documented that the institution does not meet
the performance standards, has submitted false information on its application, or does not
comply with any other action affecting the institution’s ability to administer the Program in
accordance with Program requirements.
32. What about a sponsored center? How can a State agency disqualify a RPI of an
unaffiliated center without the sponsor being seriously deficient?
Program regulations have not established procedures for terminating centers that participate
under a sponsoring organization. However, in some instances the person responsible for a
sponsoring organization’s serious deficiency(ies) might be a person employed by or
otherwise associated with a sponsored center, rather than with the sponsoring organization
itself. This is why the definition of ‘‘responsible principal or responsible individual’’ includes a
principal or individual associated with a sponsored center who is responsible for the
sponsoring organization’s serious deficiency(ies). This means that anyone responsible for
serious deficiency(ies) is subject to a proposed disqualification, regardless of whether he or
she is associated with the sponsoring organization of centers, or with a sponsored center.
Program regs prohibit a sponsoring organization from submitting an application on behalf of
a sponsored facility (or a State agency from approving such an application) if the facility
itself or one of its principals is on the NDL. This will prevent family day care homes or
sponsored centers on the NDL from re-entering the Program. It will also prevent an
individual on the list for actions committed while associated with a sponsor of centers from
re-entering the Program as a sponsored center, or an individual on the list for actions
committed while a principal in a sponsored center from re-entering the Program as a
principal in another institution (an independent center or a sponsoring organization of homes
and/or centers).
The sponsoring organization is ultimately responsible for any serious deficiency of a
sponsored facility (i.e., day care home and affiliated or unaffiliated center). Whether the

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 32

sponsoring organization is declared seriously deficient based on the non-compliance of a
facility would depend on the frequency and severity of the error. Whatever action is taken, it
should be in compliance with the policies and procedures of the State agency.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 33

PART 2. Serious Deficiency Process for Day Care Homes
This section provides information on the serious deficiency process for DCH providers including
the procedures, corrective action, termination and disqualification, and Program payments
during the serious deficiency process. If a provider is caring for children in a home other than his
or her own house, the serious deficiency process will document the provider’s name and
address and the house address. If a DCH is using a business name, the provider’s name and
the business name will be documented as seriously deficient. The State agency and/or
sponsoring organization must name all pertinent RP/I names and addresses in any actions and
notices.

A. Serious Deficiency Process for DCHs
Again, remember that CACFP regulations define seriously deficient as the status of an
institution or a day care hone that has been determined to be non-compliant in one or more
aspects in its operation of the Program [7 CFR 226.2]. The serious deficiency process offers a
systematic way for a sponsoring organization to take actions allowing DCHs to correct problems
and give them the opportunity for due process. If DCHs are unwilling or incapable of correcting
serious problems, the serious deficiency process protects Program integrity by terminating and
disqualifying those in noncompliance of Program requirements.
The serious deficiency process has six steps that start when a sponsoring organization
identifies a deficiency and ends when that deficiency has been resolved. The resolution will be
either the correction of the problem and the issuance of a temporary deferment of the serious
deficiency, or the DCH’s termination and disqualification from the Program.
The six steps in the serious deficiency process are:

1. Identify the serious deficiencies;
2. Issue a notice of serious deficiency;
3. Receive and assess the DCH’s written CAP;
4. Issue a notice of temporary deferral of the serious deficiency if the CAP is adequate, or
issue a notice of proposed termination and disqualification, including appeal procedures,
if the CAP is not adequate (or if no CAP is received);

5. If requested, hold an appeal, of the proposed termination and disqualification; and
6. If termination is upheld, issue a notice of final termination and disqualification or if
termination is overturned, issue a notice of temporary deferral.
Each of these steps is described in detail in this guidance. For a graphic chart of the steps,
reference Attachment B.

B. Identifying Serious Deficiencies for DCHs
A DCH may be declared seriously deficient if the sponsoring organization finds Program
violations or issues of non-compliance with CACFP requirements at any time during the DCH’s

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 34

participation. Serious deficiencies that are not permanently corrected will result in the proposed
termination and disqualification of the DCH.
If however, the serious deficiencies involve an imminent threat to the health and safety of
participants, or the provider has engaged in activities that threaten the public health or safety,
the sponsoring organization must follow the procedures outlined in Part 5 of this guidance.
Sponsoring organizations should become familiar with the serious deficiencies. The following
are noncompliance issues that rise to the level of a serious deficiency [7 CFR 226.16(l)(2)]:
1. Submission of false information on the DCH’s application;
2. Submission of false claims for reimbursement;
3. Simultaneous participation under more than one sponsor;
4. Non-compliance with the Program meal pattern;
5. Failure to keep required records;
6. Conduct or conditions that threaten the health or safety of a child(ren) in care, or the
public health or safety;
7. A determination that the provider has been convicted of any activity that occurred during
the past seven years and that indicated a lack of business integrity. A lack of business
integrity includes deceit, antitrust violations, embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery,
falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, receiving stolen property,
making false claims, obstruction of justice, or any other activity indicating a lack of
business integrity as defined by the State agency, or the concealment of such a
conviction;
8. Failure to participate in training; and
9. Any other circumstance related to non-performance under the sponsoring organization’s
DCH agreement, as specified by the sponsoring organization or the State agency.
This list should not be considered to be all-inclusive.
Determining Serious Deficiencies
A sponsoring organization has the authority to determine when a violation rises to the level of a
serious deficiency. In deciding whether a Program violation rises to the level of a serious
deficiency, sponsoring organizations will consider, but not limit themselves to the following
items.
•

The severity of the problem. Is the noncompliance on a minor or substantial scale?
Are the violations indicative of a recurring problem at the DCH, or is the problem an
isolated event? Even minor problems may be serious if systemic. Some problems are
serious even though they have occurred only once.

•

The degree of responsibility attributable to the DCH. To the extent that evidence is
available, can the sponsoring organization determine whether the violations were

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 35

inadvertent errors of an otherwise responsible DCH provider? Is there evidence of
negligence or a conscious indifference to regulatory requirements? Or, even worse, is
there evidence of deception, or intentional noncompliance?
•

The provider’s history of participation in the Program. Are problems of
noncompliance frequently recurring at the same DCH?

•

The nature of the requirements that relate to the problem. Are the DCH’s violations a
clear violation of Program requirements? Has the provider failed to implement new
CACFP policy appropriately?

•

The degree to which the problem impacts Program integrity. Are the violations
undermining the intent or purpose of the CACFP?

Once a sponsoring organization has determined that a serious deficiency has occurred, it must
begin the serious deficiency process.

C. Serious Deficiency Notification and Corrective Action Procedures for DCHs
The most critical step in the serious deficiency process may be when the sponsoring
organization prepares and issues the formal notice of serious deficiency. After the sponsoring

What Constitutes Notice?
Notice means a letter sent by certified mail, return receipt (or the equivalent private
delivery service), by fax, or by email, that describes an action proposed or taken by the
State agency with regard to an institution’s, responsible principal’s, or responsible
individual’s Program participation [7 CFR 226.2].
A notice is considered received by the institution or responsible principal or responsible
individual five days after being sent to the addressee’s last known mailing address, fax
number, or email address. Any timeframes associated with a given notice start with the
earliest form of transmission.
It is a best practice to get proof of the delivery of the notice.
organization thoroughly investigates and documents any serious deficiencies, it must issue a
notice of serious deficiency.
Note: Any reference in this Guidance to the “number of days” always means calendar days.
It is vitally important that the serious deficiency notice is written in a way that clearly explains the
sponsoring organization’s action to the hearing official in the event that the provider later
appeals.
A sponsoring organization should remember to include all findings identified during a review in
some way. Findings that do not rise to the level of a serious deficiency must still be issued to a
DCH. This can be done in the serious deficiency notice with clear language that the areas are
not considered serious deficiencies but that they also must be corrected, or the other findings
can be issued in a separate letter. The serious deficiency notice must include:

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 36

•

The serious deficiencies, including appropriate citations from the CACFP regulations;

•

The actions to be taken by the DCH to correct the serious deficiencies;

•

The allotted time to correct the serious deficiencies, this must be as soon as possible,
but not to exceed 30 days;

•

That the serious deficiency determination is not subject to administrative review
(appeal);

•

That failure to fully and permanently correct the serious deficiencies within the allotted
timeframe will result in the issuance of a Notice of Proposed Termination and
Disqualification of the DCH’s agreement and disqualification of the DCH; and

•

That the DCH’s voluntary termination of its agreement after being notified of the serious
deficiency determination will still result in the DCH’s formal termination by the sponsoring
organization and placement of the DCH’s and provider’s names on the NDL [7 CFR
226.16(l)(3)].

At the same time a notice is issued, the sponsoring organization must also provide a copy of the
notice to the appropriate State agency.
Refer to Prototype Letter 15: Notice of Serious Deficiency for Providers. A copy of the
letter must be sent to the State agency at the same time it is sent to the provider.

D. Corrective Action Plans for DCHs
In response to the serious deficiency notice, a DCH must submit a CAP within 30 days (or less if
required by the sponsoring organization) that details the processes implemented to ensure that
the serious deficiencies have been fully and permanently corrected. The sponsoring
organization will evaluate the CAP and determine whether adequate internal controls have been
put into place to fully and permanently correct the deficiencies. An acceptable CAP must include
the following information:
•

Name of the provider(s) associated with the serious deficiencies;

•

Address of the DCH;

•

Date of birth for the provider(s) associated with the serious deficiencies; and

•

Details of the serious deficiencies:
o

What are the serious deficiencies and the procedures that were implemented to
address the serious deficiencies?

o

Who addressed the serious deficiencies? List DCH personnel responsible for
this task.

o

When was the procedure for addressing the serious deficiencies implemented?
Provide a timeline for implementing the procedure (i.e., will the procedure be

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 37

done daily, weekly, monthly, or annually, and when did implementation of the
corrective action plan begin)?

o

Where is the CAP documentation retained?

o

How will the provider ensure that the CAP corrects the deficiency and continues
to be implemented [7 CFR 226.16(l) and CACFP 14-2012, Child and Adult Care
Food Program Guidance on the Serious Deficiency Process and Acceptable
Corrective Action Plans, National Disqualified List Procedures and Debt
Collection, May 1 2012]?

The CAP is a DCH’s response to the sponsoring organization’s requirement that Program
serious deficiencies be corrected. The response will generally include details of and
documentation that the corrections have already been made. This might include copies of
income eligibility forms, enrollment rosters, menus, Child Nutrition Labels or manufacturers’
product analysis sheets or recipes, attendance records, meal count forms, etc. If the CAP and
supporting documentation is acceptable, the sponsoring organization can approve it.
Example: During an administrative review, a sponsoring organization discovers that a
DCH provider fails to maintain adequate Program records (i.e., enrollment forms,
attendance records, meal counts, menus, etc.). The sponsoring organization sends a
notice of serious deficiency to the provider. The provider responds to the serious
deficiency and indicates that he or she ‘will comply with CACFP requirements in relation
to the maintenance of Program administrative records’. This is not an acceptable CAP.
An acceptable CAP for the serious deficiencies listed above must answer the questions what,
who, when, where, and how. The following CAP would be acceptable:

May 13, 2013
Nola Grant, Director
Integrity Sponsorship
1234 First Street
Metropolis, Georgia 30365
Dear Ms. Grant:
This is my corrective action plan required by the Notice of Serious Deficiency I received
on May 1, 2013.
Serious Deficiency: Incomplete Enrollment Records
I understand that I may not claim meals for children in care who are not currently and
completely enrolled in my care and claimed for reimbursement. These records on file will
be on file and available for review.
I have updated my procedures to ensure that complete and current enrollment records
are on file for each enrolled child. As new children are brought to my day care home for
care, the parents will be required to complete enrollment forms at that time.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 38

Parents will be required to update enrollment forms on an annual basis. I will alert
parents of this requirement and give them one week to supply the updated information. I
will issue the child’s parent or guardian a notice stating that the form must be submitted
or an administrative charge will be added to their account. I am responsible for ensuring
that all required records are in the child’s folder prior to claiming them for CACFP
reimbursement. I have taken the sponsoring organization’s on-line training ‘Collecting
and Processing Enrollment Forms’ on this new procedure on May 16, 2012. I have
placed a copy of these procedures in my CACFP binder. I notified all parents of these
new procedures on May, 25, 2012 and will do so with each renewal. I verified on May
20, 2012 that all currently enrolled children have complete and current enrollment
records on file.
Serious Deficiency: Missing Menu Item or Incomplete meals
I have updated my procedures for establishing menus. I will write out a month’s worth of
menus in the last week of the preceding month. I will then purchase the items for a
week’s worth of meals at a time. If an item is not available, I will make a like substitution
and make that change on my menu. I have placed a copy of these procedures in my
CACFP binder. A menu will be posted next to the parent sign-in sheet. I have attached
the menus I will be using in June.
Sincerely,

Zena Smith, Provider

This CAP has enough detail explaining what was done, how it was done, when it was done, and
by whom it was it done, for the sponsoring organization to make an assessment regarding its
effectiveness in fully and permanently correcting the serious deficiencies. The CAP also
describes where the documentation of changes will be housed.

E. Successful Corrective Action of a DCH
If the provider submits corrective action that corrects the serious deficiencies to the sponsoring
organization’s satisfaction within the allotted timeframe, the serious deficiency determination will
be temporarily deferred. As required by 7 CFR 226.16(l)(3)(i)(C), the DCH has 30 days to
correct the issues, not simply to provide a plan for correcting. If the corrections are made to the
sponsoring organization’s satisfaction, the sponsoring organization must:
•

Notify the DCH that the sponsoring organization has temporarily deferred its serious
deficiency determination; and

•

Remind all parties that the corrective action must be permanent or the serious deficiency
process will be reinstated starting with the Notice of Proposed Termination and
Disqualification.

At the same time this notice is issued, the sponsoring organization must provide a copy of the
notice to the appropriate State agency.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 39

Refer to Prototype Letter 16: Notice of Successful Corrective Action and Temporary
Deferral of Serious Deficiency. A copy of the letter must be sent to the State agency at the
same time it is sent to the provider.

F. Unsuccessful Corrective Action of a DCH
If the DCH fails to implement timely corrective action to fully and permanently correct the
serious deficiencies cited, the sponsoring organization must issue a notice proposing to
terminate and disqualify the DCH and to include its name on the NDL.
The notice must specify:
•

That the sponsoring organization is proposing to terminate the DCH’s agreement and to
disqualify the DCH from the Program;

•

That the DCH may appeal this decision;

•

That the DCH may continue to participate and receive Program reimbursement for
eligible meals served until a requested appeal has concluded;

•

That the termination of DCH’s agreement will result in the DCH’s termination for cause
and the DCH and provider’s disqualification; and

•

That if the DCH voluntarily terminates its agreement with the sponsoring organization
after receiving the Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification, it will still be
placed on the NDL [7 CFR 226.16(l)(3)(iii)].

At the same time this notice is issued, the sponsoring organization must provide a copy of the
notice to the appropriate State agency.
Refer to Prototype Letter 17: Notice Proposed Termination and Proposed Disqualification
of Providers – No Corrective Action. A copy of the letter must be sent to the State agency at
the same time it is sent to the provider.
Refer to Prototype Letter 18: Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification for
Providers – Required Corrective Action Not Acceptable. A copy of the letter must be sent to
the State agency at the same time it is sent to the provider.

If an appeal is requested, the sponsoring organization must follow the appeal procedures for
DCHs in Part 8 of this guidance.

G. Agreement Termination and Disqualification of a DCH
When the time for requesting an appeal expires or when the appeal official upholds the
sponsoring organization’s proposed termination and disqualification, the sponsoring
organization must immediately:

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 40

•

Notify the DCH that its agreement has been terminated and that the DCH has been
disqualified; and

•

Provide a copy of the notice and the mailing address and date of birth for provider, with
the full amount of any determined debt associated with both the DCH provider; to the
appropriate State agency within 10 days of the notification for inclusion on the NDL
[7 CFR 266.16(l)(3)(v)].

Refer to Prototype Letter 19: Notice of Termination and Disqualification - Provider does
not appeal. A copy of the letter must be sent to the State agency at the same time it is sent to
the provider.
Refer to Prototype Letter 20: Notice of Termination and Disqualification - Sponsoring
Organization prevails in appeal). A copy of the letter must be sent to the State agency at the
same time it is sent to the provider.
If the DCH fails to implement successful corrective action, it will be terminated and placed on
the NDL. Once on the NDL, the DCH is not eligible to participate in the CACFP in any State as
an RP/I at an institution or as DCH provider. Completing the entire process is important. If the
sponsoring organization does not complete the serious deficiency process, the provider may,
because he or she has not been disqualified, simply move, reapply and be admitted to
participate in the Program in another State.
If the DCH corrects the serious deficiencies and pays all the DCH debts owed, the DCH may be
removed from the NDL. See Part 10 of this guidance for more information about requests for
early removal from the NDL.

H. Outcomes of the Serious Deficiency Process for DCHs
CACFP regulations allow only two possible outcomes of the serious deficiency process: the
correction of the serious deficiency to the sponsor’s satisfaction within stated timeframes, or the
sponsoring organization’s proposed termination and disqualification of the DCH and its
agreement. Once a sponsoring organization’s conditions for successful corrective action,
including repayment of a debt, are established in a notice of serious deficiency, those conditions
may not be altered by any form of “negotiated settlement.”
However, the issuance of the notice of intent to terminate does not mean that the DCH should
stop working on corrective action. In fact, the sponsoring organization can accept corrective
action at any point up until the appeal deadline has passed or the DCH’s agreement is
terminated. If the DCH submits documented evidence which convinces the sponsoring
organization that the DCH has fully and permanently corrected the serious deficiency, the
sponsoring organization may accept the DCH’s corrective action and temporarily defer the
proposed termination. This is not considered a “settlement agreement” because it would be
acceptable corrective action. Note again that if the DCH later fails to maintain this corrective
action, the sponsoring organization must immediately re-issue a notice of proposed termination
and disqualification [7 CFR 226.16(l)(3)].

I. Program Payments during Serious Deficiency Process for DCHs
During the serious deficiency process, a sponsoring organization must continue to pay a DCH’s
valid claims. The sponsoring organization must continue to pay any valid claims for

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 41

reimbursement for eligible meals served until the serious deficiency is corrected or the DCH’s
agreement is terminated, including the period of any appeal [7 CFR 226.16(l)(3)].

J. Questions & Answers
1. If a DCH loses its license from failing to reapply on time, must the sponsoring
organization declare the DCH seriously deficient?
If a DCH loses its license (not because of a Program serious deficiency), it is ineligible to
participate. As long as the DCH notifies the sponsoring organization that it has lost its
license and is not claiming meals, there is no need for the sponsoring organization to
declare the DCH seriously deficient. Since the DCH is no longer eligible to participate, the
sponsoring organization must terminate the agreement and offer appeal rights. It may allow
the DCH to reapply if/when it becomes eligible.
2. During a review, the sponsoring organization issues a finding that is not a serious
deficiency, but that requires the DCH to take corrective action. Can the provider
voluntarily terminate at this point, without any action by the sponsor?
Yes, the DCH can terminate its agreement with the sponsoring organization “for
convenience” at any time, provided that the sponsoring organization has not declared the
provider seriously deficient.
EXAMPLE: A sponsoring organization finds on its first review of a new
provider that three meals for the review month were missing a component.
The sponsoring organization provides technical assistance on menu planning
and, takes the overclaim for meals that are unallowable, and requires that
procedures be updated. The provider may at this time decide to voluntarily
terminate without consequence. Keep in mind that if they did not voluntarily
terminate and similar findings were found on the next review, the serious
deficiency process would need to start.
3. During a review, the sponsoring organization finds an area of non-compliance at a
DCH that does not rise to the level of a serious deficiency. Can the sponsor require
the provider to submit a written corrective plan?
CACFP regulations only require DCHs to submit written corrective action when the area of
non-compliance rises to the level of serious deficiency [7 CFR 226.16(k)(3)]. However, any
area of non-compliance must be corrected. For non-serious deficiency findings, the sponsor
has the discretion as the method used to document correction of the deficiency. FNS
suggests that a sponsor require the provider to submit written corrective action. Written
responses provide documentation that the provider stated what will be done to correct the
deficiency. Requiring a written response may be a part of the sponsor’s policies and
procedures.
4. Is there a requirement to report whether disqualified providers owe debts to the
Program?
Yes, DCHs and the RP/Is stay on the NDL until they have repaid all debts to the Program,
even if that takes longer than seven years.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 42

5. If/when a disqualified DCH repays its debt, where must the funds be sent?
The funds are sent to the sponsoring organization, which then returns the funds to the State
agency with a record of the fiscal year(s) to which it pertains. The State agency should
contact its FNS Regional Office - Financial management for details on how to remit funds for
the fiscal year(s) involved.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 43

PART 3. Serious Deficiency Process for Unaffiliated Centers
This Section was Intentionally Left Blank. Information regarding the serious deficiency process
for unaffiliated centers will be added when the Final Rule implementing these provisions is
published.

PART 4. Suspension Process for Institutions
This section provides information on the suspension process for institutions, including the
procedures, termination and disqualifications, and withholding of Program payments during the
suspension process. A suspension is the only time a State agency can combine a notice of
serious deficiency with a notice of proposed termination and proposed disqualification.

A. Suspension Process for Institutions
Suspension refers to a period of time (prior to the termination of an institution’s Program
agreement) when an institution’s Program participation, including Program payments, is
suspended. The regulations outline two circumstances under which State agencies must or may
suspend an institution [7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(i)-(ii)]:
•

An institution’s participation must be suspended if it poses an imminent threat to the
health or safety of Program participants or the public; and
o

•

The State agency must withhold Program reimbursement as of the beginning of
the serious deficiency process and to release payment for valid claims during the
suspension period if the institution requests a suspension review and is upheld.

An institution’s participation may be suspended if it submits a false or fraudulent claim
for reimbursement;
o

If the State agency determines that an institution has knowingly submitted a false
or fraudulent claim, the State agency may initiate action to suspend the
institution’s participation and must initiate action to terminate the institution’s
agreement and initiate action to disqualify the institution and the responsible
principals and responsible individuals.

B. Notice of Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Proposed Termination
Procedures
When the State agency suspends an institution because its operation poses an imminent threat
to the health and safety of Program participants or the public or due to the filing of a false or
fraudulent claim, the institution and all RP/Is will be notified in writing of the suspension and the
basis for it. In both circumstances, the institution and RP/Is must also be issued the notice of
serious deficiency.
•

A suspension related to an imminent threat to health and safety is immediate and may
not be appealed prior to the suspension.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 44

•

The suspension of an institution’s participation related to filing a false or fraudulent claim
must be done as a proposed suspension which is appealable prior to the suspension
starting [7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(i)].

See each section below for the different procedures that must be followed.
1) Imminent Threat to Health and Safety
When an institution’s conduct poses an imminent threat to the health or safety of children or the
public, the State agency must suspend the institution’s participation in CACFP. Some examples
of imminent threat to health and safety include but are not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Failure of a facility’s fire detection or prevention system;
Inadequate or incompetent supervision;
Providing care for more children than the licensed capacity allows;
Unsanitary conditions for food service or unsanitary water;
Inadequate light, ventilation, sanitation, or heating;
Lost or missing child;
Suspected maltreatment of a child;
Suspected sexual, physical, or emotional abuse of staff, volunteers, or family members
occurring while they are on the premises of the child care facility;
Injuries to children requiring medical or dental care;
Illness or injuries requiring hospitalization or emergency treatment;
Mental health emergencies;
Health and safety emergencies involving parents or guardians and visitors to the child
care facility;
Death of a child or staff member (including a death that occurred outside of child care
hours that had resulted from serious illness or injury at the child care facility); or
The presence of a threatening individual who attempts or succeeds in gaining entrance
to the facility.

If the institution is cited by State or local health or licensing officials for an offense that
constitutes serious health and safety violations, the State agency must immediately declare the
institution seriously deficient in addition to suspending its participation in CACFP. The State
agency will also notify the institution that it is proposing to terminate the institution’s agreement
and to disqualify the institution and the RP/Is [CACFP 13-2013, Health and Safety in the Child
and Adult Care Food Program, July 26, 2013].
If the State agency, rather than the health or licensing officials, discovers conditions that might
constitute an imminent threat to public health or safety, the State agency is required to notify the
appropriate State or local licensing or health authorities and to take action based on those
recommendations.
Suspension
Once it has been determined that an imminent health or safety violation has occurred, the State
agency must notify the institution and all RP/Is that the institution’s participation, including
Program payments has been suspended [7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(i)].The notice must state:
•

The serious deficiencies found;

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 45

•

That the institution can appeal the suspension and the proposed termination and
disqualification;

•

That the institution’s Program participation including all Program payments are
suspended with a specific start date until an appeal is concluded;

•

That the State agency is prohibited from offering a review (appeal) of the suspension
prior to the suspension being effective;

•

That, unless overturned by a review official, the suspension will remain in effective
throughout the serious deficiency process;

•

That if the hearing official overturns the suspension, the institution may claim
reimbursement for eligible meals served during the suspension;

•

That termination from the Program will result in placement of the institution and RP/Is
on the NDL; and

•

That the institution’s voluntary termination of its agreement with the State agency
after having been notified that it is seriously deficient and suspended from the
Program will still result in the institution and RP/Is formal termination by the State
agency and placement on the NDL.

The notice must include the State agency’s appeals procedures.
Refer to Prototype Letter 7: Notice of Serious Deficiency, Suspension and Proposed
Termination and Disqualification for Institutions - Combined Notice for Imminent Threat
to Health and Safety. A copy of the letter must be sent to the FNS Regional office at the same
time it is sent to the institution.
If an institution wants to appeal this action, it must follow the appeal procedures listed in Part 7
of this guidance.
Depending on the whether the institution files an appeal and the decision of the hearing official,
refer to these Prototype Letters:
Prototype Letter 8: Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Institutions: Imminent
Threat to Health and Safety - Institution Does Not Appeal. A copy of the letter must be sent
to the FNS Regional office at the same time it is sent to the institution.
Prototype Letter 9: Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Institutions - Imminent
Threat to Health and Safety after State agency prevails in appeal. A copy of the letter must
be sent to the FNS Regional office at the same time it is sent to the institution.
Prototype Letter 10: Notice of Reinstatement - Imminent Threat to Health and Safety after
institution prevails in appeal. A copy of the letter must be sent to the FNS Regional office at
the same time it is sent to the institution.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 46

2) Submission of False or Fraudulent Claims
The submission of a false or fraudulent claim constitutes a
serious deficiency for participating institutions. If an
institution knowingly files a false or fraudulent claim for
reimbursement, the State agency must declare the
institution and RP/Is seriously deficient; for example, an
institution filing a claim for meals that it did not serve, an
institution that claims more than two meals and a snack per
child, or reporting children as eligible for free meals on the
claim without supporting income eligibility applications.

FRAUD
Not all false statements are
fraudulent. Elements defining
fraud contain distinct differences
that may be difficult to realize but
are important and not easy to
prove.

Fraud is defined as a willful act commenced with the Specific Intent to deceive or cheat, in order
to cause some financial detriment to another and to engender personal financial gain.
A misrepresentation is fraudulent if the maker
(a) knows or believes that the matter is not as he represents it to be,
(b) does not have the confidence in the accuracy of his representation that he states or implies,
or
(c) knows that he does not have the basis for his representation that he states or implies.
If the State agency or sponsoring organization cannot prove these conditions without any doubt,
FNS advises that a charge of knowingly filing a fraudulent claim not be used.
As part of the adverse action, the State agency has the option to suspend the institution and
RP/Is from Program participation, including Program payments, until the serious deficiency has
been resolved [7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(ii)].

Proposed Suspension
When the State agency proposes to suspend an institution’s participation, including Program
payments for the submission of a false or fraudulent claim, the State agency must issue a
combined notice of serious deficiency and proposed suspension. The institution and RP/Is must
be notified in writing that the State agency intends to suspend the institution’s participation
(including all Program payments) unless the institution requests a review of the proposed
suspension. The notice must state:
•

The serious deficiencies found;

•

That the State agency is proposing to suspend the institution’s and RP/Is’ Program
participation, including the payment of claims;

•

The effective date of the suspension (this cannot be earlier than 10 days after the
institution receives the notice);

•

That the institution can appeal the proposed suspension;

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 47

•

The contact information for the suspension review official;

•

That a suspension review must be requested within 10 days of receipt of the notice;

•

That if the hearing official overturns the proposed suspension, the institution may
claim reimbursement for eligible meals served during the proposed suspension; and

•

That the institution’s voluntary termination of its agreement with the State agency
after having received the notice will still result in the institution and RP/Is formal
termination by the State agency and placement on the NDL.

Include the State agency’s appeal procedures for suspensions and terminations.
The notice should also state that, if the suspension review official overturns the proposed
suspension, the institution is still required to submit corrective action to fully and permanently
correct the serious deficiency(ies).
If the State agency chooses not to suspend an institution’s participation for submitting a false or
fraudulent claim, it must immediately initiate action to terminate
and disqualify the institution and the RPIs following the
Initiating Action to Terminate
procedures outlined in Part 1 of this guidance and 7 CFR
and Disqualify
226.6(c)(3).

Refer to Prototype Letter 11: Notice of Serious Deficiency
and Proposed Suspension of an Institution - Combined
Notice for False or Fraudulent claim. A copy of the letter
must be sent to the FNS Regional Office at the same time it is
sent to the institution.

Initiating action to terminate and
disqualify an institution begins
with the Notice of Serious
Deficiency…NOT the Notice of
Proposed Termination and
Disqualification.

C. Suspension Review – Suspension Appeal
What is the difference between a “suspension review” and an “abbreviated appeal”?
A suspension review is an abbreviated appeal that is available to institutions before a
suspension for submission of false or fraudulent claims takes effect. It consists of a review of
written documents, instead of an in-person hearing, to determine whether Program payments
will continue. It does not resolve any appeal option that the institution may request of the State
agency’s proposed termination and disqualification of the institution; the institution may request
a regular appeal if they are dissatisfied with the result of the suspension appeal.
An abbreviated appeal also involves a review of documentation instead of an in-person hearing
(see Part 7 of this guidance for details on the in-person hearing) and the decision of this review
is final. This is held when one of the following occurs:
1. The information submitted on the application was false;
2. The institution, one of its sponsored facilities, or one of the principals of the institution or
its facilities is on the NDL;

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 48

3. The institution, one of its sponsored facilities, or one of the RP/Is of the institution or its
facilities is ineligible to participate in any other publicly funded Program by reason of
violation of the requirements of the Program; or

4. The institution, one of its sponsored facilities, or one of the RP/Is of the institution or its
facilities has been convicted for any activity that indicates a lack of business integrity
[7 CFR 226.6(k)(9)].
Suspension Review
If an institution wants a suspension review, it must send a request to the suspension review
official within 10 days of receipt of the notice of proposed suspension. The appeal request
should include the reasons the institution disagrees with the suspension. The institution may
submit documentation to support its appeal.
The suspension review official must be an individual who is independent and impartial. The
State agency must be notified immediately of the institution’s request. The State agency must
provide the suspension review official with the original proposed suspension and any other
supporting documentation. The suspension review official must render a decision within 10 days
of the deadline for receiving the institution’s documentation opposing the suspension [7 CFR
226.6(c)(5)(ii)(C)].
Suspension Appeal
The institution also has the right to appeal the suspension through the regular appeal process
as described in Part 7 of this guidance (regardless of whether it requests a suspension review).
The maximum time for suspension of participation is 120 days following the suspension review
decision. Within the 120 days, the institution’s appeal should be heard and a decision rendered
either overturning the serious deficiency, suspension and proposed termination and
disqualification or the institution and RP/Is should be terminated. If a suspension appeal lasts
more than 120 days, the State agency must pay any valid claims received by the institution
starting on day 121 [7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(ii)(F)].
Refer to Prototype Letter 12: Notice of Suspension - False or Fraudulent claims:
Institution does not request a suspension review. A copy of the letter must be sent o the
Regional Office at the same time it is sent to the institution.
Refer to Prototype Letter 13: Notice of Suspension for Institutions: False or Fraudulent
Claims after State agency prevails in suspension. A copy of the letter must be sent to the
FNS Regional Office at the same time it is sent to the institution.
Suspension Overturned - Must Propose Termination
If the hearing official overturns the State agency’s proposed suspension, the State agency
cannot suspend the institution’s participation or withhold reimbursement payments for the
suspension period. The State agency must still proceed with the proposed termination and
proposed disqualification as outlined in Part 1 of this guidance [7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(ii)(A)].
Refer to Prototype Letter 14: Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed Suspension for
Institutions - False or fraudulent claims after institution prevails in suspension review. A

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 49

copy of the letter must be sent to the FNS Regional Office at the same time it is sent to the
institution.
Corrective Action
Whether or not the institution is successful in its suspension appeal, the institution has the
opportunity to submit corrective action to address the serious deficiency determination, such as
submitting revised claiming procedures. If the institution’s corrective action is accepted by the
State agency, the serious deficiency is temporarily deferred, the suspension is removed, and
the institution is able to continue participation in CACFP.
If the corrective action is not accepted, the State agency must continue with the proposed
termination and disqualification of the institution and the RP/Is and begin the regular appeal
process as outlined in Part 7 of this guidance.

D. Agreement Termination and Disqualification
When the time for requesting an appeal expires or the hearing official upholds the proposed
termination or disqualification, the State agency must:
•

Notify the institution’s executive director and chairman of the board of directors, and the
RP/Is that the institution’s agreement has been terminated and that the institution and
RP/Is have been disqualified;

•

Update the State agency list at the time such notice is issued; and

•

Provide a copy of the notice and the mailing address and date of birth for each RP/I with
the full amount of any determined debt associated with the institution and/or the RP/I to
the appropriate FNS Regional Office for inclusion on the NDL [7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(iii)(E)].

If the institution and RP/Is request an appeal and the hearing official overturns the State
agency’s suspension, the State agency must temporarily defer the serious deficiency and
withdraw the suspension [7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(iii)(B)(1)(i)].
The State agency will report the name of the terminated and disqualified institution and RP/Is to
the FNS Regional Office at the same time the institution and RP/Is are notified. In reporting the
name of the institution and RP/Is to the FNS Regional Office, the State agency will follow the
instructions outlined in Part 10 of this guidance. The FNS Regional Office will request that the
FNS National Office add the names of the institution and the RP/Is to the NDL.
Refer to Prototype Letter 3: Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification of
Institutions. A copy of the letter must be sent to the FNS Regional Office at the same time it is
sent to the institution.

E. Program Payments during a Suspension
The State agency is not allowed to pay claims to a suspended institution. Payments for valid
claims may only be paid if a suspension review official or hearing official overturns the
suspension.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 50

When a sponsoring organization is suspended for the submission of a false or fraudulent claim,
the State agency is required to make sure that payments to the sponsored DCHs for eligible
meals served are still made. The State agency may work with another sponsoring organization
to process the claims during the suspension process or the State agency may temporarily make
meal payments directly to the sponsored facilities during the period of the sponsoring
organization’s suspension. The State agency should contact the FNS Regional Office for
additional guidance with this emergency and temporary procedure.
If there is no other way to provide the sponsored facilities with earned meal reimbursements
other than by passing payments through the suspended sponsoring organization, then the law
requires these payments to continue. The sponsoring organization would be liable for continuing
to pay all valid claims and any claims not paid would be added to the debt owed by the
institution.
If the suspended sponsoring organization appeals the proposed termination and disqualification
and is upheld, it could submit claims for allowable Program administrative costs incurred during
the period of suspension that are properly documented.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 51

F. Questions & Answers
1. What does it mean to “take action consistent with licensing recommendations” when
a State agency’s monitor finds conditions of imminent threat to health and safety
when reviewing an institution or a facility?
If a State agency monitor discovers imminent threat to the health and safety of a participant
at an institution or facility, the monitor must call the proper authorities and stay at the site
until authorities have arrived. [CACFP 13-2013]
EXAMPLE: A crocodile is legally kept as a pet and the children are separated
from the crocodile by a couch. The State agency monitor found this concerning
and reported it to licensing for health and safety concerns, but the licensing
agency indicated it would not make a visit that day and in fact, failed to take
any action at all. Since the State agency identified this as an imminent threat,
what action should the State agency take?
In this instance, since licensing has indicated that it would not make a visit that
day, the State agency monitor should contact another authority – e.g., police,
animal control, etc. – and remain at the site until authorities have arrived.
Because there have been these types of instances in most States, FNS has
recommended that the CACFP State agency develop criteria to identify
imminent threat and written procedures it will use to take action to suspend the
institution’s/facility’s participation. FNS recommends including the licensing
agency in these discussions and determinations.
2. What is an institution’s “Program status” during the period of time between when it is
suspended and when it is either reinstated or terminated from the Program?
The institution’s agreement is still current and active during the CACFP suspension period,
but payments are suspended. If the institution is still providing care for children (because its
license has not been suspended or revoked) it should continue to maintain required
Program records so that it may claim reimbursement if it is reinstated.
3. The suspension notice is dated January 9, 2014, and the valid part of the December
claim is paid. Are the January 1-8, 2014, meals eligible for reimbursement if the
records are valid?
Yes, all meals served prior to the suspension notice are eligible for reimbursement if the
records are valid.
4. Why do the regulations permit the institution to appeal the suspension for imminent
threat to health and safety or proposed suspension (false/fraudulent claim), as well as
the State agency’s proposed termination and disqualification of the institution?
For imminent threat to health and safety, the State agency must notify the institution’s
executive director and chairman of the board that the institution’s participation (including
Program payments) has been suspended, that the institution has been determined to be
seriously deficient, and that State agency proposes to terminate and disqualify the institution
and its RPIs. In the notice, the State agency must include the procedures for seeking an
appeal of the suspension and proposed termination and disqualification. There is no

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 52

separate appeal for suspension. If the suspended institution prevails in the hearing, the
State agency must pay any claims for eligible meals served during the period of suspension.
For false or fraudulent claims, suspension and termination and disqualification are two
distinct actions that entitle the institution to separate appeals. The purpose of the
suspension review is to allow the State agency and the institution the opportunity to present
written documentation relating to the State agency’s suspension of Program payments.
The suspension review official does not determine whether the filed a false or fraudulent
claim. Rather, the review official determines whether “the preponderance of the evidence”
supports the State agency’s decision to suspend payments until the institution’s appeal of a
notice of proposed termination and disqualification is resolved, i.e., the institution moves
through the SD process which results in completion of approvable corrective action or
termination and disqualification. If the review official overturns the proposed suspension,
the State agency must continue to reimburse the institution for all eligible meals served
during the SD process. If the State agency prevails, the institution’s payments will be
suspended effective the date of the suspension review. However, if the suspended
institution prevails in the appeal of the proposed termination and disqualification, the State
agency must pay any valid unpaid claims for reimbursement for eligible meals served and
allowable administrative costs incurred during the suspension period.
5. When an institution’s license is revoked by the licensing agency for a health or safety
threat, does this action release a State agency from having to suspend the institution
in that they can no longer participate in the Program?
The CACFP regulations at 7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(i) require the State agency to suspend the
institution’s Program participation, initiate action to terminate the institution’s agreement, and
initiate action to disqualify the institution and the RP/Is even if it is prior to the licensing
agency’s formal action to revoke the institution’s license or approval. Suspension only allows
the State agency to stop paying an institution until the serious deficiency process is
complete. It does not take the place of the serious deficiency process.
6. A State agency starts the CACFP suspension process following notification that the
licensing agency has cited an institution for serious infractions. After the CACFP
suspension process has begun, the licensing agency re-instates the license. Should
the CACFP State agency drop or continue the CACFP suspension process?
The State agency MUST continue the CACFP suspension process and initiate the process to
terminate and disqualify the institution, providing the institution with the procedures for
appealing the termination and disqualification. The reinstatement of the license does not alter
regulatory procedures. If State or local health or licensing officials have cited an institution
for serious health or safety violations, the State agency must immediately suspend the
institution’s Program participation, initiate action to terminate the institution’s agreement, and
initiate action to disqualify the institution and the responsible principals and responsible
individuals prior to any formal action to revoke the institution’s licensure or approval [7 CFR
226.6(c)(5)(i)](A).
The State agency is prohibited from paying any claims for reimbursement from a suspended
institution. However, if the suspended institution prevails in the administrative review of the
proposed termination, the State agency must pay any claims for reimbursement for eligible
meals served and allowable administrative costs incurred during the suspension period [7
CFR 226.6(c)(5)(i)(D).

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 53

If the institution’s license is reinstated, the institution may submit an application to again
participate in the Program.
7. If a State agency is suspending an institution because of a false claim, can the State
agency stop payment of any of that institution’s claims?
The CACFP does not allow for stop payment procedures. Unlike suspension for imminent
threat to health and safety which is immediate, for a false or fraudulent claim, the State
agency proposes to suspend. The suspension in not implemented unless the institution
does not appeal the action or, if an appeal is filed, the review official upholds the action
proposed by the State agency.
The State agency must determine the valid part of all claims and make payments within 45
days of submission of that claim [7 CFR 226.7(k)].
8. Doesn’t the prohibition of paying “invalid claims” to an institution amount to
suspension of payments?
Suspension involves a total end of Program payments until a suspension review or hearing
official has ruled on an institution’s suspension appeal, or until an institution fails to request
an appeal prior to the regulatory deadline. The prohibition of paying invalid claims means
that a State agency must not reimburse an institution for that portion of a claim that the State
agency knows to be invalid.
9. Are there any circumstances under which an entire claim could be deemed invalid?
If a State agency determines that an independent center has improperly claimed meals for
an extended period of time by failing to take meal counts, the State agency would declare
the center seriously deficient and provide an appropriate period of time for the completion of
the corrective action.
If the State agency learned on a follow-up review that the center has failed to institute meal
counting as required in the CAP, no part of the claim for that period (the period of corrective
action) could be considered valid and, therefore, no portion of the claim could be
reimbursed.
10. What is the definition of a false claim?
A false claim is any claim that cannot be verified with required documentation, i.e.,
enrollment statements, attendance records, meal counts, menus that comply with meal
pattern requirements, costs records, etc.
11. What is an appropriate corrective action for the intentional submission of a false
claim?
First, “intent” must be proven, not simply based on appearance, i.e. the State agency
documenting intent. Secondly, the corrective is not to request that the institution prove that
the allegation is not true. An institution cannot correct documents that have already been
reviewed and determined to be inaccurate by the State agency. If the institution can provide
documentation that refutes the State agency’s finding(s), that may be accepted by the State
agency.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 54

It is important for the institution and the State agency to determine the root cause of the
false claim; are systems upgrades needed, or perhaps second party oversight increased?
If the institution is not able to provide documentation to refute the State agency’s findings,
the required corrective action is to have the institution to establish procedures to ensure that
the deficiency does not recur.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 55

PART 5. Suspension Process for Day Care Homes
This section provides information on the suspension process for DCHs including the
procedures, termination and disqualifications, and Program payments during the suspension
process [7 CFR 226.16(l)(4)(iv)]. A suspension is the only time a sponsoring organization can
combine a notice of serious deficiency with a notice of proposed termination and proposed
disqualification. A suspension in the only time a sponsoring organization can stop paying DCHs
before giving them the opportunity to correct the problems and appeal the termination.

A. Suspension Process for DCHs
If State or local health or licensing officials cite a DCH for serious health or safety violations, the
sponsoring organization must take action when it learns of the concerns, even though the
licensing agency has not yet taken formal action to revoke the DCH’s licensure or approval. In
some States, the CACFP State receives citation or revocation alerts from the licensing agency;
in these cases, it must provide the information to the sponsoring organization.
Even if the proper authorities indicate that it is safe for the monitor to leave a DCH while they
conduct further investigation or inquiry, the monitor and sponsoring organization should still
initiate a suspension and the serious deficiency process. FNS expects sponsoring organizations
to take immediate action to stop payments and suspend the DCH’s CACFP participation and
declare the DCH seriously deficient, regardless of any formal procedures pending or underway
by the licensing authorities to revoke the DCH’s license or approval [CACFP 13-2013, Health
and Safety in the Child and Adult Care Food Program, July 26, 2013].
If the sponsoring organization determines that there is an imminent threat to the health or safety
of participants at a DCH, or that the DCH has engaged in activities that threaten public health or
safety, the sponsoring organization must immediately notify the appropriate State or local
licensing and health authorities. If the licensing agency cannot make an immediate onsite visit,
the sponsoring organization will take action that is consistent with the recommendations and
requirements of the licensing agency.

B. Notice of Serious Deficiency, Suspension and Proposed Termination
Procedures for DCHs
Once a health or safety threat has been established, the sponsoring organization must notify the
DCH, in writing, that he or she has been suspended from Program participation, that he or she
has been determined seriously deficient and that the sponsoring organization is proposing to
terminate the DCH’s agreement for cause.
The notice must state:
•

The serious deficiencies found;

•

That the DCH may only appeal the proposed termination;

•

That participation, including all Program payments, is suspended until the appeal is
concluded;

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 56

•

That if the hearing official overturns the proposed
termination and disqualification, the DCH may claim
reimbursement for eligible meals served during the
suspension;

•

That termination from the Program will result in the
DCH being placed on the NDL;

•

That the DCH’s voluntary termination of its agreement
with the sponsoring organization after receiving the notification will still result in the
DCH’s formal termination by the sponsoring organization and placement on the NDL;
and

•

The sponsoring organization’s appeals procedures [7 CFR 226.16(l)(4)(ii)(A)–(E)].

The appeal is of the proposed
termination and disqualification.
A suspension for imminent threat
to health and safety cannot be
appealed.

Refer to Prototype Letter 22: Notice of Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Proposed
Termination and Disqualification for Providers - Combined Notice for imminent Threat to
Health and Safety. A copy of the letter must be sent to the State agency at the same time it is
sent to the provider.

C. Agreement Termination and Disqualification of a DCH
The sponsoring organization will immediately terminate the DCH’s agreement and disqualify the
DCH when the hearing official upholds the sponsoring organization’s suspension, proposed
termination, and proposed disqualification. At the same time, the notice of termination and
disqualification is issued to the DCH [7 CFR 226.16(l)(4)(iii)].
The notice must state:
•

That the DCH has been terminated from the Program; and

•

That the DCH will be added to the NDL.

If the DCH provider does not request an appeal, the sponsoring organization will immediately
terminate the DCH provider’s agreement and disqualify the DCH provider when the opportunity
to request the appeal expires. At the same time, the notice of termination and disqualification is
issued to the DCH provider.
Refer to Prototype Letter 23: Notice of Termination and Disqualification – Suspension,
and Proposed Termination and Disqualification - Provider does not appeal. A copy of the
letter must be sent to the State agency at the same time it is sent to the provider.
If the DCH provider requests an appeal and subsequently loses that appeal, the sponsoring
organization will immediately terminate the DCH provider’s agreement and disqualify the DCH
provider when the decision of the appeal official is issued. At that time, the notice of termination
and disqualification is issued to the DCH provider.
Refer to Prototype Letter 24: Notice of Termination and Disqualification - Imminent threat
to health or safety after sponsoring organization prevails in appeal. A copy of the letter
must be sent to the State agency at the same time it is sent to the provider.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 57

The State agency will report the name of the terminated and disqualified DCH provider to the
FNS Regional Office within 10 days of receipt from the sponsoring organization after the DCH
provider has been terminated for cause, placing his or her name on the NDL. In reporting the
name of the DCH provider to the FNS Regional Office, the State agency will follow the
instructions outlined in Part 10 of this guidance.
If the DCH requests an appeal and the hearing official overturns the sponsoring organization’s
action to suspend the DCH, the sponsoring organization must temporarily defer the serious
deficiency and withdraw the suspension.
Refer to Prototype Letter 25: Notice of Temporary Deferment of Serious Deficiency,
Suspension, Proposed Termination and Proposed Disqualification after provider prevails
in appeal). A copy of the letter must be sent to the State agency at the same time it is sent to
the provider.

D. Program Payments during the Suspension of a DCH
A sponsoring organization is prohibited from making any Program payments to a DCH that has
been suspended until any appeal of the proposed termination is completed. If the suspended
DCH prevails in the appeal of the proposed termination, the sponsoring organization must
reimburse the DCH for all eligible meals served during the suspension period that are properly
documented [7 CFR 226.16(l)(4)(iv)]. If the provider loses the appeal, payments are not to be
made to the provider.

E. Questions & Answers
1. May a sponsoring organization suspend payment to a provider that submits false or
fraudulent claims?
Program regulations only provide for the suspension of payments to providers when a
provider has engaged in conduct that poses an imminent threat to the health or safety of
participants or the public. However, neither a State agency nor a sponsoring organization
may pay any portion of an invalid claim.
2. Doesn’t the prohibition on paying “invalid claims” to an institution or provider
amount to a suspension of payments?
Suspension involves a total end of Program payments until a hearing official has ruled on a
DCH’s appeal, or until the DCH fails to request an appeal prior to the regulatory deadline.
The prohibition on paying invalid claims means that a State agency or sponsoring
organization must not reimburse the DCH for that portion of a claim that the State agency or
sponsoring organization knows to be invalid.
3. What is the process for suspending a DCH whose license has been revoked? The
DCH no longer meets eligibility requirements, so why would the sponsoring
organization follow the serious deficiency process? What happens if the DCH license
is reinstated?
The CACFP regulation at 7 CFR 226.16(l)(4) requires the sponsoring organization to
suspend the DCH’s participation and payments, and propose to terminate its participation if

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 58

the license is revoked for imminent threat or safety reasons. There is no opportunity to
correct a serious deficiency based on imminent threat or safety reasons.

A sponsoring organization may not make payments to a day care has been suspended until
an administrative review of the proposed termination is completed. If the suspended day
care home prevails in the administrative review of the proposed termination, the sponsoring
organization must reimburse the day care home for eligible meals served during the
suspension period.
.
EXAMPLE: A provider is remodeling the entryway of the DCH and there are
exposed wires in areas where the children play. The area is not sufficiently
blocked off from the children for the days the area is being remodeled. The
licensing official reviews the DCH during this time and notices that the children
are playing with the builder’s tools near the exposed wires while relatively
unsupervised since the provider is preparing lunch. The licensing official
immediately revokes the license pending correction, citing imminent threat to the
health and safety of the children.
Upon learning of the license being revoked, the sponsoring organization would
immediately suspend the DCH’s participation, declare it seriously deficient and
(imminent threat to the health and safety) propose termination and
disqualification.
If the provider either completes the remodeling of that area or establishes a nonmovable barrier that children cannot get through and licensing activates the
provider’s license, the sponsoring organization must continue with the proposed
termination and disqualification. The provider may appeal and present
documentation that the problem has been resolved and the license has been
reinstated. If the provider prevails, the proposed termination and disqualification
would be vacated and the provider would be allowed to resume participation in
the Program. However, the provider will be reimbursed for any meals served
during the time of the suspension [226.26(k)(4)(iv)].
The sponsoring organization shall require the provider to state how he/she will
prevent this from recurring.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 59

PART 6. Suspension Process for Unaffiliated Centers
This Section was intentionally left blank. Information regarding the suspension process for
unaffiliated centers will be added when the Final Rule implementing these requirements is
published.

PART 7. Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures for Institutions
in the Serious Deficiency Process
This section provides information on the administrative review procedures for institutions. State
agencies must develop procedures consistent with CACFP regulations for providing
administrative reviews, more commonly referred to as “appeals,” to institutions and RP/Is.
Appeal procedures for DCHs are covered in Part 8 of this guidance.

A. Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures
Program regulations provide specific guidance regarding those actions a State agency may take
that are subject to appeal, and those that are not, as well as the procedures that must be
followed in providing institutions and RP/Is notice of their appeal rights [7 CFR 226.6(k)]. These
actions are listed in Section B of this Part.
Except for circumstances under which an abbreviated appeal is held, the State agency must
develop an appeals process that adheres to the following procedures when an institution or RP/I
requests a review of any action subject to appeal. It is important that the hearing official fully
understands the nature of the appeal procedures specific to the CACFP.
It is not the purpose of the hearing to determine
whether to uphold duly promulgated Federal and State
Program requirements. The purpose of the hearing is
limited to a determination as to whether the State
agency acted in accordance with Program
requirements in taking the actions being appealed.
The hearing official’s decisions should be limited to
that purpose.

Best Practice
State agencies are encouraged
to invite hearing officials to the
State’s annual training for
institutions. This allows hearing
officials to better understand
Program requirements and the
specific information being
provided to Program participants.

While it is possible to provide some guidance in the
context of a hearing (for example in the State’s
opening remarks), it is advisable that the State agency provide information and Program
orientation to the hearing official, annually or more frequently, to ensure they understand the
purpose, scope, and limitations of the appeal procedures.
Below are the procedures that each State agency must follow for all appeals received from
institutions or RP/Is.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 60

Notice of Action
The institution, its executive director, chairman of the board of directors and the RP/Is must be
given notice of:
•

The action being taken or proposed (see appealable actions in Part B of this Section);

What Constitutes Notice?
Notice means a letter sent by certified mail, return receipt (or the equivalent private
delivery service), by fax, or by email, that describes an action proposed or taken by the
State agency with regard to an institution’s, responsible principal’s, or responsible
individual’s Program participation [7 CFR 226.2].
A notice is considered received by the institution or responsible principal or responsible
individual five days after being sent to the addressee’s last known mailing address, fax
number, or email address. Any timeframes associated with a given notice start with the
earliest form of transmission.
It is a best practice to get proof of the delivery of the notice.
•

The basis for the action; and

•

The procedures under which the institution and the RP/Is may request an appeal of the
action [7 CFR 226.6(k)(5)(i)].
Note: Any reference in this Guidance to the “number of days” always means calendar days.
The institution, its executive director, chairman of the board, and any additional RP/Is identified
as responsible for the serious deficiencies may appeal the State agency’s actions together or
individually. In addition to the notice of action provided to the executive director and chairman of
the board of directors on behalf of the institution, each principal and individual identified as
responsible for the serious deficiencies must be notified independently. When the institution and
RP/Is choose to appeal independently, the State agency may request that the hearings be
consolidated; however, that decision rests with the hearing official.
Time to Request an Administrative Review
An appeal must be requested in writing by an institution and/or its RP/Is no later than 15 days
after the date the State agency’s notice of action is received. Upon receipt of a request for a
hearing, the State agency must acknowledge receipt of the request within 10 days [7 CFR
226.6(k)(5)(ii)]. If the State Agency’s appeal procedures direct the appellant to send the request
to the hearing official, then the procedures must identify which office will be responsible for
acknowledging the appellant’s request.
Representation
The institution and the RP/Is may represent themselves, retain legal counsel, or may be
represented by another person [7 CFR 226.6(k)(5)(iii)].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 61

Review of Record
Any information upon which the State agency based its action must be available to the
institution and the RP/Is for inspection from the date of receipt of the request for an appeal
[7 CFR 226.6(k)(5)(iv)]. The Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification should
provide, in detail with applicable attachments, all information upon which the State agency
based its action. However, the State may provide this information again to the institution and the
RP/Is.

Opposition
The institution and the RP/Is may refute the findings contained in the notice of action in person
or by submitting written documentation to the hearing official. Remember that, in order to be
considered, all parties, including the State agency, must submit any written documentation to
the hearing official not later than 30 days after receipt of the notice of action. This means that
all documentation must be submitted PRIOR to the beginning of the hearing. This
documentation is the official written basis for the proposed action and the hearing official should
respond to any requests for copies, not the State agency. Once the hearing begins, no further
documentation may be submitted by either party.
Hearing
The institution and/or RP/I may request that the appeal consist of only a review of written
materials, an in person hearing, or a combination of both. A hearing must be held by the hearing
official if one is requested by the institution and/or RP/I in a written request.
If the institution’s representative, the RP/Is, or their representative, fail to appear at a scheduled
hearing, they waive the right to an in-person hearing, unless the hearing official agrees to
reschedule the hearing. A representative of the State agency must be allowed to attend the
hearing to respond to the testimony of the institution and the RP/Is and to answer questions
posed by the hearing official. If a hearing is requested, the institution, the RP/Is, and the State
agency must be provided at least 10 days advance notice of the time and place of the hearing.
A rescheduled hearing must still be held in time to render a decision within 60 days of the
original request for an appeal [7 CFR 226.6(k)(5)].
Administrative Review (Hearing) Official
The hearing official must be independent and impartial. This means that, although the hearing
official may be an employee of the State agency, he or she must not have been involved in the
action that is the subject of the appeal, or have a direct personal or financial interest in the
outcome of the appeal.
If the hearing official is an employee of the State agency, he or she may not occupy a position in
which he or she is potentially subject to undue influence from the individual responsible for the
State agency’s action. Nor should the official occupy a position in which he or she may exercise
undue influence on the individual responsible for the action.
The institution and the RP/Is must be permitted to contact the hearing official directly if they so
desire [7 CFR 226.6(k)(5)(vi)].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 62

Basis for Decision
The hearing official must make a determination based solely on the information provided by the
State agency, the institution and the RP/Is, and in Federal and State laws, regulations, policies,
and procedures governing the Program [7 CFR 226.6(k)(5)(viii)].
Time for Issuing a Decision
Within 60 days of the State agency’s receipt of the request for an appeal, the hearing official
must inform the State agency, the institution’s executive director and chairman of the board of
directors, and the RP/Is, of the appeal’s outcome.
This timeframe is a Program requirement for the State agency and cannot be used as a basis
for overturning the State agency’s action if a decision is not made within the specified
timeframe.
As noted above, an institution and/or its RP/Is failure to appear at a scheduled hearing
constitutes a waiver of their right to a personal appearance, unless the hearing official agrees to
reschedule the hearing. However, the 60-day deadline for informing parties to the appeal of the
outcome remains in place. Therefore, should the hearing official agree to reschedule the
hearing, the timing of the rescheduled hearing must allow sufficient time to report the outcome
of the hearing within 60 days of the State agency’s receipt of the request for an appeal [7 CFR
226.6(k)(5)(ix)].
Final Decision
The determination made by the hearing official is the final administrative determination to be
afforded the institution and the RP/Is [7 CFR 226.6(k)(5)(x)].

B. Actions Subject to Administrative Review (Appeal)
The State agency must offer institutions and RP/Is the opportunity to appeal the following
actions:
•

Denial of a new institution’s application for participation, or a participating institution at
renewal.
If a new institution’s application or an application renewal does not meet all of the
requirements for the approval of applications and the execution of agreements, the State
agency must deny the application and provide appeal procedures in accordance with
Program regulations.

•

Denial of an application submitted by a sponsoring organization on behalf of a facility.
If the State agency determines that a facility does not meet Program eligibility
requirements, the State must notify the institution that the application is denied and
provide the institution an opportunity to appeal the State agency’s determination.

•

Proposed termination of an institution’s agreement.
If an institution that has been declared seriously deficient in its administration of the
CACFP demonstrates that it is unwilling or unable to take appropriate corrective actions,

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 63

the State agency must notify the institution that it proposes to terminate and disqualify
the institution. Although a State agency’s determination that an institution is seriously
deficient is not subject to appeal, the notice of proposed termination and disqualification
is subject to appeal, and the State agency appeal procedures must be provided with the
notice.
•

Notice of Proposed disqualification of an RP/I.
In addition to notifying an institution of its proposed termination and disqualification, the
State agency must notify the institution’s executive director, chairman of the board of
directors, and any RP/Is that the State agency proposes to disqualify them from future
participation in the Program. The State’s determination that specific principals and
individuals are responsible for the institution’s serious deficiency is not subject to appeal;
however, the State’s proposed disqualification of RP/Is is subject to appeal.

•

Suspension of an institution’s participation.
If the State agency has determined that the institution has engaged in unlawful acts with
regard to the administration of the Program, such as the submission of false information,
or is operating in such a manner as to pose an imminent threat to the health and/or
safety of Program participants or the public, the State agency must propose to suspend
the institution’s participation, including Program payments, and propose to terminate and
disqualify the institution and RP/Is. The State agency’s decision to suspend an
institution’s participation is subject to an appeal separate and apart from any appeal to
which the institution is entitled in response to the proposed termination and
disqualification. The suspension process for institutions is covered in Part 4 of this
guidance.

•

Denial of an institution’s application for start-up or expansion payments.
If the State agency determines that an institution is not eligible to receive start-up or
expansion payments or that the institution’s request has not demonstrated that the
proposed costs are reasonable and necessary, the State agency must deny the
institution’s application. This denial is subject to appeal.

•

Denial by the State agency of an institution’s request for
an advance payment.
If the State agency offers advance payments, institutions
may appeal a determination by the State agency that is
ineligible to receive advance payments, or that the amount
of advance payments requested is excessive.

•

Recovery of all or part of an advance payment in excess of
the claim for the applicable period through a demand for
full repayment or an adjustment of subsequent payments.

Advances
The State agency
has the authority
to determine
whether or not
advances will be
offered.

If a State agency offers advance payments, institutions may also appeal a decision by
the State agency to recover all or part of an advance if the claim covering the applicable
period does not cover the advance amount, regardless of the manner by which the
demand for recovery is made, e.g. through a demand for full repayment or an
adjustment of subsequent payments.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 64

•

Denial of all or a part of an institution’s claim for reimbursement.
The State agency may deny all or part of an institution’s claim if the State agency has
reason to believe that an institution, one of its facilities, or its food service management
company has engaged in unlawful acts with respect to Program operations, evidence
found in audits, investigations, or other reviews provide the basis for non-payment of all
or part of an institution’s claim for reimbursement.

•

A decision by the State agency not to forward to FNS an exception request by an
institution for payment of a late claim or a request for an upward adjustment to a claim.
The denial of a claim based on a late submission is not subject to appeal. A decision by
Late Claims
In an institution’s reason for submitting a claim after the deadline is not, in the
State’s determination, justifiable, it is appropriate for the State agency to deny the
claim and choose not to forward the claim to FNS. Only those instances that the
institution appropriately justifies and that State agency can support paying late
should be forwarded to the FNS Regional Office
the State agency not to forward an exception request to FNS for a late claim payment, or
for an upward adjustment of a claim, is subject to appeal. Conversely, a denial by FNS
to pay a late claim is not subject to appeal.

•

•

A demand by the State agency for the remittance of an overpayment.
If the State agency determines that an institution has received more money in
reimbursements than what they can account for,
Practice Tip
the State agency must recover the unearned
funds. The demand for repayment is subject to
State agencies or
appeal. If an institution believes that the
sponsoring organizations
repayment demand has not been calculated
may choose to offer DCH
correctly, they must provide documentation of
providers the opportunity to
this to the hearing official for review.
appeal additional adverse
actions, such as disallowed
Any other action of the State agency affecting
meals. However, if they do
an institution’s participation or its claim for
so, these appeals must
reimbursement, except as noted in Program
follow the same appeal
regulations.
procedures as the required
appeal and FNS Regional
The State agency may take other actions
Office approval must be
affecting an institution’s participation or its claim
obtained first [CACFP 05for reimbursement which are subject to appeal.
2007 Additional State
For example, limitations imposed on the number
Agency Requirements, May
of facilities an institution may sponsor; or
9, 2007].
determinations regarding whether specific costs
included in the institutions budget represent
allowable Program expenses [7 CFR
226.6(k)(2)(i)–(xii)].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 65

When these appealable actions are taken against an institution on the basis of a Federal review
or audit, the State agency may choose to offer Federal appeal procedures for a Federal hearing
rather than a State hearing.

C. Actions Not Subject to Administrative Reviews (Appeal)
The State agency is prohibited from offering appeals for any of the following actions.
•

A decision by FNS to deny an exception request by an institution for payment of a late
claim, or for an upward adjustment to a claim is not subject to appeal.
A decision by the State agency not to forward the request to FNS is subject to appeal.

•

A determination that an institution is seriously deficient.
A State agency’s proposal to terminate an institution’s agreement and to disqualify its
RP/Is is subject to appeal; however, the State agency’s determination that an institution
and its RP/Is are seriously deficient in the administration of the Program is not subject to
appeal.

•

Disqualification and placement on State agency list and NDL.
While institution and RP/Is must be given the opportunity to appeal the State agency’s
proposal to disqualify them, the resulting disqualification and placement on the State
agency list and the NDL is not subject to appeal.

•

Termination of a participating institution’s agreement, including termination of a
participating institution’s agreement based on the disqualification of the institution by
another State agency or FNS.
The termination of an institution’s agreement is not subject to appeal because the
institution is afforded the opportunity to appeal to a different State agency’s proposal to
terminate the institution’s agreement.

•

A determination, by either the State agency or by FNS, that the corrective action taken
by an institution or a RP/I is not adequate to warrant the removal of the institution or the
RP/I from the NDL is not subject to appeal.
An institution and/or its RP/Is may request removal from the NDL based upon a CAP
intended to address the organization’s serious deficiencies. While the State agency must
consider the request, a determination that a previously disqualified institution or its RP/Is
has failed to provide sufficient documentation to support a recommendation to remove
them from the NDL is not subject to appeal. Should the State agency agree to submit the
request to the FNS Regional Office for consideration, (based on a justification that the
State agency determines is supportable) a decision by FNS that removal from the NDL
is not warranted is also not subject to appeal [7 CFR 226.6(k)(3)(i)–(vi)].

Exception: Actions Not Subject to Administrative Review (Appeal), but Subject to an
Abbreviated Hearing
•

The State agency’s refusal to consider an institution’s application when either the
institution or one of its RP/Is is on the NDL, or the State agency’s refusal to consider an

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 66

institution’s submission of an application on behalf of a facility when either the facility or
one of its RP/Is is on the NDL are subject to an abbreviated hearing.
The State agency must provide an applicant institution and/or its RP/Is the opportunity
for an abbreviated hearing to demonstrate that they are not the institution or individuals
included on the NDL. Once it has been determined that the named institution or RP/I is
on the NDL, the State agency is prohibited from providing them a full appeal [7 CFR
226.6(k)(3)(vii)].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 67

D. Providing the Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures to Institutions
The State agency’s appeal procedures must be provided:
•

Annually to all institutions - if a State agency’s own handbook and or operational manual
contains its appeal procedures, the State agency must still initiate an annual
announcement which could be an email alerting institutions where to locate the
procedures;

•

To an institution and to each RP/I when the State agency takes any action subject to an
appeal as described in section B of this Part; and

•

Any other time upon request [7 CFR 226.6(k)(4)(i)–(iii)].

E. Abbreviated Administrative Review
An abbreviated review is limited to a review of written submissions by the appellant and may not
include an in-person hearing. There are two State agency actions that if appealed, result in an
abbreviated review:
1. The State agency’s proposal to terminate an institution’s agreement because of the
submission of specific false or disqualifying information on its application; or
2. The accuracy of the State agency’s determination to deny an application based on an
institution and/or an individual being disqualified
If a State agency finds that the following has been submitted by a new institution or a
participating institution upon renewal of its application, it must deny the application and offer the
institution and RP/Is an abbreviated review:
•

The information submitted on the application is false;

•

The institution, one of its sponsored facilities, or one of its principals is on the NDL;

•

The institution, one of its sponsored facilities, or one of its principals has been declared
to be ineligible for another publicly funded Program during the prior seven years; or

•

The institution, one of its sponsored facilities, or one of its principals has been convicted
of an activity in the past seven years that indicated a lack of business integrity [7 CFR
226.6(k)(9)].
In each of these cases, the institution or the principals will have already had an
opportunity to refute the charge (i.e., the action that led to the placement on the NDL, the
ineligibility determination for the other public Program, or the criminal conviction). Since
these issues will have been fully reviewed by the appropriate authority, the institution
and RP/Is are not entitled to a second appeal. There is no benefit to be derived from
requiring a ‘‘full’’ appeal in cases in which the only issue will be whether or not the
affected party is really the same party that appears on the NDL, was declared ineligible
for another publicly funded Program, or was convicted.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 68

F. Program Payments during the Administrative Review (Appeal) Process
If an appeal is requested, the State agency must continue to pay any valid claims for
reimbursement for eligible meals served and allowable administrative expenses incurred until a
decision has been rendered for participating institutions, unless the institution has been
suspended from participation based on health or safety violations or false or fraudulent claims
[7 CFR 226.6(c)(1)(iii)(D); (c)(2)(iii)(D); (c)(3)(iii)(D); (c)(5)(i); (c)(5)(ii) respectively; and CACFP
Policy Termination of Program Payment Procedures, October 17, 2000].

G. Question and Answer
1. What is the definition of “submission date” for determining whether the institution’s
request for an appeal has been submitted in time?
The regulations indicate ‘the first day after receipt’ by the institution. The State agency may
further define its process based on the regulatory requirement that it be “submitted within 15
days.” FNS has recommended sending all notices via certified mail or other process that
defines the day/time the notice is delivered and accepted.
If the notice has been determined ‘undeliverable,’ then the State agency should resume its
termination process 5 days after the date of the notice.
2. Once a serious deficiency notice is issued, the only way for the process to end is
through successful corrective action or a termination and disqualification of the
institution. What if the State agency decides on its own to withdraw the serious
deficiency notice while the appeal is pending?
If a State agency discovers that it has erred in part of the process; e.g., key information was
accidentally omitted from the serious deficiency notice, a corrected notice may be issued.
If, after a notice of proposal to terminate and disqualify has been issued, the institution
presents documented evidence that it has fully and permanently corrected the serious
deficiency, the State agency may [but is not required to] accept the corrective action and
temporarily defer the serious deficiency, through proper notice.
Once the hearing has been held, neither party may withdraw, but must accept the official’s
decision.
3. May an institution appeal a finding that requires fiscal action or an overclaim?
Yes. If the State agency disallows partial or full payment of a claim, it shall notify the
institution of its right to appeal. State agencies may permit disallowances to be appealed
separately from claims for reimbursement [7 CFR 226.7(k)].
4. When an institution’s debt goes to the State’s collections office, will the collection
action be appealable?
No. The appeal opportunity will already have been given with the CACFP State agency’s
fiscal action and overclaim notice. Program regulations state that if, after 60 calendar days,
the institution fails to remit the full payment or agree to a satisfactory repayment schedule,

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 69

the State agency shall refer the claim against the institution to appropriate State or Federal
authorities for pursuit of legal remedies [7 CFR 226.14(a)(1)].
5. Can the hearing official require the State agency to first send its documentation to the
institution before sending it to the hearing official?
No. This additional step is not included in the regulatory procedures and would therefore,
be unallowable. All parties, including the State agency, must submit any written
documentation to the hearing official not later than 30 days after receipt of the notice of
action.
6. Are there opportunities after the appeal hearing for an institution to have its case
heard?
No. The decision of the hearing official is the final administrative recourse offered by the
Program. There are no further appeal options offered by the Program. The institution would
have to file a court case in order to appeal further.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 70

PART 8. Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures for Day Care
Home Providers
This section provides information on the appeal procedures for DCHs. When a sponsoring
organization proposes to terminate its Program agreement with a DCH for cause, the DCH must
be provided an opportunity for an appeal of the proposed termination. The State agency may do
this either by choosing to offer a State-level appeal, or by requiring sponsoring organizations to
offer appeals. The State agency’s choice with regard to who offers the appeal must apply to all
DCHs in that State.
After the State agency has made its choice to offer State-level appeals or to require sponsoring
organizations to offer them, the State agency must notify the appropriate FNS Regional Office
within 30 days of any subsequent change under this option. The State agency or the sponsoring
organization (subject to State agency approval) must develop procedures for offering and
providing DCH appeals according to the procedures described below.

A. Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures for DCHs
The State agency or sponsoring organization, as applicable, must follow the procedures
described below when a DCH requests an appeal.
•

Uniformity. The same procedures must apply to all DCHs.

•

Representation. The DCH may represent him or herself, retain legal counsel, or may be
represented by another person.

•

Review of record and opposition. The DCH may review the record on which the
sponsoring organization’s decision was based and refute the action in writing. The
hearing official is not required to hold an in-person hearing.

•

Administrative review official. The hearing official must be independent and impartial.
This means that, although the hearing official may be an employee of the State agency
or an employee or board member of the sponsoring organization, he or she must not
have been involved in the action that is the subject of the appeal or have a direct
personal or financial interest in the outcome of the appeal.
If the hearing official is an employee of the sponsor, he or she may not occupy a position
in which he or she is potentially subject to undue influence from the individual
responsible for the sponsoring organization’s action, nor may he or she occupy a
position in which he or she may exercise undue influence on the individual responsible
for the action.
The provider must be permitted to contact the hearing official directly if he or she so
desires.

•

Basis for decision. The hearing official must make a determination based solely on the
information provided by the sponsoring organization and the DCH, and on Federal and
State laws, regulations, polices, and procedures governing the Program.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 71

•

Time for issuing a decision. The hearing official must inform the sponsoring organization
and the DCH of the appeal’s outcome within the period of time specified in the State
agency’s or sponsoring organization’s appeals procedures. This timeframe is an
administrative requirement for the State agency or sponsoring organization, and may not
be used as a basis for overturning a termination if a decision is not made within the
specified timeframe.

•

Final decision. The determination made by the hearing official is the final administrative
determination to be afforded the DCH [7 CFR 226.6(l)].

B. Actions Subject to Administrative Review (Appeal) - DCH
The State agency or sponsoring organization is required to offer an appeal to a DCH for only a
notice of proposed termination or suspension [7 CFR 226.6(l)(2)].

C. Actions Not Subject to Administrative Review (Appeal) - DCH
Neither the State agency nor the sponsoring organization is required to offer an appeal for
reasons other than the proposed termination of a DCH [7 CFR 226.6(l)(3)].

D. Providing Administrative Review (Appeal) Procedures to DCHs
The appeal procedures must be provided to DCHs as follows:
•

Annually to all DCHs (if these are in a sponsor’s handbook for providers or operational
manual, the sponsoring organization will still need to, annually, provide a written notice
of where to find the procedures);

•

Whenever the State agency or sponsoring organization takes any action subject to
appeal; and

•

At any other time upon request [7 CFR 226.6(l)(4)].

E. Program Payments during the Administrative Review Process
for DCHs
If an appeal is requested, the sponsoring organization must continue to pay any valid claims for
reimbursement for eligible meals served until a decision has been rendered, unless the DCH
provider has been suspended from participation based on health or safety violations [7 CFR
226.16(l)(3)(iv), and CACFP Policy Termination of Program Payment Procedures, October 17,
2000].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 72

F. Questions & Answers
1.

In my State, different types of facilities are designated as DCH providers; such as,
group, registered, or licensed. Can the State agency or sponsoring organization
establish different requirements according to the type of facility?
Appeal procedures developed or approved by the State agency must apply to all DCHs
within the sponsorship.

2.

If a DCH provider loses an appeal conducted by the sponsoring organization, can the
DCH provider then request that the State agency review or reconsider the decision?
The determination made by the hearing official is the final administrative decision. No
additional appeal hearing may be requested or provided [7 CFR 266.6(l)(5)(vi)].

3.

If a DCH provider requests an opportunity to present its appeal in person at a
hearing, must the State agency or sponsoring organization permit it?
Sponsoring organizations must offer DCH providers the opportunity to have their appeals
determined on the basis of the written record. However, if an in-person hearing is offered to
one provider, it must be available to all DCH providers. This can be accomplished in a
variety of ways, such as holding the hearing via teleconference, to expedite the process and
reduce the burden on all parties.

4.

May a sponsoring organization suspend the payments to a DCH until a determination
has been made on the DCH’s appeal?
The only reason a sponsoring organization may suspend the participation of, and payments
to, a DCH provider is if there is an imminent threat to the health and/or safety of a child in
care or the public.

5.

May a DCH appeal a decision by a sponsoring organization to not sponsor its
participation in the CACFP?
Although the proposed termination of a participating DCH provider’s agreement to
participate in the CACFP for cause is subject to appeal, denial of an applicant’s request to
be sponsored is not.

6.

If a DCH decides to withdraw from the Program before its appeal is heard, may the
State agency or sponsoring organization just cancel the appeal?
Once a determination has been made that a DCH provider has been declared seriously
deficient, State agencies or sponsoring organizations must continue with the serious
deficiency process, including with the appeal, if requested. If the DCH provider chooses not
to participate in the appeal, the hearing official must make his or her decision based on all
evidence provided and render a decision.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 73

PART 9. Administrative Review (Appeals) Procedures for
Unaffiliated Centers
This Section was intentionally left blank. Information regarding administrative review procedures
for unaffiliated centers will be added after the Final Rule implementing these provisions is
published.

PART 10. State Agency List and National Disqualified List
A. Maintenance of the State Agency List
The State agency list means an actual paper or electronic list, or the retrievable paper records,
maintained by the State agency, that includes a synopsis of information concerning seriously
deficient institutions and providers terminated for cause in that State [7 CFR 226.2].

B. The Purpose of the State Agency List
The purpose of the State agency list is twofold. First, a State-level list is useful for analytic
purposes. Although the NDL provides a complete picture of all institutions, individuals, and DCH
providers that have been disqualified and are ineligible for Program participation, the NDL does
not capture a great deal of additional information that is necessary for State agencies and FNS
to assess the effectiveness of the serious deficiency process.
EXAMPLE: Many institutions, DCH providers and RP/Is will be declared seriously
deficient but will never appear on the NDL. This is because either they successfully
completed corrective action or a hearing official overturned the State agency’s or
sponsoring organization’s proposed termination of the Program agreement.
In order to properly assess Program management and integrity, it is critical for the State agency
and FNS to have information about the number of institutions declared seriously deficient which
are never placed on the NDL, as well as the ways in which serious deficiencies were ultimately
resolved short of termination. Information on DCHs may also be maintained. The State agency
list will capture information about the ultimate disposition of each case in which an institution
was declared seriously deficient. The list will provide State agencies with an effective internal
management device that shows State staff, at a glance, the relevant deadlines for issuing
notices throughout the serious deficiency process, for tracking an institution’s progress in
correcting each serious deficiency, and for tracking sponsoring organizations in their
management of the serious deficiency process.
The State agency list should provide State agency staff working with a particular institution on
its serious deficiencies with a readily available chart of the institution’s progress towards
resolving each serious deficiency, if the deadline for corrective action had passed, and the
deadlines for and/or status of its appeal.
Second, FNS must be able to quantify the results of State agency and sponsoring
organization’s actions in order to assess the frequency with which certain actions are being

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 74

taken, as well as determining National and/or State-specific trends. The NDL only captures
information about institutions, individuals, and DCHs that have been terminated and/or
disqualified. Information about other institutions, individuals, and DCHs that are in the midst of
the serious deficiency process, but not yet disqualified, is available on the State agency list.
State agencies must also be able to have data that will allow them to assess their own
implementation of the serious deficiency process, identify any changes needed in its processes
and procedures and identify trends and training needs for State agency or institution staff.

C. Required Information for the State Agency List
The list must be made available to FNS upon request, and must include the following
information:
•

Institutions determined to be seriously deficient by the State agency, including the
names and mailing addresses of the institutions, the basis for each serious deficiency
determination, and the status of the institutions as they move through the subsequent
stages of corrective action, proposed termination, suspension, agreement termination,
and/or disqualification, as applicable;

•

RP/Is who have been disqualified from participation by the State agency, including their
names, mailing addresses, and dates of birth; and

•

DCH providers whose agreements have been terminated for cause by a sponsoring
organization in the State, including their names, mailing addresses, and dates of birth
[7CFR 226.6(c)(8)(i)(A)–(C)].

D. Placement on the National Disqualified List
Program regulations require that disqualified and
terminated institutions, RP/Is, and DCH providers be
placed on the NDL. Whenever a State agency determines
that an institution is seriously deficient, the State agency
must also determine who is responsible for the serious
deficiency. These individuals may be principals of the
institution or they may have some other relationship to the
institution.

RP/Is
An institution can never be
seriously deficient without
some improper action by
RP/Is. An individual or
individuals are always
responsible for the
institution or facility failing to
comply with regulatory
requirements.

Program regulations define a “principal” as anyone in the
institution who is: A manager, officer, or board member.
Principals could also include the owner of a for-profit
organization or the supervisor of the director of an
institution operated by a public entity. Not all principals are
considered to be “responsible principals”. A responsible individual is any non-principal
associated with the institution’s operation of the Program who bears responsibility for a serious
deficiency [7 CFR 226.6(c)(7) and CACFP 14-2012 Child and Adult Care Food Program
Guidance on the Serious Deficiency Process and Acceptable Corrective Action Plans, National
Disqualified List Procedures and Debt Collection, May 1 2012].
NDL submission requests sent from an FNS Regional Office to the FNS National Office must
contain all required information as indicated in the “Institutions/RP/Is” and “Day Care Home
Providers” section below. If a State agency does not submit all of the required information with

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 75

its notification of a disqualification, the FNS Regional Office will contact the State agency to
obtain the missing information before forwarding the submission to the FNS National Office. If a
required piece of information is not available, the State agency should include an explanation of
why the missing information is unobtainable. Incomplete information that does not have an
explanation for the missing data will be returned to the State agency for completion. The
following information is required when submitting information to FNS for inclusion on the NDL.
For Institutions and RP/Is
•

Name and address of the institution (including city, State, and zip code);

•

Any known aliases;

•

Termination date;

•

Amount of debt owed, if any, noting the RP/I;

•

Reason(s) for the disqualification (if other is checked, an explanation must be included);

•

RP/I’s full name;

•

Any know aliases;

•

RP/I’s address (with city, State, and zip code);

•

RP/I’s date of birth; and

•

RP/I’s position in the institution.

For DCH Providers
•

Name(s) of the provider;

•

Any known aliases;

•

Address (including city, State and zip code);

•

Date of birth;

•

Termination date;

•

Amount of debt owed, if any;

•

Name and address of the individual’s sponsor; and

•

Reason(s) for the disqualification (if other is checked, an explanation must be included).

E. Removal from the National Disqualified List
CACFP regulations require that a disqualified institution, RP/I, or provider remain on the NDL
unless it is determined that the serious deficiencies have been corrected, for seven years or

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 76

until any outstanding debt is repaid, whichever is longer. When both the seven years have
elapsed and the debt repaid, the institution, RP/I, or provider will be removed from the NDL.

F. Early Removal from the National Disqualified List – Documented Corrective
Action and Debt Payment
Institutions and RP/Is may submit corrective action, pay off any debts owed (including any
interest), and submit a request to the State agency for early removal from the NDL. The burden
for documenting that the corrective action has been accomplished lies with the institution or the
individual. If the State agency approves the removal, the information must then be submitted to
the FNS Regional Office for approval.
An individual who wishes to assume a position related to the CACFP and learns that his or her
name is on the NDL always has the right to request removal from the list which would
necessitate submission of an acceptable CAP.
DCHs may submit corrective action, pay off any debts owed (including any interest), and submit
a request to the State agency for early removal from the NDL. If the State agency approves the
removal, the information must then be submitted to the
FNS Regional Office for removal. If the FNS Regional
Program Debts
Office and the State agency approve the submitted
information, the information will be sent to FNS for early
Institutions, RP/Is, and providers
removal from the NDL [7 CFR 226.6(c)(7)(v) for
that fail to repay debts owed
institutions, (vi) for DCHs].
under the Program will remain on
the NDL unless it is determined
While the State agency must determine whether an
that the serious deficiencies have
institution, RP/I, or provider has successfully completed
been corrected, until the debt has
corrective action, the burden for documenting that it is
been paid in full, including
fully capable of operating the Program and comply with
interest.
all requirements lies with the institution, RP/I, or the
provider. The State agency or sponsoring organization
may wish to make an onsite visit soon after the
institution, RP/I, or provider has been reinstated to verify that corrective action has actually been
implemented.
Being on the NDL means that the institution, RP/I, or DCH failed to take successful corrective
action at least once and has already been given due process. Since there is no statutory or
regulatory requirement for a State agency to expedite the processing of these requests, the
State agency may handle these requests in their normal course of business. The State agency’s
procedures for removal from the NDL must be written and consistently applied. See the
headings below for the procedures that institutions, RP/Is, and DCH providers must follow to be
removed from the NDL.
The effective date of NDL removals will be the date on which the FNS National Office processes
the removal request. The FNS Regional Office will be notified once the removal has been
completed by the FNS National Office and will inform the State agency.
Institutions and Their Associated RP/Is
To ensure consistency in the process for removing institutions or RP/Is from the NDL, all
requests for removals must be reviewed by the FNS National Office. For FNS National Office to

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 77

make an informed decision regarding requests to remove an institution and/or its associated
RP/Is from the NDL, it is necessary to have a complete history of the institution’s or RP/I’s
serious deficiencies, including how the serious deficiencies were fully and permanently
corrected.
The State agency’s request for removal of the
institution or RP/I must include;

Requests not Subject to Appeal
The State Agency’s or FNS’ decision
to deny a request for removal from the
National Disqualified List is not subject
to appeal.

•

The original serious deficiency
notification;

•

The Notice of Proposed Termination and
Disqualification;

•

The Notice of Final Termination and Disqualification;

•

All additional correspondence relating to the serious deficiency process for a particular
institution or RP/I such as:
o

A prior notice of successful corrective action and temporary deferment of the
serious deficiency (if applicable),

o

Information relating to the institution’s debt, or

o

Information concerning the RP/Is’ dates of birth.

•

A detailed explanation of the actions taken by the institution or RP/I to fully and
permanently correct the serious deficiencies including, but not limited to, the resolution
of any associated debt;

•

The documentation the State agency relied on to come to this conclusion; and

•

A Statement which clearly identifies whether the request is for the removal of the
o

Institution; or

o

Institution and all associated RP/Is; or

o

Specific or all of the RP/Is, but not the
institution.

Final Step in Removal
The FNS National Office is the
final approval authority for
removing a name from the NDL.

The FNS Regional Office must review the
documentation submitted with a request for removal of
an institution or RP/I to verify that it is complete and
provides sufficient information. Based on the submitted documentation, the FNS National Office
will approve or deny the request for removal.

Upon receipt of a request to remove an institution or RP/I from the NDL, the FNS National Office
will determine whether it concurs with the FNS Regional Office approval of the State agency’s
recommendation and notify the FNS Regional Office of its decision. The FNS Regional Office
will notify the State agency of the FNS National Office’s decision.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 78

DCH Providers
The State agency must review and approve a DCH provider’s request for removal from the
NDL. If the State agency approves the request, and ensures that any debt associated has been
paid, it may submit the information to the FNS Regional Office, where it will be reviewed for
completeness. The FNS Regional Office will also ensure that the State agency’s request is
within Program requirements and that the documentation supports the early removal. Once
reviewed, the FNS Regional Office will submit the request to the FNS National Office for
removal. The effective date of NDL removal will be the date on which the FNS National Office
processes the removal request. The FNS Regional Office will be notified once the removal has
been completed and inform the State agency [7 CFR 226.6(c)(7)(vi)].
Once an institution, facility or other names are removed from the NDL whether based on early
or normal seven-year timeframe, they may reapply for participation in the Program. Their
application will be evaluated by the State agency as they do for any applicant institution or
facility.

G. Debt Collection
CACFP regulations are very specific in terms of the State agency’s responsibility to collect debts
(overpayments), including any assessment of
interest. After the State agency has sent the
Participation after Removal
necessary demand letter for debt collection, State
agency staff must refer the claim to the appropriate
Removal from the NDL does not
State authority for pursuit of the debt payment. FNS
equate to approval to participate.
defers to the State’s own laws and procedures when
establishing a repayment plan, though it is a best
Institutions, facilities, or RP/Is can
practice to recover funds as quickly as possible and
be removed from the NDL and
not allow payment plans to cover several years. The
still subsequently not be
details of any repayment plan should be worked out
approved to participate in the
between the State agency and the institution [7 CFR
Program.
226.14(a)].
Interest must be assessed on institutions’ debts
established on or after July 29, 2002. Interest will continue to accrue on debts not paid in full
within 30 days of the initial demand for remittance up to the date of payment, including during an
extended payment plan and if placed on the NDL, each month while on the NDL. It is the
responsibility of the State agency to notify the institution that interest will be charged. State
agencies are required to assess interest using one uniform rate. The appropriate rate to use is
the Current Value of Funds Rate, which is published annually by Treasury in the Federal
Register and is available from the FNS Regional Office, Financial Management.
EXAMPLE: The State agency bills an institution for an overclaim of $100 on September 1,
2011. (The initial demand letter must advise the institution that interest will be assessed on
debts not paid in full within 30 days.) On October 1, 2011, the State agency has received no
payment or contact from the institution. The State agency would send a second demand
letter stating that the debt is now delinquent and interest for the month of September has
been added to the bill.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 79

DCH providers are not charged interest on debts. Repayment of debt is made to the sponsoring
organization and returned to the State agency by its routine funds recovery system.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 80

H. Questions & Answers
1. May an institution, provider, or RP/I be removed from the State agency list?
The State agency list is perpetual. It is a record of institutions declared seriously deficient
and the ways in which serious deficiencies were ultimately resolved; i.e., serious deficiency
determination temporarily deferred or institution terminated and disqualified. The State
agency list provides a historical record that should be reviewed each time an institution is
declared seriously deficient and may provide a basis to assess the institution’s ability to
administer the Program.
2. What must be done when the State agency is required to ‘‘update’’ the State agency
list?
For each institution declared seriously deficient, and for each institution filing a request for
an administrative review, the State agency will ‘‘update’’ the State agency list whenever the
next stage of action occurs.
EXAMPLE: When an institution is declared seriously deficient, the State
agency must add the institution and the basis for the determination of serious
deficiency to the list. If the institution fully and permanently corrects the
serious deficiency within the allotted time, the State agency updates the list to
document that corrective action is complete.
3. May an institution be removed from the NDL when most of its debt has been paid?
If the institution does not pay the debt in full, including accrued interest, it will remain on the
NDL. There is no provision for erasing uncollectible debts or for the State agency to “forgive”
the debt simply because it is uncollectible at the time the institution or individual requests to
be removed from the NDL.
4. What if a State agency determines that a debt is uncollectible?
The State agency must consult with the FNS Regional Office if it is determined that a debt is
uncollectible. Please note that the institution and RP/Is or provider will remain on the NDL
until the debt, with all incurred interest, is repaid. Interest continues to accrue throughout the
entire period the institution, RP/Is, or providers remain on the NDL. See FNS Instruction
420-1, Managing Agency Debits for reference.
5. Is it ever optional for the State agency to not collect interest on a CACFP debt?
Interest must accrue and be collected for all debts incurred by institutions. DCH providers
are not charged interest.
6. May a State agency set an interest “waiver” threshold; i.e., may a State agency have a
policy that, if interest on a debt falls below a pre-determined collection threshold,
interest will not be collect?
CACFP regulations at 7 CFR 226.8(f) allow a State agency to waive repayment of an
overclaim; however, the State agency does not have the authority to waive repayment of
interest once a debt is established.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 81

7. What is the record retention requirement by the State agency for an institution and/or
individual on the NDL?
Records must be retained for as long as an institution, principal, or individual remains on the
NDL plus three years following removal. If the institution or individuals remain on the list for
more than seven years because a debt is owed, the records must be retained longer. It is
important to remember that, since the State initiated the action, it is responsible for
maintaining the records relating to that action.
This means that records related to the NDL are to be “saved” for longer periods of time than
the normal three-year period for records retention. In any event, “up to seven years or even
longer” is the record retention standard for institutions, principals or individuals on the NDL
[CACFP 01-2007, Retention of Records Relating to Institutions, Responsible Principals or
Responsible Individuals, and DCHs on the National Disqualified List; Retention of Records
Relating to Serious Deficiencies, January 26, 2007].
8. May a State agency require or allow a “trial period” as a prerequisite for removal from
the NDL?
Trial periods may not be required by State agencies or sponsoring organizations when
considering a removal from the NDL. The State agency has no legal agreement with an
institution that is on the NDL; therefore, the State agency cannot require maintenance of
records before approving participation in the Program. Similarly, a disqualified DCH is not
under agreement with a sponsoring organization, so there is no means for their participation.
9. May a State agency add or include additional restrictions for an institution/RPI being
removed from the NDL other than the regulatory seven years and debt repayment?
State agencies may not place additional restrictions on removal from the NDL. The State
agency’s procedures for evaluating applications should treat it as an application from a new
institution and, as with a new institution, the State should include a prudent review of the
application and required materials.
10. What is the role of FNS in approving removal of a DCH provider from the NDL?
According to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(7)(vi), once included on the NDL, a provider will remain on the
list until the State agency determines that the serious deficiencies that led to its placement
on the list have been corrected, or until seven years have elapsed since its agreement was
terminated for cause. However, if the provider has failed to repay debt owed under the
Program, it will remain on the list until the debt has been repaid.
Even though the CACFP regulations give the States authority to remove providers from the
NDL, this does not relinquish FNS’ responsibility to provide oversight of State agencies’
actions to remove providers from the NDL. The FNS Regional Office will review the
documentation to ensure State agencies are operating in accordance with CACFP
requirements and that documentation supports removal of the provider from the list. The
effective date of the removal will be the date the request is processed by FNS.
11. How long will FNS take to approve a removal request for a provider from the NDL?
There is no set time frame for this process and FNS may request additional information
before adding or removing names from the NDL.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 82

PART 11. Acronyms
CAP - Corrective Action Plan
CACFP - Child and Adult Care Food Program
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
DCH - Day Care Home
FNS - Food and Nutrition Service
NDL - National Disqualified List
RP/I - Responsible Principal or Responsible Individual(s)
USDA - United States Department of Agriculture
Definitions of terms used in the CACFP can be found in the CACFP regulations at 7 CFR 226.2.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 83

PART 12. Resource Materials
A. Memoranda Issued by FNS Relating to the CACFP Serious Deficiency Process
November 21, 2014

CACFP 02-2015 Child and Adult Care Food Program – Role and
Responsibilities of Administrative Review Officials
http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/CACFP02-2015os.pdf

July 26, 2013

CACFP 13-2013 Health and Safety in the Child and Adult Care
Food Program
http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/CACFP13-2013.pdf

May 1, 2012

CACFP 14-2012 Child and Adult Care Food Program Guidance
on the Serious Deficiency Process and Acceptable Corrective
Action Plans, National Disqualified List Procedures and Debt
Collection
http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/CACFP14-2012.pdf

July 25, 2011

CACFP 24-2011 Automatic Revocation of Tax Exempt Status
http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/CACFP-24-2011.pdf

May 9, 2007

CACFP 05-2007 Additional State Agency Requirements
http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/CACFP_05-2007.pdf

January 26, 2007

CACFP 01-2007 Retention of Records Relating to Institutions,
Responsible Principals or Responsible Individuals, and DCHs on
the National Disqualified List; Retention of Records Relating to
Serious Deficiencies
http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/CACFP_01-2007.pdf

November 7, 2005

CACFP 03-2006 Questions and Answers
http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/CACFP_03-2006.pdf

October 17, 2000

Termination of Program Payment Procedures
http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2000-10-17.pdf

B. References
CACFP Regulations
http://www.fns.usda.gov/cacfp/regulations
CACFP Policy
http://www.fns.usda.gov/cacfp/policy
FNS Instruction 420-1 Managing State Agency Debt
Obtain a copy from the FNS Regional Office

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 84

C. CACFP Handbooks
State agencies and institutions may find additional CACFP requirements relating to specific
types of institutions in CACFP Handbooks.
•

Adult Day Care

•

At-Risk Afterschool

•

Family Day Care Homes Monitor

•

Guidance for Management Plans and Budgets

•

Independent Child Care Centers

•

Monitoring Handbook for State Agencies

D. Attachments
Attachment A. Serious Deficiency Chart – Flow Chart for Institutions
Attachment B. Serious Deficiency Chart – Flow Chart for Day Care Homes
Attachment C. Serious Deficiency Corrective Action Plan - South Carolina Example
Attachment D. Serious Deficiency Corrective Action Plan - Florida Example
Attachment E. Notice of Serious Deficiency Documentation - Checklist Florida Example

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 85

Attachment A Flow Chart -Serious Deficiency Process
for Institutions and/or
Responsible Principal/Individual (RP/I)

Issue Letter –
Serious Deficiency
with Corrective
Action Deadline

State agency sends
signed letter to:
 Institution and
RP/Is
 Copy to Regional
Office
 Add name and
information to
State list &
evaluates
Institution’s
actions

Institution submitted
corrective action--State
agency determines
correction is fully and
permanently
implemented

Institution submitted
corrective action--State
agency determines
correction is not fully
and permanently
implemented
OR
Institution did not
submit corrective action

Issue Letter - Temporarily Defers
Serious Deficiency *See below
State agency sends signed letter to:
 Institution and RP/Is
 Copy to Regional Office


Update State list & evaluate
Institution’s actions



State agency sends signed letter to:
 Institution and RP/Is
 Copy to Regional Office with
copy of hearing official’s
written outcome


Institution
and RP/Is
requests
appeal by
deadline

Hold
appeal
hearing

Institution and
RP/Is do not
request appeal
by deadline.

Issue Letter – Proposing
Disqualification and
Termination
State agency sends
signed letter to:
 Institution and RP/Is
with Appeal
Procedures
 Copy to Regional
Office

Issue Letter – Institution and/or
RP/I(s) Prevails in Appeal
*See below

*Issue Letter –
Notice of Proposed Termination
and Proposed Disqualification
If another serious deficiency action
is needed for the same actions,
move immediately to this phase

Update State list

Issue Letter – State Agency
Prevails
State agency sends signed letter
to:
 Institution and RP/Is
 Copy to Regional Office with
copy of hearing official’s
written outcome


Update State list

Issue Letter- Disqualification
and Termination - Institution
did not Appeal
State agency sends signed letter
to:
 Institutions and RP/Is
 Copy to Regional Office


Update State list

Update State list

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 86

Attachment B Flow Chart –
Serious Deficiency Process for Day Care
Home Providers
Sponsor
determines
Provider Seriously
Deficient
Issue Letter Notice of Serious
Deficiency
Sponsor sends
signed letter to:
DCH Provider
Copy to State
agency
State agency
action:
Add name to State
list & evaluates
sponsor’s actions

Provider submitted
corrective action-Sponsor determines
correction is fully and
permanently
implemented
Provider submitted
corrective action;
Sponsor determines
correction is not fully
and permanently
implemented.
OR
Provider did not
submit corrective
action

Issue Letter - Temporarily Defer Serious
Deficiency - Provider Prevails in Appeal *See
below

Issue Letter - Temporarily
Defer Serious Deficiency
*See below
Sponsor sends signed letter to:
 DCH Provider
 Copy to State agency
State Agency action:
 Update State list &
evaluates sponsor’s
actions

Issue Letter - Notice of
Proposed Termination and
Proposed Disqualification

State agency
reviews each
letter as
received and
contacts the
sponsor if
revisions or
reissuance are
required

Hold appeal hearing

Provider requests
appeal by deadline

Enclose Sponsor’s Appeal
Procedures.
Sponsor sends signed letter to:
 DCH Provider with
Appeal Procedures
 Copy to State Agency
State Agency action:
 Update State list &
evaluates sponsor’s
actions

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Provider does not
request appeal by
deadline

*Issue Letter - Notice of
Proposed Termination and
Proposed Disqualification

Sponsor sends signed letter to:
 DCH Provider
 Copy to State Agency with copy of
hearing official’s written outcome
State Agency action:
 Update State list & evaluates sponsor’s
actions
Issue Letter - CACFP Termination and
Disqualification Notice (Sponsor Prevails)
State agency will immediately update the
provider NDL Spreadsheet--Enter Termination
Date and Reason

Sponsor sends signed letter to:
 DCH Provider
 Copy to State Agency with copy of
hearing official’s written outcome
State Agency action:
 Update State list & evaluates sponsor’s
actions
Issue Letter - CACFP Termination and
Disqualification Notice (Failure to Appeal)
State agency will immediately update the
provider NDL spreadsheet. Enter Termination
Date and Reason

Sponsor sends signed letter to:
 DCH Provider
 Copy to State agency
State Agency action:
 Update State list & evaluates sponsor’s
actions
 Notify Regional Office

Page 87

Attachment C

South Carolina Department of Social Services
Serious Deficiency Corrective Action Plan for

Institution: __________________________

Agreement Number:___________

A. Name of Principals and Responsible Individuals:
Name

Title

Date of Birth

B. Serious Deficiency (state the serious deficiency as indicated in the serious deficiency notice):
C. Corrective Actions, Documentation and Timetable for Implementation (The corrective action plan
must be detailed and must include information on who will perform tasks/duties, what tasks will be
performed, when the tasks will be performed (frequency and implementation timeframe), where (the
location of CAP documentation) and how (method of implementation—handbook, training, etc.).
a. Name and title of individuals that will address the serious deficiency
b. Procedures already implemented or to be implemented to correct the serious deficiency
c. Timeframe for implementing the procedures to correct the issue:
When will the procedure for addressing the serious deficiency begin?
What is the timeline for implementing the procedure (i.e., will the procedure be done
daily, weekly, monthly, or annually)?
d. Where will the CAP documentation be retained associated with correcting this issue:
e. Have written policies and procedures been modified or prepared? ______ Yes _______ No
If yes, provide a copy of the policies and procedures as an attachment to this CAP.
Policy/procedure attached? ________ Yes _________ No
If yes, what is the title of the policy/procedure?
f.

Identify the supporting documentation included with this CAP which verifies corrections were made
or will be implemented. (This might include copies of training documentation, site monitoring
reports, attendance records, meal count forms, etc.)

g. Was a revised claim submitted for this serious deficiency? _______ Yes
If yes, attach the signed revised claim to your response.
Revised claim attached? _______ Yes ________ No

_______ No

The individual signing the corrective action plan must have the authority to sign on behalf of the institution.
Signature: ___________________________________

Date: ____________________

Print Name: __________________________________

Title: _____________________

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 88

Attachment D

Note – Institutions should reference the Instructions for this form; see the next page.
For DOE use
DOE Approval:_________________(initials)
Date: _________________________
Notes:_______________________________________________________________________
_____
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 89

SERIOUS DEFICIENCY - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP) GUIDELINES
1) Why Are CAPs Needed?
A. To ensure that staff understands what they are doing wrong and what they need to do to make
improvements.
B. To document the institution’s plan for improvement and to provide an opportunity for the plan to
be accepted by the Department or for the Department to request additional information or
clarification.
C. To provide sufficient detail so that during future reviews a determination can be made about
whether the institution staff made and maintained the corrective action(s).
2) When Are CAPs Required?
Any time issues of noncompliance are found.
3) What Information Must Be Included?
A. The plan must specifically address each issue of noncompliance noted on the review form or
the Notice of Serious Deficiency.
B. The plan must clearly state:
• What are the serious deficiency(ies) and the procedures that will be implemented to
address the serious deficiency(ies)?
• Who will address the serious deficiency? List personnel responsible for this task.
• When will the procedures for addressing the serious deficiency be implemented?
Provide a timeline for implementing the procedures (i.e., will the procedure be done
daily, weekly, monthly, or annually, and when will it begin?)
• Where will the CAP documentation be retained?
• How will the staff and facilities or providers be informed of the new policies and
procedures (e.g., Handbook, training, website, etc.)? Note: The plan should not merely
restate the issue(s) with vague assurances, e.g., “we will correctly complete the meal
count worksheet” or “management will take greater care to….” It is best to number the
items on the CAP with the corresponding finding on the review form or Notice of Serious
Deficiency.
4) What Will Happen Once I Have Submitted the CAP?
A. Your response will be reviewed, issue by issue, to ensure that you have provided a clear
statement of What, Who, When, Where, and How the issue of noncompliance will be corrected.
B. If the CAP is denied, you will be notified and if time remains before the CAP due date you may
resubmit the CAP. If no time remains, you will receive a Propose to Terminate and Disqualify
letter.
C. If the CAP is approved, the Department staff will conduct a follow-up review to verify that the
CAP has been implemented.
D. If the follow-up review reveals that the correction was not fully and permanently corrected, then
a Propose to Terminate and Disqualify letter will be issued which could result in the institution
and responsible principals and individuals being terminated and disqualified from the Child Care
Food Program.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 90

Attachment E

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 91

PART 13. Prototype Letters
Prototype letters have been developed for use in the steps of the CACFP serious deficiency
process. The letters in the section A. are for use by State agencies with institutions, and the
letters in section B. for use by sponsoring organization with its DCHs. The letters contain all
required regulatory language. Bracketed information is to be updated with appropriate names,
dates, and information.

A. List of Prototypes - Institutions
Prototype Letter 1:

Notice of Serious Deficiency for Institutions

Prototype Letter 2:

Notice of Successful Corrective Action and Temporary Deferment of
Serious Deficiency for Institutions

Prototype Letter 3:

Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification of Institutions

Prototype Letter 4:

Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Institutions - Institution
does not appeal

Prototype Letter 5:

Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Institutions - State agency
prevails in appeal

Prototype Letter 6:

Notice of Temporary Deferment of Serious Deficiency, Proposed
Termination and Proposed Disqualification for Institutions - Institution
prevails in appeal

Prototype Letter 7:

Notice of Serious Deficiency, Suspension and Proposed Termination
and Disqualification for Institutions - Combined Notice for Imminent
Threat to Health and Safety

Prototype Letter 8:

Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Institutions: Imminent
Threat to Health and Safety - Institution Does Not Appeal

Prototype Letter 9:

Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Institutions - Imminent
Threat to Health and Safety after State agency prevails in appeal

Prototype Letter 10:

Notice of Reinstatement - Imminent Threat to Health and Safety after
institution prevails in appeal

Prototype Letter 11:

Notice of Serious Deficiency and Proposed Suspension of an Institution
- Combined Notice for False or Fraudulent claim)

Prototype Letter 12:

Notice of Suspension - False or Fraudulent claims: Institution does not
request a suspension review

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 92

Prototype Letter 13:

Notice of Suspension for Institutions: False or Fraudulent Claims after
State agency wins suspension review

Prototype Letter 14:

Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed Suspension for Institutions - False or
fraudulent claims after institution prevails in suspension review

B. List of Prototypes - Day Care Homes
Prototype Letter 15: Notice of Serious Deficiency for Day Care Home Providers
Prototype Letter 16:

Notice of Successful Corrective Action and Temporary Deferment of
Serious Deficiency for Providers

Prototype Letter 17:

Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification for Providers – No
Corrective Action Submitted

Prototype Letter 18:

Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification for Providers –
Required Corrective Action Not Acceptable

Prototype Letter 19:

Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Providers - Provider does
not appeal

Prototype Letter 20:

Notice Termination and Disqualification for Provider - Sponsoring
Organization prevails in appeal

Prototype Letter 21:

Notice of Temporary Deferment of Serious Deficiency and Termination
and Disqualification – Provider prevails in appeal

Prototype Letter 22:

Notice of Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Proposed Termination
and Disqualification for Providers - Combined Notice for imminent
Threat to Health and Safety

Prototype Letter 23:

Notice of Termination and Disqualification – Suspension, and Proposed
Termination and Disqualification - Provider does not appeal

Prototype Letter 24:

Notice of Termination and Disqualification - Imminent threat to health or
safety after sponsoring organization prevails in appeal

Prototype Letter 25:

Notice of Temporary Deferment of Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and
Proposed Termination and Disqualification for Imminent threat to health
or safety after provider prevails in appeal

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 93

C. List of Prototypes - Unaffiliated Centers
This Section was intentionally left blank. We will provide prototype letters related to
unaffiliated centers when the Final Rule implementing these requirements is published.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 94

D. Prototype Letters - Institutions
Prototype Letter 1: Notice of Serious Deficiency for Institutions
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the [brief description of the basis for the serious deficiency
determination – review, audit, etc., and date] of [institution’s] operation of the Child and
Adult Care Food Program (CACFP).
SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION
Based on the [review/audit/etc.] on [date], the [State agency] has determined that
[institution] is seriously deficient in its operation of the CACFP. In addition, the [State
agency] has identified [Director] and [Board Chair] as responsible for the serious
deficiencies in light of their responsibility for the overall management of [institution’s]
operations.
If there are other RP/Is, you must list them here and state why they are responsible for
the serious deficiencies. If [institution] does not fully and permanently correct all of the
serious deficiencies and submit documentation of the corrective action by [due date], the
State agency will:
•

Propose to terminate [institution’s] agreement to participate in the CACFP,

•

Propose to disqualify [institution] from future CACFP participation, and

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 95

•

Propose to disqualify [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] from
future CACFP participation.

In addition, if [institution] voluntarily terminates its agreement after receiving this letter, the
State agency will propose to disqualify [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and any
other RP/Is] from future CACFP participation. If disqualified, [institution], [Director], and
[Board Chair and any other RP/Is] will be placed on the National Disqualified List (NDL).
While on the list, [institution] will not be able to participate in the CACFP as an institution
or facility. [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] will not be able to serve as a
principal in any institution or facility or as a day care home provider in the CACFP.
Institutions and individuals remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service,
in consultation with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have
been corrected, or until seven years after their disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, they will remain on the list until
the debt has been repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3) of the CACFP regulations.
SERIOUS DEFICIENCIES AND REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTION
[The following paragraphs detail each serious deficiency and the corrective action
required. Insert discussion of serious deficiencies and required corrective action. Each
serious deficiency discussed must include a citation of the relevant serious deficiency in
the regulations at 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(ii). If the serious deficiency is not specifically listed,
cite: 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(ii)(U), any other action affecting the institution’s ability to
administer the CACFP.]
[If there is an overclaim, repayment of the overclaim must be a condition of corrective
action. In addition, for an overclaim, you must include the following language:] The
institution may appeal the determination of the overclaim. A copy of the appeal
procedures is enclosed. If the institution chooses to appeal the overclaim, follow the
enclosed appeal procedures as failure to do so may result in the denial of the request for
an appeal.
SUMMARY
The State agency has determined that [institution] is seriously deficient in its operation of
the CACFP and that [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] are responsible for
the serious deficiencies.
The institution must provide documentation that shows it has taken the required
corrective action for each of the serious deficiencies cited in this letter. The
documentation must be received (not just postmarked) by [corrective action deadline].
You may establish different deadlines for different serious deficiencies, as long as they
are consistent with the regulations at 7 CFR 226.6(c)(4).

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 96

If the State agency does not receive the documentation of the corrective action by the
due date, or if we determine that the actions taken do not fully and permanently correct all
of the serious deficiencies, we will propose to terminate [institution’s] CACFP agreement
and will disqualify [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] from
further participation in the CACFP.
The institution may not appeal the serious deficiency determination. However, if the
[State agency] proposes to terminate [institution’s] agreement and disqualify [institution],
[Director], or [Board Chair or any other RP/Is], the institution will be able to appeal those
actions. The institution will be advised of appeal rights and the appeal procedures at that
time.
[Institution] may continue to participate in the CACFP during the corrective action period.
[If suspension is also being proposed based on the submission of a false or falsified
claim, insert unless [institution’s] CACFP participation is suspended.] Valid claims for
reimbursement submitted by [institution] for this period will be paid. As always, the
institution must submit claims within 60 calendar days of the last day of the month
covered by the claim. In addition, the State agency will deny any portion of a claim
determined invalid. If payment of any portion of a claim is denied, that action may be
appealed.
Insert if applicable: If the [State agency] receives the documentation of the institution’s
corrective action by [due date] and determines that the corrective action plan fully and
permanently corrects all of the serious deficiencies, the [State agency] will temporarily
defer the determination of serious deficiency. (NOTE: Conducting a follow-up review is
not required to accept a corrective action and should NOT delay the temporary
deferral of a serious deficiency determination.) The [State agency] may conduct an
unannounced follow-up review to verify the adequacy of the corrective action. If the [State
agency] finds in a follow-up review or any subsequent review that any of these serious
deficiencies have not been fully and permanently corrected, the [State agency] will
immediately propose to terminate [institution’s] agreement and propose to disqualify
[institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] without any further
opportunity for corrective action.
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name and Title
Include appeal procedures as an enclosure if an overclaim is involved.
cc: FNS Regional Office

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 97

[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 98

Prototype Letter 2: Notice of Successful Corrective Action and Temporary
Deferment of Serious Deficiency for Institutions
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the determination in the Serious Deficiency Notice dated [insert date]
that [institution] is seriously deficient in its operation of the Child and Adult Care Food
Program (CACFP), and that [Director] and [Board Chair and any other responsible
principals or responsible individuals (RP/Is)] are responsible for the serious deficiencies.
The [State agency] received the documentation sent detailing the actions the institution
has taken to correct these serious deficiencies. This documentation was received on
[date], before the corrective action deadline date of [insert date]. [Insert if applicable: The
[State agency] conducted a follow-up review on [date] to verify the adequacy of the
corrective actions.] (NOTE: Conducting a follow-up review is not required to accept
a corrective action and should NOT delay the temporary deferral of a serious
deficiency determination.)
SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION TEMPORARILY DEFERRED
Based on the review of the documentation [insert if applicable: ‘”and the [date] follow-up
review”], the State agency has determined that [institution] has fully and permanently
corrected the serious deficiencies that were cited in the Serious Deficiency Notice. As a
result, the serious deficiency determination has been temporarily deferred as of the date
of this letter. This also means that the State agency will not propose to terminate
[institution’s] agreement based on this serious deficiency finding and disqualify
[institution], [Director], or [Board Chair or any other RP/Is] on that basis.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 99

ADEQUACY OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
The following paragraphs describe the results of a review of the corrective action. [Insert
discussion of each serious deficiency and why the corrective action is adequate. Each
serious deficiency discussed must include a citation for the relevant serious deficiency in
the regulations at 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(ii). If the serious deficiency is not specifically listed,
cite 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(ii)(U), any other action affecting the institution’s ability to
administer the CACFP).]
[Insert if appropriate: The [State agency’s] report on the [date] follow-up review will be
provided in a separate letter.]
SUMMARY
The [State agency] has temporarily deferred the serious deficiency determination.
However, if, in any subsequent review, any of these serious deficiencies have not been
fully and permanently corrected, the [State agency] will immediately propose to terminate
[institution’s] agreement and propose to disqualify [institution], [Director], and [Board
Chair and any other RP/Is] without any further opportunity for corrective action.
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name and Title
cc: FNS Regional Office
[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals
100

Page

Prototype Letter 3: Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification of
Institutions
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the Serious Deficiency Notice dated [insert date] which determined
that [institution] is seriously deficient in its operation of the Child and Adult Care Food
Program (CACFP) and that [Director] and [Board Chair and any other responsible
principals or responsible individuals (RP/Is)] are responsible for the serious deficiencies.
The [State agency] received the documentation sent detailing the actions the institution
has taken to correct these serious deficiencies on [date], before the corrective action
deadline date of [insert date]. [Insert if applicable: The [State agency] conducted a
follow-up review on [date] to verify the adequacy of the corrective actions.] (NOTE:
Conducting a follow-up review is not required to accept a corrective action and
should NOT delay the temporary deferral of a serious deficiency determination.)

Based on the [State agency’s] review of the documentation [insert if applicable: and the
follow-up review], the [State agency] has determined that [institution] has not fully and
permanently corrected the serious deficiencies cited in the Serious Deficiency Notice.
PROPOSED TERMINATION AND PROPOSED DISQUALIFICATION
As a result, effective [date], the [State agency] proposes to:
•

Terminate [institution’s] agreement to participate in the CACFP;

•

Disqualify [institution] from future CACFP participation; and

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 101

•

Disqualify [Director] and [Board Chair] [and any other RP/Is] from future
CACFP participation.

Note regarding effective date of action: The institution has 15 days after receiving this
notice to submit its request for an appeal. Therefore, the effective date for these actions
must be at least 15 days after the date of this letter, plus the time necessary for the
institution to receive this notice and the time necessary for the State agency to receive
the request for an appeal. In addition, the effective date for the disqualifications should
generally be the same as the agreement termination date, and not earlier; otherwise,
the institution, Director, Board Chair and any other RP/Is will be disqualified and
ineligible to participate before the institution’s agreement is terminated.
In addition, if [institution] voluntarily terminates its agreement after receiving this letter,
the [State agency] will propose to disqualify [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and
any other RP/Is] from future CACFP participation. If disqualified, [institution], [Director],
and [Board Chair] [and any other RP/Is] will be placed on the National Disqualified List
(NDL). While on the NDL, [institution] will not be able to participate in the CACFP as an
institution or facility. [Director] and [Board Chair] [and any other RP/Is] will not be able to
serve as a principal in any institution or facility or as a day care home provider in the
CACFP.
Institutions and individuals remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service,
in consultation with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have
been corrected, or until seven years after their disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, they will remain on the NDL
until the debt is repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3).
STATUS OF SERIOUS DEFICIENCIES
The following paragraphs detail each serious deficiency and its status based on the
review of the corrective action documentation [insert if applicable: and the [date] followup review.] [Insert discussion of each serious deficiency and the reasons why corrective
action was inadequate (the corrective action may be adequate for some items and not
for others; make sure you specify the status of the corrective action for each serious
deficiency). Each serious deficiency discussed must include a citation for the relevant
serious deficiency in the regulations at 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(ii). If the serious deficiency is
not specifically listed, cite: 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(ii)(U) “any other action affecting the
institution’s ability to administer the CACFP”.]

APPEAL OF PROPOSED TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
[Institution] may appeal the proposed termination of its agreement. In addition,
[institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] may appeal their
proposed disqualifications. A copy of the appeal procedures is enclosed. If any of you
Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 102

decide to appeal the proposed actions, all appeal procedures must be followed as
failure to do so may result in the denial of your request for an appeal.
SUMMARY
[Institution] has not fully and permanently corrected the serious deficiencies identified in
the Serious Deficiency Notice. For this reason, the [State agency] is proposing to
terminate [institution’s] CACFP agreement and disqualify [institution], [Director], and
[Board Chair and any other RP/Is].
The proposed termination and the disqualifications may be appealed. If appealed, the
proposed actions will not take effect until the hearing official issues a decision. If
[institution] does not make a timely request for an appeal, [institution’s] agreement will
be terminated on [date]. If [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is]
do not appeal their proposed disqualification, they will be disqualified from future
CACFP participation effective [date] and placed on the NDL.
Insert the following unless the institution has been suspended (if there was a proposed
suspension, any suspension review should be complete by this point): [Institution] may
continue to participate in the CACFP until [termination/ disqualification effective date] or,
if [institution] appeals the proposed actions, until the hearing official issues a decision on
the appeals. We will pay all valid claims for reimbursement submitted by [institution] for
this period. As always, you must submit claims within 60 calendar days of the last day of
the month covered by the claim. In addition, we will deny any portion of a claim we
determine is invalid. If we deny payment of any portion of a claim, that action may be
appealed.
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name and Title
Enclosure: Appeal Procedures
cc: FNS Regional Office
[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 103

Prototype Letter 4: Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Institutions Institution does not appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the [date] Notice of Proposed Termination & Disqualification, which
proposed to terminate [institution’s] agreement to participate in the Child and Adult Care
Food Program (CACFP). In that letter, the [State agency] also proposed to disqualify
[institution], [Director] and [Board Chair and any other responsible principals or
responsible individuals (RP/Is)] from further CACFP participation. These actions were
based on the determination in the [date] Serious Deficiency Notice that [institution] is
seriously deficiency in its operation of the CACFP and that [Director] and [Board Chair
and any RP/Is] are responsible for the serious deficiencies.
[Institution] received the Notice of Proposed Termination & Disqualification on [date
received]. The institution had 15 days from that date (i.e., [date 15 days after date of
receipt of Notice of Proposed Termination and Proposed Disqualification]) to submit any
requests for appeals of the proposed actions. No requests for appeals were submitted
by that deadline.
TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
Because the time to request an appeal has now expired, effective [date], the [State
agency] is:
•

Terminating [institution’s] agreement to participate in the CACFP;

•

Disqualifying [institution] from future CACFP participation; and

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 104

•

Disqualifying [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] from future
CACFP participation.

The effective date for the disqualifications should generally be the same as the
agreement termination date, and not earlier; otherwise, the institution, Director, Board
Chair and any other RP/Is will be disqualified and ineligible to participate before the
institution’s agreement is terminated.
Upon disqualification, [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] will
be placed on the National Disqualified List (NDL). While on the NDL, [institution] will not
be able to participate in the CACFP as an institution or facility. [Director] and [Board
Chair and any other RP/Is] will not be able to serve as a principal in any institution or
facility or as a day care home provider in the CACFP.
Institutions and Individuals remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service,
in consultation with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have
been corrected, or until seven years after their disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, they will remain on the NDL
until the debt is repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to7 CFR 226.6(c)(3).
SUMMARY
The [State agency] is terminating [institution’s CACFP agreement and disqualifying
[Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is]. [Institution] may not appeal the
termination of its agreement. In addition, [institution], [Director] and [Board Chair and
any other RP/Is] may not appeal the disqualifications.
Insert the following unless the institution has been suspended (If there was a proposed
suspension, any suspension review should be complete by this point.):
“[Institution] may continue to participate in the CACFP until [termination/disqualification
effective date]. The [State Agency] will pay any valid claims for reimbursement
submitted by [institution] for this period. As always, claims must be submitted within 60
calendar days of the last day of the month covered by the claim. In addition, the [State
agency] will deny any portion of a claim determined is invalid. If the [State agency]
denies payment of any portion of a claim, that action would be appealable.
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name and Title
cc: FNS Regional Office

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 105

[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 106

Prototype Letter 5: Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Institutions State agency prevails in appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name & Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors & Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the [State agency’s] [date of Notice of Proposed Termination &
Disqualification] Notice of Proposed Termination & Disqualification, which proposed to
terminate [institution’s] agreement to participate in the Child and Adult Care Food
Program (CACFP). In that letter, we also proposed to disqualify [institution], [Director]
and [Board Chair] [and any other responsible principals or responsible individuals
(RP/Is)] from further CACFP participation. These actions were based on the
determination in the [date of Serious Deficiency Notice] Serious Deficiency Notice that
[institution] is seriously deficient in its operation of the CACFP and that and that
[Director] and [Board Chair] [and any RP/Is] are responsible for the serious deficiencies.
[Institution] filed a timely appeal of the proposed termination and disqualification. In
addition, [Director], and [Board Chair] [and any other RP/Is] filed timely appeals of their
proposed disqualifications. On [date of hearing official’s decision], the hearing official
issued a decision on all of the appeals. In that decision, the hearing official upheld all of
the proposed actions.
TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
As a result, effective [date], the State agency is:
•

Terminating [institution’s] agreement to participate in the CACFP;

•

Disqualifying [institution] from future CACFP participation; and

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 107

•

Disqualifying [Director] and [Board Chair] [and any other RP/Is] from future
CACFP participation.

[The effective date may be no earlier than the date of the hearing official’s decision. The
effective date for the disqualifications should generally be the same as the agreement
termination date, and not earlier; otherwise, the institution, Director, Board Chair and
any other RP/Is will be disqualified and ineligible to participate before the institution’s
agreement is terminated.]
[Institution], [Director], and [Board Chair] [and any other RP/Is] will be placed on the
National Disqualified List (NDL). While on the NDL, [institution] will not be able to
participate in the CACFP as an institution or facility. [Director] and [Board Chair] [and
any other RP/Is] will not be able to serve as a principal in any institution or facility or as
a day care home provider in the CACFP.
Institutions and individuals remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service,
in consultation with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have
been corrected, or until seven years after their disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, they will remain on the NDL
until the debt is repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3).
SUMMARY
The State agency is terminating [institution’s] CACFP agreement and disqualifying
[Director] and [Board Chair] [and any other RP/Is]. [Institution] may not appeal the
termination of its agreement. In addition, [institution], [Director] and [Board Chair] [and
any other RP/Is] may not appeal the disqualifications.
[Insert the following unless the institution has been suspended (if there was a proposed
suspension, any suspension review should be complete by this point):
“[Institution] may continue to participate in the CACFP until [termination/disqualification
effective date]. The [State Agency] will pay any valid claims for reimbursement
submitted by [institution] for this period. As always, claims must be submitted within 60
calendar days of the last day of the month covered by the claim. In addition, the [State
agency] will deny any portion of a claim determined is invalid. If the [State agency]
denies payment of any portion of a claim, that action would be appealable.
Sincerely,

State agency Employee Name & Title
cc: FNS Regional Office
Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 108

[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 109

Prototype Letter 6: Notice of Temporary Deferment of Serious Deficiency,
Proposed Termination and Proposed Disqualification for Institutions - Institution
prevails in appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date

Institution Director Name & Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors & Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the [State agency’s] [date of Notice of Proposed Termination &
Disqualification] Notice of Proposed Termination & Disqualification. In that letter, the
[State agency] also proposed to terminate [institution’s] agreement and disqualify
[institution], [Director] and [Board Chair] [and any other responsible principals or
responsible individuals (RP/Is)] from further CACFP participation. These actions were
based on the determination in the [date of Serious Deficiency Notice] Serious Deficiency
Notice that [institution] is seriously deficient in its operation of the CACFP and that
[Director] and [Board Chair] [and any RP/Is] are responsible for the serious deficiencies.
[Institution] filed a timely appeal of the proposed termination and disqualification. In
addition, [Director], and [Board Chair] [and any other RP/Is] filed timely appeals of their
proposed disqualifications. On [date of appeal decision], the hearing official issued a
decision. In that decision, the hearing official overturned all of the proposed actions.
SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION
As a result, the State Agency’s proposed termination and disqualification of [Institution]
and its responsible principals and individuals [Director], and [Board Chair] [and any
other RP/Is] has been vacated.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 110

However, the institution and RP/Is must still implement procedures and policies to
permanently correct the serious deficiencies. Upon approval of a corrective action, the
[State agency] will temporarily defer the serious deficiency determination. If the [State
agency] initially determine that the corrective action has fully and permanently corrected
the serious deficiency(ies),, but later determine that the serious deficiency(ies) has/have
recurred, the [State agency] must move to immediately to issue a notice of proposed
termination and disqualification the institution and RP/Is.
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name & Title
cc: FNS Regional Office
[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 111

Prototype Letter 7: Notice of Serious Deficiency, Suspension and Proposed
Termination and Disqualification for Institutions - Combined Notice for Imminent
Threat to Health and Safety
REMEMBER: For imminent threat to health and safety, there is no opportunity to
correct.

Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the [brief description of the basis for the serious deficiency
determination – review, audit, etc. and date] of [institution’s] operation of the
Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP).
SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION
An imminent threat to health or safety of participants and engaging in activities that
threaten the public health or safety constitute serious deficiencies. [Describe
details here.] Based on the [review/audit/etc.], on [date], the [State agency] has
determined that [institution] is seriously deficient in its operation of the CACFP. In
addition, we have identified [Director] and [Board Chair] as responsible for the
serious deficiencies in light of their responsibility for the overall management of
[institution’s] operations.
[If there are other responsible principals or responsible individuals (RP/Is), you must list
them here and state why they are responsible for the serious deficiencies.]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 112

SUSPENSION
If State or local health or licensing officials have cited n institution for serious
health or safety violations, or if the State Agency has determined that there is
imminent threat to the health or safety of participants at an institution, or that the
institution has engaged in activities that threaten the public health or safety, the
State agency must immediately suspend the institution’s Program participation,
initiate action to terminate the institution’s agreement and initiate action to
disqualify the institution and responsible principals and responsible individuals
prior to any action to revoke the institution’s licensure or approval. Because of
this imminent risk, the [State agency] is suspending [institution’s] CACFP
participation (including all Program payments). The suspension of CACFP
participation (including all Program payments) will take effect on the date of this
letter. This action is being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(i) of the CACFP
regulations.
The suspension of CACFP participation (including all Program payments) will take
effect on the date of this letter. This action is being taken pursuant to 7 CFR
226.6(c)(5)(ii)(D) of the CACFP regulations. )
PROPOSED TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
Effective [date], the [State agency] also proposes to:
•

Terminate [institution’s] agreement to participate in the CACFP for cause
and

•

Disqualify [institution/Director/Board or other RP/Is] from future CACFP
participation.

[The effective date for the termination/disqualification must be after the deadline for
requesting an appeal. In addition, the effective date for the disqualification should
generally be the same as the agreement termination date, and not earlier; otherwise,
the provider could be disqualified and ineligible to participate before the agreement is
terminated.]
If [institution] voluntarily terminates its agreement after receiving this letter, the State
agency will propose to disqualify [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and any other
RP/Is] from future CACFP participation. If disqualified, [institution], [Director], and [Board
Chair and any other RP/Is] will be placed on the National Disqualified List (NDL). While
on the NDL, [institution] will not be able to participate in the CACFP as an institution or
facility. [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] will not be able to serve as a
principal in any institution or facility or as a day care home provider in the CACFP.
Institutions and individuals remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service,
in consultation with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have
Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 113

been corrected, or until seven years after their disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, they will remain on the list until
the debt has been repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3).
APPEAL OF SUSPENSION AND PROPOSED TERMINATION AND
DISQUALIFICATION
[Institution] may appeal the suspension and its proposed termination and disqualification
for cause. In addition, [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] may
appeal their proposed disqualifications. If a decision is made to appeal the proposed
actions, follow the appeal procedures exactly as failure to do so may result in the denial
of your request for an appeal. Enclosed are procedures for appeal of the suspension
and appeal of the proposed termination and disqualification].
SUMMARY
The [State agency] is suspending [institution’s] CACFP participation (including all
Program payments) effective (date of this letter). In addition, the [State agency] is
proposing to terminate [institution’s] CACFP agreement and disqualify [institution],
[Director], and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is].
The suspension will remain in effect during the period of any appeal. However, if the
institution requests an appeal and the hearing official overturns the suspension, all valid
claims for reimbursement submitted by [institution] for the period of the suspension will
be paid. As always, the [State agency] will deny any portion of a claim that is
determined to be invalid.
The proposed termination and disqualification may also be appealed. If appealed, the
proposed actions will not take effect until the hearing official issues a decision. If
[institution] does not make a timely request for an appeal, [institution’s] agreement will
be terminated on [date]. If [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is]
do not appeal their proposed disqualification, they will be disqualified from future
CACFP participation effective [date] and placed on the NDL.
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name and Title
Enclosure: Appeal Procedures
cc: FNS Regional Office

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 114

[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 115

Prototype Letter 8: Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Institutions:
Imminent Threat to Health and Safety - Institution Does Not Appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the [date] Combined Notice which suspended [institution’s]
participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) In that letter, we also
proposed to terminate [institution’s] CACFP participation and disqualify [institution],
[Director] and [Board Chair and any other responsible principals or responsible
individuals (RP/Is)] from further CACFP participation. These actions were based on the
determination in the [date] letter that [institution] is seriously deficient in its operation of
the CACFP and posed an imminent threat to the health or safety of CACFP participants
or the public and that [Director] and [Board Chair and any RP/Is] are responsible for the
serious deficiencies.
[Institution] had 15 days from [date] to submit a request for appeal of the suspension
and the proposed termination and disqualification. No request for appeal was submitted
by that deadline.
TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATIONS
Because the time to request an appeal has now expired, effective [date], the [State
agency] is:
•

Terminating [institution’s] agreement to participate in the CACFP;

•

Disqualifying [institution] from future CACFP participation; and

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 116

•

Disqualifying [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] from future
CACFP participation.

The [State agency] is placing [institution], [Director] and [Board Chair and any other
RP/Is] on the National Disqualified List (NDL). While on the NDL, [institution] will not be
able to participate in the CACFP as an institution or facility. [Director] and [Board Chair
and any other RP/Is] will not be able to serve as a principal in any institution or facility or
as a day care home provider in the CACFP.
Institutions and individuals remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service,
in consultation with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have
been corrected, or until seven years after their disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, they will remain on the list until
the debt is repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(i).
SUMMARY
The [State agency] is terminating [institution’s] CACFP agreement and disqualifying
[Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is]. [Institution] may not appeal the
termination of its agreement. In addition, [institution], [Director] and [Board Chair and
any other RP/Is] may not appeal the disqualifications. Since your participation was
suspended, [Institution] may only claim reimbursement for valid meal served up until
(insert date of suspension). The institution must submit a claim for these meals by
[insert a date that will give the provider an appropriate length of time to submit these
claims].
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name and Title
cc: FNS Regional Office
[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 117

Prototype Letter 9: Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Institutions Imminent Threat to Health and Safety after State agency prevails in appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the [date] Combined Notice which suspended [institution’s]
participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). In that letter, we also
proposed to terminate [institution’s] CACFP participation and disqualify [institution],
[Director] and [Board Chair and any other responsible principals or responsible
individuals (RP/Is)] from further CACFP participation. These actions were based on the
determination in the [State agency’s] [date] letter that [institution] is seriously deficient in
its operation of the CACFP and posed an imminent threat to the health or safety of
CACFP participants or the public and that [Director] and [Board Chair and any RP/Is] are
responsible for the serious deficiencies.
[Institution] filed a timely appeal of the suspension and proposed termination and
disqualification. In addition, [Director], and [Board Chair] [and any other RP/Is] filed
timely appeals of their proposed disqualifications. On [date of hearing official’s decision],
the hearing official issued a decision. In that decision, the hearing official upheld all of
the proposed actions.
TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
As a result, effective [date], the State agency is:
•

Terminating [institution’s] agreement to participate in the CACFP;

•

Disqualifying [institution] from future CACFP participation; and

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 118

•

Disqualifying [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] from future
CACFP participation.

[The effective date will be the date of or after the date of hearing official’s decision.]
The [State agency] is placing [institution], [Director] and [Board Chair and any other
RP/Is] on the National Disqualified List (NDL). While on the NDL, [institution] will not be
able to participate in the CACFP as an institution or facility. [Director] and [Board Chair
and any other RP/Is] will not be able to serve as a principal in any institution or facility or
as a day care home provider in the CACFP.
Institutions and individuals remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service,
in consultation with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have
been corrected, or until seven years after their disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, they will remain on the list until
the debt is repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to7 CFR 226.6(c)(3) and (5)(i).
SUMMARY
The [State agency] is terminating [institution’s] CACFP agreement and disqualifying
[institution’s name], [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is]. [Institution] may
not appeal the termination of its agreement. In addition, [institution], [Director] and
[Board Chair and any other RP/Is] may not appeal the disqualifications. Since the
institution’s participation was suspended, [Institution] may only claim reimbursement for
valid meal served up until (insert date of suspension). The [institution] must submit a
claim for these meals by [insert a date that will give the provider an appropriate length
of time to submit these claims].
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name and Title
cc: FNS Regional Office
[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 119

Prototype Letter 10: Notice of Reinstatement - Imminent Threat to Health and
Safety after institution prevails in appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the [date] Combined Notice which suspended [institution’s]
participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). In that letter, we also
proposed to terminate [institution’s] CACFP participation and disqualify [institution],
[Director] and [Board Chair and any other responsible principals or responsible
individuals (RP/Is)] from further CACFP participation. These actions were based on the
determination in the [date] letter that [institution] is seriously deficient in its operation of
the CACFP and posed an imminent threat to the health or safety of CACFP participants
or the public and that [Director] and [Board Chair and any RP/Is] are responsible for the
serious deficiencies.
[Institution] filed a timely appeal of the suspension and proposed termination and
disqualification. In addition, [Director], and [Board Chair] [and any other RP/Is] filed
timely appeals of their proposed disqualifications. On [date of hearing official’s decision],
the hearing official issued a decision. In that decision, the hearing official overturned all
of the proposed actions.
SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION, SUSPENSION, AND PROPOSED
TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
Based on the hearing official’s decision, the [State agency] is prohibited from
terminating and disqualifying [institution] and [institution’s] [Director], or [Board Chair]
[and any other RP/Is].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 120

However, the [institution and RP/Is] must still implement procedures and policies to
permanently correct the serious deficiencies. Upon approval of an acceptable corrective
plan, the [State agency] will temporarily defer the determination that [institution] and its
RPIs are seriously deficient. If the [State agency] initially determines that the corrective
action is complete, but later determines that the serious deficiency(ies) has recurred,
the [State agency] must move to immediately to issue a notice of intent to terminate
and disqualify the institution and RP/Is.
All valid claims for reimbursement submitted by [institution] for the period of the
suspension will be paid. These must be submitted by [insert a date that will give the
institution an appropriate length of time to submit these claims].
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(i)(D).
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name & Title
cc: FNS Regional Office
[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 121

Prototype Letter 11: Notice of Serious Deficiency and Proposed Suspension of an
Institution - Combined Notice for False or Fraudulent claim
REMEMBER: For false or fraudulent claim, the SA may suspend but must initiate
action to terminate the institution’s agreement and disqualify the institution and its RPIs.
The first step in initiating the termination and disqualification process is the declaration
of serious deficiency.)

[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the [brief description of the basis for the serious deficiency
determination of false or fraudulent claim – review, audit, etc. and date and any other
applicable serious deficiency(ies)] of [institution’s] operation of the Child and Adult Care
Food Program (CACFP).
SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION
Based on the [review/audit/claim etc.] on [date], the State agency has determined that
[institution] is seriously deficient in its operation of the CACFP. In addition, the [State
agency] has identified [Director] and [Board Chair] as responsible for the serious
deficiencies in light of their responsibility for the overall management of [institution’s]
operations.
[If there are other responsible principals or responsible individuals (RP/Is), you must list
them here and state why they are responsible for the serious deficiencies.]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 122

SERIOUS DEFICIENCIES AND REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTION
[The following paragraphs detail each serious deficiency and the corrective action
required. Insert discussion of serious deficiencies and required corrective action. Each
serious deficiency discussed must include a citation of the relevant serious deficiency in
the regulations at 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(ii). If the serious deficiency is not specifically listed,
cite: 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3)(ii)(U), any other action affecting the institution’s ability to
administer the CACFP.]
[If there is an overclaim, repayment of the overclaim must be a condition of corrective
action. In addition, for an overclaim, you must include the following language:] The
institution may appeal the determination of the overclaim. A copy of the appeal
procedures is enclosed. If the institution chooses to appeal the overclaim, follow the
enclosed appeal procedures as failure to do so may result in the denial of the request
for an appeal.
If [institution] does not fully and permanently correct all of the serious deficiencies and
submit documentation of the corrective action by the due date, the [State agency] will:
•

Propose to terminate [institution’s] agreement to participate in the CACFP;

•

Propose to disqualify [institution] from future CACFP participation; and

•

Propose to disqualify [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] from
future CACFP participation.

In addition, if [institution] voluntarily terminates its agreement after receiving this letter,
we will propose to disqualify [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and any other
RP/Is] from future CACFP participation. If disqualified, [institution], [Director], and [Board
Chair and any other RP/Is] will be placed on the National Disqualified List (NDL). While
on the NDL, [institution] will not be able to participate in the CACFP as an institution or
facility. [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] will not be able to serve as a
principal in any institution or facility or as a day care home provider in the CACFP.
Institutions and individuals remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service,
in consultation with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have
been corrected, or until seven years after their disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, they will remain on the list until
the debt is repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3).
You may not appeal the serious deficiency determination.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 123

[Institution] may continue to participate in the CACFP until [proposed suspension date]
or, if [institution] request a suspension review, until the suspension official issues a
decision. The [State agency] will pay any valid claims for reimbursement submitted by
[institution] for this period. As always, claims must be submitted within 60 calendar days
of the last day of the month covered by the claim. In addition, the [State agency] will
deny any portion of a claim determined is invalid. If the [State agency] denies payment
of any portion of a claim, that action would be appealable.
PROPOSED SUSPENSION
One of the serious deficiencies identified is the filing of a false or fraudulent claim. As
per Program regulations, if the State agency determines that an institution has
knowingly submitted a false or fraudulent claim, the State agency may initiate action to
suspend the institution’s participation. Because of this false or fraudulent claim, the
[State agency] is proposing to suspend [institution’s] CACFP participation effective
[cannot be earlier than 10 days after the institution receives this letter].
This action is being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(ii)(A) and (B).
SUSPENSION REVIEW (APPEAL) OF PROPOSED SUSPENSION
[Institution] may appeal the proposed suspension of its CACFP participation. A copy of
the suspension review procedures is enclosed. If [Institution] requests a review of the
proposed action, the procedures must be followed as failure to do so could result in the
denial of your request.
If the institution appeals the proposed suspension, the proposed action will not take
effect until the suspension official issues a decision on the suspension review. If
[institution] does not make a timely request for a suspension review, [institution’s]
CACFP participation will be suspended on [date].
[Institution] may continue to participate in the CACFP until [proposed suspension date]
or, if [institution] request a suspension review, until the suspension official issues a
decision. The [State agency] will pay any valid claims for reimbursement submitted by
[institution] for this period. As always, claims must be submitted within 60 calendar days
of the last day of the month covered by the claim. In addition, the [State agency] will
deny any portion of a claim determined is invalid. If the [State agency] denies payment
of any portion of a claim, that action would be appealable.
SUMMARY
The [State agency] has determined that [institution] is seriously deficient in its operation
of the CACFP and that [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] are responsible
for the serious deficiencies.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 124

[Institution] must provide documentation that shows it has taken the required corrective
action for each of the serious deficiencies cited in this letter. The documentation must
be received (not just postmarked) by [corrective action deadline]. You may establish
different deadlines for different serious deficiencies, as long as they are consistent with
the regulations at 7 CFR 226.6(c)(4).
If the [State agency] does not receive the documentation of your corrective action by the
due date, or if we determine that the actions taken do not fully and permanently correct
all of the serious deficiencies, the [State agency] will propose to terminate [institution’s]
CACFP agreement and will propose to disqualify [institution], [Director], and [Board
Chair and any other RP/Is].
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name & Title
Enclosures: Suspension Review Procedures
cc: FNS Regional Office
[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

NOTE: If the institution fails to submit an acceptable corrective action plan,
Prototype Letter 3 should be used.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 125

Prototype Letter 12: Notice of Suspension - False or Fraudulent claims: Institution
does not request a suspension review
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the determination in the [State agency’s] [date] Combined Notice of
Serious Deficiency and Proposed Suspension that [institution] was seriously deficient in
its operation of the CACFP and that [Director] and [Board Chair and any other
responsible principals or responsible individuals (RP/Is)] are responsible for the serious
deficiencies. In that letter, the [State agency] proposed to suspend [institution’s] CACFP
participation for filing false or fraudulent claims.
The institution had 10 days from [date] to submit a request for an appeal of the
proposed suspension. No request for an appeal was submitted by that deadline.
SUSPENSION
Because the time to request an appeal has now expired, the [State agency] is
suspending [institution’s] participation in the CACFP effective [date of this letter].
SUMMARY
The State agency is suspending [institution’s] CACFP participation (including all
Program payments) effective (date of this letter).
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(ii)(D).

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 126

Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name & Title
Enclosures: Appeal Procedures
cc: FNS Regional Office
[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 127

Prototype Letter 13: Notice of Suspension for Institutions: False or Fraudulent
Claims after State agency prevails in suspension review
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the determination in the [State agency’s] [date] Combined Notice of
Serious Deficiency and Suspension that [institution’s] was seriously deficient in its
operation of the CACFP and that [Director] and [Board Chair and any other responsible
principals or responsible individuals (RP/Is)] are responsible for the serious deficiencies.
In that letter, the State agency also proposed to suspend [institution’s] CACFP
participation for filing false or fraudulent claims.
[Institution] filed a timely appeal of the proposed suspension. On [date of hearing
official’s decision], the hearing official issued a decision on the appeal. In that decision,
the hearing official upheld the proposed suspension.
SUSPENSION
As a result, the State agency is suspending [institution’s] participation in the CACFP
effective [date of this letter].
SUMMARY
The State agency is suspending [institution’s] CACFP participation (including all
Program payments) effective (date of this letter).
[Institution] must still provide a corrective action plan to address the serious
deficiency(ies) in the [insert serious deficiency and proposed suspension letter date]
letter by [corrective action due date]
Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 128

If [institution] does not fully and permanently correct all of the serious deficiencies and
submit documentation of the corrective action by [due date], the State agency will:
•

Propose to terminate [institution’s] agreement to participate in the CACFP,

•

Propose to disqualify [institution] from future CACFP participation, and

•

Propose to disqualify [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] from
future CACFP participation.

In addition, if [institution] voluntarily terminates its agreement after receiving this letter,
the State agency will propose to disqualify [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and
any other RP/Is] from future CACFP participation. If disqualified, [institution], [Director],
and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] will be placed on the National Disqualified List
(NDL). While on the list, [institution] will not be able to participate in the CACFP as an
institution or facility. [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] will not be able to
serve as a principal in any institution or facility or as a day care home provider in the
CACFP.
Institutions and individuals remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service,
in consultation with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have
been corrected, or until seven years after their disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, they will remain on the list until
the debt has been repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(ii)(D).
Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name & Title
cc: FNS Regional Office
[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 129

Prototype Letter 14: Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed Suspension for
Institutions - False or Fraudulent claims after institution prevails in suspension
review
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Institution Director Name and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Name of Chairman of Board of Directors and Title
Institution Name
Institution Street Address
Institution City, State 00000
Re: Agreement Number _____
Dear [Director] and [Board Chair]:
This letter concerns the determination in the [State agency’s] [date] Combined Notice of
Serious Deficiency and proposed Suspension that [institution’s] was seriously deficient
in its operation of the CACFP and that [Director] and [Board Chair and any other
responsible principals or responsible individuals (RP/Is)] are responsible for the serious
deficiencies. In that letter, the State agency also proposed to suspend [institution’s]
CACFP participation for filing false or fraudulent claims.
[Institution] filed a timely appeal of the proposed suspension. On [date of hearing
official’s decision], the hearing official issued a decision. In that decision, the hearing
official overturned the proposed action. Therefore, [name of institution] may continue to
claim reimbursement for eligible meals and, if applicable, administrative costs until the
serious deficiency process is completed.
WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSED SUSPENSION
As a result, the State agency is withdrawing the proposed suspension of [institution’s]
CACFP participation as of [date of hearing official’s decision].
[Institution and RP/Is] must still provide corrective action for the serious deficiency(ies)
listed in the [insert serious deficiency letter date]. [List the serious deficiency(ies)].
Corrective action is due [insert due date]. These actions are being taken pursuant to 7
CFR 226.6(c)(3); (c)(5)(ii)(D) of the CACFP regulations.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 130

If [institution] does not fully and permanently correct all of the serious deficiency(ies)
and submit documentation of the corrective action by [due date], the State agency will:
•

Propose to terminate [institution’s] agreement to participate in the CACFP,

•

Propose to disqualify [institution] from future CACFP participation, and

•

Propose to disqualify [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] from
future CACFP participation.

In addition, if [institution] voluntarily terminates its agreement after receiving this letter,
the State agency will propose to disqualify [institution], [Director], and [Board Chair and
any other RP/Is] from future CACFP participation. If disqualified, [institution], [Director],
and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] will be placed on the National Disqualified List
(NDL). While on the list, [institution] will not be able to participate in the CACFP as an
institution or facility. [Director] and [Board Chair and any other RP/Is] will not be able to
serve as a principal in any institution or facility or as a day care home provider in the
CACFP.
Institutions and individuals remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service,
in consultation with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have
been corrected, or until seven years after their disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, they will remain on the list until
the debt has been repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.6(c)(5)(ii)(D).

Sincerely,

State Agency Employee Name & Title
cc: FNS Regional Office
[If there are additional people identified as RP/Is, they must also be noted as “cc’s” and
sent their copy of the letter in accordance with the requirements in 7 CFR 226.2
(definition of “notice”).]

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 131

E. Prototype Letters – Day Care Homes
Prototype 15: Notice of Serious Deficiency Notice for Providers
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
This letter concerns the [brief description of the basis for the serious deficiency
determination – review, audit, etc. and date] of your operation of the Child and Adult
Care Food Program (CACFP).
SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION
Based on the [review/audit/etc.], the [sponsoring organization] has determined that you
are seriously deficient in your operation of the CACFP. If you do not fully and
permanently correct all of the serious deficiencies and submit documentation of the
corrective action by [date], we will propose to:
•

Terminate your agreement to participate in the CACFP for cause, and

•

Disqualify you from future CACFP participation.

If you voluntarily terminate your agreement after receiving this letter, we will propose to
disqualify you from future CACFP participation. If disqualified, the [provider] will be
placed on the National Disqualified List (NDL). While on the NDL, you will not be able to
participate in the CACFP as a day care home provider. In addition, you will not be able
to serve as a principal in any CACFP institution or facility.
You will remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service, in consultation
with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have been corrected,
or until seven years after your disqualification. However, if any debt relating to the
serious deficiencies has not been repaid, you will remain on the list until the debt has
been repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.16(l).

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 132

SERIOUS DEFICIENCIES AND REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTION
The following paragraphs detail each serious deficiency and the corrective action
required. [Insert discussion of serious deficiencies and required corrective action. Each
serious deficiency discussed must include a citation for the relevant serious deficiency
in the regulations at 7 CFR 226.16(l)(2). If the serious deficiency is not specifically
listed, cite: 7 CFR 226.16(l)(2)(ix), any other circumstance related to non-performance
under the sponsoring organization-day care home agreement.]
SUMMARY
We have determined that you are seriously deficient in your operation of the CACFP.
Documentation showing the corrective action for each of the serious deficiencies cited
in this letter is required. The documentation must be received (not just postmarked) by
[corrective action deadline]. Different deadlines for different serious deficiencies may be
established.
If we do not receive the documentation of your corrective action by [date], or if we
determine that the actions taken do not fully and permanently correct all of the serious
deficiencies, we will propose to terminate your CACFP agreement for cause and
disqualify you.
You may not appeal the serious deficiency determination. However, if we propose to
terminate your agreement for cause and disqualify you, you will be able to appeal those
actions and you will be advised the appeal procedures at that time.
You may continue to participate in the CACFP during the corrective action period. We
will pay any valid claims for reimbursement submitted by you for this period. You must
submit the claims by the normal deadline.
If we receive the documentation of your corrective action by the due date and determine
that it fully and permanently corrects all of the serious deficiencies, we will temporarily
defer the serious deficiency determination. We may conduct an unannounced follow-up
review to verify the adequacy of the corrective action. If we find in the follow-up review,
or any subsequent review, that the serious deficiency(ies) has/have not been fully and
permanently corrected, we will immediately propose to terminate your agreement for
cause and disqualify you without any further opportunity for corrective action.
Sincerely,

Sponsoring Organization Employee Name and Title
cc: State Agency

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 133

Prototype Letter 16: Notice of Successful Corrective Action and Temporary
Deferment of Serious Deficiency for Providers
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
This letter concerns the [date] Notice that you are seriously deficient in your operation of
the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). On [date], [insert if applicable:
before the corrective action deadline], we received the documentation you sent us
detailing the actions you have taken to correct these serious deficiency(ies).

SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION TEMPORARILY DEFERRED
Based on our review of the documentation, we have determined that you have fully and
permanently corrected the serious deficiency(ies). As a result, we have temporarily
deferred our serious deficiency determination as of the date of this letter. (NOTE:
Conducting a follow-up review is not required to accept a corrective action and
should NOT delay the temporary deferral of a serious deficiency determination.)
This also means that we will not propose to terminate your agreement for cause based
on this serious deficiency finding or disqualify you.
ADEQUACY OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS (optional)
The following paragraphs describe the results of our review of the corrective action.
[Insert discussion of each serious deficiency and why the corrective action is adequate.
Each serious deficiency discussed must include a citation for the relevant serious
deficiency in the regulations at 7 CFR 226.16(l)(2). If the serious deficiency is not
specifically listed, cite: 7 CFR 226.16(l)(2)(ix), any other circumstance related to nonperformance under the sponsoring organization-day care home agreement. Insert if
appropriate: Our report on the [date] follow-up review will be provided to you in a
separate letter.]
SUMMARY
We have temporarily deferred our serious deficiency determination. We may conduct an
unannounced review to determine the adequacy of your corrective action(s). If we find
Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 134

on the follow-up review or, in any subsequent review, that the serious deficiency(ies)
has/have not been fully and permanently corrected, we will immediately propose to
terminate your agreement for cause and to disqualify you without any further opportunity
for corrective action.
Sincerely,

Sponsoring Organization Employee Name and Title
cc: State Agency

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 135

Prototype Letter 17: Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification for
Providers - No Corrective Action Submitted
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
This letter concerns the [date] Notice that you are seriously deficient in your operation of
the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP).
On or before [date], you were required to the documentation detailing the actions taken
to correct the serious deficiency(ies). As of this date, you have not submitted the
required correction(s).
PROPOSED TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
As a result, effective [date], we propose to:
•

Terminate your agreement to participate in the CACFP for cause and

•

Disqualify you from future CACFP participation.

[The effective date for the termination/disqualification must be after the deadline for
requesting an appeal.]
If you voluntarily terminate your agreement after receiving this letter, we will propose to
disqualify you from future CACFP participation. If disqualified, you will be placed on the
National Disqualified List (NDL). While on the NDL, you will not be able to participate in
the CACFP as a day care home provider. In addition, you will not be able to serve as a
principal in any CACFP institution or facility.
You will remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service, in consultation
with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have been corrected,
or until seven years after your disqualification. However, if any debt relating to the
serious deficiencies has not been repaid, you will remain on the list until the debt is
repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.16(l).
Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 136

STATUS OF SERIOUS DEFICIENCY(IES) (optional)
The following paragraphs detail each serious deficiency and its status based your failure
to submit the corrective action(s) documentation.
Insert discussion of each serious deficiency and the reasons why corrective action was
inadequate (the corrective action may be adequate for some items and not for others;
make sure you specify the status of the corrective action for each serious deficiency).
Each serious deficiency discussed must include a citation for the relevant serious
deficiency in the regulations at 7 CFR 226.16(l)(2). [If the serious deficiency is not
specifically listed, cite: 7 CFR 226.16(l)(2)(ix), any other circumstance related to nonperformance under the sponsoring organization-day care home agreement.]
APPEAL OF PROPOSED TERMINATION AND PROPOSED DISQUALIFICATION
The proposed termination of your agreement for cause and your disqualification may be
appealed. A copy of the appeal procedures is enclosed. If you choose to appeal the
proposed actions, follow the appeal procedures exactly as failure to do so may result in
the denial of your request for an appeal.
SUMMARY
You have not fully and permanently corrected the serious deficiencies identified in the
Serious Deficiency Notice. For this reason, the [sponsoring organization] is proposing to
terminate your CACFP agreement for cause and to disqualify you from future Program
participation.
If you appeal the proposed termination and disqualification, the actions will not take
effect until the hearing official issues a decision. If you do not make a timely request for
an appeal, your agreement will be terminated for cause. You will be disqualified from
future CACFP participation effective [date] and placed on the NDL.
You may continue to participate in the CACFP until [termination/disqualification effective
date] or, if you appeal the proposed actions, until the hearing official issues a decision
on the appeal. We will pay any valid claims for reimbursement submitted by you for this
period. You must submit the claims by the normal deadline.
Sincerely,

Sponsoring Organization Employee Name and Title
Enclosure: Appeal Procedures
cc: State Agency
Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 137

Prototype Letter 18: Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification for
Providers - Required Corrective Action Not Acceptable
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
This letter concerns the [date] Notice that you are seriously deficient in your operation of
the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP).
On [date], we received the documentation detailing the actions taken to correct the
serious deficiency(ies). Based on our review of the documentation, we have
determined that you have not fully and permanently corrected the serious
deficiency(ies) stated in the Notice.
PROPOSED TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
As a result, we propose to:
•

Terminate your agreement to participate in the CACFP for cause and

•

Disqualify you from future CACFP participation, effective [date].

[The effective date for the termination/disqualification must be after the deadline for
requesting an appeal.]
If you voluntarily terminate your agreement after receiving this letter, we will propose to
disqualify you from future CACFP participation. If disqualified, you will be placed on the
National Disqualified List (NDL). While on the NDL, you will not be able to participate in
the CACFP as a day care home provider. In addition, you will not be able to serve as a
principal in any CACFP institution or facility.
You will remain on the NDL until USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service, in consultation
with the [State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have been corrected,
or until seven years after your disqualification. However, if any debt relating to the
serious deficiencies has not been repaid, you will remain on the list until the debt is
repaid.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 138

These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.16(l).
STATUS OF SERIOUS DEFICIENCY(IES)
The following paragraphs detail each serious deficiency and its status based on our
review of the corrective action documentation.
Insert discussion of each serious deficiency and the reasons why corrective action was
inadequate (the corrective action may be adequate for some items and not for others;
make sure you specify the status of the corrective action for each serious deficiency).
Each serious deficiency discussed must include a citation for the relevant serious
deficiency in the regulations at 7 CFR 226.16(l)(2). [If the serious deficiency is not
specifically listed, cite: 7 CFR 226.16(l)(2)(ix), any other circumstance related to nonperformance under the sponsoring organization-day care home agreement.]
APPEAL OF PROPOSED TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
The proposed termination of your agreement for cause and your disqualification may be
appealed. A copy of the appeal procedures is enclosed. If you choose to appeal the
proposed actions, follow the appeal procedures exactly as failure to do so may result in
the denial of your request for an appeal.
SUMMARY
You have not fully and permanently corrected the serious deficiencies identified in the
Serious Deficiency Notice. For this reason, the [sponsoring organization] is proposing to
terminate your CACFP agreement for cause and to disqualify you from future Program
participation.
If you appeal the proposed termination and disqualification, the actions will not take
effect until the hearing official issues a decision. If you do not make a timely request for
an appeal, your agreement will be terminated for cause. You will be disqualified from
future CACFP participation effective [date] and placed on the NDL.
You may continue to participate in the CACFP until [termination/disqualification effective
date] or, if you appeal the proposed actions, until the hearing official issues a decision
on the appeal. We will pay any valid claims for reimbursement submitted by you for this
period. You must submit the claims by the normal deadline.
Sincerely,

Sponsoring Organization Employee Name and Title
Enclosure: Appeal Procedures
Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 139

cc: State Agency

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 140

Prototype Letter 19: Notice of Termination and Disqualification for Providers Provider does not appeal

[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
This letter concerns the determination in [sponsoring organization’s] Notice which
proposed to terminate your agreement to participate in the Child and Adult Care Food
Program (CACFP) for cause. In that letter, we also proposed to disqualify you from
further CACFP participation. These actions were based on your failure to submit
acceptable corrective action(s) for the serious deficiency(ies) noted in our [date] Notice
of Serious Deficiency.
You received the Notice of Proposed Termination and Disqualification on [date
received]. You had until [insert deadline for requesting appeal] to submit a request for
an appeal of the proposed actions. No request for an appeal was submitted by that
deadline.
TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
Because the time to request an appeal has now expired, the [sponsoring organization]
is:
•

Terminating your agreement to participate in the CACFP for cause and

•

Disqualifying you from future CACFP participation, effective [date].

The effective date for the disqualification should generally be the same as the
agreement termination date, and not earlier; otherwise, the provider could be
disqualified and ineligible to participate before the agreement is terminated.
As a result of your disqualification, your name will be placed on the National Disqualified
List (NDL). While on the NDL, you will not be able to participate in the CACFP as a day
care home provider. In addition, you will not be able to serve as a principal in any
CACFP institution or facility.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 141

You will remain on the NDL, unless USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service, in consultation
with [insert name of State agency] determines that the serious deficiency(ies) has/ have
been corrected, or until seven years after your disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, you will remain on the list until
the debt is repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to7 CFR 226.16(l) of the CACFP regulations.
SUMMARY
The [sponsoring organization] is terminating your CACFP agreement for cause and
disqualifying you. You may not appeal the termination for cause or the disqualification.
You may continue to participate in the CACFP until [termination/disqualification effective
date]. We will pay any valid claims for reimbursement submitted by you for this period.
You must submit the claims by the normal deadline.
Sincerely,

Sponsoring Organization Employee Name and Title
cc: State Agency

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 142

Prototype Letter 20: Notice Termination and Disqualification for Provider Sponsoring Organization prevails in appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
This letter concerns our [date] Notice which proposed to terminate your agreement to
participate in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) for cause. In that letter,
we also proposed to disqualify you from further CACFP participation. These actions
were based on the determination in our [date] Notice that you are seriously deficiency in
your operation of the CACFP.
You filed a timely appeal of the proposed termination and disqualification. On [date of
hearing official’s decision], the hearing official issued a decision on the appeal. In that
decision, the hearing official upheld our proposed actions.
TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
As a result, the [sponsoring organization] is:
•

Terminating your agreement to participate in the CACFP for cause and

•

Disqualifying you from future CACFP participation, effective [date].

The effective date for the disqualifications should generally be the same as the
agreement termination date, and not earlier; otherwise, the provider could be
disqualified and ineligible to participate before the agreement is terminated.
As a result of your disqualification, your name will be placed on the National Disqualified
List (NDL). While on the NDL, you will not be able to participate in the CACFP as a day
care home provider. In addition, you will not be able to serve as a principal in any
CACFP institution or facility.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 143

You will remain on the NDL unless USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service, in consultation
with [insert name of State agency] determines that the serious deficiency(cies) has/have
been corrected, until seven years after your disqualification. However, if any debt
relating to the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, you will remain on the list until
the debt is repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.16(l) of the CACFP regulations.
SUMMARY
The [sponsoring organization] is terminating your CACFP agreement for cause and
disqualifying you. You may not appeal the termination for cause or the disqualification.
You may continue to participate in the CACFP until [termination/disqualification effective
date]. We will pay any valid claims for reimbursement submitted by you for this period.
You must submit the claims by the normal deadline.
Sincerely,

Sponsoring Organization Employee Name and Title
cc: State Agency

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 144

Prototype Letter 21: Notice of Temporary Deferment of Serious Deficiency and
Termination and Disqualification – Provider prevails in appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
This letter concerns our [date] Notice which proposed to terminate your agreement to
participate in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) for cause. In that letter,
we also proposed to disqualify you from further CACFP participation. These actions
were based on the determination in our [date] Notice that you are seriously deficient in
your operation of the CACFP.
You filed a timely appeal of the proposed termination and disqualification. On [date of
hearing official’s decision], the hearing official issued a decision on the appeal. In that
decision, the hearing official overturned our proposed actions. Therefore, [name of
sponsoring organization] is prohibited from terminating your agreement and
disqualifying your future participation in the Program.
SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION TEMPORARILY DEFERRED
You must still implement procedures and policies to permanently correct the serious
deficiency(ies). Upon approval of an acceptable corrective plan, [sponsoring
organization] will temporarily defer the determination that [institution] and its RPIs are
seriously deficient. If [sponsoring organization] initially determines that the corrective
action is complete, but later determines that the serious deficiency(ies) has recurred,
[sponsoring organization] must move to immediately to issue a notice of intent to
terminate and disqualify the institution and RP/Is.
Sincerely,

Sponsoring Organization Employee Name and Title
cc: State Agency

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 145

Prototype Letter 22: Notice of Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Proposed
Termination and Disqualification for Providers - Combined Notice for Imminent
Threat to Health and Safety
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
This letter concerns the [brief description of the basis for the serious deficiency
determination – review, audit, etc. and date] of your operation of the Child and Adult
Care Food Program (CACFP).
SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION
Based on the [review/audit/etc.], [sponsoring organization] have determined that you are
seriously deficient in your operation of the CACFP.
SUSPENSION
The serious deficiency identified is the imminent threat to the health or safety of
CACFP participants or the public (for details, see the description of the serious
deficiencies later in this letter). Because of this imminent risk, the sponsoring
organization is suspending your CACFP participation (including all Program
payments).
The suspension of CACFP participation (including all Program payments) will take
effect on the date of this letter. This action is being taken pursuant to 7 CFR
226.16(l)(4).
PROPOSED TERMINATION AND PROPOSED DISQUALIFICATION
As a result, effective [date], we propose to:
•

Terminate your agreement to participate in the CACFP for cause and

•

Disqualify you from future CACFP participation effective [date].

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 146

(The effective date for the termination and disqualification must be after the deadline for
requesting an appeal.)
If you voluntarily terminate your agreement after receiving this letter, we will propose to
disqualify you from future CACFP participation. If disqualified, you will be placed on the
National Disqualified List (NDL). While on the list, you will not be able to participate in
the CACFP as a day care home provider. In addition, you will not be able to serve as a
principal in any CACFP institution or facility.
You will remain on the list until the USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service, in consultation
with [name of State agency], determines that the serious deficiencies have been
corrected or until seven years after your disqualification. However, if any debt relating to
the serious deficiencies has not been repaid, you will remain on the list until the debt is
repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.16(l).
SERIOUS DEFICIENCIES
The following paragraphs detail each serious deficiency. [Insert discussion of serious
deficiencies. Each serious deficiency discussed must include a citation for the relevant
serious deficiency in the regulations at 7 CFR 226.16(l)(2). If the serious deficiency is
not specifically listed, cite: 7 CFR 226.16(l)(2)(ix), any other circumstance related to
non-performance under the sponsoring organization-day care home agreement.]
APPEAL OF SUSPENSION, PROPOSED TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
You may appeal the suspension, the proposed termination of your Program agreement
for cause, and your proposed disqualification. A copy of the appeal procedures is
enclosed. If you choose to appeal the proposed actions, follow the appeal procedures
exactly as failure to do so may result in the denial of your request for an appeal.
SUMMARY
[Name of sponsoring organization] is suspending your CACFP participation (including
all Program payments). In addition, [name of sponsoring organization] is proposing to
terminate your agreement for cause and to disqualify you.
The suspension will remain in effect during the period of any appeal. However, if you
request an appeal and the hearing official overturns the suspension all valid claims for
reimbursement submitted by you for the period of the suspension will be paid. As
always, the sponsoring organization will deny any portion of a claim that is determined
to be invalid.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 147

If you appeal the proposed termination and disqualification, these actions will not take
effect until the hearing official issues a decision. If you do not make a timely request for
an appeal, your agreement will be terminated for cause on [date]. You will be
disqualified from future CACFP participation and your name placed on the NDL.
Sincerely,

Sponsoring Organization Employee Name and Title
Enclosure: Appeal Procedures
cc: State Agency

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 148

Prototype Letter 23: Notice of Termination and Disqualification Suspension, and Proposed Termination and Disqualification - Provider does not
appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
On [date received], you received a combined Notice of Serious Deficiency,
Suspension, Proposed Termination and Disqualification. This letter concerns that
Notice which suspended your participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program
(CACFP). In that Notice, [name of sponsoring organization] also proposed to terminate
your CACFP agreement for cause and to disqualify you from further CACFP
participation. These actions were based on the determination that you were operating
under conditions that posed an imminent threat to the health and safety of Program
participants [if applicable, or the day care home had engaged in activities that
threaten the public health or safety].
You had until [insert deadline for requesting appeal] to submit a request for an appeal.
No request for an appeal was submitted by that deadline.
TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
As a result of this decision, effective [date], the [name of sponsoring organization] is:
•

Terminating your agreement to participate in the CACFP for and

•

Disqualifying you from future CACFP participation effective on [date].

As a result of the disqualification, your name will be placed on the National Disqualified
List (NDL). While on the NDL, you will not be able to participate in the CACFP as a day
care home provider. In addition, you will not be able to serve as a principal in any
CACFP institution or facility.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 149

You will remain on the NDL unless USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service], in consultation
with [name of State agency] determines that the serious deficiencies have been
corrected or until seven years after your disqualification. However, if any debt relating to
the serious deficiency has not been repaid, you will remain on the list until the debt has
been repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.16(l)(4).
SUMMARY
[Name of sponsoring organization] is terminating your CACFP agreement for cause and
disqualifying you. You may not appeal the termination for cause or the disqualification.
Since your participation was suspended, you may only claim reimbursement for valid
meals served up until [insert date of suspension]. You must submit a claim for these
meals by [insert a date that will give the provider an appropriate length of time to submit
these claims].
Sincerely,
Sponsoring Organization Employee Name & Title
cc: State Agency

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 150

Prototype Letter 24: Notice of Termination and Disqualification - Imminent Threat
to Health or Safety after sponsoring organization prevails in appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
On [date received], you received a combined Notice of Serious Deficiency,
Suspension, Proposed Termination and Disqualification. This letter concerns that
Notice which suspended your participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program
(CACFP). In that Notice, [name of sponsoring organization] also proposed to terminate
your CACFP agreement for cause and to disqualify you from further CACFP
participation. These actions were based on the determination that you were operating
under conditions that posed an imminent threat to the health and safety of Program
participants [if applicable, or the day care home had engaged in activities that
threaten the public health or safety].
You filed a timely appeal of the suspension and proposed termination and
disqualification. On [date of appeal official‘s decision], the Administrative Review
Official issued a decision on all of the appeals. In that decision, the suspension and
proposed actions were upheld.
TERMINATION AND DISQUALIFICATION
As a result of this decision, effective [date] the sponsoring organization is:
•

Terminating your agreement to participate in the CACFP for cause and

•

Disqualifying you from future CACFP participation.

As a result of your disqualification, your name will be placed on the National Disqualified
List (NDL). While on the NDL, you will not be able to participate in the CACFP as a day
care home provider. In addition, you will not be able to serve as a principal in any
CACFP institution or facility.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 151

You will remain on the NDL unless USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service], in consultation
with [name of State agency] determines that the serious deficiencies have been
corrected or until seven years after your disqualification. However, if any debt relating to
the serious deficiency has not been repaid, you will remain on the list until the debt has
been repaid.
These actions are being taken pursuant to 7 CFR 226.16(l).

SUMMARY
[Name of sponsoring organization] is terminating your CACFP agreement for cause and
disqualifying you. You may not appeal the termination for cause or the disqualification.
Since your participation was suspended, you may only claim reimbursement for valid
meals served up until [insert date of suspension]. You must submit a claim for these
meals by [insert a date that will give the provider an appropriate length of time to submit
these claims].
Sincerely,
Sponsoring Organization Employee Name & Title
cc: State Agency

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 152

Prototype Letter 25: Notice of Recission of Suspension, Proposed
Termination and Disqualification - Imminent Threat to Health or Safety after
provider prevails in appeal
[Note: Send this letter by certified mail/return receipt, an equivalent private delivery
service (such as FedEx), fax, or e-mail as required by 7 CFR 226.2, definition of “notice”
in the regulations.]
Date
Provider Name
Provider Street Address
Provider City, State 00000
Dear [Provider]:
On [date received], you received a combined Notice of Serious Deficiency,
Suspension, Proposed Termination and Disqualification. This letter concerns that
Notice which suspended your participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program
(CACFP). In that Notice, [name of sponsoring organization] also proposed to terminate
your CACFP agreement for cause and to disqualify you from further CACFP
participation. These actions were based on the determination that you were operating
under conditions that posed an imminent threat to the health and safety of Program
participants [if applicable, or the day care home had engaged in activities that
threaten the public health or safety]
You filed a timely appeal of the suspension and the proposed termination and
disqualification. On [date of appeal official‘s decision], the Administrative Review
Official issued a decision. In that decision, the suspension and proposed actions
were overturned.
SERIOUS DEFICIENCY DETERMINATION, SUSPENSION, PROPOSED
TERMINATION AND PROPOSED DISQUALIFICATION
As a result, [name of sponsoring organization] is prohibited from suspending your
participation, terminating your agreement for cause, and your proposed disqualifying
you from future participating in the Program.
Any valid claims for reimbursement submitted by you for the period of the suspension
will be paid. You must submit these claims by [insert a date that will give the provider
an appropriate length of time to submit these claims].
You must still submit a corrective action plan to implement procedures and policies to
permanently correct the serious deficiency(ies). Upon approval of an acceptable
corrective plan, [sponsoring organization] will temporarily defer the determination that
you are seriously deficient. If [sponsoring organization] initially determines that the
Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 153

corrective action is complete, but later determines that the serious deficiency(ies) has
recurred, [sponsoring organization] must move to immediately to issue a notice of intent
to terminate and disqualify you.
Sincerely,

Sponsoring Organization Employee Name & Title
cc: State Agency

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 154

F. Prototype Letters – Unaffiliated Centers
This section was intentionally left blank. We will provide prototype letters related to
unaffiliated centers when the final regulation implementing these requirements is
published.

Serious Deficiency, Suspension, and Appeals

Page 155