National Security Space Institute (NSSI) End of Course Survey

NSSI End of Course Survey

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 0704-0553

OMB EXPIRATION DATE: XX/XX/XXXX

AGENCY DISCLOSURE NOTICE

The public reporting burden for this collection of information, 0704-0553, is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, at [email protected]. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

Start of Block: Survey Introduction

Thank you for attending National Security Space Institute! 

To help us continuously improve the experience we provide our students, please complete this end of course evaluation. This evaluation will cover both the course content and your instructor. Providing information in this survey is voluntary. 

This survey should take you 5-10 minutes to complete. 

Page Break

End of Block: Survey Introduction

Start of Block: QR

Please select your course

• Aegis

• Space Executive Course

• Joint Integrated Space Team Course

• Concepts if Orbital Warfare Course

• Joint Space Targeting Course

• Squadron Leadership Course

Page Break

End of Block: QR

Start of Block: Standardized evaluation

Overall, how satisfied were you with this course? 

• Very dissatisfied

• Dissatisfied

• Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

• Satisfied

• Very satisfied

Page Break

How satisfied were you with the quality of the course content?

• Very dissatisfied

• Dissatisfied

• Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

• Satisfied

• Very satisfied

How relevant is the course content?

• Course content was irrelevant

• Most of the content was irrelevant

• Some of the content was relevant

• Most of the content was relevant

• Course content was relevant

How clear was the content covered in this course? 

• All of the content was confusing and poorly-presented

• Some of the content was confusing/poorly-presented

• Neither clear nor unclear

• Some of the course content was clear/well-presented

• All of the course content was clear and well-presented

Was the course content appropriate for the course level? 

• Extremely inappropriate

• Somewhat inappropriate

• Neither appropriate nor inappropriate

• Somewhat appropriate

• Extremely appropriate

Page Break

Was the course engaging?

• Not at all engaging

• Slightly engaging

• Neutral

• Moderately engaging

• Extremely engaging

How satisfied were you with the pace of this course?

• Very dissatisfied

• Dissatisfied

• Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

• Satisfied

• Very satisfied

Page Break

How satisfied were you with the knowledge checks/assessments in this course? 

• Very dissatisfied

• Dissatisfied

• Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

• Satisfied

• Very satisfied

Page Break

How difficult were the course knowledge checks/assessments

• Extremely difficult

• Somewhat difficult

• Neither easy nor difficult

• Somewhat easy

• Extremely easy

How aligned were the knowledge checks/assessments to the course content?

• Not aligned at all

• Somewhat aligned

• Moderately aligned

• Mostly aligned

• Very well aligned

Page Break

Were the resources provided throughout the course (i.e., readings, hyperlinks) useful?

• Not at all useful

• Slightly useful

• Moderately useful

• Very useful

• Extremely useful

Page Break

Is there any additional feedback about the course content, material or instruction you would like to provide?

________________________________________________________________

End of Block: Standardized evaluation

Start of Block: Instructor Selection

Select your instructor

▼ Chad Riden ... Maj Swank

End of Block: Instructor Selection

Start of Block: Instructor Evaluation

How satisfied were you with ${e://Field/role} throughout this course?

• Very dissatisfied

• Dissatisfied

• Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

• Satisfied

• Very satisfied

Please explain why you were ${Q2.12/ChoiceGroup/SelectedChoices} with ${e://Field/role}? 

________________________________________________________________

How knowledgeable was ${e://Field/role} on the course content?

• Not knowledgeable at all

• Slightly knowledgeable

• Moderately knowledgeable

• Very knowledgeable

• Extremely knowledgeable

How would you rate ${e://Field/role}'s professionalism throughout this course?

• Extremely unprofessional

• Somewhat unprofessional

• Neither professional nor unprofessional

• Somewhat professional

• Extremely professional

Please provide any additional details regarding ${e://Field/role}'s professionalism:

________________________________________________________________

How well did ${e://Field/role} communicate the course content? 

• Not well at all

• Slightly well

• Moderately well

• Very well

• Extremely well

End of Block: Instructor Evaluation

Start of Block: Aegis Block

After completing the Aegis Members' Course, graduates will be able to:
1) Understand how they can more effectively execute their unit's mission.
2) Understand how they can more effectively manage resources in support of their unit's mission. 3)Understand how they can improve their unit in key performance areas.
4) Understand how they can more effectively lead people within their unit.
5) Understand how command culture and climate can be reinforced through a "30-60-90 Day" Plan.

The course objectives stated above were successfully achieved.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

The course was well organized.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

The course contained current content.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

Instruction during the course was delivered effectively.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

The speakers promoted an inclusive learning environment where all students felt free to participate.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

The diversity of topics, speakers, mentors, and attendees contributed to the effectiveness of the course.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

Please indicate your overall level of satisfaction with this course.

• Very dissatisfied

• Dissatisfied

• Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

• Satisfied

• Very satisfied

How likely are you to recommend this course to your peers and colleagues?

• Extremely Likely to Recommend

• Somewhat Likely to Recommend

• Neutral

• Unlikely to Recommend

• Will Not Recommend

Did the venue contribute to student learning and achieving course objectives, why or why not?

________________________________________________________________

Are there lesson(s) you think should be added to the course and explain why?

________________________________________________________________

End of Block: Aegis Block

Start of Block: SLC Block

After completing the Aegis Members' Course, graduates will be able to:
 1) Understand how they can more effectively execute their unit's mission.
 2) Understand how they can more effectively manage resources in support of their unit's mission. 
 3)Understand how they can improve their unit in key performance areas.
 4) Understand how they can more effectively lead people within their unit.
 5) Understand how command culture and climate can be reinforced through a "30-60-90 Day" Plan.

The course objectives stated above were successfully achieved.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

The course was well organized.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

The course contained current content

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

Instruction during the course was delivered effectively.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

The speakers promoted an inclusive learning environment where all students felt free to participate.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

The diversity of topics, speakers, mentors, and attendees contributed to the effectiveness of the course.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

Please indicate your overall level of satisfaction with this course.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

How likely are you to recommend this course to your peers and colleagues?

• Extremely Likely to Recommend

• Somewhat Likely to Recommend

• Neutral

• Unlikely to Recommend

• Will not Recommend

Did the venue contribute to student learning and achieving course objectives, why or why not?

________________________________________________________________

Are there lesson(s) you think should be added to the course and explain why?

________________________________________________________________

End of Block: SLC Block

Start of Block: ITS Block

Thank you for completing the survey.

End of Block: ITS Block

Start of Block: DAC Block

Thank you for completing the survey.

End of Block: DAC Block

Start of Block: Space 200 Block

Thank you for completing the survey.

End of Block: Space 200 Block

Start of Block: Space 100 Block

How did you attend the course?

• In Resident

• Distance Learning

• Virtual Attendance

End of Block: Space 100 Block

Start of Block: Space 300 Block

The course design promoted critical and/or creative thinking and inquiry. 

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

The course focus on the strategic level of warfighting and acquisition of space capabilities met my expectations for a 300-level course. 

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Neither Agree nor Disagree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

Thank you for completing the survey.

Start of Block: Take Again

Do you need to evaluate another instructor?

• Yes

• No

End of Block: Take Again

Page 14 of 14