Document
PTA-AVS-Drug and Alcohol Testing Program for Personnel Engaged in Specified Aviation Activities Notice of Propose Rulemaking (NP
ICR 202606-2120-015 · OMB 2120-0535 · Object 169922500.
Document Viewer [pdf]
Status: Original and derived artifacts are available for this document.
Download: pdf
Loading document viewer…
Document Metadata
| File Type | application/pdf |
|---|---|
| File Title | PTA-AVS-Drug and Alcohol Testing Program for Personnel Engaged in Specified Aviation Activities Notice of Propose Rulemaking (NP |
| Author | Shams-Ramsey, Maria CTR (OST) |
| Last Modified By | Acrobat PDFMaker 23 for Word |
| File Modified | 2024-02-27 |
| File Created | 2024-02-27 |
| Conversion State | complete |
Extracted Text
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) Federal Aviation Administration Drug and Alcohol Testing Program for Personnel Engaged in Specified Aviation Activities Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) signed KARYN Digitally by KARYN MARIE GORMAN MARIE Date: 2024.02.27 GORMAN 13:54:23 -05'00' 1 U.S. Department of Transportation Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) The Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) is an analytical tool used to determine the scope of privacy risk management activities that must be executed to ensure that the Department’s initiatives do not create undue privacy risks for individuals. The Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) is a privacy risk management tool used by the Department of Transportation (DOT) Chief Privacy Officer (CPO). The PTA determines whether a Department system 1 creates privacy risk for individuals that must be further analyzed, documented, or mitigated, and determines the need for additional privacy compliance documentation. Additional documentation can include Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs), System of Records notices (SORNs), and Privacy Act Exemption Rules (Exemption Rules). The majority of the Department’s privacy risk emanates from its direct collection, use, storage, and sharing of Personally Identifiable Information (PII), 2 and the IT systems used to support those processes. However, privacy risk can also be created in the Department’s use of paper records or other technologies. The Department may also create privacy risk for individuals through its rulemakings and information collection requirements that require other entities to collect, use, store or share PII, or deploy technologies that create privacy risk for members of the public. To ensure that the Department appropriately identifies those activities that may create privacy risk, a PTA is required for all IT systems, technologies, proposed rulemakings, and information collections at the Department. Additionally, the PTA is used to alert other information management stakeholders of potential risks, including information security, records management and information collection management programs. It is also used by the Department’s Chief Information Officer (CIO) and Associate CIO for IT Policy and Governance (Associate CIO) to support efforts to ensure compliance with other information asset requirements including, but not limited to, the Federal Records Act (FRA), the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), the Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA) and applicable Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance. Each Component establishes and follows its own processes for developing, reviewing, and verifying the PTA prior to its submission to the DOT CPO. At a minimum the PTA must be reviewed by the Component business owner, information system security For the purposes of the PTA the term “system” is used throughout document but is not limited to traditional IT systems. It can and does refer to business activity and processes, IT systems, information collection, a project, program and/or technology, and proposed rulemaking as appropriate for the context of the assessment. 2 The term “personally identifiable information” refers to information which can be used to distinguish or trace an individual's identity, such as their name, social security number, biometric records, etc. alone, or when combined with other personal or identifying information which is linked or linkable to a specific individual, such as date and place of birth, mother’s maiden name, etc. 1 1 U.S. Department of Transportation manager, general counsel, records officers, and privacy officer. After the Component review is completed, the Component Privacy Office will forward the PTA to the DOT Privacy Office for final adjudication. Only PTAs watermarked “adjudicated” and electronically signed by the DOT CPO are considered final. Do NOT send the PTA directly to the DOT PO; PTAs received by the DOT CPO directly from program/business owners will not be reviewed. If you have questions or require assistance to complete the PTA please contact your Component Privacy Officer or the DOT Privacy Office at [email protected]. Explanatory guidance for completing the PTA can be found in the PTA Development Guide found on the DOT Privacy Program website, www.dot.gov/privacy. 2 U.S. Department of Transportation PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SYSTEM name: Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certificated Repair Station Employees Located Outside of the United States Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) Cyber Security Assessment and Management (CSAM) ID: N/A SYSTEM MANAGER CONTACT Information: Name: Nancy Rodriguez Brown Email:[email protected] Phone Number: 202-267-8442 Is this a NEW system? ☒ Yes (Proceed to Section 1) ☐ No ☐ Renewal ☐ Modification Is there a PREVIOUSLY ADJUDICATED PTA for this system? ☐ Yes: Date: ☐ No 1 SUMMARY INFORMATION 1.1 System TYPE ☐ Information Technology and/or Information System Unique Investment Identifier (UII): Cyber Security Assessment and Management (CSAM) ID: ☐ Paper Based: ☒ Rulemaking Rulemaking Identification Number (RIN): Rulemaking Stage: ☒ Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) 2120-AK09 ☐ Supplemental NPRM (SNPRM): ☐ Final Rule: Federal Register (FR) Notice: https://www.regulations.gov/document/FAA-2012-1058-0092 3 U.S. Department of Transportation ☐ Information Collection Request (ICR)3 ☐ New Collection ☐ Approved Collection or Collection Renewal ☐ OMB Control Number: ☐ Control Number Expiration Date: ☐ Other: 1.2 System OVERVIEW: The Federal Aviation Administration is developing a Privacy Threshold Assessment for the Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certificated Repair Station Employees Located Outside of the United States Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 mandates the FAA to include certain aviation entities located outside the territory of the United States in its requirement to conduct drug and alcohol testing. Additionally, the NPRM is promulgated under section 2112 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016, which directed the publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking under 49 U.S.C. 44733. As a result, the FAA published in December 2023, the NPRM, Drug, and Alcohol Testing of Certificated Repair Station Employees Located Outside of the United States, which would require a part 145 repair station located outside the territory of the U.S. to implement a drug and alcohol testing program meeting the requirements of 49 CFR part 40 and 14 CFR part 120, which must cover its employees who perform maintenance functions on part 121 air carrier aircraft. If adopted, this rule would require foreign repair stations to obtain a Drug and Alcohol Testing Program Operations Specification (A449) in the FAA’s Operations Specifications database. Additionally, these repair stations would be required to report annual drug and alcohol testing program statistics through the Department of Transportation Drug and Alcohol Management Information System (DAMIS 4). Foreign repair stations would submit their annual reports electronically via DAMIS or submit a paper copy via email or fax or the United States Postal Service. A senior program analyst enters the data directly into DAMIS. The annual reports collect the company’ name, doing business as name if applicable, address, email address, telephone number, name of certifying official, and signature. If the report was prepared by someone other than the certifying official, the reports collect their name and phone number. If a Consortium/Third Party Administrator (C/TPA) performs administrative services for an employer’s drug and alcohol program operation, the report collects their name and phone See 44 USC 3501-3521; 5 CFR Part 1320 DAMIS is own by DOT. The FAA is not creating any new systems with this rule. The required information will be added to an existing DOT and FAA systems. 3 4 4 U.S. Department of Transportation number. See the Department of Transportation, Drug and Alcohol Testing Data Collection Form for a complete list of data that is collected. This rule would also require foreign repair stations to report to the FAA's Federal Air Surgeon all drug or alcohol test violations (e.g., verified positive drug test results or prohibited alcohol-related conduct) for any safety-sensitive employee or applicant who holds a medical certificate issued under 14 CFR part 67, and all violations of refusing to submit to a drug or alcohol test by any safety-sensitive employee or applicant who holds a certificate issued under 14 CFR parts 61, 63, or 65. These reports collect personally identifiable information about individuals who have tested positive on or refused a DOT drug or alcohol test, which may include the employee's name, position, employee number 5, and date of birth. This is currently an existing requirement for domestic employers subject to testing under 14 CFR part 120 and would extend to foreign repair stations if the NPRM is finalized as proposed. As with the current requirement for domestic employees, all information will be entered into the Compliance and Enforcement Tracking System (CETS) 6. 2 INFORMATION MANGEMENT 2.1 SUBJECTS of Collection Identify the subject population(s) for whom the system collects, maintains, or disseminates PII. (Check all that apply) ☒ Members of the public: Note: The information collected is about aviation entities outside of the United States and not individuals. ☐ Citizens or Legal Permanent Residents (LPR) ☐ Visitors ☐ Members of the DOT Federal workforce ☐ Members of the DOT Contract workforce ☐ System Does Not Collect PII. If the system does not collect PII, proceed directly to question 2.3. CETS does not collect the SSN but asked for the employee ID number. Some companies may use the employee’s SSN as their employee ID number. Individual of foreign repair station are most likely not US citizens and would not have SSN. 6 There is an adjudicated PTA for CETS dated 03/02/2023; CSAM ID 1381 5 5 U.S. Department of Transportation 2.2 2.3 What INFORMATION ABOUT INDIVIDUALS will be collected, used, retained, or generated?For reports of specific employee violations to the FAA, reports collect personally identifiable information about individuals who have tested positive on or refused a DOT drug or alcohol test, which may include the employee’s name, position, employee number, and date of birth. Does the system RELATE to or provide information about individuals? ☒ Yes: ☐ No If the answer to 2.1 is “System Does Not Collect PII” and the answer to 2.3 is “No”, you may proceed to question 2.10. If the system collects PII or relate to individual in any way, proceed to question 2.4. 2.4 Does the system use or collect SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS (SSNs)? (This includes truncated SSNs) ☐ Yes: Authority: Purpose: 2.5 ☒ No: The system does not use or collect SSNs, including truncated SSNs. Proceed to 2.6. Has an SSN REDUCTION plan been established for the system? ☐ Yes: ☐ No: 2.6 Does the system collect PSEUDO-SSNs? ☐ Yes: ☐ No: The system does not collect pseudo-SSNs, including truncated SSNs. 6 U.S. Department of Transportation 2.7 Will information about individuals be retrieved or accessed by a UNIQUE IDENTIFIER associated with or assigned to an individual? ☐ Yes Is there an existing Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) for the records retrieved or accessed by a unique identifier? ☐ Yes: SORN: ☒ No: Explanation: Expected Publication: 2.8 ☐ Not Applicable: Proceed to question 2.9 Has a Privacy Act EXEMPTION RULE been published in support of any Exemptions claimed in the SORN? ☐ Yes Exemption Rule: ☐ No Explanation: Expected Publication: 2.9 ☒ Not Applicable: SORN does not claim Privacy Act exemptions. Has a PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) been published for this system? ☐ Yes: ☒ No: This is the initial PTA for the NPRM. 2.10 ☐ Not Applicable: The most recently adjudicated PTA indicated no PIA was required for this system. Does the system EXCHANGE (receive and/or send) DATA from another INTERNAL (DOT) or EXTERNAL (non-DOT) system or business activity? ☐ Yes: ☒ No 2.11 Does the system have a National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)-approved RECORDS DISPOSITION schedule for system records? ☒ Yes: Schedule Identifier: Schedule Summary: 7 U.S. Department of Transportation ☒ In Progress NCl-237-83-1, Item 12, 2100 RULES AND REGULATIONS RECORDS is in the procress of being updated. ☐ No: Click here to enter text. 3 SYSTEM LIFECYCLE 3.1 3.2 The systems development life cycle (SDLC) is a process for planning, creating, testing, and deploying an information system. Privacy risk can change depending on where a system is in its lifecycle. Was this system IN PLACE in an ELECTRONIC FORMAT prior to 2002? The E-Government Act of 2002 (EGov) establishes criteria for the types of systems that require additional privacy considerations. It applies to systems established in 2002 or later, or existing systems that were modified after 2002. ☐ Yes: ☐No ☒Not Applicable: The system is not currently an electronic system. Proceed to Section 4. Has the system been MODIFIED in any way since 2002? ☐ Yes: The system has been modified since 2002. ☐ Maintenance. ☐ Security. ☐ Changes Creating Privacy Risk: ☐ Other: 3.3 ☐ No: The system has not been modified in any way since 2002. Is the system a CONTRACTOR-owned or -managed system? ☐ Yes: The system is owned or managed under contract. Contract Number: Contractor: 3.4 ☐ No: The system is owned and managed by Federal employees. Has a system Security Risk CATEGORIZATION been completed? The DOT Privacy Risk Management policy requires that all PII be protected using controls consistent with Federal Information Processing Standard Publication 199 (FIPS 199) moderate confidentiality standards. The OA Privacy 8 U.S. Department of Transportation Officer should be engaged in the risk determination process and take data types into account. ☐ Yes: A risk categorization has been completed. Based on the risk level definitions and classifications provided above, indicate the information categorization determinations for each of the following: Confidentiality: Integrity: Availability: ☐ Low ☐ Low ☐ Low ☐ Moderate ☐ Moderate ☐ Moderate ☐ High ☐ High ☐ High ☐ Undefined ☐ Undefined ☐ Undefined Based on the risk level definitions and classifications provided above, indicate the information system categorization determinations for each of the following: Confidentiality: Integrity: Availability: 3.5 ☐ Low ☐ Low ☐ Low ☐ Moderate ☐ Moderate ☐ Moderate ☐ High ☐ High ☐ High ☐ Undefined ☐ Undefined ☐ Undefined ☐ No: A risk categorization has not been completed. Provide date of anticipated completion. Click here to enter text. Has the system been issued an AUTHORITY TO OPERATE? ☐ Yes: Date of Initial Authority to Operate (ATO): Anticipated Date of Updated ATO: ☐ No: ☐ Not Applicable: System is not covered by the Federal Information Security Act (FISMA). 4 COMPONENT PRIVACY OFFICER ANALYSIS The Component Privacy Officer (PO) is responsible for ensuring that the PTA is as complete and accurate as possible before submitting to the DOT Privacy Office for review and adjudication. COMPONENT PRIVACY OFFICER CONTACT Information Name: Essie L. Bell Email: [email protected] Phone Number: 202-267-6034 9 U.S. Department of Transportation COMPONENT PRIVACY OFFICER Analysis Click here to enter text. 5 COMPONENT REVIEW Prior to submitting the PTA for adjudication, it is critical that the oversight offices within the Component have reviewed the PTA for completeness, comprehension and accuracy. Component Reviewer Name Business Owner Nancy Rodriguez Brown Information System Security Manager (ISSM) Click here to enter text. General Counsel Privacy Officer Records Officer Michael McKinley Review Date 2/1/2024 2/22/2024 Essie L. Bell 2/1/2024 Richard Allen 2/1/2024 Table 1 - Individuals who have reviewed the PTA and attest to its completeness, comprehension and accuracy. 10 U.S. Department of Transportation Control Control Name Primary PTA # Question AP-1 AP-2 AR-1 AR-2 AR-3 Satisfied Authority to Collect Purpose Specification 1.2 Overview 1.2 Overview X Other N/A Component PO Assessment than Satisfied 49 CFR part 40 and 14 CFR part 120 X Purposed Defined Concur Governance and Privacy Program Privacy Impact and Risk Assessment Common Control X Addressed by DOT Privacy Concur Program Management X Privacy Requirements for Contractors and Service Providers 3.3 Contractor System The NPRM requires repair stations located outside the Concur territory of the U.S. to implement a drug and alcohol testing program and report to report to the FAA's Federal Air Surgeon all drug or alcohol test violations. This information will be entered into the Compliance and Enforcement Tracking System (CETS). The FAA already collects the information from domestic repair station and there is a Privacy Impact Assessment for CETS available at https://www.transportation.gov/individuals/privacy/piacompliance-and-enforcement-tracking-system-cets. A PIA is not required for the NPRM. Since the information is collected form non-US citizen no update is required is for CETS. This is a NPRM, owned and managed by Federal Concur employees. 1 DOT CPO Assessment Concur U.S. Department of Transportation Control Control Name Primary PTA # Question AR-4 AR-5 AR-6 AR-7 AR-8 DI-1 DI-2 DM-1 Privacy Monitoring and Auditing Privacy Awareness and Training Privacy Reporting PrivacyEnhanced System Design and Development Accounting of Disclosures Data Quality Common Control Data Integrity and Data Integrity Board Minimization of PII 3.4 - Security Risk Categorization Satisfied Other N/A Component PO Assessment than Satisfied Addressed by DOT CPO. DOT CPO Assessment Concur Common Control X Addressed by DOT CPO. Concur Common Control 2.5 - SSN Reduction X Addressed by DOT CPO. Concur 2.7 - SORN 1.2 - System Overview 2.2 – Information About Individuals X The proposed rulemaking does not require collection of Concur the SSN. X Not a Privacy Act System of Records. Concur Business owner is responsible for ensuring DOT Privacy Risk Management Policy and the FIPPs are applied to all data holdings and systems. Activity does not constitute sharing covered by the CMA. Concur Collection of PII commensurate with purpose of the system. Concur X X X 2 Concur U.S. Department of Transportation Control Control Name Primary PTA # Question DM-2 Data Retention and Disposal 2.11 - Records Disposition Schedule DM-3 Minimization of PII Used in Testing, Training, and Research Consent 2.2 – Information About Individuals IP-1 IP-2 Individual Access 2.7 - SORN 2.8 – Exemption Rule Satisfied X Other N/A Component PO Assessment than Satisfied Record schedule for the rule is in place but requires updating. X DOT CPO Assessment Concur NPRM is not proposing to use information for testing, training or research. Concur Control is N/A to the primary purposes and records of the system. Business owner is responsible for ensuring DOT Privacy Risk Management Policy and the FIPPs are applied to all data holdings and systems. Concur The proposed rulemaking does not require collection of information that is not already required under existing FAA regulations. No SORN coverage is required. Control is N/A to the primary purposes and records of Concur the system. Business owner is responsible for ensuring DOT Privacy Risk Management Policy and the FIPPs are applied to all data holdings and systems. X The proposed rulemaking does not require collection of information that is not already required under existing FAA regulations. No SORN coverage is required. IP-3 Redress 2.7 - SORN X Control is N/A to the primary purposes and records of the system. Business owner is responsible for ensuring 3 Concur U.S. Department of Transportation Control Control Name Primary PTA # Question IP-4 SE-1 SE-2 TR-1 TR-2 TR-3 UL-1 Complaint Management Inventory of PII Privacy Incident Response Privacy Notice System of Records Notices and Privacy Act Statements Dissemination of Privacy Program Information Internal Use Common Control Common Control Common Control Satisfied Other N/A Component PO Assessment than Satisfied DOT Privacy Risk Management Policy and the FIPPs are applied to all data holdings and systems. DOT CPO Assessment X The proposed rulemaking does not require collection of information that is not already required under existing FAA regulations. No SORN coverage is required. Addressed by DOT Privacy. Concur X Not an IT system under FISMA. Concur X Addressed by DOT Privacy. Concur 2.7 - SORN X No SORN coverage is required. Concur 2.7 - SORN X No SORN coverage is required. Concur Addressed by DOT Privacy Concur No internal sharing Concur Common Control 2.10 - Internal and External Use X X 4 U.S. Department of Transportation Control Control Name Primary PTA # Question UL-2 Information Sharing with Third Parties 2.10 - Internal and External Use Satisfied Other N/A Component PO Assessment than Satisfied X No internal sharing 5 DOT CPO Assessment Concur U.S. Department of Transportation 1