Document

60-Day FRN

ICR 202606-2127-001 · OMB 2127-0753 · Object 170946200.

Document Viewer [pdf]

Status: Original and derived artifacts are available for this document.

Download: pdf

Primary: pdfSource: application/pdf
Loading document viewer…

Document Metadata

Record metadata
application/pdf
60-Day FRN
govinfo, U. S. Government Publishing Office
2026-06-25
2026-06-25
complete

Extracted Text

38472

Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2026 / Notices

• Wellness Questionnaire (NHTSA
Form 2182): We expect 300 participants
to take approximately 2 minutes to
complete this form three times for a
total burden of six minutes.
• Questionnaire 1 (NHTSA Form
2183): We expect it will take six
minutes for completion. 50 respondents
will complete this form five times.
• Questionnaire 2 (NHTSA Form
2184): We expect it will take five
minutes for completion. 50 respondents
will complete this form once.
• Questionnaire 3 (NHTSA Form
2185): We expect it will take 10 minutes

for completion. 250 respondents will
complete this form once.
• Questionnaire 4 (NHTSA Form
2186): We expect it will take 15 minutes
for completion. 250 respondents will
complete this form once.
• Driving Behavior Assessment 1: We
expect 50 participants to complete the
behavior assessment once. Participants
will take 80 minutes to complete the
block of procedures. The procedures
include a pre-drive PowerPoint training
and simulator orientation of
approximately 5 minutes, a
familiarization drive of approximately

15 minutes, and five study drives of
approximately 12 minutes each.
• Driving Behavior Assessment 2: We
expect 250 participants to complete the
driving behavior assessment once.
Participants will take 110 minutes to
complete the block of procedures. The
procedures include a pre-drive
PowerPoint training and simulator
orientation of approximately five
minutes, a familiarization drive of
approximately 15 minutes, and two
study drives of approximately 45
minutes each.

TABLE 2—BURDEN ESTIMATES
NHTSA
form No.

Information collection

2179 .......
2180 .......
2181 .......

Eligibility Questionnaire ...............................................................
Informed Consent Document 1 ...................................................
Informed Consent Document 2 ...................................................
Intake & Eligibility Confirmation ..................................................
Wellness Questionnaire ..............................................................
Questionnaire 1 ...........................................................................
Questionnaire 2 ...........................................................................
Questionnaire 3 ...........................................................................
Questionnaire 4 ...........................................................................
Driving Behavior Assessment 1 ..................................................
Driving Behavior Assessment 2 ..................................................

2182 .......
2183 .......
2184 .......
2185 .......
2186 .......

Number of
respondents

Frequency of
response

700
50
250
300
300
50
50
250
250
50
250

1
1
1
1
3
5
1
1
1
1
1

lotter on DSK8BHNXB4PROD with NOTICES1

Total .........................................................................................

Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
$0.
Respondents will not incur any
reporting or recordkeeping costs from
the information collection. The only
cost respondents will incur is a onetime cost for local travel to and from
DSRI. The costs are minimal and are
expected to be offset by the monetary
compensation that will be provided to
all participants who enroll.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspects of this
information collection, including (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Department’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:39 Jun 24, 2026

Jkt 268001

Cem Hatipoglu,
Associate Administrator, Vehicle Safety
Research.
[FR Doc. 2026–12835 Filed 6–24–26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2026–1321]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Notice and Request for
Comment; State Data Transfer
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments on a request for a renewal
with modification of a currently
approved information collection.
SUMMARY: NHTSA invites public

comments about our intention to request
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for a renewal with
modification of a currently approved
information collection. Before a Federal

Frm 00082

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

12
15
15
5
2
6
5
10
15
80
110

Burden hours
140
13
63
25
30
25
5
42
63
67
459
932

amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order
1351.29A.

PO 00000

Time per
response
(minutes)

agency can collect certain information
from the public, it must receive
approval from OMB. Under procedures
established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB
approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed
collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatement of
previously approved collections. This
document describes a collection of
information for which NHTSA intends
to seek OMB approval on the State Data
Transfer (SDT) program for Vehicle
Crash Information.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 24, 2026.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Docket No. NHTSA–2026–
1321 through any of the following
methods:
• Electronic submissions: Go to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket
Management, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Building, Room W58–
213, Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except on Federal holidays. To

E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM

25JNN1

lotter on DSK8BHNXB4PROD with NOTICES1

Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2026 / Notices
be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 366–9826 or (202) 366–
9317 before coming.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this notice. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
www.transportation.gov/privacy.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to http://
www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets
via internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or access to
background documents, contact Liza
Lemaster-Sandbank, Office of State Data
Reporting System Division, (NSA–
0120), (202) 744–5942, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
W43–481, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Please identify the relevant collection of
information by referring to its OMB
Control Number, 2127–0753.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before an agency
submits a proposed collection of
information to OMB for approval, it
must first publish a document in the
Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulation (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following: (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:39 Jun 24, 2026

Jkt 268001

(c) how to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) how to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses. In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed
collection of information for which the
agency is seeking approval from OMB.
Title: State Data Transfer (SDT).
OMB Control Number: 2127–0753.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Type of Request: Renewal with
modification of a currently approved
information collection.
Type of Review Requested: Regular.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: Three years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: The State Data Transfer
(SDT) program is a voluntary collection
of motor vehicle crash data.
Participating States electronically
transfer Police Crash Report (PCR) data,
supplemental crash reports, and crash
images to NHTSA using automated
electronic data transfer (EDT) protocols.
Transfers typically occur nightly in
Extensible Markup Language (XML) or
JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)
formats via web services. This
information collection updates the
burden estimates and removes the
legacy State Data System (SDS) protocol,
which is being sunsetted, leaving only
the automated EDT protocol in place.
The program includes Non-SEDC States
that voluntarily transmit data under the
terms of a memorandum of
understanding, as well as SEDC States
participating under the State Electronic
Data Collection (SEDC) discretionary
grant program, which requires states to
modernize their crash data repositories,
align with Model Minimum Uniform
Crash Criteria (MMUCC) Sixth Edition
standards, and transfer data
electronically.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information: NHTSA uses SDT data to
identify existing and emerging highway
safety trends, evaluate the effectiveness
of motor vehicle safety standards, and
develop countermeasures to reduce
deaths and injuries from motor vehicle
crashes. The data allows NHTSA to
study the effectiveness of emerging
technologies, such as advanced driver
assistance systems (ADAS), and
supplies critical volume to support costbenefit analyses for Corporate Average

PO 00000

Frm 00083

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

38473

Fuel Economy (CAFE) rulemakings
regarding vehicle mass and fatality
rates. Furthermore, automated SDT data
pre-populates several NHTSA systems
and special studies, including the
Fatality Analysis Reporting System
(FARS), Crash Report Sampling System
(CRSS), and Crash Investigation
Sampling System (CISS). This electronic
transfer significantly reduces the
administrative and technical burden on
States by eliminating manual,
redundant data entry into Federal
databases.
Affected Public: State governments,
the District of Columbia government,
and U.S. Territory governments
(generically referred to as ‘‘States’’).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
35.
Frequency: Nightly/daily automated
electronic feeds, with some respondents
submitting weekly or monthly.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 14,386 hours.
The SDT Program receives crash data
from States in two ways: (1) the NonSEDC protocol, under a voluntary MOU
between NHTSA and each State, of
which there are currently 22
participating States, and (2) the SEDC
grant, which imposes specific grant
requirements; there are 18 SEDC
grantees. Of the 22 Non-SEDC States, 10
have been awarded SEDC grants and
will transition to SEDC transmission
requirements by January 2030. The
remaining eight participating SEDC
grantees are actively developing their
capabilities to implement electronic
data transmission under the SEDC
requirements by that same deadline.
This ICR is being modified to remove
the legacy SDS protocol and to reflect
the ongoing EDT participation by both
Non-SEDC States and SEDC grantees. As
a result, NHTSA projects a total of 33
annual respondents by January 2030: 12
Non-SEDC States (the 22 original States
minus the 10 transitioning to SEDC) and
18 SEDC grantees (the 10 transitioning
EDT States plus the 8 SEDC-only
States). The transition to the SEDC
transmission will happen gradually,
with approximately three States
migrating per year until all 10 complete
the shift by January 2030. The eight
SEDC-only States will also begin their
SEDC transmissions over this period.
Because the transmission requirements
differ for Non-SEDC and SEDC grantees,
the annual burden for each group is
detailed separately below.
States Using SDS Protocol
SDS information was previously
obtained using a traditional method via
electronic media through secured mail
or a Secure File Transfer Protocol

E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM

25JNN1

38474

Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2026 / Notices

(SFTP) from participating States on an
annual basis. However, this collection
has been sunset, removing the
associated State burden.
Non-SEDC EDT Protocol
The State burden associated with the
EDT protocol varies between Non-SEDC
States and SEDC grantees. This
difference is driven by the distinct
requirements placed on each group,

such as mutually agreed upon data
sharing memorandum of understanding
for Non-SEDC States or mandatory data
standardization and MMUCC alignment
for SEDC grantees.
The burden estimate for Non-SEDC
States is derived from the actual level of
effort reported by states currently using
the Non-SEDC EDT protocol. NHTSA
projects that each year, one additional
state will implement the protocol, while

several existing SEDC grantees will
transition from Non-SEDC to SEDC
requirements annually. Consequently,
NHTSA anticipates an average of 17
active Non-SEDC states annually over
the next three years (22 in Year 1, 20 in
Year 2, and 18 in Year 3) as shown in
Table 1. For these states, the burden is
limited to annual maintenance, apart
from the newly added state, which also
includes implementation costs.

TABLE 1—NUMBER OF NON-SEDC PROTOCOL STATES
Number of Non-SEDC
State each year

Non-SEDC protocol State

Newly added
Non-SEDC
States

Current Year ......................................................................................
Current + 1 .........................................................................................
Current + 2 .........................................................................................
Current + 3 .........................................................................................

22
22
20
18

0
1
3
3

0
1
1
1

Average Per Year for Next Three Years ....................................

20

3

1

Maintenance Burden Calculation for
Non-SEDC States
Non-SEDC States report an annual
maintenance burden of five (5) hours
per respondent, primarily dedicated to
troubleshooting connections and
refining data mapping protocols. To
calculate the economic impact, NHTSA
utilizes the May 2024 BLS mean wage
for Software and Web Developers
($71.54/hour).1 Adjusting for total
compensation, where wages comprise
61.7% 2 of the package, the fully loaded
hourly rate is $115.95. Consequently,
the annual maintenance cost per state is
approximately $579.75. Based on a
projected average of 20 participating
Non-SEDC States, the total annual
collective burden is estimated at 100
hours and $11,595.00 in labor costs.
Implementation Burden Calculation for
Non-SEDC States
States report an initial
implementation burden of 150 hours per
respondent. To calculate the economic
impact, NHTSA utilizes the May 2024
BLS mean wage for Software and Web
Developers ($71.54/hour). Adjusting for
total compensation, where wages
comprise 61.7% of the package, the
fully loaded hourly rate is $115.95.
Consequently, the implementation cost
for a new Non-SEDC EDT State is
lotter on DSK8BHNXB4PROD with NOTICES1

Number of Non-SEDC
State to SEDC State
conversion

1 May 2024 National Occupational Employment
and Wage Estimates United States, Occupational
Employment Statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
U.S. Department of Labor, https://www.bls.gov/
news.release/ecec.t01.htm, last accessed April 29,
2026).
2 See Table 1. Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation by ownership (Dec. 2025), available
at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t01.htm
(accessed April 29, 2026).

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:12 Jun 24, 2026

Jkt 268001

approximately $17,392.50 in labor costs.
Based on the addition of one new
participating State, the total collective
implementation burden is estimated at
150 hours and $17,392.50 in labor costs.
SEDC EDT Protocol
On January 31, 2024, NHTSA issued
a Notice of Funding Opportunity
(NOFO) to modernize state crash data
systems and facilitate electronic data
transfer to NHTSA, which is the SEDC
program. Twenty-six jurisdictions,
including States, Territories, and the
Bureau of Indian Affairs, applied for the
SEDC grant. Nineteen applicants were
awarded the SEDC Grant. There are
currently eighteen active SEDC grantees,
with one grantee terminating their
agreement in the first year of the project.
SEDC grantees must commit to
electronically transferring standardized
crash data to NHTSA within five years
of the award. Key implementation
actions and funding uses were
identified from each State’s workplan
and budget for the following three goals:
(i) equipment to upgrade a statewide
crash data repository;
(ii) adoption of electronic crash
reporting by law enforcement agencies;
and
(iii) increasing alignment of State
crash data with the latest Model
Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria.
Under the SEDC grant, States
(excluding American Samoa) are
required to provide a 20% non-federal
match of the total grant award. Because
grant applications required total budget
commitments rather than granular labor
categories, NHTSA’s State burden
estimates are derived directly from these
matching funds committed. These costs

PO 00000

Frm 00084

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

cover both the initial development
effort, such as repository updates and
MMUCC alignment, and the ongoing
implementation of standardized data
transmissions. The SEDC grant does not
allow operation and maintenance costs,
therefore, the same Non-SEDC State
calculations are used to estimate the
maintenance burden cost for the SEDC
grantees.
NHTSA anticipates that during the
first two (2) years of the grant, i.e., the
past and current year, all States will be
in the development and implementation
phase, meaning no data transmission is
expected. Beginning next year
(Current+1), States will gradually begin
transmitting data using the SEDC
protocol, either by converting from an
existing Non-SEDC EDT system or
joining as a brand-new SEDC state.
Specifically, NHTSA estimates that two
states will begin transmitting in Year
(Current+1), five in Year (Current+2),
and five in Year (Current+3), averaging
four states per year. Over these final
three years, an average of seven states
per year will be actively transmitting
data. Concurrently, for the next three
years, the number of states in the
maintenance phase will scale from zero
Year (Current+1) to two Year
(Current+2), and seven Year
(Current+3), averaging three states per
year. Meanwhile, the number of states
remaining in the implementation phase
will decrease from 16 Year (Current+1)
to 11 Year (Current+2), and six
(Current+3), averaging 11 states per
year. The details are shown in Table 2.

E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM

25JNN1

38475

Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2026 / Notices
TABLE 2—NUMBER OF SEDC PROTOCOL STATES
Total number of SEDC
State under
implementation

States finish
implementation

SEDC protocol

Number of States
for maintenance

Current Year ..............................................................................................
Current + 1 .................................................................................................
Current + 2 .................................................................................................
Current + 3 .................................................................................................

0
2
5
5

18
16
11
6

0
0
2
7

Average Per Year for Next Three Years ............................................

4

11

3

Implementation Burden Calculation for
SEDC States
The collective burden calculation for
the 17 SEDC States based on the State’s
matching fund, except for American
Samoa which is not required to provide
matching fund. These matching funds
represent eligible expenses such as state
employee labor, contractual services, IT,
and equipment costs. Because this
comprehensive project inherently
demands a mix of contractual services,
IT or equipment needs, in addition to
State’s personnel costs, some States
agreed to a flat 20% match under
personnel, contractual or a combination
of eligible cost categories rather than
calculating an exact mathematical
breakdown for each individual line
item.
Out of the eighteen SEDC States, 15
committed matching funds for State
personnel costs. Among these, only four
States itemized their actual labor costs
and burden hours, while the remaining
11 committed to a flat percentage. Based
on the four states that explicitly
provided estimated burden hours for
their matching personnel costs, the

baseline average per State is 1,284
burden hours annually, with a
corresponding average labor cost of
$198,512.65. Applying these averages to
the 11 states projected to be in the
implementation phase each year, the
total labor burden hours and cost are
14,121 hours and $2,183,639.15.
Nine out of these fifteen States also
committed a percentage of their Statematch to contractual costs, which may
be used for contractor, IT, or equipment
activity costs. The remaining three
States committed their entire matching
requirement to the contractual cost
category without exact breakdowns for
contractual services, IT and equipment
costs.
Maintenance Burden Calculation for
SEDC States
Non-SEDC States report an annual
maintenance burden of five (5) hours
per respondent, primarily dedicated to
troubleshooting connections and
refining data mapping protocols.
NHTSA will apply this same annual
maintenance burden to the SEDC
grantees. To calculate the economic

impact, NHTSA utilizes the May 2024
BLS mean wage for Software and Web
Developers ($71.54/hour.) 3 Adjusting
for total compensation, where wages
comprise 61.7% 4 of the package, the
fully loaded hourly rate is $115.95.
Consequently, the annual maintenance
cost per state is approximately $579.75.
Based on a projected average of 3
participating SEDC States under
maintenance phase, the total annual
collective burden is estimated at 15
hours and $1,739.25 in labor costs.
Table 3 is a representation of
implementation and maintenance
burden. The breakdown is based on
information received from every SEDC
grantees’ workplan and budget
descriptions. NHTSA estimates burden
for development and implementation
using actual labor hour and cost
breakdowns when available, percent
cost commitment, or actual monetary
figures provided. Maintenance costs are
based on known State maintenance
burden reported by Non-SEDC EDT
States currently maintaining the EDT
protocol.

TABLE 3—TOTAL ANNUAL STATE IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE BURDEN
Annual
respondents
(states)

Burden per
respondent
(hours)

Annual total
burden hours
(hours)

Non-SEDC Implementation .......................
Non-SEDC Maintenance ...........................
SEDC Implementation ...............................
SEDC Maintenance ...................................

1
20
11
3

150
5
1,284
5

150
100
14,124
15

Total ...................................................

35

1,444

14,389

lotter on DSK8BHNXB4PROD with NOTICES1

Category

Overhead
rate
(%)

Labor rate
w/overhead
($)

Burden
cost per
respondent
($)

Total labor
cost
($)

$71.54
71.54
NA
71.54

61.70
61.70
NA
61.70

$115.95
115.95
NA
115.95

$17,392.50
579.75
198,512.65
579.75

$17,392.50
$11,595.00
2,183,639.15
1,739.25

........................

................

....................

....................

2,214,365.90

Labor rate
w/overhead
($)

Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
$6,262,231.02.
The SEDC grant, in compliance with
IIJA, requires a 20% match from
participating State respondents. Based
on information provided by the SEDC
grantees, as part of the required 20%
match from each grantee with the

exception of American Samoa, NHTSA
estimates the annual average per State
burden cost for the SEDC program
(beyond the labor costs discussed above)
will be about $569,293.73 for the nonlabor burdens, which includes
contracts, equipment, IT cost and other
miscellaneous burdens. For the eleven

states under implementation, the total
burden cost is $6,262,231.02.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspects of this
information collection, including (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the

3 May 2024 National Occupational Employment
and Wage Estimates United States, Occupational
Employment Statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics,

U.S. Department of Labor, http://www.bls.gov/soc/
home.htm, last accessed April 29, 2026).

4 Employer Costs for Employee Compensation by
ownership (Dec. 2025), available at https://
www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t01.htm (accessed
April 29, 2026).

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:39 Jun 24, 2026

Jkt 268001

PO 00000

Frm 00085

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM

25JNN1

38476

Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2026 / Notices

Department, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Department’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as
amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order
1351.29A.
Rajesh Subramanian,
Acting Associate Administrator, National
Center for Statistics and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2026–12776 Filed 6–24–26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2026–0893]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Renewal of a Previously
Approved Information Collection:
Freight Logistics Optimization Works
(FLOW)
AGENCY: Bureau of Transportation

Statistics (BTS), Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Research and Technology
(OST–R), DOT.
ACTION: Submission for OMB review; 30day notice and request for comments.

lotter on DSK8BHNXB4PROD with NOTICES1

SUMMARY: BTS has submitted the

following information collection
requirement to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for its
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. BTS is requesting approval to
renew an existing ICR 2138–0049,
Freight Logistics Optimization Works.
The renewal of this ICR will enable BTS
to continue collecting intermodal trade
data in support of the FLOW program’s
aim to improve supply chain
efficiencies. This is the second notice
for public comment; the first was
published in the Federal Register on
March 2, 2026. BTS received two
comments. The purpose of this notice is
to respond to comments received on the
first notice and allow 30 days for public
comment to OMB on this collection
from all interested individuals and
organizations.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted by July 27, 2026.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:39 Jun 24, 2026

Jkt 268001

Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer
for the Bureau of Transportation
Statistics, 725 17th Street NW, Room
10235, Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allison Fischman, Bureau of
Transportation Statistics, Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Research and
Technology, USDOT, RTS–35, E36–302,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590–0001,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. The Data Collection
Title: Freight Logistics Optimization
Works (FLOW).
OMB Control Number: 2138–0049.
Type of Review: Renewal of
information collection.
Respondents: Businesses in the freight
industry.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
140.
Estimated Time per Response: 21
hours, which includes initial data file
development and connection to data
system as well as periodic updates.
Frequency: Annual.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,940.
II. Public Participation and Request for
Public Comments
On March 2, 2026, BTS published a
notice (91 FR 10198) encouraging
interested parties to submit comments
to docket number DOT–OST–2026–0893
and allowing for a 60-day comment
period. The comment period closed on
May 1, 2026. Two comments were
received. All comments were posted,
without edit, to https://
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
III. Discussion of Public Comments and
BTS Responses
BTS received a comment from a
transportation logistics company which
was deemed nonrelevant, as the
comment did not include any input on
the FLOW collection. The second
comment stated support for renewal of
the FLOW collection and its scope,
which includes data from beneficial
cargo owners, intermodal equipment
providers, the logistics real estate sector,
ports and marine terminal operators,
motor carriers, ocean carriers, nonvessel operating common carriers, rail
carriers, and third-party logistics
providers. The commenter proposed
additional metrics and signals that
could be developed from FLOW data to
provide value to program participants.
Specifically, the commenter proposed
developing a set of summary indicators

PO 00000

Frm 00086

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

of freight risk to help participants to
proactively adjust their operations to
improve throughput and mitigate or
avoid congestion. BTS appreciates these
suggestions and will consider them in
the development of additional analytics
and models using the FLOW data.
Allison Fischman,
Director, Office of Safety Data and Analysis,
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S.
Department of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2026–12829 Filed 6–24–26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[Docket ID No.TREAS–DO–2026–0430]

Designation of OpenCorporates
Dataset Into DNP Working System
AGENCY: United States Department of

the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed designation.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Payment

Integrity Information Act of 2019 (PIIA)
(31 U.S.C. 3351, et seq.), Treasury is
issuing this notice to provide the public
an opportunity to comment on the
proposed designation of the U.S. legal
entity dataset of OpenCorporates
Limited (‘‘OpenCorporates’’), which
contains business registration
information sourced from official U.S.
state and territory public registries to
the Do Not Pay Working System.
DATES: Submit written comments on or
before July 10, 2026. At the conclusion
of the comment period, if Treasury
decides to finalize the designation,
Treasury will publish a notice in the
Federal Register to officially designate
the database.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID TREAS–DO–
2026–0430, online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments can
also be mailed to the Department of the
Treasury, Office of the Fiscal Assistant
Secretary, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20220, Attn: Do
Not Pay Comments. Commenters are
encouraged to submit public comments
electronically.
Submission of comments in response
to this notice is voluntary. Comments
may be used to inform decision-making
on topics related to this notice. All
comments received will be posted
without change to www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
publicly available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S.
Department of the Treasury, Office of

E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM

25JNN1