State of Georgia’s Criminal Justice Coordinating Council’s (CJCC) Evaluation of the Implementation of the (SSI)/SSDI Outreach, Access, and Recovery (SOAR) Model in County Jails
ICR 202610-0960-007 · OMB 0960-0833 · Received in OIRA
State of Georgiaâs Criminal Justice Coordinating Councilâs (CJCC) Evaluation of the Implementation of the (SSI)/SSDI Outreach, Access, and Recovery (SOAR) Model in County Jails
Revision of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
10/30/2026
table that charts list comparision
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
10/31/2026
80
360
48
170
0
0
SSA is in a cooperative agreement with the State of Georgiaâs Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (CJCC) to conduct an intervention and evaluation of the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) Outreach, Access, and Recovery (SOAR) model in county jails with inmates with serious and persistent mental illness (SPMI) across the state. In addition to SSA, CJCC partnered with: (1) Applied Research Services (ARS), (2) the Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD), and (3) four county jails to implement the program. For this intervention, investigators hypothesized that untreated mental illness and repeated psychiatric crises may be a factor in jail recidivism. Therefore, the ability for inmates with SPMI to receive SSI/SSDI and attendant insurance benefits may help them obtain treatment and thus help to mitigate their criminal tendencies. This intervention connects respondents in four county jails identified as having SPMI to Medicaid Eligibility Specialists (MES) hired and trained by the Georgia DBHDD, who help them apply for SSI and SSDI. Respondents in two of the four counties (Fulton County Jail and Cobb County Jail) also have the option of working with a Forensic Peer Mentor (FPM), a formerly incarcerated individual who is familiar with resources that may help participants increase their quality-of-life post incarceration and avoid recidivism. SSA works with the two DBHDD MESs who are serving the participants over the total life of the project. To maximize the likelihood of the SSI/SSDI application approval, the MES employs the SOAR method, which uses in depth medical and personal summaries of disability to facilitate the SSI/SSDI application process. Researchers collect data from participant surveys to evaluate and study the impact of the intervention. Through the data collected through these surveys, along with administrative data from SSA, the State of Georgia, participating counties, and DBHDD hope to address the following research questions:
⢠Does connection to a SOAR-trained specialist increase the likelihood that a person with SPMI in jail will be approved for SSI/SSDI benefits?
⢠If a person with SPMI receives SSI/SSDI benefits, are they able to connect to treatment resources that they may not have been able to obtain before?
⢠If a person with SPMI connects to treatment resources and successfully engages with them, are they able to achieve mental health recovery and stay out of jail?
To date, we began the initial enrollment and informed consent phase of this intervention, and we are currently completing this stage. We also began the follow up survey stage for the first set of enrollees in the intervention, and we will continue to administer the follow-up survey as needed through 2027 until we complete this phase with all the respondents.
The respondents are individuals with serious and persistent mental illness incarcerated in county jails in the state of Georgia.
US Code:
42 USC 1310
Name of Law: Social Security Act
When we cleared this ICR in 2023, the burden was 113 hours. However, we are currently reporting a burden of 28 hours. This change stems from reducing the expected number of participants from 90 annually to 60 total for the duration of the project, as well as a reduction in the number of follow-up surveys from two to one. Because the burden estimates are directly tied to the number of individuals completing the consent form and survey instruments, a smaller respondent pool results in a corresponding decrease in total time burden. We note that we need to reduce the overall respondent pool based on overall delays in staffing, delays in the federal review processes, and changes to the multi-agency implementation requirements.
*Note: The total burden reflected in ROCIS is 48, while the burden cited in #12 of the Supporting Statement is 28. This discrepancy is because the ROCIS burden also reflects the learning costs. In contrast, the chart in #12 above reflects actual burden.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.