The monthly
collections in this package are disapproved, pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.6. Stating that industry collects the data on a monthly basis
is not adequate justification, because it is easy to aggregate
monthly data to quarterly. When BOM resubmits this package, they
should address the following questions: - Why is it necessary to
collect information on these minerals on monthly basis? What is the
information used for and why wouldn't quarterly data be sufficient
for these uses? (This question should be answered mineral by
mineral). - Are any of these minerals classified strategic by FEMA?
If so, which ones? - Why is it necessary to do a separate annual
survey, rather than aggregating the quarterly or monthly data?
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
03/31/1988
03/31/1988
14,459
0
0
17,628
0
0
0
0
0
THIS SURVEY ENABLES THE SECRETARY OF
THE INTERIOR TO MEET THE RESPONSIBILITIES MANDATED BY THE NATIONAL
MATERIALS AND MINERALS POLIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1980
(P.L. 96-479) AND TO INFORM THE CONGRESS OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE
MINERALS INDUSTRIES INCLUDING POTENTIA CRISES THEREIN. THE
INFORMATION IS PUBLISHED IN SEVERAL BUREAU OF MINES PUBLICATIONS
FOR USE BY PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHE
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.