CICH Eval Stats -- 2006-06--Appendix M

CICH Eval Stats -- 2006-06--Appendix M.pdf

National Outcomes Performance Assessment of the Collaborative Initiative to Help End Chronic Homelessness

OMB: 0990-0304

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
HUD/HHS/VA Collaborative Initative to Help End Chronic Homelessness
National Performance Outcomes Assessment
Recruitment Report - June 2006
(Cumulative Statistics for Data Processed through 06/25/2006)
Site
Total

Chattanooga,
TN

Chicago,
IL

Columbus,
OH

Denver,
CO

Ft.
Lauderdale,
FL

Los
Angeles,
CA

Martinez,
CA

(A) Number of Phase 1
Screening Forms (SC)
Received

1453

77

95

93

100

53

146

479

(B) Number Phase 1 Enrolled
in CICH (per Screening
Form) *

1264

61

70

86

100

53

116

(C) Number of Baseline
Forms Received (Phase 1
CICH Clients Enrolled)

756

53

64

80

97

53

(D) Percent of Phase 1
Screened and enrolled
into CICH (B/A)

87.0

79.2

73.7

92.5 100.0

(E) Percent of Phase 1
enrolled into evaluation
(C/B)

59.8

86.9

91.4

93.0

(F) Percent of Phase 1 CICH
Clients housed at Baseline
Assessment

29.0

30.2

14.1

(G) Percent of Phase 1 CICH
Clients who are Veterans
**

35.6

45.3

(H) Number of Baseline
Forms Received (Phase 2
Comparison Group
Enrolled)

119

19

New
York
City,
NY

Philadelphia,
PA

Portland,
OR

San
Francisco,
CA

131

72

104

103

451

52

72

103

100

64

54

52

69

72

98

100.0

79.5

94.2

39.7

100.0

99.0

97.1

97.0

100.0

55.2

12.0 100.0

95.8

69.9

98.0

30.0

41.2

5.7

37.5

14.8

9.6

4.3

4.2

85.7

25.0

41.3

24.7

22.6

50.0

57.4

51.9

31.9

36.1

22.4

0

0

0

0

18

32

25

0

25

0

* Based on positive responses to item 6A on Screening Form: Client enrolled into Collaborative Initiative Program?
** Based on positive responses to item 15 on Baseline Form: Have you ever served on active duty in the US Armed Forces?

HUD/HHS/VA Collaborative Initative to Help End Chronic Homelessness
National Performance Outcomes Assessment
Follow-up Rates Report [Among Phase 1 CICH Clients Only] - June 2006
(Cumulative Statistics for Follow-up Interviews due on or before 05/25/2006)
Site
Ft.
Lauderdale,
FL

Los
Angeles,
CA

Total

Chattanooga,
TN

Chicago,
IL

Columbus,
OH

Denver,
CO

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

3-Mo. N Done

669

47

45

77

89

45

61

3-Mo. N Due

736

53

58

80

95

48

3-Mo. FU Rate

90.9

88.7

77.6

96.3

93.7

6-Mo. N Done

625

47

37

78

6-Mo. N Due

708

52

56

6-Mo. FU Rate

88.3

90.4

9-Mo. N Done

581

9 Mo. N Due

New
York,
NY

San
Francisco,
CA

Philadelphia,
PA

Portland,
OR

.

.

.

.

48

49

62

65

81

64

51

52

69

72

94

93.8

95.3

94.1

94.2

89.9

90.3

86.2

77

42

59

45

44

64

63

69

80

89

48

63

47

50

68

71

84

66.1

97.5

86.5

87.5

93.7

95.7

88.0

94.1

88.7

82.1

48

39

70

67

35

54

45

41

59

58

65

668

52

50

80

78

41

61

47

47

65

69

78

9-Mo. FU Rate

87.0

92.3

78.0

87.5

85.9

85.4

88.5

95.7

87.2

90.8

84.1

83.3

12-Mo. N Done

520

39

40

58

62

29

52

42

38

52

58

50

12 Mo. N Due

613

51

48

80

66

35

61

45

43

57

66

61

12-Mo. FU Rate

84.8

76.5

83.3

72.5

93.9

82.9

85.2

93.3

88.4

91.2

87.9

82.0

15-Mo. N Done

438

38

29

58

45

21

48

34

33

42

55

35

15 Mo. N Due

548

50

41

80

52

29

61

41

41

44

64

45

15-Mo. FU Rate

79.9

76.0

70.7

72.5

86.5

72.4

78.7

82.9

80.5

95.5

85.9

77.8

18-Mo. N Done

357

33

18

55

40

11

46

31

28

27

48

20

18 Mo. N Due

447

45

36

65

46

16

54

37

37

32

59

20

18-Mo. FU Rate

79.9

73.3

50.0

84.6

87.0

68.8

85.2

83.8

75.7

84.4

81.4

100.0

21-Mo. N Done

238

22

14

32

30

4

35

27

25

20

29

.

21 Mo. N Due

300

29

25

41

34

4

42

32

33

21

39

.

21-Mo. FU Rate

79.3

75.9

56.0

78.0

88.2

100.0

83.3

84.4

75.8

95.2

74.4

.

24-Mo. N Done

116

8

2

12

12

.

24

15

18

9

16

.

24 Mo. N Due

142

11

3

13

14

.

27

17

26

9

22

.

24-Mo. FU Rate

81.7

72.7

66.7

92.3

85.7

.

88.9

88.2

69.2

100.0

72.7

.

Follow-up
(Phase 1 CICH
Clients

Martinez,
CA

HUD/HHS/VA Collaborative Initative to Help End Chronic Homelessness
National Performance Outcomes Assessment
Housing Rates Report [Among Phase 1 CICH Clients Only] - June 2006
(Cumulative Statistics for data processed through 06/25/2006)
Site
Total

Chattanooga,
TN

Chicago,
IL

Columbus,
OH

Denver,
CO

Ft.
Lauderdale,
FL

Los
Angeles,
CA

Martinez,
CA

New
York,
NY

Philadelphia,
PA

Portland,
OR

San
Francisco,
CA

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

3-Mo. N
Housed

600

44

39

71

85

44

44

45

49

50

48

81

3-Mo. Housed
Rate

89.3

93.6

81.3

92.2

95.5

97.8

72.1

93.8 100.0

80.6

73.8

100.0

6-Mo. N
Housed

572

46

31

72

74

42

44

44

54

51

70

6-Mo. Housed
Rate

91.2

97.9

83.8

92.3

96.1

100.0

74.6

95.7 100.0

84.4

81.0

100.0

9-Mo. N
Housed

539

42

38

66

62

35

44

41

51

54

66

9-Mo. Housed
Rate

91.7

87.5

92.7

94.3

87.3

100.0

81.5

88.9 100.0

86.4

93.1

100.0

12-Mo. N
Housed

491

39

38

55

56

29

42

37

37

51

51

56

12-Mo. Housed
Rate

92.3

100.0

92.7

94.8

88.9

100.0

80.8

86.0

97.4

92.7

87.9

100.0

15-Mo. N
Housed

399

35

30

52

43

20

37

32

33

40

40

37

15-Mo. Housed
Rate

87.9

92.1

93.8

89.7

91.5

95.2

77.1

84.2

97.1

87.0

72.7

100.0

18-Mo. N
Housed

329

31

20

53

32

11

30

28

30

26

41

27

18-Mo. Housed
Rate

85.7

91.2

90.9

86.9

78.0

100.0

63.8

87.5 100.0

86.7

83.7

100.0

21-Mo. N
Housed

234

22

19

35

28

4

30

25

19

29

.

21-Mo. Housed
Rate

84.5

84.6

100.0

87.5

90.3

100.0

71.4

76.7 100.0

82.6

78.4

.

24-Mo. N
Housed

132

13

11

16

16

.

17

19

10

16

.

24-Mo. Housed
Rate

83.0

86.7

100.0

84.2

94.1

.

63.0

77.8 100.0

83.3

76.2

.

Veteran
Housing Rates:

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

3-Mo. N Vet
Housed

184

13

12

28

21

9

12

20

18

16

16

19

3-Mo. N Vets

219

16

14

33

24

10

19

21

19

22

19

22

Overall
Housing Rates
(Phase I CICH
Clients)

(Continued)

44

40

23

14

HUD/HHS/VA Collaborative Initative to Help End Chronic Homelessness
National Performance Outcomes Assessment
Housing Rates Report [Among Phase 1 CICH Clients Only] - June 2006
(Cumulative Statistics for data processed through 06/25/2006)
Site
Total

Chattanooga,
TN

Chicago,
IL

Columbus,
OH

Denver,
CO

Ft.
Lauderdale,
FL

Los
Angeles,
CA

Martinez,
CA

New
York,
NY

Philadelphia,
PA

Portland,
OR

San
Francisco,
CA

3-Mo. Vet
Housed Rate

84.0

81.3

85.7

84.8

87.5

90.0

63.2

95.2

94.7

72.7

84.2

86.4

6-Mo. N Vet
Housed

173

14

9

27

19

7

15

18

16

16

16

16

6-Mo. N Vets

210

16

13

33

21

10

19

19

18

21

19

21

6-Mo. Vet
Housed

82.4

87.5

69.2

81.8

90.5

70.0

78.9

94.7

88.9

76.2

84.2

76.2

9-Mo. N Vet
Housed

166

12

10

28

16

7

15

15

17

14

16

16

9-Mo. N Vets

201

16

13

33

21

7

19

18

18

20

18

18

9-Mo. Vet
Housed Rate

82.6

75.0

76.9

84.8

76.2

100.0

78.9

83.3

94.4

70.0

88.9

88.9

12-Mo. N Vet
Housed

149

11

9

22

14

6

16

14

15

15

15

12

12-Mo. N Vets

186

15

11

33

17

7

19

18

17

18

17

14

12-Mo. Vet
Housed Rate

80.1

73.3

81.8

66.7

82.4

85.7

84.2

77.8

88.2

83.3

88.2

85.7

15-Mo. N Vet
Housed

124

10

8

22

8

4

14

13

12

13

12

8

15-Mo. N Vets

169

15

10

33

12

5

19

17

17

14

16

11

12-Mo. Vet
Housed Rate

73.4

66.7

80.0

66.7

66.7

80.0

73.7

76.5

70.6

92.9

75.0

72.7

18-Mo. N Vet
Housed

104

9

4

22

7

4

11

10

11

7

14

5

18-Mo. N Vets

141

14

9

30

10

4

15

14

15

9

16

5

18-Mo. Vet
Housed Rate

73.8

64.3

44.4

73.3

70.0

100.0

73.3

71.4

73.3

77.8

87.5

100.0

21-Mo. N Vet
Housed

73

7

5

13

6

1

11

6

10

5

9

.

21-Mo. N Vets

101

10

6

20

7

1

13

13

14

6

11

.

21-Mo. Vet
Housed Rate

72.3

70.0

83.3

65.0

85.7

100.0

84.6

46.2

71.4

83.3

81.8

.

24-Mo. N Vet
Housed

36

5

2

5

3

.

3

3

7

2

6

.

24-Mo. N Vets

50

6

4

7

4

.

5

6

9

2

7

.

72.0

83.3

50.0

71.4

75.0

.

60.0

50.0

77.8

100.0

85.7

.

24-Mo. Vet
Housed Rate

HUD/HHS/VA Collaborative Initiative for Chronic Homelessness (CICH)
National Performance Outcomes Assessment
Missing Forms Report - Phase 1 CICH Clients) Only - June 2006
(Number of Missing Forms and Evaluation Logs as of 06/25/2006)
Site
Denver, CO

Ft.
Lauderdale,
FL

Los
Angeles,
CA

Martinez, CA

New York
City, NY

Philadelphia,
PA

Portland, OR

San
Francisco,
CA

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

FU3

10

0

0

0

2

5

0

0

0

2

0

1

FU4

18

0

0

0

5

6

0

0

1

4

0

2

FU5

12

0

0

0

4

4

0

0

0

3

0

1

FU6

19

0

1

1

2

10

1

0

0

2

0

2

FU7

25

2

2

1

8

9

0

0

0

3

0

0

Discharge

26

0

1

6

1

4

1

4

1

0

5

3

Hsub5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Hsub6

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Hsub7

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Hsub8

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

TStat5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

TStat6

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

TStat7

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

TStat8

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Total

Chattanooga,
TN

Chicago, IL

Columbus, OH

Screening

1

0

0

Baseline

0

0

FU1

0

FU2

Screening - Client screening form date given on Recruitment Log and/or Baseline Form received, but missing CSF.
Baseline - One or more Follow-up forms received, but missing CBF.
Follow up - Follow-up form(s) missing and greater than 60 days past due.
Discharge - Treatment status shown as "Discharged" on one or more logs, but missing CDF.
HUD Sub - Missing HUD Subsidy entry for client for indicated quarter (e.g., Apr 2004 log for Qtr 1, July 2004 for Qtr 2., etc.)
Tx Stat - Missing Treatment Status Log entry for client for indicated quarter (e.g., Apr 2004 log for Qtr 1, July 2004 for Qtr 2., etc.)

HUD/HHS/VA Collaborative Initative to Help End Chronic Homelessness
National Performance Outcomes Assessment
Follow-up Rates Report [Among Phase 2 Compasison Group Only] - June 2006
(Cumulative Statistics for Follow-up Interviews due on or before 05/25/2006)
Site
Total

Chattanooga, TN

Los Angeles, CA

Martinez, CA

New York, NY

Portland, OR

.

.

.

.

.

.

3-Mo. N Done

58

13

3

22

2

18

3-Mo. N Due

80

19

5

29

2

25

72.5

68.4

60.0

75.9

100.0

72.0

6-Mo. N Done

49

7

3

23

.

16

6-Mo. N Due

68

10

5

27

1

25

72.1

70.0

60.0

85.2

0.0

64.0

9-Mo. N Done

37

2

1

20

1

13

9 Mo. N Due

50

2

5

22

1

20

9-Mo. FU Rate

74.0

100.0

20.0

90.9

100.0

65.0

12-Mo. N Done

24

.

.

10

1

13

12 Mo. N Due

28

.

.

12

1

15

85.7

.

.

83.3

100.0

86.7

Follow-up (Phase 2 Comparison Group

3-Mo. FU Rate

6-Mo. FU Rate

12-Mo. FU Rate

HUD/HHS/VA Collaborative Initative to Help End Chronic Homelessness
National Performance Outcomes Assessment
Housing Rates Report [Among Phase 2 Comparison Group Only] - June 2006
(Cumulative Statistics for data processed through 06/25/2006)
Site
Total

Chattanooga, TN

Los Angeles, CA

Martinez, CA

New York, NY

Portland, OR

.

.

.

.

.

.

16

1

3

7

.

5

21.1

7.7

25.0

31.8

0.0

27.8

18

1

3

9

.

5

35.3

11.1

100.0

39.1

.

31.3

20

.

1

10

1

8

47.6

0.0

100.0

45.5

100.0

53.3

12

.

.

5

1

6

46.2

.

.

41.7

100.0

46.2

Veteran Housing Rates:

.

.

.

.

.

.

3-Mo. N Vet Housed

3

.

.

2

.

1

3-Mo. N Vets

36

8

11

7

3

7

3-Mo. Vet Housed Rate

8.3

0.0

0.0

28.6

0.0

14.3

5

.

.

2

.

3

21

7

.

7

.

7

23.8

0.0

.

28.6

.

42.9

4

.

.

2

.

2

14

1

.

7

.

6

28.6

0.0

.

28.6

.

33.3

12-Mo. N Vet Housed

4

.

.

2

.

2

12-Mo. N Vets

9

.

.

4

.

5

44.4

.

.

50.0

.

40.0

Overall Housing Rates (Phase 2 Comparison Group)
3-Mo. N Housed
3-Mo. Housed Rate
6-Mo. N Housed
6-Mo. Housed Rate
9-Mo. N Housed
9-Mo. Housed Rate
12-Mo. N Housed
12-Mo. Housed Rate

6-Mo. N Vet Housed
6-Mo. N Vets
6-Mo. Vet Housed
9-Mo. N Vet Housed
9-Mo. N Vets
9-Mo. Vet Housed Rate

12-Mo. Vet Housed Rate

HUD/HHS/VA Collaborative Initiative for Chronic Homelessness (CICH)
National Performance Outcomes Assessment
Missing Forms Report - Phase 2 Participants Only - June 2006
(Number of Missing Forms as of 06/25/2006)
Site
Total

Chattanooga,
TN

Los
Angeles,
CA

Martinez, CA

New York
City, NY

Portland, OR

Baseline

0

0

0

0

0

0

FU1

0

0

0

0

0

0

FU2

1

1

0

0

0

0

FU3

2

0

0

1

0

1

FU4

1

0

0

0

0

1

FU5

0

0

0

0

0

0

FU6

0

0

0

0

0

0

Note: Only BL and FU forms shown, since CSF, CDF, HSub, TXstat forms are not collected for Phase 2 participants
Baseline - One or more Follow-up forms received, but missing CBF.
Follow up - Follow-up form(s) missing and greater than 60 days past due.


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2006-06-27
File Created2006-06-26

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy