Grants to States for Training Incarcerated Youth Offenders - Eligible Population Data Request Form (JH)

Forms and Documents

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Annual Evaluation Report for Incarerated Youth Grantees	Form and Instruction	New	Repair queued
Triannual Grant Application for Training Incarcerated Youth Offenders	Form and Instruction	Modified	Available
Incarerated Youth Supporting statement.doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2007-01-10	Available

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
46665	Annual Evaluation Report for Incarerated Youth Grantees	Form and Instruction	New
22621	Triannual Grant Application for Training Incarcerated Youth Offenders	Form and Instruction	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1830-0563	ICR Reference No: 200611-1830-003
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200611-1830-001
Agency/Subagency: ED/OCTAE	Agency Tracking No: 03176
Title: Grants to States for Training Incarcerated Youth Offenders - Eligible Population Data Request Form (JH)
Type of Information Collection: Extension without change of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 01/10/2007
	Date Received in OIRA: 11/21/2006
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	01/31/2010	36 Months From Approved	01/31/2007
Responses	93	0	56
Time Burden (Hours)	2,147	0	2,147
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: To receive an award under the Grants to States for Training Incarcerated Youth Offenders Program, a State Correctional Education Agency (SCEA) must submit an application that includes a state plan describing how the program will operate. States must also submit an Eligible Population Data Request Form necessary to run the allocation formula and an evaluation report. During the first year the info requested will be the state plan (application), the eligible population form, and the evaluation report. During the final two years only the latter two must be submitted.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 105 - 244 821 Name of Law: 1998 Amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	71 FR 54476	09/15/2006
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	71 FR 67115	11/20/2006
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 2

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Triannual Grant Application for Training Incarcerated Youth Offenders	NA	GRANTS TO STATES FOR WORKPLACE AND COMMUNITY TRANSITION TRAINING FOR INCARCERATED YOUTH OFFENDERS PROGRAM
Annual Evaluation Report for Incarerated Youth Grantees	na, na	Incarerated Youth Eligible Population Request Form ,   Incarerated Youth Annual Evaluation Report

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	93	56	0	37	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	2,147	2,147	0	0	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Reduction Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Short Statement: There was neither a burden increase or burden reduction to the Information Collection. Rather, at OMB direction ED split the ICR into two separate ICs, meaning that Rocis recognizes burden being shifted from one IC into two. Rocis perceives this separation as a burden reduction to the first IC -- where the total burden was originally shown, and the second IC as a burden increase. Additionally the number of respondents stays the same at 56, whereas Rocis recognizes the number of responses as 112, due to the 56 respondents all responding to both ICs.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $8,000

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 11/21/2006

---