Conversion Magnet Schools Evaluation

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
Response to Request to Collect Additional Information.doc Supplementary Document	2007-07-11
Conversion Magnet Schools Evaluation.Responses to OMB Questions.doc Supplementary Document	2007-07-11
App P Purposes of Variables in Coordinator�s Follow-Up Interview 4-5-07.doc Supplementary Document	2007-04-06
App O Notification Letter to Coordinator for Follow-up Interview 4-5-07.doc Supplementary Document	2007-04-06
App N MSAP MSAP Project-School Choice Coordinator Interview Guide 4-5-07.doc Supplementary Document	2007-04-06
App M Purposes of Variables in Principal Survey 4-5-07.doc Supplementary Document	2007-04-06
App K Purposes of Variables in Student Data Collection Plan 4-5-07.doc Supplementary Document	2007-04-06
App J Evaluation Phase Brochure 4-5-07.doc Supplementary Document	2007-04-06
App H Purposes of Variables in Grantee Screening Protocol for Modules A through D 4-5-07.doc Supplementary Document	2007-04-06
App G Feasibility Phase Brochure 4-5-07.doc Supplementary Document	2007-04-06
App F Grantee Screening Notification Letter to MSAP Project Director 4-5-07.doc Supplementary Document	2007-04-06
Part B of Conv Magnet Schools.doc Supporting Statement B	0000-00-00
Part A of Conv Magnet Schools.doc Supporting Statement A	0000-00-00

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
179516	2007 Principal Survey (2004 Grantee Cohort) Other-survey	New
179515	Third Classroom Data Requests for 2004 and 2007 Grantee Cohorts (2008-2009) Other-student data plan	New
179513	Second Classroom Data Requests for 2004 and 2007 Grantee Cohorts (2007-2008) Other-student data plan	New
179512	First Classroom Data Request for 2007 Grantee Cohort (2004-2005 through 2006-2007) Other-student data plan	New
179511	First Classroom Data Request for 2004 Grantee Cohort (2001-2002 through 2006-2007) Other-student data plan	New
179510	Third Student Data Requests for 2004 and 2007 Grantee Cohorts (2008-2009) Other-student data plan	New
179509	Second Student Data Requests for 2004 and 2007 Grantee Cohorts (2007-2008) Other-student data plan	New
179508	First Student Data Request for 2007 Grantee Cohort (2004-2005 through 2006-2007) Other-student data plan	New
179507	First Student Data Request for 2004 Grantee Cohort (2001-2002 through 2006-2007) Other-student data plan	New
179506	Grantee Screening Interview (Module D) Other-Screening Protocol	New
179505	Grantee Screening Interview (Module C) Other-screening protocol	New
179504	Grantee Screening Interview (Module B) Other-screening protocol	New
179503	Grantee Screening Interview (Module A) Other-screening protocol	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1850-0832	ICR Reference No: 200703-1850-003
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: ED/IES	Agency Tracking No: 3262
Title: Conversion Magnet Schools Evaluation
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 07/17/2007
	Date Received in OIRA: 04/12/2007
Terms of Clearance: OMB is only approving the first stage of this study (on feasibility) at this time. After the first stage, ED must report back to OMB their results and must receive OMB approval before proceeding to the study's next stage.

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	07/31/2010	36 Months From Approved
Responses	94	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	1,062	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The Conversion Magnet Schools Evaluation studies the impact of federally funded elementary magnet schools on the academic achievement of students who attend them, and on minority group isolation in the schools. The first phase of the study investigates the feasibility of conducting rigorous research using experimental or quasi-experimental designs to explore the impact of the magnet programs on students who attend them as their neighborhood schools and on students from other neighborhoods who compete in lotteries for admission. Collection and analysis of student data will proceed if rigorous studies are found to be feasible. The evaluation will inform policymakers and researchers on the effectiveness of magnet schools as an educational approach and a type of school choice.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 107 - 110 5310 Name of Law: No Child Left Behind Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	72 FR 2871	01/23/2007
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	72 FR 18462	04/12/2007
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 13

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
First Classroom Data Request for 2007 Grantee Cohort (2004-2005 through 2006-2007)
First Student Data Request for 2004 Grantee Cohort (2001-2002 through 2006-2007)
Second Student Data Requests for 2004 and 2007 Grantee Cohorts (2007-2008)
Grantee Screening Interview (Module D)
First Student Data Request for 2007 Grantee Cohort (2004-2005 through 2006-2007)
Grantee Screening Interview (Module C)
Grantee Screening Interview (Module A)
Second Classroom Data Requests for 2004 and 2007 Grantee Cohorts (2007-2008)
Third Classroom Data Requests for 2004 and 2007 Grantee Cohorts (2008-2009)
2007 Principal Survey (2004 Grantee Cohort)
First Classroom Data Request for 2004 Grantee Cohort (2001-2002 through 2006-2007)
Third Student Data Requests for 2004 and 2007 Grantee Cohorts (2008-2009)
Grantee Screening Interview (Module B)

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	94	0	0	94	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	1,062	0	0	1,062	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This is a new collection.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $684,026

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 04/12/2007

---