CS-08-097 - COMPL. CEN0TER EXAM TOLL-FREE SURVEY; CS-08-098 - WAGE AND INVESTMENT e-help Survey; CS-08-099 - TE/GE TOLL-FREE Survey; CS-08-100 - W&I-Spec Partners Lcl/Ntl survey

Voluntary Customer Surveys to Implement E.O. 12862 Coordinated by the Corporate Planning and Performance Division on Behalf of All IRS Operations Functions

CS-100 SPEC National Partner 2009 Questionnaire Draft

CS-08-097 - COMPL. CEN0TER EXAM TOLL-FREE SURVEY; CS-08-098 - WAGE AND INVESTMENT e-help Survey; CS-08-099 - TE/GE TOLL-FREE Survey; CS-08-100 - W&I-Spec Partners Lcl/Ntl survey

OMB: 1545-1432

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

2008 W&I Spec National Partner Survey

IN DATABASE: DO NOT ASK

NAME

ORGANIZATION

ORGANIZATION CHANNEL

a. Educational Institution /Government Agency

b. Financial Institution Partnerships

c. Volunteer and Community/Large Employer

RELATIONSHIP MANAGER

The Paperwork Reduction Act requires that the IRS display an OMB control number on all public information requests. The OMB Control Number for this study is 1545-1432. Also, if you have any comments regarding the time estimates associated with this study or suggestions on making this process simpler, please write to the, Internal Revenue Service, Tax Products Coordinating Committee, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC  20224.

Scheduling Phone Appointment


N1. Hello, my name is [CALLER NAME] calling from Macro International Inc. on behalf of IRS’s Stakeholder Partnerships, Education, and Communication (SPEC) organization. We are working with the SPEC program to obtain feedback about your satisfaction as a National Partner who works with the SPEC program on joint national initiatives and coalition building. Could I speak to [INSERT NAME]?


01 Yes (Named person)

02 No (Person no longer works there or wrong name) Skip to N3


N2. Are you the person at [INSERT ORGANIZATION] who manages or interacts with the SPEC program, who could best provide us with candid feedback about the SPEC program?


01 Yes (Skip to S1)

02 No


N3. Who would be the best person for us to speak with in your organization about this?


[Record name and number. Thank and terminate call. Whether transferred or calling the new number, begin again with SCREENER INTRODUCTION using new name.]


S1. I’m calling today to schedule a time that would be convenient for you to speak with an interviewer from Macro International Inc. The interview will take about 15 minutes to complete. Is there a time that you have available during the next week or so?


01 Yes (Schedule date and time—ensure correct time zone)

02 Complete interview now Skip to RM1

03 Soft refusal (Set time to call back to schedule interview)

04 Hard refusal (Thank you and terminate call)


Interviewer may provide if asked:

- The overall goal of the research is to gather information that will help SPEC provide better service and improve the relationship between SPEC and your organization.

- During the past couple weeks, you should have received a letter signed by the Director of the SPEC program, Julie Garcia, notifying you that we would be giving you a call.

- At this time, we are just scheduling the interview, not conducting the survey. We will conduct the interview at the time you propose.


Terminate Scheduling Call

Thank you for your willingness to share your feedback with SPEC. We look forward to speaking with you at [REPEAT DATE/TIME].

Introduction


Hello, my name is [CALLER NAME] calling from ORC Macro on behalf of IRS’s Stakeholder Partnerships, Education, and Communication (SPEC) organization.


C1. Am I speaking with [INSERT NAME]?


01 Yes (Named person)

02 No (Not named person) Ask to be connected. Repeat C1.


C2. Great. As you may recall when we contacted you to set up this call, Macro International Inc. is working with the SPEC program to obtain feedback about your satisfaction as a National Partner who works with SPEC on joint national initiatives and coalition building. We had scheduled this time for a 15-minute interview to gather your feedback for SPEC. May I assume that this still a good time?


01 Yes

02 No (schedule new date and time—ensure correct time zone))

03 Soft refusal (Thank you and terminate call)

04 Hard refusal (Thank you and terminate call)


Interviewer may provide if asked:

- The overall goal of the research is to gather information that will help SPEC provide better service and improve the relationship between SPEC and your organization.

- During the past couple weeks, you should have received a letter to you signed by the Director of the SPEC program, Julie Garcia, notifying you that we would be giving you a call.


________________________________________________________________________


Thank you. Please, feel free to be open and frank with us. Your identity and individual responses will be held confidential by Macro International Inc., and your feedback will be provided to SPEC in aggregate only. Please keep in mind that this discussion will only be about your opinions of your experiences with the SPEC National Partnership program and not with any interactions you may have had with other parts of the IRS.


RM1. According to our files, your primary SPEC relationship manager is (RM NAME). Is that correct?


01 Yes (Skip to Q1)

02 No (Continue with RM2)

08 [DK] (Skip to Q1)

09 [Refused] Skip to Q1


RM2. Who is your primary SPEC relationship manager?


[Record verbatim]


I. Market Segments And Demographics


Let me start by asking some general questions.


Q1. Which of the following are your primary areas of emphasis as a national partner? Again, we want to know the roles you play at the national level, not the roles of your local affiliates. (Read list and check all that apply) [Probe: Any others?]

01 Return Preparation, such as volunteer assistance, facilities, or equipment

02 Education and Outreach, such as communications, products, news articles, or websites

03 Asset Building, such as financial education, funding, or wealth building

04 Other Tax Assistance

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


Q2. Which of the following types of customers do you, your affiliates, or members serve most frequently? (Read list and check all that apply)


01 Low Income—less than $40,000

02 Elderly

03 Military

04 People with disabilities

05 Foreign students

06 U.S.-based students

07 Rural

08 Native American

09 Limited English Proficient

10 Something else (Specify)

98 [DK]

99 [Refused]


Q3. For how many years has your organization partnered with SPEC?


____ years


98 [DK]

99 [Refused]


Q4. Which of the following reasons best describe why your organization continues to partner with SPEC? (Read List and check all that apply)

01 To benefit from SPEC’s tax law knowledge

02 To benefit from related mission and goals

03 To benefit from the range of SPEC-provided products and services

04 To provide a value added service to the community

05 To make a greater economic impact on the community

06 As an opportunity to move families toward self-sufficiency

07 Something else (please specify)______________________________

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


II. Relationship Manager


Now I would like to ask you about your satisfaction with the relationship between you and the SPEC relationship manager you work with. Please think of your direct experience with your SPEC relationship manager only, not about your other experiences with SPEC or your local affiliates’ or members’ experiences dealing with their local SPEC offices.


Please use a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means very satisfied and 1 means very dissatisfied. If an item is not applicable or if you have no experience with it, please let me know.


Q5. How satisfied are you with your SPEC relationship manager’s…? [read and rotate A-G]


  1. Courtesy and professionalism

  2. Proactiveness or anticipation of your needs

  3. Flexibility in meeting your needs

  4. Responsiveness to your concerns, questions, and suggestions

  5. Adherence to security and privacy standards

  6. Understanding your mission

  7. Ability to fulfill SPEC partnership agreements with you


05 Very satisfied

04

03

02

01 Very dissatisfied

06 [Not applicable/Have not used/No experience]

07 [DK]

08 [Refused]


Q6. Did your SPEC relationship manager provide you with results of your accomplishments and/or help you assess the impact of your program?


01 Yes

02 No

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


Q7. Using the same scale [repeat as often as necessary], how satisfied are you with the guidance and assistance that you receive from your SPEC relationship manager in…? [read and rotate A-D]



  1. Your selection of tax return preparation site locations—for example, what cities are in need of VITA sites

  2. Reaching your target customers

  3. Identifying community based organizations as potential partners

  4. Establishing partnerships with community based organizations

05 Very satisfied

04

03

02

01 Very dissatisfied

06 [Not applicable/Have not used/No experience]

07 [Unaware product/service was available]

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


Q8. Using the same scale [repeat as often as necessary], how satisfied are you with the guidance and assistance that you receive from your SPEC relationship manager at national conferences, conventions, or meetings?


05 Very satisfied

04

03

02

01 Very dissatisfied

06 [Not applicable/Have not used/No experience]

07 [Unaware product/service was available]

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


[If Q8 = 1 to 5 only]

Q9. What in particular about your SPEC relationship manager’s presence at national conferences, conventions and meetings influenced your satisfaction level?

[Record verbatim]


Q10. Using the same scale [repeat as often as necessary], overall, how satisfied are you with your national partner SPEC relationship manager?


05 Very satisfied

04

03

02

01 Very dissatisfied

06 [Not applicable/Have not used/No experience]

07 [DK]

09 [Refused]


III. Relationship Building


Q11. Do you have local affiliates that partner with SPEC?


01 Yes

02 No Skip to Q15

08 [DK] Skip to Q15

09 [Refused] Skip to Q15


Q12. Has SPEC worked with you to connect your affiliates or members to SPEC local relationship managers in an effort to facilitate collaboration?


01 Yes

02 No Skip to Q15

08 [DK] Skip to Q15

09 [Refused] Skip to Q15


Q13. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means very satisfied and 1 means very dissatisfied, how satisfied are you with…? [Read and rotate A-B]


  1. SPEC’s communication of national partner agreements down to local SPEC relationship managers

  2. SPEC’s success in building relationships between your local affiliates or members and local SPEC relationship managers


05 Very satisfied

04

03

02

01 Very dissatisfied

06 [Not applicable/Have not used/No experience]

07 [Unaware product/service was available]

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


Q14. How could SPEC better create national partner agreements that you can implement successfully with your local affiliates?


[Record verbatim]


IV. Research


Now I have a few questions about the research and databases that SPEC provides.


Q15. Have you received and used SPEC-provided research, such as databases, MapPoint Analysis reports, return filing statistics or tables?


01 Yes

02 No Skip to Q19

08 [DK] Skip to Q19

09 [Refused] Skip to Q19


Q16. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being very satisfied and 1 being very dissatisfied, how satisfied are you with the following types of SPEC-provided research? [Read and rotate A-E]


  1. Return filing related statistics, (such as on e-filing or EITC Returns)

  2. Information on target market segments, such as Low Income, Limited English, Rural, Disabled, Elderly, etc

  3. SPEC Tax Return Filing databases (such as SPEC Returns Database, SPEC EITC Database)

  4. SPEC-provided MapPoint analysis

  5. SPEC-provided reports


05 Very satisfied

04

03

02

01 Very dissatisfied

06 [Not applicable/Have not used/No experience]

07 [Unaware product/service was available]

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


Q17. Did you receive the information in a timely manner?


01 Yes

02 No

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


Q18. What was the impact of SPEC provided research on your organization?

(Read list and check all that apply) [Probe: Any others?]

01 Allowed assessment of outreach or return preparation activities on communities served

02 Provided information for funding or grant requests

03 Helped determine locations for return preparation sites

04 Identified communities for outreach

05 Something else (Specify)

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


[If Q1 = 01 Continue]

[If Q1 = 02, 03, 04, 08, 09 only Skip to Q24]


V. Privacy, Confidentiality and Security

Next, I would like to ask for your feedback on SPEC’s efforts to improve the privacy, confidentiality, and security procedures, as referenced in Publication 4299 – Privacy and Confidentiality - A Public Trust, at return preparation sites.

Q19. Are you familiar with SPEC’s efforts to maintain and improve the privacy, security and confidentiality at return preparation sites?


01 Yes

02 No Skip to Q22

08 [DK] Skip to Q22

09 [Refused] Skip to Q22


Q20. Did SPEC provide guidance material to assist with the privacy, confidentially and security of taxpayer data, including protection of data on computers and laptops?


01 Yes

02 No

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


Q21. Overall, how satisfied are you with SPEC’s efforts to improve the privacy, confidentiality, and security procedures at return preparation sites.


05 Very satisfied

04

03

02

01 Very dissatisfied

06 [Not applicable/Have not used/No experience]

07 [Unaware product/service was available]

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


VI. Quality Review Process

Now I would like to ask you about SPEC’s Volunteer Return Preparation Program - Quality Improvement Process, also known as VRPP-QIP.


Q22. Are you familiar with SPEC’s efforts to improve quality of return preparation?


01 Yes

02 No Skip to Q24

08 [DK] Skip to Q24

09 [Refused] Skip to Q24


Q23. Using the same scale [repeat as often as necessary], overall how satisfied are you with the guidance, tools, and support provided by SPEC to improve the VRPP-QIP?

05 Very satisfied

04

03

02

01 Very dissatisfied

06 [Not applicable/Have not used/No experience]

07 [Unaware product/service was available]

08 [DK]

09 [Refused]


VII. Overall Satisfaction


Q24. We’ve talked about the service you have received from SPEC. Considering all of your responses to this survey, we’d like you to rate your overall satisfaction with SPEC’s products and services. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being very satisfied and 1 being very dissatisfied, are you…?


05 Very satisfied

04

03

02

01 Very dissatisfied

06 [DK]

09 [Refused]


Q25. Given your experience, on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means very satisfied and 1 means very dissatisfied, how likely are you to continue partnering with SPEC next year?


05 Very likely

04

03

02

01 Very unlikely

06 [DK]

09 [Refused]


[If Q25 = 1 or 2]

Q26. If you do not anticipate partnering with SPEC next year, what is the main reason you are relatively unlikely to continue?


[Record verbatim]


Q27. What services provided by SPEC do you value most?


[Record verbatim]


VI. Closing Comments


Q28. Do you have any other comments or suggestions for improvement for the SPEC program?

[Record verbatim]


That concludes this survey. On behalf of the IRS, SPEC and Macro International Inc., thank you very much for your participation.


DRAFT 12/13/2007

Macro International Inc.

File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleRespondent Information
Authoreswall58
Last Modified Bymdsloa00
File Modified2008-07-24
File Created2008-07-24

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy