SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A (“IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS – SUBGRANTS TO LEAS”)

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A-Subgrants to LEAs	Form and Instruction	Modified	Available
SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A (“IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS	Form and Instruction	New	Available
1810-0618 OMB-ED QandA.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2008-04-14	Available
1810-0618 Explanation Changes 2008-09.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2008-02-13	Available
1810-0618 Use of Funds Supporting Statement.doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2008-02-13	Available
1810-0618 SSTATE B.doc	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2008-02-13	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
21325	Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A-Subgrants to LEAs	Form and Instruction	Modified
183750	SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A (“IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS	Form and Instruction	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1810-0618	ICR Reference No: 200802-1810-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200612-1810-001
Agency/Subagency: ED/OESE	Agency Tracking No: 3523
Title: SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A (“IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS – SUBGRANTS TO LEAS”)
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 04/15/2008
	Date Received in OIRA: 02/20/2008
Terms of Clearance: The next time this data is collected, we encourage ED to consider a sampling design that would provide reliable data in connection with urbanicity.

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	04/30/2011	36 Months From Approved	05/31/2008
Responses	850	0	800
Time Burden (Hours)	5,000	0	4,000
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), which reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, provides funds to districts to improve the quality of their teaching and principal force and raise student achievement. These funds are provided to districts through Title II, Part A (“Improving Teacher Quality State Grants – Subgrants to LEAs”). The purpose of this survey is for the U.S. Department of Education to have a better understanding of how districts are using these funds. The survey also collects information on high-quality professional development in LEAs.This OMB clearance request is to continue these analyses using a similar data collection instrument and sampling plan for the 2007-2008 school year and subsequent years. The major change from past years is the addition of a short survey for State Educational Agencies (SEA). The SEA survey will provide information on fiscal year allocations of Title II, Part A funds made to the LEAs selected for participation in the main survey and be preprinted with the names of the LEAs selected for participation in the LEA survey.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 107 - 110 1119(a)(2)(B) Name of Law: The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	72 FR 69670	12/10/2007
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	73 FR 9105	02/19/2008
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 2

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A (“IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS	N/A	SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A (�IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS
Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A-Subgrants to LEAs	NA	SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A (?IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS ? SUBGRANTS TO LEAS?)

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	850	800	0	50	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	5,000	4,000	0	1,000	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: The total annual hours increased by 1,000 hours to accommodate the additional time needed for LEAs to complete one additional question on the LEA survey and for SEAs to complete the SEA survey.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $100,000

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 02/20/2008

---