County Scorecard Update 2008 at NCAS meeting

1. County Scorecard Update
   NACS

 

• •NOAA has a relatively new performance metric that assesses how well we are doing at “enabling” local capacity for accurate positioning.  This metric: 

• • Makes use of NOAA’s Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) as a proxy to assess the local use of NOAA positioning tools and services. Was developed over the past several years in partnership with National Association of County Surveyors (NACS).  

  • Involves the use of a web-based county scorecard of 23 survey questions specifically focusing on infrastructure, NGS models and tools, NGS capacity building and outreach, and overall satisfaction.  

• •We need input from YOU, our core customers, to help NOAA improve its geospatial products and services. 

• •For more information, visit http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/scorecard/ 

1.         or contact:

• • Your NOAA State Geodetic Advisor  

1.          (for current list visit http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/ADVISORS/)

• 1. OR

• • Brett Howe ([email protected])  

1.        

1. Background

 

1. Our Performance Metric Asks

• •Are Counties using NOAA’s positioning products and services? 

• • NOAA looks at County Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) use as a proxy.  Have there been 25 or more OPUS solution generations in a given county in the last 12 months? 

  • Counties meeting the above criteria are “substantially enabled” (shaded yellow). 

• •Is there feedback and interaction between the local community and NOAA? 

 

1. GPRA Measure Details

• 1. Indicator:

             By County, a measure of the NOAA-provided level of infrastructure, tools, and local capacity needed for accurate positioning as follows:  

• 1.       RED    –   Not yet classified

• 1. YELLOW   –   County “substantially enabled” to conduct                             accurate positioning (Use OPUS as a Proxy)

• 1.   GREEN    –  County is “fully enabled” to conduct accurate                             positioning (Use County Scorecard for validation and                               to improve NGS products and services)

• 1.        

1. • Red:  This is indicated by fewer than 25 OPUS solution generations in a given county in the last year and no capacity validation.

     Yellow:  Indicates county has demonstrated capacity needed for accurate positioning.  This is indicated by 25 or more OPUS solution generations in a given county in the last year.  

     Green:  Indicates county validated capacity needed for accurate positioning.  This is indicated by having local interaction through, for example, a submitted and accepted OPUS project for inclusion in the NOAA’s geodetic database.

    

 

 

1. The Latest:

• •Internet Site Developed 

1.                 http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/scorecard/

• • 1. CONTAINS:

• • • •General Information and FY08 Action Plan 

    • •Detailed Survey Results 

    • •Presentations and Updates 

    • •Online form to request survey 

• •667 Total Responses from Nov 2005 – Present 

• • • •142 from NACS members 

    • •160 from GIS Mapping Users 

    • •132 from “Other Land Surveyor/Engineer” 

• •Proactively integrating survey results into management decisions 

• • • •Conducting workshops in areas with an identified need 

    • •Re-tailoring workshop program based on customer needs 

    • •Analyzing results for ways to improve products and services 

       

 

 

 

 

1. GPRA Measure Targets

Ranking	FY 2007	FY 2008	FY 2009	FY 2010	FY 2011
Substantially Enabled	48%	52%	62%	62%	62%
Fully Enabled	4%	8%	13%	20%	30%
Total GPRA (Green and/or Yellow)	49%	60%	75%	82%	92%

 

1. Detailed Results
   

 

 

 

 

1. Some Ongoing Activities Based on Feedback

 

1. NGS’ Corbin Training Center       

 

1. County Scorecard Next Steps

• •Involve NACS and NACo GIS Committee members in 2008 ESRI Survey & Engineering GIS Summit (August 2 – 5, 2008) 

• •Work with NACo on possibility of hosting focus groups or other workshops with core customers to provide an independent evaluation of NGS programs and how we are doing. 

• •Add NACo National Association of County Engineers events to NGS’ outreach calendar (for example NACE Illinois 2009 Annual Conference) 

• •Reach out to and brief other NACo constituencies 

• •Provide feedback to further incorporate stakeholder feedback into NGS management decisions. 

• •Investigate linkages to National Height Modernization efforts 

• •Other areas?  We welcome your input. 

   

 

1. Questions?  Comments?  

 

File Type	application/vnd.ms-powerpoint
File Title	National States Geographic Information Council Annual Conference September 23, 2007
Author	Brett.Howe
Last Modified By	Brett Howe
File Modified	2008-03-03
File Created	2007-08-20

---

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy

---