2010 Census Integrated Communication Program (ICP) Evaluation

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
nonsubstantive change request.doc Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change	2009-12-01
Revisions made to CICPE draft questionnaires in 4-27-09.doc Supplementary Document	2009-07-23
Revisions based on Rd2 interviews.doc Supplementary Document	2009-07-23
NORC_National_Frame_Summary.doc Supplementary Document	2009-07-23
CICPE_WAVE1_CI_Comments_033109.doc Supplementary Document	2009-07-23
Appendix K CICPE_Case_Management_Flow.pdf Supplementary Document	2009-05-26
Appendix P BOC Response to CTaeuber comments_letter.pdf Supplementary Document	2009-05-26
OMB 2010 Census ICP Evaluation Supporting Statement Part B Rev 7 17 2009.doc Supporting Statement B	2009-07-23
2010 Census ICP Evaluation Supporting Statement Part A Rev 072309_.doc Supporting Statement A	2009-07-23

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
189290	Instruments Other-Advance letter sent to core sample households with matched	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0607-0955	ICR Reference No: 200912-0607-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200905-0607-006
Agency/Subagency: DOC/CENSUS	Agency Tracking No:
Title: 2010 Census Integrated Communication Program (ICP) Evaluation
Type of Information Collection: No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 12/29/2009
	Date Received in OIRA: 12/01/2009
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	06/30/2011	06/30/2011	06/30/2011
Responses	44,347	0	11,200
Time Burden (Hours)	8,611	0	7,100
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The Census Bureau is requiring an independent evaluation of the 2010 Census Integrated Communication Campaign (2010 Census ICC) to determine if the goals of the 2010 Census ICC achieved it's goals, for assessing the success of 2010 Census and for planning of the 2020 Census. This evaluation will allow stakeholders and concerned parties, to determine if the reduced Nonresponse Followup burden due to the 2010 Census ICC justifies the significant investment in the program. The survey involves the general public based on probability methods that combine cross-sectional, time-series samples with longitudinal samples to maximize the statistical power of cross-sectional estimates and change over time.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 13 USC 141, 193 Name of Law: null
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 9214	03/03/2009
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 26201	06/01/2009
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? Yes

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Instruments	2010 Census ICP Evaluation Questionnaire Wave 3, 2010 Census ICP Evaluation Questionnaire Wave 2, 2010 Census ICP Evaluation Questionnaire Wave 1	2010 Census ICP Evaluation Questionnaire Wave 1 ,   2010 Census ICP Evaluation Questionnaire Wave 2 ,   2010 Census ICP Evaluation Questionnaire Wave 3

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	44,347	11,200	0	0	33,147	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	8,611	7,100	0	-500	2,011	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Reduction Due to: Changing Forms

Short Statement: We have shortened the Wave 2 interview from 30 down to 20 minutes.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $2,200,000

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 12/01/2009

---