Section 8 Random Digit Dialing Fair Marketing Rent Surveys

ICR 201006-2528-002

OMB: 2528-0142

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2010-06-07
Supporting Statement B
2010-06-07
Supplementary Document
2007-12-17
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
2528-0142 201006-2528-002
Historical Active 200711-2528-002
HUD/PD&R
Section 8 Random Digit Dialing Fair Marketing Rent Surveys
Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 08/11/2010
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 06/17/2010
This collection is approved for a period of one year, during which time HUD and its contractor will revise the methodology for this survey and address issues of coverage and nonresponse. HUD is encouraged to keep OMB informed on these efforts as they progress and to consult with OMB as needed.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
08/31/2011 24 Months From Approved
15,772 0 0
662 0 0
0 0 0

This survey provides HUD with a fast, inexpensive way to estimate Section 8 Fair Market Rents (FMRs) in areas not covered by the American Community Survey annual reports and in areas where FMRs are believed to be incorrect. The Department has used this random digit dialing (RDD) survey methodology for 15 years, as recently improved to offset low response rates. The affected public would be those renters surveyed and Section 8 voucher holders.

None
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  75 FR 17943 04/08/2010
75 FR 33821 06/15/2010
No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Section 8 Random Digit Dialing Fair Marketing Rent Surveys

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 15,772 0 0 15,772 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 662 0 0 662 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
The response burden estimates are based on 4 area surveys. The time spent for both screening out respondents and administering the survey have increase. The screen–out time increased just a little, from 1.70 minutes to 1.74 minutes. However, this is offset by the significant reduction in the number of respondents contacted, which decreased from an average of 7,641 per survey area to 3,086 per survey areas.

$1,000,000
Yes Part B of Supporting Statement
No
No
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Marie Lihn 2024025866 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
06/17/2010


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy