Attachment I - Published 30-day FRN

8724

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondents

Number of respondents

Number of responses per
respondent

Average burden per response
(in hours)

State Oral Health Programs ........................................................................................................

21

2

11

Dated: February 17, 2010.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010–3866 Filed 2–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–10–09CH]

Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to [email protected]. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
Proposed Project
A Controlled Evaluation of Expect
Respect Support Groups (ERSG):
Preventing and Interrupting Teen Dating
Violence among At-Risk Middle and
High School Students—New—National
Center for Injury Prevention and Control
(NCIPC), Division of Violence

Prevention (DVP), Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The prevalence and consequences of
teen dating violence make it a public
health concern that requires early and
effective prevention. To date, only three
prevention strategies—Safe Dates, the
Youth Relationships Project, and 4th
R—have demonstrated reductions in
dating violence behaviors in rigorous,
controlled evaluations, and only one of
these (Safe Dates) has effectively
prevented sexual violence. In order to
protect young people and build the
evidence for effective prevention
strategies, evaluations of additional
programs are needed, including those
programs currently in the field. Expect
Respect Support Groups (provided by
Safe Place) are currently in use in the
Austin Independent School District and
demonstrates promising results in an
uncontrolled program evaluation, which
strongly suggests a controlled evaluation
is warranted to more rigorously examine
program effects.
The proposed study has two primary
goals and two exploratory aims. The
primary goals are: (1) To evaluate the
effectiveness of Expect Respect Support
Groups (ERSG) in preventing and
reducing teen dating violence and (2)
Comparing whether there is increased
healthy conflict resolution skills
reported by at-risk male and female
middle and high school students
supported by ERSG, compared to at-risk
students in control schools who do not
receive ERSG.
The exploratory aims are: (1) To
evaluate whether or not the

effectiveness of ERSG is enhanced by
the presence of universal, school-wide
prevention programs, and (2) To
examine whether participants with
different characteristics respond
differently to the intervention. For
example, we will determine whether
outcome for boys or girls are the same.
The proposed evaluation will use a
quasi-experimental/non-randomized
design in which a convenience sample
of participants in schools receiving
universal and/or targeted prevention
services are compared to students in
control schools in which no dating
violence prevention services are
available. Based on past experience with
an uncontrolled program evaluation of
Expect Respect Support groups, we
anticipate that in the Austin
Independent School District, 800
students will undergo an Intake
Assessment. From that number, 600
respondents from the intervention and
control groups will be eligible for the
Baseline Survey, and from that number,
400 will complete the Completion
Survey.
Therefore, over three years we will
recruit 1800 students (300 per year from
intervention schools and 300 per year
from control schools), of whom we
anticipate 1200 will have complete data.
Control schools will be selected that
have characteristics (e.g., risk status,
socio-economic status) similar to the
Austin Independent School District
intervention schools.
There is no cost to respondents. The
total estimated annual burden hours are
2000.

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents

Number of
responses
per respondent

Average
burden per
response (in
hours)

Type of respondent

Form name

Control Schools (School districts surrounding Austin Independent
School District).

Intake assessment .....................

400

1

15/60

Baseline Survey .........................
Completion Survey .....................
Follow-up Survey 1 ....................
Follow-up Survey 2 ....................
Intake assessment .....................
Baseline Survey .........................
Completion Survey .....................
Follow-up Survey 1 ....................

300
200
200
200
400
300
200
200

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
15/60
1
1
1

Intervention Schools (Austin Independent School District) ............

VerDate Nov<24>2008

16:34 Feb 24, 2010

Jkt 220001

PO 00000

Frm 00080

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM

25FEN1

8725

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Type of respondent

Number of
respondents

Form name

Follow-up Survey 2 ....................

Dated: February 12, 2010.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010–3825 Filed 2–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES

[30Day–10–0735]

Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to [email protected]. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806.
Written comments should be received
within 30 days of this notice.

200

1

Average
burden per
response (in
hours)
1

effective providers of health information
and resources to our target audiences.
CDC is requesting renewal of our
existing 3-year generic clearance, with
revisions, in order to carry out its
mission. Generic clearance is needed to
ensure that CDC can continuously
improve its Web sites, social media,
mobile-based or other electronic
communication channels hosting CDC
content though regular surveys
developed from these pre-defined
questions.
Surveying the CDC Web site, social
media, mobile-based or other electronic
communication channels hosting CDC
content on a regular, ongoing basis will
help ensure that users have an effective,
efficient, and satisfying experience on
any of our Web sites or communication
channels, maximizing the health impact
of the information and resulting in
optimum benefit for public health. The
surveys will ensure that all CDC Web
sites and electronic communication
channels meet customer and partner
priorities, build CDC’s brand, and
contribute to CDC health impact goals.
There is no cost to respondents other
than their time. The total estimated
annualized burden hours are 41,500.

Proposed Project
CDC Web site and Communication
Channels Usability Evaluation, (OMB
no. 0925–0735, exp. 3/31/2010)—
Revision—National Center for Health
Marketing (NCHM), Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, (CDC).
Background and Brief Description

Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention

Number of
responses
per respondent

Executive Order 12862 directs Federal
agencies that provide significant
services directly to the public to survey
customers to determine the kind and
quality of services they need and their
level of satisfaction with existing
services. The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) seeks
approval to conduct usability surveys
on CDC Web sites, social media, mobilebased or other electronic
communication channels hosting CDC
content on an ongoing basis.
It is important for CDC to ensure that
health information, interventions, and
programs at CDC are based on sound
science, objectivity, and continuous
customer input. The CDC Web sites,
social media, mobile-based or other
electronic communication channels
hosting CDC content must be designed
to be easy to use, easy to access, and

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Survey type

In Person Surveys .......................................................................................................................
Remote Surveys ..........................................................................................................................

Dated: February 18, 2010.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010–3824 Filed 2–24–10; 8:45 am]

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES

BILLING CODE 4163–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Title: State Self-Assessment Review
and Report.
OMB No.: 0970–0223.
Description: Section 454(15)(A) of the
Social Security Act, as amended by the
Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996,

VerDate Nov<24>2008

16:34 Feb 24, 2010

Jkt 220001

PO 00000

Frm 00081

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Number of respondents

Number of responses per
respondent

8,000
67,000

1
1

Average burden per response
(hrs.)
1
30/60

requires each State to annually assess
the performance of its child support
enforcement program in accordance
with standards specified by the
Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services, and to provide a
report of the findings to the Secretary.
This information is required to
determine if States are complying with
Federal child support mandates and
providing the best services possible. The
report is also intended to be used as a
management tool to help States evaluate
their programs and assess performance.

E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM

25FEN1