ATTACHMENT 2
OMB No. 1121-0312: Approval Expires [INSERT DATE]
Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems, 2010
Since 1989, the Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems has been used to collect the nation’s most complete, comprehensive and relevant data on the number and status of state-maintained criminal history records and on the increasing number of operations and services involving non-criminal justice background checks provided by the state repositories. This data collection is supported by Cooperative Agreement No. 2007-RU-BX-K011 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. As in previous years, response to this survey is voluntary.
Respondents using the online survey tool, accessible at [Insert Website Address], to enter 2010 data can view previously submitted 2008 data for comparison purposes. References to your state’s 2008 responses are displayed within each section of the online form. It is hoped that this information will assist respondents in completing the survey more accurately and efficiently. If you have any questions or comments, please contact SEARCH staff Dennis DeBacco at 916-392-2550 ext. 325, email [email protected].
If more convenient, the survey sections may also be printed, completed manually, and faxed (916-392-8440) or mailed to the attention of Dennis DeBacco at SEARCH, 7311 Greenhaven Drive, Suite 145, Sacramento, CA 95831.
The survey is divided into 8 sections, each of which may be submitted independently and not necessarily in the order presented. This was done so that different people on each repository’s staff may submit the data for which their section is responsible. Repository directors will still be responsible to see that the survey is submitted in its entirety. Please note the following:
All reported data should be for calendar year 2010, or as of December 31, 2010.
The term “felony” includes any crime classified as a felony under your state’s laws. These offenses are generally punishable by a term of incarceration in excess of one year. If your state’s laws do not use the term “felony,” please substitute functional equivalents, such as class 1, 2, 3 and 4 offenses in New Jersey and class A, B and C offenses in Maine.
Questions which seek responses based on a “legal requirement,” refer only to a state statute or a state administrative regulation having the force of law.
If additional space is needed, please use the “Additional Comments” area at the end of each section.
Please use the “Additional Comments” area at the end of each section to identify questions for which “no data is available.”
If a question is not applicable to your repository, please indicate “NA” in the “Additional Comments” area at the end of each section.
Burden Statement
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, we cannot ask you to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The survey will be sent to criminal history repositories in 56 jurisdictions, including the 50 States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The average time required for each agency to complete the survey is estimated at 6.3 hours. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this survey, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Director, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street, NW, Washington DC 20531. Do not send your completed form to this address.
SECTION I: REPOSITORY
This section completed by
Name ________________________________ Title ________________________________
Agency _____________________________________________________________________
Phone ________________________________ Email _______________________________
Date Completed ________________________
|
The following questions relate to descriptions of your criminal history record information and master name index databases:
How many subjects (individual criminal offenders) were in your
criminal history file as of
December 31, 2010?
(a)
Automated records _______________ (Include subjects whose records
are
partially automated)
(b) Manual
records _______________
(c) Total
records _______________
Fingerprints processed in 2010:
Purpose Number Percentage of
Totals
2010 volume
(a) Criminal
___________ ____________
(b) Non-criminal (not retained) ___________
____________
(c) Non-criminal (retained) ___________
____________ (b+c) ____________
(d) What was the total number of fingerprint-based
background checks conducted during 2010? (a+b+c) __________
(a) Does your state combine both criminal events and
non-criminal justice applicant information in the same record?
Yes No
(b) If so, how many records in your database contain both
criminal
events and non-criminal justice applicant information? ___________
(c) Of the total records in your database ___________ percent
represent records that
contain both criminal events and
non-criminal justice applicant information.
Do you have felony conviction flagging capability, i.e., does your criminal history record database include a data field or flag enabling you to quickly determine whether a given record subject has a felony conviction?
Yes, all subjects with felony convictions
Yes, some subjects with felony convictions
No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
SECTION
II: ARREST/FINGERPRINT
REPORTING AND ENTRY
This section completed by
Name ________________________________ Title ________________________________
Agency _____________________________________________________________________
Phone ________________________________ Email _______________________________
Date Completed ________________________
|
How many felony arrests were reported during calendar year
2010?
____________ arrests
How many criminal justice fingerprints were submitted to the
repository via livescan during 2010?
____________
(a) As of December 31, 2010, was there a backlog of arrest data to
be entered into the AFIS database?
Yes
No
(b) If yes, how many unprocessed or partially processed fingerprint
cards (work backlog) did you have at that time?
____________
Size of backlog as of December 31, 2010, is not available
What biometric information does your repository retain? Check all
that apply.
Latent fingerprints
Flat prints
2-Finger prints for identification purposes
2-Finger prints for updating incarceration or release identification
Palm prints
Facial images/mug shots
Scars, Marks, and Tattoo images
Facial Recognition Data
1- or 2-Finger prints for updating disposition information
Other: __________________________
5. (a) Total number of law enforcement agencies that submit arrest prints
via livescan: ____________
(b) Total number of agencies without livescan devices that
receive
livescan services from agencies that do have that
equipment
(e.g., a sheriff might submit arrest prints on behalf
of 20 agencies): ____________
(c) Percentage of criminal prints submitted via livescan during 2010: ____________%
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
SECTION III: DISPOSITIONS
This section completed by
Name ________________________________ Title ________________________________
Agency _____________________________________________________________________
Phone ________________________________ Email _______________________________
Date Completed ________________________
|
The
following questions seek to determine to what extent the records in
your criminal history record database contain final disposition
information. (“Final case disposition” is defined as
release by police after charging; decline to proceed by prosecutor,
or final trial court disposition.)
Are you a National Fingerprint File (NFF) state?
Yes No
If yes, under NFF participation protocols, have you elected not
to forward disposition information on second and subsequent arrests
to the FBI?
Yes No
(a) How many final case dispositions were received by the repository
during 2010?
____________ dispositions
(b) Of
those, how many were sent to the FBI?
____________
dispositions
Of the dispositions forwarded to the FBI:
(c) What percentage were sent by Machine Readable
Data (MRD)
such as tape/CD/DVD? ____________ %
(d) What percentage
were sent via hard copy/paper? ____________ %
(e) What
percentage were sent by Interstate
Identification Index (III)
message key? ____________ %
What percentage of all arrests in the criminal history database have
had final case dispositions recorded?
(a) Arrests
entered within past five years ____________ %
(b)
Arrests in entire database ____________ %
(c) Felony
charges ____________ %
Of the dispositions received at the repository during 2010, what
percentage could not be linked to a specific arrest
record?
____________ %
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
SECTION IV: COURT REPORTING
This section completed by
Name ________________________________ Title ________________________________
Agency _____________________________________________________________________
Phone ________________________________ Email _______________________________
Date Completed ________________________
|
As of December 31, 2010, was any court disposition data reported
directly to the repository by automated means?
Yes No
(a) As of December 31, 2010, was any court disposition information
reported directly to the repository by your state’s
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)?
Yes No
(b)
What percentage of dispositions received was reported by the
AOC? ____________ %
In 2010, what was the average time elapsed between the occurrence of
final felony trial court dispositions and receipt of information
concerning such dispositions by the repository?
____________
days
In 2010, what was the average time elapsed between receipt of final
felony trial court disposition information by the repository and
entry of that information into the criminal history record
database?
____________ days
As of December 31, 2010, was your state using livescan devices in
the courtroom to link positive identifications with dispositions?
Yes No
(a) As of December 31, 2010, was there a backlog of court
disposition data to be entered into the criminal history record
database?
Yes No
(b) If yes, how many unprocessed or partially
processed court disposition forms (work backlog) did you
have?
____________ forms
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
SECTION V: CORRECTIONS REPORTING
This section completed by
Name ________________________________ Title ________________________________
Agency _____________________________________________________________________
Phone ________________________________ Email _______________________________
Date Completed ________________________
|
In 2010, what was the average time elapsed between receipt of
corrections admission data by the repository and entry of
that information into the criminal history record
database?
____________ days
Not currently receiving corrections admission data
In 2010, what was the average time elapsed between receipt of
corrections release data by the repository and entry of that
information into the criminal history record database?
____________
days
Not currently receiving corrections release data
(a) Do any corrections agencies currently report admission/release/status change information to the repository by automated means?
Yes No
(b) If yes, how many corrections agencies currently report by
automated means?
____________ agencies representing ______% of the
admission/release/status change activity
(a) As of December 31, 2010, was there a backlog of corrections data
to be entered into the criminal history record database?
Yes No
(b) If yes, how many unprocessed or partially processed
corrections reports (work backlog) did you have?
____________
reports
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
SECTION VI: REPOSITORY ADMINISTRATION
This section completed by
Name ________________________________ Title ________________________________
Agency _____________________________________________________________________
Phone ________________________________ Email _______________________________
Date Completed ________________________
|
(a) As of December 31, 2010, does your repository conduct “lights
out” processing of fingerprints (an identification decision is
made without fingerprint technician intervention)?
Yes No
(b) If yes, what percentage of fingerprints
was handled with
“lights out”
processing? __________ %
(c) If yes, what percentage of criminal
fingerprints was handled
with “lights out”
processing? __________ %
(d) If yes, what percentage of
non-criminal applicant
fingerprints
was handled with “lights out”
processing? __________ %
(a) Does your state maintain a protection order file?
Yes No
(b) If no, does law enforcement or courts enter protection order
information directly to the FBI-NCIC Protective Order File?
Yes No
(c) If yes, how many records are in the state protection order
record database as of
December 31, 2010?
__________ records
Yes No
If no, what agency in your state is responsible for the maintenance of the sex offender registry?
Department of Corrections
Other ___________________
As of December 31, 2010, what is the total number of
registered
sex offenders in your state? __________
What is the total number of registered sex offenders
on your publicly available state registry? __________
(a) As of December 31, 2010, how many hours per day did your state
repository operate?
Number of operating hours per day
Monday – Friday 8 10 12 14 16 24 Other _____
Saturday 8 10 12 14 16 24 Other _____
Sunday 8
10 12
14 16
24 Other _____
(b) Number of hours per day with fingerprint technicians on site
Monday – Friday 8 10 12 14 16 24 Other _____
Saturday 8 10 12 14 16 24 Other _____
Sunday 8
10 12
14 16
24 Other _____
In addition to criminal history information, to what other records
does your state’s repository
provide access? Check all
that apply.
Sex offender registry
Orders of protection
Wants and warrants
Retained applicant prints
Rap back services for criminal justice purposes
Wanted persons
Firearm registration
Community notification (Check all that apply):
Sex offender residency, employment,
or school
Victim
notification to crime victims
Other: ______________________________
(a) In 2010, did the repository perform compliance audits of agencies who contributed information to the repository?
Yes No
(b) In 2010, did the repository perform compliance audits of agencies who received information from the repository?
Yes No
(a) Has your state implemented a GJXDM or NIEM-compliant standardized rap sheet?
Yes No
(b) If yes, please describe your implementation status. Check all that apply.
Testing
Operational, limited transmissions
Operational, all transmissions
Other. Please describe:
(c) What issues or challenges might delay your state’s implementation of the standardized rap sheet?
Funding
Need to upgrade/replace message switch
Limited internal resources
Need for technical assistance
Other. Please describe:
(a) Which of the following best describes your criminal history system platform?
Built in-house on Windows or .NET framework
Built in-house on Open Source (e.g., JAVA platform)
Built in-house utilizing mainframe services
Vendor supplied on Window or .NET framework
Vendor supplied on Open Source framework
Vendor supplied on Mainframe environment
Combinations
Other. Please describe:
(b) Does your state have plans to migrate to web services?
Yes No
(c) If yes, when do you anticipate your state will migrate to web services?
2011
2012
Other. Please explain:
Does your state currently capture and produce statistics on the following for budgeting or other reporting?
Criminal history transactions
Hits versus no-hits
Purpose codes
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
SECTION
VII: NON-CRIMINAL
BACKGROUND CHECKS
This section completed by
Name ________________________________ Title ________________________________
Agency _____________________________________________________________________
Phone ________________________________ Email _______________________________
Date Completed ________________________
|
BACKGROUND CHECKS
(a) Does your state charge a fee for conducting a search of the
criminal history record
database for non-criminal justice
purposes?
Yes No
If yes, what fees are charged for the state record search as of
December 31, 2010?
(b) Fingerprint-supported search: $_______ retained
$_______ non-retained
$_______ volunteer (retained)
$_______ volunteer (not retained)
(c) Name search: via Internet $_______ non-profit
$_______ government
$_______ volunteer (retained)
$_______ volunteer (not retained)
$_______ others
via Mail $_______ non-profit
$_______ government
$_______ volunteer (retained)
$_______ volunteer (not retained)
$_______ others
(d) Additional service fees: $_______ mailed fingerprint cards/forms
$_______ “no resubmission of prints” for repeat applicant
$_______ retained service
$_______ rap back service
How are fees allocated?
All fees go to the state general fund, with repository funded by
general fund allotment
A percentage of fees go to support repository operations: __________ %
All fees go to support repository operations
Other
________________________________________________________________
Is there a state legal requirement to perform background checks for
any of the following?
Check all that apply.
Nurses/Elder caregivers
Daycare providers
Caregivers – residential facilities
School teachers
Non-teaching school personnel, including volunteers
Volunteers with children
Prospective foster care parents
Prospective adoptive parents
Relative caregivers
Hazardous materials licensees
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
________________________
________________________
Does your state offer a rap back service to provide automatic
updates or notifications
of results when changes to records
occur? Check all that apply.
Yes, always
Yes, but only for notification of subsequent arrest
Yes, but only for notification of subsequent conviction
Other: _____________________________________________
FINGERPRINT-BASED SEARCHES
(a) Has your
state privatized the taking of fingerprints for non-criminal
justice purposes?
Yes
No
(b) If yes, does the vendor assess a fee above what the state
charges to perform the background check?
Yes, Fee $ No
(c) Does the vendor provide any additional services besides the fingerprint capture (e.g. evaluating responses for the requestor, sending responses back to the requestor)?
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
(a) Total number of non-criminal justice fingerprints submitted to the
repository via livescan during 2010: ____________
(b) Total number of law enforcement agencies that submit
non-criminal justice fingerprints via livescan: ____________
(c) Percentage of non-criminal justice fingerprints submitted via
livescan during 2010: ____________
(d) Total number of livescan devices available for non-criminal
justice purposes only: ____________
(e) Total number of livescan devices used for both criminal
and
non-criminal justice purposes: ____________
(a) What is
the average processing time from fingerprint receipt to response?
For electronic requests: ____________ hours ____________ days
For mail requests: ____________ hours ____________ days
(b) Has a goal been established for maximum processing time?
Yes, ____________ days No
What information is contained in the results for fingerprint-based
non-criminal justice background checks? Check all that apply.
Full record
Convictions only
Juvenile records
Arrests without disposition—over 1 year old
Other _____________________________________________________________________
What is the identification rate for fingerprint-based non-criminal justice background checks?
___________ %
Does your
state retain fingerprints submitted for any of the following
non-criminal
justice purposes? Check all that apply.
No. This state
does not retain non-criminal justice fingerprints for any reason.
Licensing
Private sector employment
Employment by justice agencies
Employment by non-criminal justice government agencies
Retention limited to private sector employment involving
vulnerable populations,
e.g., children, the elderly or the
disabled
All non-criminal justice purpose fingerprints may be
retained at the option of the contributor
Other:
________________________________________________________
If your state does retain non-criminal justice fingerprints for any purpose, how are the fingerprints utilized? Check all that apply.
Searched against
existing criminal history database
Searched against latent fingerprint database
Searched against subsequent criminal fingerprint submissions
Searched against subsequent latent fingerprint submissions
Other
_________________________________________________________
NAME-BASED SEARCHES
How many name-based non-criminal justice background checks were performed in 2010?
Received via Internet ____________
Received via mail ____________
Received via telephone ____________
Total received ____________
What information is contained in the results for a name-based non-criminal justice background check? Check all that apply.
Full record
Convictions only
Juvenile records
Arrests without disposition—over 1 year old
Other
_________________________________________________________________
What is the identification rate for name-based non-criminal justice background checks?
____________ %
Is written consent required by the subject before a name-based search is conducted?
Yes No
(a) Are local
agencies authorized to conduct name checks of state records for
non-criminal justice purposes?
Yes
No
(b) If yes, what fee is the local agency authorized to charge? $____________
INTERNET ACCESS
(a) Does your repository provide web-based non-criminal justice
background checks to the public?
Yes
No
(b) What is the website location (URL)? ___________________________________________
(c) If yes, what is required for Internet access for the general
public?
Registration/account information
Credit card payment information
(d) Are fees involved for Internet access for the general public
(not including any
registration or account fees)?
Yes, Fee $ ____________ No
(a) Does the
state AOC provide web-based non-criminal justice background
checks to the public?
Yes
No
(b) If yes, what is the website location (URL)? ______________________________________
(a) If a
private agency maintains the website, how much does it collect per
transaction?
$ ___________________
(b) Of that amount, how much is returned to the repository?
$
___________________
(c) How much is returned to the office of court administration?
$
___________________
FINGERPRINT CAPTURE CERTIFICATION
(a) Does your state have a certification program for persons taking fingerprints?
Yes
No
(b) If yes, was this program established through legislation?
Yes
No
FBI FEE RETENTION
(a) Does the state process allow the Interstate Identification Index (III) record to be retrieved and forwarded to the requestor when the state check reveals a III record rather than forwarding the fingerprints to the FBI to process?
Yes No
(b) If so, is the FBI fee retained by the state?
Yes No
(c) Is the FBI fee returned to the requestor?
Yes No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
SECTION VIII: INDIAN COUNTRY INFORMATION
This section completed by
Name ________________________________ Title ________________________________
Agency _____________________________________________________________________
Phone ________________________________ Email _______________________________
Date Completed ________________________
|
(a) Do you have any federally recognized Tribes in your state?
Yes No
If yes, please complete the following:
(b) How many Tribes do you have? ____________
(a) Do Tribes in your state submit arrest fingerprints to your state repository?
Yes No
(b) If yes, how many Tribes reported in 2010? ____________
(c) How many arrests did the Tribes report in 2010? ____________
(d) How were the records reported?
Electronically Hard Copy Other. Please explain: ____________
Does the repository receive protection order information from Tribes in your state?
Yes No
(a) Does the repository provide sex offender registry services for any Tribes in your state?
Yes No
(b) If yes, how many Tribes submitted sex offender registration information to the repository-maintained state registry in 2010?
(a) Do Tribes in your state submit fingerprints for non-criminal justice background checks?
Yes, Fee $ No
(b) If yes, how many fingerprint-based non-criminal justice background checks did Tribes submit in 2010?
(a) Do Tribes in your state submit name-based non-criminal justice background checks?
Yes, Fee $ No
(b) If yes, how many name-based non-criminal justice background checks did Tribes submit in 2010?
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | September 15, 2005 |
Author | schmitte |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-02-01 |