SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A ("IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS – SUBGRANTS TO LEAS")

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Att_Appendix C IIA OMB renewal--District Survey cover letter 12-6-10.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2011-02-23	Available
Att_APPENDIX D IIA OMB renewal--Explanation of Changes 12-6-10.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2011-02-23	Available
Att_IIA Use of Funds Supporting Statement 12-20-10 Part A.docx	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2011-02-23	Available
Att_IIA Use of Funds Supporting Statement 12-20-10 Part B.docx	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2011-02-23	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
21325	Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A-Subgrants to LEAs	Other-Survey	Modified
183750	SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A (“IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS	Other-Survey	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1810-0618	ICR Reference No: 201102-1810-002
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200802-1810-001
Agency/Subagency: ED/OESE	Agency Tracking No: 4473
Title: SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A ("IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS – SUBGRANTS TO LEAS")
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 06/27/2011
	Date Received in OIRA: 02/28/2011
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	06/30/2014	36 Months From Approved	06/30/2011
Responses	850	0	850
Time Burden (Hours)	4,600	0	5,000
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended, provides funds to districts to improve the quality of their teaching and principal force and raise student achievement. These funds are provided to districts through Title II, Part A (Improving Teacher Quality State Grants – Subgrants to Local Educational Agencies (LEA)). The purpose of this survey is for the U.S. Department of Education to have a better understanding of how districts use these funds. The survey also collects information on high-quality professional development in LEAs. In addition to the LEA survey, the package also includes a short survey for State Educational Agencies (SEA) that provides information on fiscal year allocations of Title II, Part A funds made to the LEAs selected for participation in the LEA survey. This OMB clearance request is to continue these analyses using a similar data collection instrument and sampling plan for the 2011-2012 school year and subsequent years. Minor changes to the LEA survey are requested. No changes to the State Educational Agency (SEA) survey are required.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 107 - 110 1119(a)(2)(B) Name of Law: The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 79351	12/20/2010
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	76 FR 10889	02/28/2011
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 2

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
SURVEY ON THE USE OF FUNDS UNDER TITLE II, PART A (“IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS
Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A-Subgrants to LEAs

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	850	850	0	0	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	4,600	5,000	0	-400	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Reduction Due to: Changing Forms

Short Statement: The total annual hours decreased by 400 hours due to a program change in question five on the LEA survey that eliminates the need for LEAs to cross reference responses with personnel databases.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $60,000

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 02/28/2011

---