Information Collection Request

Consumer Survey

ICR 201102-3060-012 · OMB 3060-1144 · Historical Active

Forms and Documents
DocumentTypeStatusAvailability
Consumer Survey Form Modified Available
Response to OMB Feb 16 2011.doc Supplementary Document Uploaded 2011-02-18 Available
Supporting Statement B (Consumer Survey 2011)2-16-11.doc Supporting Statement B Uploaded 2011-02-17 Available
Supporting Statement A (Consumer Survey 2011) 2-11-11.doc Supporting Statement A Uploaded 2011-02-11 Available
Don Waldman letter to OMB.doc Supplementary Document Uploaded 2011-01-06 Available
KN best practices.pdf Supplementary Document Uploaded 2011-01-06 Available
SIGNINOUT.DOC Supplementary Document Uploaded 2011-01-06 Available
Focus Group Introduction Script.doc Supplementary Document Uploaded 2011-01-06 Available
IC Document Collections
IC IDCollectionTypeStatusForm
195101 Consumer Survey Form Modified
ICR Details
3060-1144 201102-3060-012
Historical Active 201011-3060-005
FCC MB
Consumer Survey
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved with change 02/18/2011
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 02/11/2011
For the main survey, the FCC has agreed that the final report prepared by the contractors, Scott Savage and Donald Waldman, will contain a discussion of focus group results and a nonresponse bias analysis. The analysis will examine nonresponse bias present in the survey response rates of panel members. The analysis will use multivariate techniques to identify the characteristics of cases selected for the survey that were least likely to respond. Cases will be coded as either responding or not responding and multivariate techniques will be used to identify which case characteristics are correlated with nonresponse. The nonresponse bias discussion in the report will review existing analyses of the nonresponse bias associated with the recruitment of panel members into the Knowledge Networks panel. In addition, the procedures used to develop the post-stratification weights that adjust for non-response will be discussed.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
02/28/2014 36 Months From Approved 07/31/2011
5,000 0 5,000
1,250 0 1,250
0 0 0

Section 202(h) of the 1996 Telecommunications Act requires the Commission to review its media ownership rules quadrennially to determine whether its rules “are necessary in the public interest as the result of competition.” The Commission is then required to repeal or modify any regulation it determines no longer to serve the public interest. This Consumer Survey (Consumer Survey or Information Collection) will be used in its determination.

US Code: 47 USC 202(h) Name of Law: Telecommunications Act of 1996
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  75 FR 68356 11/05/2010
75 FR 68356 11/05/2010
No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Consumer Survey None Choosing Information From Your Media Environment: What Are the Options?

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 5,000 5,000 0 0 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 1,250 1,250 0 0 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
No
No

$88,300
Yes Part B of Supporting Statement
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Amy Brett 202 418-2703

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
02/11/2011