Part 870 (OSM-1) 30-Day FR Notice

59424

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2011 / Notices

jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Project Objectives
• Manage natural and cultural
resources to support their protection,
restoration, and preservation.
• Manage wilderness and potential
wilderness areas to preserve the
character and qualities for which they
were designated.
• Provide opportunities for visitor use
and enjoyment of park resources.
The draft environmental impact
statement considers four alternatives.
Alternative A. No New Special-Use
Permit—Conversion to Wilderness (No
Action). This alternative considers the
expiration of existing RUO and SUP,
and subsequent conversion of the area
to Wilderness consistent with Public
Law 94–567. The existing SUP and RUO
expire on November 30, 2012. The
Secretary would not exercise the
discretion granted to him under Section
124 of Public Law 111–88 to issue a new
10-year SUP. Upon removal of the nonconforming structures and uses from
Drakes Estero, NPS would convert the
area from potential wilderness to
wilderness.
Alternative B. Issue New Special-Use
Permit—Existing Onshore Facilities and
Infrastructure and Offshore Operations
Would Be Allowed for a Period of 10
Years. This alternative considers a level
of use consistent with conditions that
were present in fall 2010 when NPS
initiated evaluation under the
environmental impact statement. The
existing SUP and RUO expire on
November 30, 2012. The Secretary
would exercise the discretion granted to
him under Section 124 to issue to DBOC
a new 10-year SUP, expiring November
30, 2022.
Alternative C. Issue new special-use
permit—onshore facilities and
infrastructure and offshore operations
present in 2008 would be allowed for a
period of 10 years. This alternative
considers a level of use that is
consistent with the conditions and
operations that existed when the current
SUP was signed in April 2008. The
existing SUP and RUO expire on
November 30, 2012. The Secretary
would exercise the discretion granted to
him under Section 124 to issue to DBOC
a new 10-year SUP, expiring November
30, 2022.
Alternative D. Issue New Special-Use
Permit—Expanded Onshore
Development and Offshore Operations
Would Be Allowed for a Period of 10
Years. This alternative considers
expansion of operations and
development of new infrastructure
consistent with the permittee’s requests
submitted for consideration as part of
this EIS process. The existing SUP and

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:37 Sep 23, 2011

Jkt 223001

RUO would expire on November 30,
2012. The Secretary would exercise the
discretion granted to him under Section
124 to issue a new 10-year special use
permit to DBOC, expiring November 30,
2022.
George J. Turnbull,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 2011–24658 Filed 9–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FW–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing
that the information collection request
for the Abandoned Mine Reclamation
Fund—Fee Collection and Coal
Production Reporting and the form
OSM–1 has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The information
collection request describes the nature
of the information collection and its
expected burden and cost.
DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove the information
collections but may respond after 30
days. Therefore, public comments
should be submitted to OMB by October
26, 2011, in order to be assured of
consideration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
receive a copy of the information
collection request contact John Trelease
at (202) 208–2783, or electronically at
[email protected]. You may also
review this collection by going to http://
www.reginfo.gov (Information Collection
Review, Currently Under Review,
Agency is Department of the Interior,
DOI–OSMRE).
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Department of the
Interior Desk Officer, by telefax at (202)
395–5806 or via e-mail to OIRADocket@
omb.eop.gov. Also, please send a copy
of your comments to John Trelease,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 1951 Constitution
Ave., NW., Room 202—SIB,
Washington, DC 20240, or electronically

PO 00000

Frm 00046

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

to [email protected]. Please refer to
OMB control number 1029–0063 in your
correspondence.
The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
require that interested members of the
public and affected agencies have an
opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping activities
[see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)]. OSM has
submitted a request to OMB to renew its
approval for the collections of
information found at 30 CFR 870—
Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund—
Fee Collection and Coal Production
Reporting and the form it implements,
the OSM–1, Coal Reclamation Fee
Report, and the Amended 0SM–1 form.
OSM is requesting a 3-year term of
approval for these information
collection activities.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
number for this collection of
information is 1029–0063. Responses
are mandatory.
As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), a
Federal Register notice soliciting
comments on this collection of
information was published on May 17,
2011 (76 FR 28454). No comments were
received. This notice provides the
public with an additional 30 days in
which to comment on the following
information collection activities:
Title: 30 CFR 870—Abandoned Mine
Reclamation Fund—Fee Collection and
Coal Production Reporting.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0063.
Summary: The information is used to
maintain a record of coal produced for
sale, transfer, or use nationwide each
calendar quarter, the method of coal
removal and the type of coal, and the
basis for coal tonnage reporting in
compliance with 30 CFR 870 and
section 401 of P.L. 95–87. Individual
reclamation fee payment liability is
based on this information. Without the
collection of information OSM could
not implement its regulatory
responsibilities and collect the fee.
Bureau Form Numbers: OSM–1,
Amended OSM–1.
Frequency of Collection: Quarterly.
Description of Respondents: Coal
mine permittees.
Total Annual Responses: 13,269.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 853.
Send comments on the need for the
collection of information for the
performance of the functions of the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM

26SEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2011 / Notices
agency; the accuracy of the agency’s
burden estimates; ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection; and ways to
minimize the information collection
burden on respondents, such as use of
automated means of collection of the
information, to the following address.
Please refer to the appropriate OMB
control number in all correspondence.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: September 20, 2011.
Stephen M. Sheffield,
Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 2011–24534 Filed 9–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–712]

In the Matter of Certain Digital Set-Top
Boxes and Components Thereof;
Notice of Commission Determination
to Grant Respondent’S Petition For
Reconsideration of the Commission
Decision Not to Review a Final Initial
Determination Finding a Violation of
Section 337; Termination of the
Investigation With a Finding of No
Violation

jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (Athe Commission@) has
determined to reconsider its decision
not to review the final initial
determination (AID@) issued by the
presiding administrative law judge
(AALJ@) on May 20, 2011, in the abovecaptioned investigation, and, on review,
to find no violation of section 337 and
terminate the investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean
H. Jackson, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3104. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:37 Sep 23, 2011

Jkt 223001

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
investigation was instituted on April 21,
2010, based on a complaint filed by
Verizon Communications Inc. and
Verizon Services Corp. (collectively,
AVerizon@), alleging a violation of
section 337 in the importation, sale for
importation, and sale within the United
States after importation of certain digital
set-top boxes and components thereof,
that infringe one or more of claim 14 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,635,979; claim 38 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,666,293; claim 13 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,381,748 (‘‘the ’748
patent’’); claim 14 of U.S. Patent No.
6,367,078; and claim 5 of U.S. Patent
No. 7,561,214. 75 FR. 20861 (2010).
Complainant named Cablevision
Systems Corp. of Bethpage, New York
(ACablevision@) as the only respondent.
Id.
On May 20, 2011, the ALJ issued his
final ID finding a violation of section
337. Specifically, the ALJ found that a
violation of section 337 has occurred in
the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, or the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain digital set-top
boxes and components thereof that
infringe claim 13 of the >748 patent. On
July 21, 2011, the Commission
determined not to review the ALJ’s final
ID, and requested that the parties file
written submissions on the issues of
remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. See Notice of Commission
Determination Not To Review a Final
Initial Determination (Dated July 21,
2011). The parties filed timely opening
and responsive submissions.
On August 8, 2011, respondent
Cablevision filed a petition for
reconsideration of the Commission’s
determination not to review the ALJ’s
finding of a violation of section 337
based on infringement of claim 13 of the
>748 patent. Respondent sought
reconsideration of the Commission’s
determination based on the August 2,
2011, entry of final judgment by the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of

PO 00000

Frm 00047

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

59425

Virginia in ActiveVideo Networks, Inc.
v. Verizon Commc’ns Inc., No. 2:10-cv248 (E.D. Va.) and the previous ruling in
that action that claim 13 of the >748
patent is invalid. Complainant Verizon
filed an opposition to respondent’s
petition, whereas the Commission
investigative attorney filed a response
supporting respondent’s petition.
Having examined the record in this
investigation, the Commission has
determined to grant respondent’s
petition for reconsideration and waive
its requirement that any petition for
reconsideration be filed within 14 days
of the action taken. Accordingly, the
Commission has determined to review
the ALJ’s final ID and, on review, to find
that there is no violation of section 337
in this investigation based on the
preclusive effects of the district court’s
finding of invalidity. The investigation
is terminated. A Commission opinion in
support of this determination will be
issued shortly.
The authority for this action is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1337), and in sections 201. 4 and
210.45–50 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.4,
210.45–50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 20, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–24576 Filed 9–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under The Clean Air Act
Notice is hereby given that on
September 12, 2011, a proposed Consent
Decree in United States et al. v. J.L.
French LLC et al., Civil Action No. 2:11–
CV–00860, was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Eastern
District of Wisconsin.
The Consent Decree would resolve
claims for injunctive relief and the
assessment of civil penalties asserted by
the United States and the
Commonwealth of Kentucky
(collectively, ‘‘Plaintiffs’’) against J.L.
French LLC and a related corporate
entity Nelson Metal Products LLC
(collectively, ‘‘Defendants’’) pursuant to
Sections 113(b) and 304(a)(1) of the
Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413(b) and
7604(a)(1).
Defendants process aluminum scrap
and dross to produce various secondary
aluminum products, a process that
results in emissions of regulated air

E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM

26SEN1