Talking Stick Webinar Survey

Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

Att_Talking Stick OELA OMB survey questions

National Charter School Resource Center and the Talking Stick Webinar Survey

OMB: 1880-0542

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

The Talking Stick

Office of English Language Acquisition

Webinar Survey Questions



  1. Evaluation for each webinar

Name of event:

Date:

Please rate your agreement with the following statements on a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 is the highest:

  1. The presenter was well-organized and clear

  2. The amount of time for Q&A or application activities was about right.

  3. Participating in the presentation was a good use of my time

  4. Information presented was relevant to my work

  5. My knowledge of the topic increased as a result of the presentation

  6. The information presented will help me do my job more effectively

  7. I will do some things differently as a result of what I learned

  8. The information presented will ultimately help to increase student achievement

  9. It was easy for me to register for and join this online event

  10. The online format was conducive to learning.



Please provide comments on the following questions:

  1. What aspects of the presentation did you find most helpful?

  2. What could have been done differently to make the presentation better?

  1. Survey on the pilot experience

Our online community of practice is completing a pilot period. Now we would like to hear how it worked for you so we can make improvement as we move into the next phase. :

  1. Regarding the site overall: Please rate your agreement with the following statements on a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 is the highest

    1. The site is well designed

    2. I found the site easy to use.

    3. The moderator promoted participation

    4. I got what I wanted out of the site

  2. Choose the response that best describes your level of participation:

    1. I participated every day

    2. I participated several times a week

    3. I participated once a week

    4. I participated every now and then

  3. Tell us how the features of the site worked for you. Rate your agreement with each statement on a scale of 1-5, with 5 being the highest.

    1. The discussions were relevant and informed my work

    2. The calendar was a convenient way to keep track of key events

    3. The blogs from experienced grantees provided me with some good ideas

    4. The library gave us central location for key resources

    5. The presentations from OELA staff were especially useful

    6. The expert presentations were especially useful

Please provide comments on the following questions:

  1. What topics would you like to see addressed in webinars in the future?

  2. What experts would you like to hear from?

  3. What about the online community worked best for you and why?

  4. What are your suggestions for improvement?


Public Burden Statement

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is voluntary. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20202-4536 or email [email protected] and reference the OMB Control Number 1880-0542. Note: Please do not return the completed Talking Stick survey to this address.

2

File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleDOCUMENTATION FOR THE GENERIC CLEARANCE
Author558022
Last Modified ByAuthorised User
File Modified2011-08-15
File Created2011-08-15

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy