Download:
pdf |
pdfYour School’s
2009 PISA Report
Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy Achievement of 15-Year-Olds in Your School
Principal:
School:
Test Date: Fall 2009
What is in
this report?
XX A brief
description
of PISA.
XX Your school’s
overall results
in reading.
XX Your school’s
results on
the reading
subscales.
XX Your school’s
overall results
in mathematics
and science.
XX Comparisons of
your school’s
results to the
United States,
the Organization
for Economic
Cooperation and
Development
(OECD) countries,
and countries
around the
world.
XXXX, XX, 2010
Dear ,
Thank you for participating in the 2009 administration of the Program for
International Student Assessment (PISA). Your school was among 165 schools
representing the United States in this important international comparison of the
knowledge and skills that 15-year-old students apply to real-world problems.
Your students were among more than 400,000 students from 66 countries and
jurisdictions that participated in PISA in 2009. We wanted to share with you your
school’s results, based on comparisons with other participating U.S. schools and
other countries around the world.
This report presents comparisons of your school’s average scores with the
average scores of 66 participating countries and jurisdictions, including the
United States, as well as the average for students in U.S. schools that are
similar to yours in terms of the percentage of students eligible for free or
reduced-price lunch.
We recommend that you interpret these results with caution and within the
context of other indicators about your students’ performance. These findings
are based on a sample of students from your school and are therefore
associated with a degree of uncertainty. The National Center for Education
Statistics (NCES), which was responsible for the administration of PISA in the
United States, will continue to maintain the confidentiality of your school’s and
students’ results and participation.
Thank you again for your contribution to U.S. participation in PISA and your
professional support of quality education in the United States. If you have any
questions about this report or about PISA more generally, please contact us at
[email protected].
Sincerely,
Holly Xie and Dana Kelly
U.S. PISA National Program Managers
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Institute of Education Sciences (IES)
U.S. Department of Education
1
The Program for International
Studen Assessment (PISA)
What is PISA’s Focus?
PISA focuses on skills that 15-year-olds have acquired
both inside and outside of the classroom, not only
assessing what students know, but also how well they
are able to reflect on and apply their knowledge to
real-life situations. In this sense, PISA emphasizes
students’ literacy in reading, mathematics, and science
rather than students’ performance on specific tasks
taught in a school cirriculum.
PISA was administered in the United States between
September and November 2009. Students completed
a two-hour paper-and-pencil test that included
both multiple-choice and open-ended questions.
The assessment framework and test questions were
developed by experts from participating countries.
PISA 2009 Overview
What was the main subject area assessed?
Reading literacy
What other subject areas were assessed?
Mathematics literacy and science literacy
Who took the assessment?
15-year-olds around the world
How many countries participated?
66 (including the United States)
Interpreting Your PISA 2009 Results
XX Because relatively few students are asked to represent each school in PISA, your school’s average scores
are reported as a confidence band. Statistically speaking, we can say with 95 percent confidence that your
school’s average PISA 2009 score is within the band reported.
XX All comparisons reported are based on statistical
analyses. Your school’s average performance is
reported as higher or lower than the average score
of a given comparison group if there is a 95 percent
level of confidence that this is the case. Otherwise,
your school’s average performance is reported as
not grouped different than the average score of the
comparison group.
XX PISA is coordinated by the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD),
an intergovernmental organization of 34 highly
industrialized countries in which the United States
participates with its closest economic peers and
competitors. The OECD average is the average of
the scores from these 34 countries.
XX “Schools like yours” are U.S. schools with a similar
proportion of students eligible for free or reducedprice lunch through the National School Lunch Program.
2
Your School’s Name
Countries in the OECD
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Japan
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
Your School’s
Reading Literacy Results
Your School’s Overall Results
in Reading: 2009
Reading Literacy
How your school compares with:
The United States:
The OECD Countries:
U.S. Schools Like Yours:
▲ Your school’s average score is higher
Sample Graph
Your school’s average score is not different
▼ Your school’s average score is lower
SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD),
Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2009.
SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD), Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2009.
Reading Literacy Subscales
How your school’s average scores compare with:
Retrieving
Information
The United States:
The OECD Countries:
U.S. Schools Like Yours:
▲ Your school’s average score is higher
Interpreting Reflection and
Texts
Evaluation
Your school’s average score is not different ▼ Your school’s average score is lower
SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Program for International Student
Assessment (PISA), 2009.
3
2009 Comparisons Around the World
Average reading score is higher
than your school:
Austria
Canada
Chinese Taipei
Estonia
Finland
Hong Kong-China
Japan
Netherlands
New Zealand
Shanghai-China
Singapore
Average reading score is not
different than your school:
Austria
Belgium
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Kazakhstan
Korea
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao-China
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Russian
Federation
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Average reading score is lower
than your school:
Austria
Canada
Chinese Taipei
Estonia
Finland
Hong KongChina
Japan
Netherlands
New Zealand
Shanghai-China
Singapore
Your School’s Results on
Reading Subscales: 2009
Sample Graph
PISA 2009 School Results
4
Your School’s
Mathematics Literacy Results
Your School’s Results in
Mathematics: 2009
Mathematics Literacy
How your school compares with:
The United States:
The OECD Countries:
U.S. Schools Like Yours:
▲ Your school’s average score is higher
Your school’s average score is not different
Sample Graph
▼ Your school’s average score is lower
SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD),
Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2009.
SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD), Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2009.
Your School’s
Science Literacy Results
Your School’s Results in
Science: 2009
Science Literacy
How your school compares with:
The United States:
The OECD Countries:
U.S. Schools Like Yours:
▲ Your school’s average score is higher
Your school’s average score is not different
Sample Graph
▼ Your school’s average score is lower
SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD), Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2009.
SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD),
Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2009.
PISA 2009 School Results
5
How the United States Compares to Other
Countries in PISA 2009 Reading Literacy
OECD Countries.
Country
Non-OECD Countries.
Score
Country
Score
Finland
563
Hong Kong-China
542
Canada
534
Chinese Taipei
532
Japan
531
Estonia
531
New Zealand
530
Lechtenstein
522
Australia
527
Slovenia
519
Netherlands
525
Macao-China
511
Korea
522
Croatia
493
Germany
516
Latvia
490
United Kingdom
515
Lithuania
488
Czech Republic
513
Russian Federation
479
Switzerland
512
Israel
454
Austria
511
Chile
438
Belgium
510
Serbia
436
Ireland
508
Bulgaria
434
Hungary
504
Uruguay
428
Sweden
503
Jordan
422
Poland
498
Thailand
421
Denmark
496
Romania
418
France
495
Montenegro
412
Iceland
491
Indonesia
393
United States
489
Argentina
391
Slovak Republic
488
Brazil
390
Spain
488
Colombia
388
Norway
487
Tunisia
386
Luxembourg
486
Azerbaijan
382
Italy
475
Qatar
349
Portugal
474
Kyrgyzstan
322
Greece
473
Turkey
424
Mexico
410
Higher than U.S. average
SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD), Program for International
Student Assessment (PISA), 2009.
Not different from U.S. average
Lower than U.S. average
For more information about PISA 2009:
The United States report, Highlights from PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students
in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context, can be found at
http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/.
The OECD report, PISA 2009: Reading Competencies for Tomorrow’s World (Vol. 1 and 2), can
be found at http://www.pisa.oecd.org.
Sample test questions from PISA 2009 can be found at http://tinyurl.com/PISA2009items.
6
Your School’s Name
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2010-09-30 |
File Created | 2010-09-08 |