During this
review, ONDCP changes consolidated its interview protocols,
simplified its Likert scale on the social networking survey, and
eliminated confusing multiple choice options. ONDCP also better
explained its sampling procedures, amended its race question to
comply with OMB guidelines, and moved demographic questions to the
end of its social networking survey. In the final report ONDCP
shall fully explain limitations of its sampling procedures,
including but not limited to its selection of participants for
interviews/focus group. ONDCP shall only interview more than 16
people at each site only when it has a compelling reason for the
additional qualitative data. ONDCP shall gather geographic data
using RUCA codes and use self-reporting for comparison
purposes.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
12/31/2014
36 Months From Approved
2,507
0
0
9,972
0
0
0
0
0
ONDCP directs the Drug Free
Communities (DFC) Program in partnership with the Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services Administration's Center for Substance
Abuse Prevention. The DFC Program has two primary goals: To reduce
youth substance abuse, and to support community anti-drug
coalitions by establishing, strengthening, and fostering
collaboration among public and private agencies. Under
reauthorization legislation (21 § USC 1702), Congress mandated an
evaluation of the DFC Program to determine its effectiveness in
meeting objectives. In 2009, a contract was awarded to evaluate the
DFC Program. This evaluation will build upon the results of an
earlier evaluation and make use of an existing web-based
performance system, called the Coalition Online Management and
Evaluation Tool (COMET) and the Coalition Classification Tool
(CCT), to gather information from DFC grantees. COMET and CCT are
being revised to reduce the burden of information collection on
grantees, increase the quality of the data, and facilitate the
monitoring and tracking of grantee progress. Revisions to the core
outcome measures of DFC are also proposed to bring this data
collection in line with the National Outcome Measures (NOMS).
Proposed changes include the addition of a peer disapproval
measure, the removal of the age of first use measure, and a
revision to the perception of risk measure for alcohol to focus on
binge drinking. Moreover, prescription drug use is proposed to be
tracked as a core substance of abuse in this study. In addition to
the information collected from the COMET and CCT system, the new
evaluation will include a case study component to document
coalition practices. This element of the evaluation will involve
interviews with coalition leaders and surveys of coalition partners
from a number of agencies. Each year, nine DFC grantees will be
evaluated and the information from the case studies will be shared
other grantees.
PL:
Pub.L. 109 - 469 801 Name of Law: Office of National Drug
Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006
US Code:
21 USC 1701 et seq. Name of Law: Office of National Drug
Control Policy
PL:
Pub.L. 107 - 82 all Name of Law: Drug Free Communities Support
Program Reathorization
PL:
Pub.L. 105 - 20 all Name of Law: Drug Free Communities Act of
1997
The current package represents
a request to a previously approved collection pertaining to the
Drug Free Communities Support Program(DFC) and the Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services (SAMHSA) Sober Truth on Preventing
Underage Drinking (STOP) Act Program. The current request pertains
to revisions to the Coalition Online Management and Evaluation Tool
(COMET) and the Coalition Classification Tool (CCT), and the
addition of a case study component.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.