2011 12f-1 Supporting Statement[1]

2011 12f-1 Supporting Statement[1].pdf

Exchange Act Rule 12f-1 – Application to Reinstate Unlisted Trading Privileges (17 CFR 240.12f-1)

OMB: 3235-0128

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
for the Paperwork Reduction Act Information Collection Submission for
“Rule 12f-1”

A.

Justification
1.

Necessity of Information Collection

Section 12(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act") governs when a national
securities exchange may trade a security that is not listed and registered on that exchange, i.e., by
extending unlisted trading privileges to the security.1 Under Section 12(f)(2) of the Act, the
Commission may, at any time within 60 days of commencement of trading on an exchange of a
security pursuant to unlisted trading privileges, suspend such unlisted trading privileges on the
exchange. Upon such suspension, the exchange shall, if it seeks to extend unlisted trading
privileges to the security, file an application with the Commission to reinstate its ability to do so
pursuant to such procedures as the Commission may prescribe by rule or order for the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets, the protection of investors and the public interest, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Rule 12f-1 (the “Rule”), originally adopted in 1934 pursuant to Sections 12(f) and 23(a)
of the Act and as modified in 1995 and 2005, sets forth the information which an exchange must
include in an application to reinstate its ability to extend unlisted trading privileges to any
security for which such unlisted trading privileges have been suspended by the Commission,
pursuant to Section 12(f)(2)(A) of the Act. An application must provide the name of the issuer,
the title of the security, the name of each national securities exchange, if any, on which the
security is listed or admitted to unlisted trading privileges, whether transaction information
concerning the security is reported pursuant to an effective transaction reporting plan
contemplated by Rule 601 of Regulation NMS, the date of the Commission’s suspension of
unlisted trading privileges in the security on the exchange, and any other pertinent information.
Rule 12f-1 further requires a national securities exchange seeking to reinstate its ability to extend
unlisted trading privileges to a security to indicate that it has provided a copy of such application
to the issuer of the security, as well as to any other national securities exchange on which the
security is listed or admitted to unlisted trading privileges.

1

Section 12(f) of the Act and Rule 12f-1 thereunder were modified in 1995 after the
Unlisted Trading Privileges Act of 1994 (“UTP Act”) took effect on October 22, 1994.
Prior to such modification and the UTP Act, Section 12(f) and Rule 12f-1 thereunder
required exchanges to apply to the Commission before extending unlisted trading
privileges to a particular security. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35637 (Apr.
21, 1995). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (Jun. 9, 2005) (making
conforming amendments to Rule 12f-1 relating to the adoption of Regulation NMS).

2.

Purpose and Use of the Information Collection

The information required by Rule 12f-1 enables the Commission to make the necessary
findings under the Act prior to granting applications to reinstate unlisted trading privileges. This
information is also made available to members of the public who may wish to comment upon the
applications. Without the Rule, the Commission would be unable to fulfill these statutory
responsibilities.
3.

Consideration Given To Information Technology

Not applicable.
4.

Duplication

Not applicable; there is no duplication of information. Each reinstatement of unlisted
trading privileges must be handled individually.
5.

Effect on Small Entities

None. The only potential respondents are national securities exchanges, and no exchange
is a small business as that term applies to this Item 5.
6.

Consequences of Not Conducting the Collection

The information is collected at a time determined by the respondent and there is no way
to require less frequent collection without undermining the purposes of the Rule.
7.

Inconsistencies with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)

The requirements of the Rule are consistent with the general information collection
guidelines imposed for public protection as set forth in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).
8.

Consultations Outside the Agency

The required Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments
on this collection of information was published. No public comments were received.
9.

Payment or Gift

Not applicable; no payments or gifts are required to be made or are made to respondents.

2

10.

Confidentiality

Not applicable; the rule contains no assurance of confidentiality. The information
collected is public information.
11.

Sensitive Questions

Not applicable; no questions of a sensitive nature are involved.
12.

Burden of Information Collection

There are 15 national securities exchanges subject to Rule 12f-1. The burden of
complying with Rule 12f-1 arises when a potential respondent seeks to reinstate its ability to
extend unlisted trading privileges to any security for which unlisted trading privileges have been
suspended by the Commission, pursuant to Section 12(f)(2)(A) of the Act. The staff estimates
that each application would require approximately one hour to complete. Thus each potential
respondent would incur on average one burden hour in complying with the rule.
The Commission staff estimates that there could be as many as 15 responses annually and
that each respondent’s related cost of compliance with Rule 12f-1 would be $168 or, the cost of
one hour of professional work of a paralegal needed to complete the application.2 The total
annual related reporting cost for all potential respondents, therefore, is $2,520 (15 responses x
$168 per response).
13.

Cost to Respondents

Not applicable; (a) it is not anticipated that respondents will have to incur any capital and
start-up costs to comply with the rule; (b) it is not anticipated that the respondents will have to
incur any additional operational or maintenance costs (other than as provided in Item 12) to
comply with the rule.
14.

Cost to Federal Government

There are no agency records prior to fiscal year 1981 that would permit the Commission
staff to compute the cost of developing the Rule. Regarding ongoing costs to the federal
government, the Commission staff estimates that the operational costs of processing a typical
Rule 12f-1 application would be approximately $244. This estimate is based on the staff time
required to review and process such application, and related overhead costs, in accordance with
the formulas set forth in the GSA, Guide to Estimating Reporting Costs (1973).

2

See Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Management & Professional
Earnings in the Securities Industry 2010.
3

15.

Changes in Burden

The form of compliance has not become more burdensome since the last submission
period. The change in burden reflects an increase in the overall number of national securities
exchanges from 11 to 15 and an adjustment in the cost of one hour’s work. The national hourly
rate of $168.00 / hour for a paralegal was derived from the Securities Industry and Financial
Markets Association report, Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry
2010.
16.

Information Collections Planned for Statistical Purposes

Not applicable.
17.

Display of OMB Approval Date

The Commission is not seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB
approval.
18.

Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

This collection complies with the requirements in 5 CFR 1320.9.
B.

Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods

The collection of information does not employ statistical methods, nor would the
implementation of such methods reduce burden or improve accuracy of results.

4


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Title_SUPPORTING STATEMENT
AuthorML Boesch
File Modified2012-01-13
File Created2012-01-13

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy