10 CFR Part 52, Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants

ICR 201201-3150-006

OMB: 3150-0151

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supplementary Document
2011-10-21
Supplementary Document
2011-10-21
Supplementary Document
2011-10-21
Supporting Statement A
2011-12-01
ICR Details
3150-0151 201201-3150-006
Historical Active 201007-3150-008
NRC
10 CFR Part 52, Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 01/27/2012
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 01/27/2012
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, this collection is pre-approved as the collection is associated with a final rule not yet published in the Federal Register.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
12/31/2014 11/30/2013 11/30/2013
19 0 11
204,099 0 204,075
0 0 0

Final Rule: 10 CFR Part 52, AP1000 Design Certification Amendment The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) is amending its regulations to certify an amendment to the AP1000 standard plant design. The amendment replaces the combined license (COL) information items and design acceptance criteria (DAC) with specific design information, addresses the effects of the impact of a large commercial aircraft, incorporate design improvements, and increases standardization of the design. This action is necessary so that applicants or licensees intending to construct and operate an AP1000 design may do so by referencing this regulation (AP1000 design certification rule (DCR)), and need not demonstrate in their applications the safety of the certified design as amended. The applicant for this amendment to the AP1000 design is Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC (Westinghouse).

PL: Pub.L. 83 - 703 68 Stat. 919 Name of Law: Atomic Energy Act of 1954
  
None

3150-AI81 Final or interim final rulemaking 76 FR 82079 12/30/2011

No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
10 CFR Part 52, Early Site Permits; Standard Design Certifications; and Combined Licenses for Nuclear Plants

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 19 11 0 8 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 204,099 204,075 0 24 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Changing Regulations
No
The overall burden for this final rule will increase by 24 hours from 204,075 hours to 204,099 hours because of the following: (1) requiring combined license applicants to report information demonstrating that an entity other than the original applicant is qualified to supply the AP1000 certified design, unless the original applicant supplies the design for the combined license applicant's use; (2) an applicant referencing the AP1000 design, that proposes to depart from the information required by 10 CFR 52.47(a)(28) to be included in the FSAR, to consider the effect of the changed AIA feature or capability on the original 10 CFR 50.150(a) assessment and to document how the modified design features and functional capabilities continue to meet the assessment requirements in 10 CFR 50.150(a)(1); and (3) the applicant for this amendment to the AP1000 design, and any applicant of licensee referencing this amendment, to maintain a copy of the aircraft impact assessment performed to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.150(a) for the term of the certification or license (including any period of renewal).

$0
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Serita Sanders 301 415-2956 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
10/21/2011


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy