60 Day Notice

36010

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Notices

Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Washington,
DC 20530.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2012–14613 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OMB No. 1121–0249]

Overview of This Information
Collection

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Agency Information
Collection Activities; Proposed
Collection; Extension of a Currently
Approved Collection; Comment
Requested Deaths in Custody—Series
of Collections From State-Level Law
Enforcement Respondents, Local Jails
and State Prisons

(1) Type of information collection:
Renewal of existing collection.
(2) The title of the Form/Collection:
Deaths in Custody Reporting Program.
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Forms—Death Report on Inmates Under
Jail Jurisdiction (CJ–9); Annual
Summary on Inmates Under Jail
Jurisdiction (CJ–9A); Death Report on
Inmates In Private and MultiJurisdictional Jails (CJ–10); Annual
Summary on Inmates in Private and
Multi-Jurisdictional Jails (CJ–10A); State
Prison Inmate Death Report (NPS–4A);
Annual Summary of Inmate Deaths in
State Prisons (NPS–4); Summary of
Arrest-Related Deaths (CJ–11); ArrestRelated Death Report (CJ–11A). The
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of
Justice Programs, Department of Justice
is the sponsor for the collection.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
to respond, as well as a brief abstract:
Primary: Local jail administrators, state
prison administrators, and state-level
law enforcement respondents. One
reporter from each of the estimated
3,000 local jail jurisdictions and one
reporter from each of the 50 state prison
systems in the United States are asked
to provide information on the following
categories:
(a) The number of inmates confined in
jail facilities on December 31 of the
previous year, by sex, either actual or
estimated (local jails only);
(b) The number of inmates admitted
to jail facilities in the previous year, by
sex, either actual or estimated (local
jails only);
(c) The average daily population of all
jail confinement facilities operated by
the jurisdiction in the previous year, by
sex, either actual or estimated (local
jails only);
(d) The number of persons who died
while under the supervision of the
jurisdiction in the previous year, by sex,

ACTION:

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

proposed collection of information
including the validity of the
methodology and assumption used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology (e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses).

60-day notice.

The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Bureau
of Justice Statistics (BJS) will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted for
60 days until August 14, 2012. This
process is in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Margaret Noonan,
Statistician, (202) 353–2060, Bureau of
Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20531.
We request written comments and
suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:05 Jun 14, 2012

Jkt 226001

PO 00000

Frm 00073

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

either actual or estimated (local jails
only);
(e) The number of persons who died
while in custody of state correctional
facility during the previous year (state
prisons only);
(f) The full name, date of death, date
of birth, sex, and race/ethnic origin for
each inmate who died during the
reporting year;
(g) The name and location of the
correctional facility involved for each
inmate who died during the reporting
year (state prisons only);
(h) The admission date and current
offense(s) for each inmate who died
during the reporting year;
(i) The legal status for each inmate
who died during the reporting year
(local jails only);
(j) Whether the inmate ever stayed
overnight in a mental health observation
unit or outside mental health facility;
(k) The location and cause of death of
each inmate death that took place
during the reporting year;
(l) The time of day that the incident
causing the inmate’s death occurred and
where the incident occurred (limited to
accidents, suicides, and homicides
only);
(m) Whether the cause of death was
a preexisting medical condition or a
condition that developed after
admission to the facility and whether
the inmate received treatment for the
medical condition after admission and if
so, the kind of treatment received
(deaths due to accidental injury,
intoxication, suicide, or homicide do
not apply);
(n) Whether an autopsy/postmortem
exam/review of medical records to
determine the cause of death of the
inmate was performed and the
availability of those results;
(o) The survey ends with a box in
which respondents can enter notes;
(p) Confirmation or correction of the
agency and agency head’s name, phone
number, email address, and mailing
address;
(q) Confirmation or correction of the
agency’s primary point of contact for
data collection, title, phone number,
email address, and mailing address;
(r) Confirmation or correction of the
names of facilities within the
jurisdiction;
(s) Whether the facility holds inmates
for U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) inmates, U.S.
Marshals Service, or other counties,
jurisdictions or correctional authorities.
A total of 52 respondents, comprising
of 50 state-level respondents,
representing each state, and two locallevel law enforcement agencies
representing the District of Columbia

E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM

15JNN1

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Notices
and New York City are asked to provide
information on the number of persons
who died during the process of arrest by
state or local law enforcement in the
reporting year. In addition, state-level
law enforcement respondents are asked
to provide the following information for
each person who died during the
process of arrest in the reporting year:
(a) The full name, date of death, date
of birth, sex, and race/ethnic origin;
(b) The name and ORI number of the
law enforcement agency involved;
(c) The address, and location type, of
the incident that caused the death;
(d) The reason for the initial contact
between law enforcement and the
deceased, as well as whether specialize
units responded during the incident;
(e) Whether the deceased engaged in
non-compliant or aggressive behavior
during the process of arrest;
(f) Whether the deceased possessed,
threaten to use, or used any weapons
during the process of arrest;
(g) Whether law enforcement
personnel engage in tactics to restrain or
used restraints or weapons during the
process of arrest;
(h) Whether the deceased sustained
injuries during the incident and
whether law enforcement personnel, the
decedent, or another civilian was
responsible for inflicting injuries;
(i) The type of weapon that caused the
death;
(j) The location, date, time, manner,
and cause of death;
(k) Whether the autopsy or postmortem evaluation indicated the
presences of alcohol, other drugs, or
confirmed psychological diagnosis;
(l) The survey ends with a box in
which respondents can enter notes.
The Bureau of Justice Statistics uses
this information in published reports
and statistics. The reports will be made
available to the U.S. Congress, Executive
Office of the President, practitioners,
researchers, students, the media, others

interested in criminal justice statistics,
and the general public.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: An approximate 3,102 total
respondents will be asked to submit an
estimated 11,152 responses each year to
this collection program. The typical
amount of time needed for a respondent
to complete each form is broken down
as follows:
Local jails/death reports (forms CJ–9
and CJ–10)—600 respondents will have
an average response time of 30 minutes
per form, for a total of 451 hours.
Analysis of data from past years shows
that approximately 80% of jails
nationwide have zero deaths in a given
calendar year. Thus, based on the 2010
data, approximately 20% of the 3,000
jails will complete death reports,
resulting in 600 respondents.
Respondents reporting zero deaths will
not need to complete a death report
form. Based on 2009 and 2010 data,
approximately 22% of the total 4,100
death reports received was from jail
respondents; thus, we expect to receive
approximately 902 death reports from
jails. For jurisdictions reporting a death,
the average response time is estimated
at 30 minutes per death, for a total of
451 hours devoted to reporting data on
deaths in jails. The estimated time is
based on feedback from jail staff.
Local jails/annual (forms CJ–9A and
CJ–10A)—an estimated 3,000 jail
respondents will have an average
response time of 15 minutes per form,
for a total of 750 hours. The estimated
time is based on feedback from jail staff.
State prison/death reports (form NPS–
A)—50 state prison respondents are
estimated to have an average response
time of 30 minutes per death, across
3,198 deaths each year, for a total of
1,599 hours. Based on 2009 and 2010
data, 78% of the total 4,100 death

36011

reports received was from state prisons;
thus, we expect to receive
approximately 3,198 death reports from
state prisons. The estimated time is
based on feedback from state prison
staff.
State prison/annual (form NPS–4)—
50 state prison respondents are
estimated to have an average response
time of 5 minutes per form, for a total
of 4 hours. Based on 2010 data, we
expect approximately 50 respondents.
The estimated time is based on feedback
from state prison staff.
Local jail and state prisons
(verification call)—3,050 respondents
(3,000 jail jurisdiction respondents and
50 state department of corrections
respondents) will be asked to participate
in the verification call, which has an
average response time of 8 minutes per
call, for a total of 407 hours (400 for jail
respondents and 7 for state prison
respondents). The estimated time is
based on the average time to complete
a verification call with a respondent.
Arrest-Related/death reports (CJ–
11A)—50 state-level respondents and 2
local law enforcement agencies are
estimated to have an average response
time of 60 minutes per death, across 900
deaths each year, for a total of 900
hours.
Arrest-Related/summary (CJ–11)—50
state-level respondents and 2 local law
enforcement agencies are estimated to
have an average response time of 5
minutes per form, for a total of 4 hours.
Based on 2010 data, we expect
approximately 50 respondents. The
estimated time is based on feedback
from state-level respondents.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 4,115 annual burden hours.
The estimates contributing to this
calculation are provided in the table
below.

SUMMARY OF TOTAL RESPONDENT BURDEN FOR DCRP DATA COLLECTION
Reporting method

Number of
responses

Average reporting
time

Total burden
hours

600
3,000
50
50

902
3,000
3,198
50

30 minutes per death
15 minutes .................
30 minutes per death
5 minutes ...................

451
750
1,599
4

Telephone ...................................
Telephone ...................................
Mail, Email, and Fax ...................
Mail, Email, and Fax ...................

Local Jails—Death Records 1 .....
Local Jails—Annual Summary 2
State Prison—Death Records 3 ..
State
Prison—Annual
Summary 4.
Local Jails– Verification Call ......
State Prisons—Verification Call
Arrest-Related Death Record 5 ...
Arrest-Related Death Summary 6

3,000
50
52
52

3,000
50
900
52

8 minutes ...................
8 minutes ...................
60 minutes per death
5 minutes ...................

400
7
900
4

Total .....................................

.....................................................

3,102

11,152

....................................

4,115

Mail
Mail
Mail
Mail

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Number of
data suppliers

Type of data supplier

and
and
and
and

Online
Online
Online
Online

Data
Data
Data
Data

Entry
Entry
Entry
Entry

........
........
........
........

1 The

forms associated with local jail death records are forms CJ–9 and CJ–10.
forms associated with local jail annual summaries are forms CJ–9A and CJ–10A.
3 The form associated with the state prison death records is form NPS–4A.
4 The form associated with the state prison annual summary is form NPS–4.
2 The

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:05 Jun 14, 2012

Jkt 226001

PO 00000

Frm 00074

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM

15JNN1

36012
5 The
6 The

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Notices

form associated with arrest-related death records is form CJ–11A.
form associated with arrest-related death summary is form CJ–11.

If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Suite 2E–508,
Washington, DC 20530.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.

Specialist, Office of Grants
Management, at (202) 693–3416.
Signed June 11, 2012 in Washington, DC.
Eric D. Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer, Employment and Training
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–14577 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

[FR Doc. 2012–14614 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am]

Notice of Record of Decision

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P

National Science Foundation.
Notice of Record of Decision.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

For
further information regarding the ROD
contact: Holly Smith, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite
725, Arlington, VA 22230; telephone:
[Funding Opportunity Number SGA/DFA
(703) 292–8583; email:
PY–11–13]
[email protected].
Notice of Availability of Funds and
SUMMARY: On June 12, 2012, the
Solicitation for Grant Applications for
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Pay for Success Pilot Projects
signed a Record of Decision (ROD)
regarding the Final Programmatic
SUMMARY: The Employment and
Environmental Impact Statement/
Training Administration (ETA), U.S.
Overseas Environmental Impact
Department of Labor, announces the
Statement (PEIS/OEIS) (hereafter Final
availability of approximately $20
PEIS) for Marine Seismic Research
million in Pay for Success grants,
Funded by NSF or Conducted by the
funded out of the Workforce Innovation
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The
Fund in the Department of Labor
Final PEIS assesses the potential
Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112–
impacts on the human and natural
74, Div. F, Tit. I). The Workforce
environment as a result of marine
Innovation Fund supports innovative
seismic surveys conducted during
approaches to the design and delivery of
marine geophysical research funded by
employment and training services that
NSF or conducted by the USGS. The
generate long-term improvements in the
Proposed Action is for academic and
performance of the public workforce
U.S. government scientists in the U.S.,
system, both in terms of positive results
and possible international collaborators,
for job seekers and employers and costto conduct marine seismic research
effectiveness. Grants awarded under this
using a variety of acoustic sources from
Solicitation for Grant Applications
research vessels operated by U.S.
(SGA) will fund pilots of a Pay for
academic institutions and government
Success model, an innovative funding
agencies. The purpose of the Proposed
strategy for achieving specific social
Action is to fund the investigation of the
service outcomes.
geology and geophysics of the seafloor
The complete SGA and any
by collecting seismic reflection and
subsequent SGA amendments in
refraction data that reveal the structure
connection with this solicitation are
and stratigraphy of the crust and/or
described in further detail on ETA’s
overlying sediment below the world’s
Web site at http://www.doleta.gov/
oceans. NSF has a continuing need to
grants/ or on http://www.grants.gov. The
fund seismic surveys that enable
Web sites provide application
scientists to collect data essential to
information, eligibility requirements,
understanding complex Earth processes
review and selection procedures and
beneath the ocean floor.
other program requirements governing
Prior to issuance of the ROD, NSF
this solicitation.
prepared the Final PEIS as the lead
DATES: The closing date for receipt of
federal agency with support from the
applications is December 11, 2012.
cooperating agencies, USGS and the
National Marine Fisheries Service
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(NMFS) of the National Oceanic and
Linda Forman, Grants Management
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Employment and Training
Administration

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:05 Jun 14, 2012

Jkt 226001

PO 00000

Frm 00075

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
The Final PEIS was prepared in
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and made available
to the public in June 2011. Two action
alternatives (Alternative A and
Alternative B) and the No-Action
Alternative were assessed. Alternative
B, the preferred alternative, was selected
in the ROD. The USGS will prepare and
publish a separate ROD for the Final
PEIS.
The NSF ROD is available on the
Internet at: http://www.nsf.gov/geo/oce/
envcomp/ in Adobe® portable document
format (pdf).
Dated: June 12, 2012.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2012–14661 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 52–039; NRC–2008–0603]

PPL Bell Bend, LLC; Bell Bend Nuclear
Power Plant Combined License
Application; Notice of Intent To
Conduct a Supplemental Scoping
Process on the Revised Site Layout
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Solicitation of public comment.
AGENCY:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is seeking public comment for the
supplemental scoping process for the
Bell Bend combined license (COL)
application review.
DATES: Please submit any comments by
July 16, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may access information
and comment submissions related to
this document, which the NRC
possesses and are publically available,
by searching on http://
www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
NRC–2008–0603. You may submit
comments by the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
http://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2008–0603. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–492–3668;
email: [email protected].
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and
Directives Branch (RADB), Office of
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM

15JNN1