OMB looks
forward to NCSES collaborating actively with the National Center
for Education Statistics and the Census Bureau on ways to
experiment with and apply "responsive design" methods to the NSCG
in order to better measure and reduce bias and improve overall
survey efficiency.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
11/30/2015
36 Months From Approved
07/31/2013
121,300
0
144,700
50,542
0
60,292
3,790,625
0
2,755,500
The data collected in this survey will
enable NSF to partially fulfill the Congressional mandate to serve
as a clearing house for information on the scientific and technical
population of the U.S. This information allows for policy and
planning activities by officials of government, private industry
and academic institutions.
US Code:
42 USC 1861 et seq. Name of Law: National Science Foundation
Act of 1950
In the past, after each
decennial census, a new sample was drawn from the census long form,
and that sample was followed until the end of the decade. This was
done in 1982, 1993 and 2003. The first survey in the decade has
been much more expensive and burdensome than the following ones
because of the larger sample size required to identify the S&E
personnel in the U.S. Through the rotating panel design established
for the NSCG's use of the ACS-based sampling frame, the NSCG sample
size will stay more consistent throughout the decade as opposed to
the once per decade sample size increase experienced using the long
form based sampling frame. Under the current sample design plans,
the average biennial sample size for the NSCG rotating panel design
will be near 110,000 cases. If we consider only the 2010 NSCG
respondents (47,000 cases) and the core sample selected from the
2011 ACS (65,000 cases), the sample size is near the proposed
110,000 per cycle sample size. It is the discontinuation of the
NSRCG, the decision to follow the 2010 NSRCG cases as part of the
NSCG, and the decision to oversample young graduates in the NSCG
that results in the burden change between the 2010 NSCG and the
2013 NSCG. The 30,00 sample size resulting from the inclusion of
the 2010 NSRCG cases (12,000 cases) and the young graduates
oversample (18,000 cases) explains the majority of the difference
in burden hours between the 2010 NSCG (34,792 burden hours) and the
2013 NSCG (50,542 burden hours).
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
2013 NSCG Supporting Statement - Appendix I (11-27-12).pdf
2013 National Survey of College Graduates