FY 2012 Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP)
Overview
A
In
FY 2012, DHS will award $10,000,000 for target hardening activities
to nonprofit organizations that are at high risk of terrorist attack
and located within one of the specific UASI-eligible urban areas.
Funding
In FY 2012, the total amount of funds distributed under this grant program will be $10,000,000. Each nonprofit organization must apply through their State Administrative Agency (SAA) for up to a $75,000 grant award. The FY 2012 NSGP funds will be allocated to high-risk nonprofit organizations, as described under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, Title 26 of the U.S.C., and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code.
Eligibility
Applicants eligible to apply for and administer funds under the FY 2012 NSGP are SAAs on behalf of nonprofit organizations. Eligible nonprofit organizations (as described under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) determined to be at high risk of terrorist attack and located within one of the designated FY 2012 UASI-eligible urban areas will be required to provide their applications to their respective SAA. Applicants will also be required to satisfy the eligibility requirements to apply for grants through their SAA.
Funding Guidelines
FY 2012 NSGP allowable costs are focused on target hardening activities. Thus, funding can be used for the acquisition and installation of security equipment on real property (including buildings and improvements) owned or leased by the nonprofit organization, specifically in prevention of and/or protection against the risk of a terrorist attack. This equipment is limited to two categories of items on the Authorized Equipment List (AEL): Physical Security Enhancement Equipment (Category 14) and Inspection and Screening Systems (Category 15). Additionally, a maximum of five percent (5%) of funds awarded may be used for management and administration (M&A) purposes associated with the grant award. The period of performance for NSGP is 24 months from the date of award.
Key FY 2012 NSGP Changes
In order to ensure standardization across all grant programs and cooperative agreements issued by DHS, NSGP’s Guidance was reformatted for consistency and renamed to Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA)
Priorities for NSGP support the implementation of Presidential Policy Directive - 8 (PPD-8) and the NPG. FY 2012 NSGP has been aligned to the five mission areas and supporting core capabilities within the NPG
Reduces the period of performance from 36 months to 24 months
Removes the Semi-Annual Assistance Progress Report (SAPR) reporting requirement in lieu of the Standard Form-Performance Progress Report (SF-PPR) to report on progress towards implementing program-specific performance measures
Expands the scope of maintenance and sustainment by allowing the support of equipment that has previously been purchased with both federal and other sources of funding as long as direct linkage can be provided to one of the core capabilities within the NPG
Removes optional 25 percent (25%) cost match as part of their Investment Justification which was previously allowed under FY 2011 NSGP
Highest weighted applicants are now defined as having “the highest risk of terrorism-related activity due to their ideology, beliefs and mission” instead of those having a religious affiliation
Removes the establishment of local Citizen Corps Council membership as an eligibility requirement
Requires NSGP recipients be located in Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC) membership states in support of the NPG
Application Process and Evaluation Criteria
Applications will be reviewed through a two-phased state and federal review process for completeness, adherence to programmatic guidelines, feasibility, and how well the Investment Justification (IJ) (project description and justification) addresses the identified risk. FY 2012 NSGP evaluation criteria include items such as:
Identification and substantiation of prior threats or attacks (from within or outside the U.S.) by a terrorist organization, network, or cell against the applicant
Symbolic value of the site(s) as a highly recognized national or historical institution(s) that renders the site as possible target of terrorism
Role of the applicant nonprofit organization in responding to terrorist attacks
Findings from previously conducted threat and/or vulnerability assessments
Integration of nonprofit preparedness with broader state and local preparedness efforts
Complete, feasible Investment Justifications that address an identified risk, including threat and vulnerability, and build or sustain a core capability identified in the NPG
Not having received prior years’ NSGP funding
Risk profile
FY 2012 NSGP Fact Sheet |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | DHS |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-28 |