Supporting Statement for OMB Control 1660-0110 (NSGP),

September 11, 2013

Supporting Statement for

Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

OMB Control Number: 1660 – 0110

Title: FEMA Preparedness Grants: Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP)

Form Number(s): FEMA Form 089-24; FEMA Form 089-25

General Instructions

A Supporting Statement, including the text of the notice to the public required by 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(i)(iv) and its actual or estimated date of publication in the Federal Register, must accompany each request for approval of a collection of information. The Supporting Statement must be prepared in the format described below, and must contain the information specified in Section A below. If an item is not applicable, provide a brief explanation. When Item 17 or the OMB Form 83-I is checked “Yes”, Section B of the Supporting Statement must be completed. OMB reserves the right to require the submission of additional information with respect to any request for approval.

Specific Instructions

A. Justification



1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information. Provide a detailed description of the nature and source of the information to be collected.

FEMA’s Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) provides funding support for target hardening activities to nonprofit organizations that are at high risk of terrorist attack. The collection of information for the UASI Nonprofit Security Grant Program is mandated by Section 2003 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. §604), as amended by Section 101, Title I of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (P.L. 110-053), which:

• Establishes an Urban Area Security Initiative to provide grants to assist high-risk urban areas in preventing, preparing for, protecting against, and responding to acts of terrorism;

• Mandates applicants submit plans to describe the proposed division of responsibilities and distribution of funding among the local and tribal government in the high-risk urban area;

• Mandates applicants submit information in support of the application as the Administrator may reasonably require;

• Mandates applicants submit their application to each State within which any part of that high-risk urban area is located for review before submission of such application to the Department; and

• Delineates and describes the actions a Governor must take if deeming that an UASI application is inconsistent with their States’ Homeland Security Strategy.

This program is designed to promote coordination and collaboration in emergency preparedness activities among public and private community representatives, State and local government agencies, and Citizen Corps Councils.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection. Provide a detailed description of: how the information will be shared, if applicable, and for what programmatic purpose.

FEMA Form 089-24, NSGP State – UAWG Prioritization of Investment Justification – This form is used by States to create a prioritized list of applicants (in rank order) from within their State. This will also allow the State Administrative Agency (SAA) to easily provide a prioritized list of applicants, ranked in consideration of two factors:

• Need – The relative need for the nonprofit organization compared to the other

applicants;

• Impact – The potential impact of the nonprofit investment on achieving

maximum prevention and/or protection results at minimal cost.

FEMA Form 089-25, NSGP Investment Justification and Selection Criteria – Submitted with the application, this document provides narrative details on proposed activities (Investments) that will be accomplished with grant funds.  Investment Justifications must demonstrate how proposed projects address gaps and deficiencies in current programs and capabilities and the ability to provide enhancements consistent with the purpose of the program and guidance provided by FEMA. The data from the IJ is collected to assist decision-making at all levels, although, it is primarily used by individual application reviewers. The NSGP grant program uses a multi-phase review process.  Application data, including the IJ, is evaluated to determine which applications are the highest-scoring and address the program priorities.  The highest scoring applications advance to the national review phase.  The national review is comprised of a panel of officials from FEMA (headquarters and regions) and peer subject matter experts.  These reviewers then determine whether proposed activities identified in the application and IJ help achieve core missions of the respective grant program.

Preparedness Comprehensive Assessment Support Tool (PrepCAST) formerly known as the National Incident Management System Compliance Assistance Support Tool (NIMSCAST) – PrepCAST facilitates and reports State, Territory, tribal and local jurisdictions’ compliance with the National Incident Management System (NIMS). PrepCAST allows incident management authorities and resource managers to assess their current capabilities as well as to determine what additional measures should be taken and what resources are needed to effectively implement the NIMS nationwide. The State Preparedness Report provides information on the readiness of states to respond to disaster situations. The capability based data in this report is used in conjunction with other data to create documents such as the National Preparedness Report. This collection activity is approved under OMB Control Number 1660-0087, which expires on 4/30/2016.

FEMA Form 024-0-1, Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) Environmental Screening Form (ESF) - The Environmental and Historic Preservation Environmental Screening Form is a paper form used by FEMA’s Grant Programs Directorate (GPD) and is utilized when following the requirements for grant packages that utilize this instrument. This form should be attached to all project information sent to GPD for an Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) regulatory compliance review. This collection activity is approved under OMB Control Number 1660-0115, which expires on 10/31/2013.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.

The NSGP Investment Justification and Selection Criteria is complete in Microsoft Word and the NSGP State – UAWG Prioritization of Investment Justification is completed in Microsoft Excel, which are both submitted electronically as attachments to their NSGP application when applying for NSGP via www.grants.gov. Eligible applicants must apply for funding through this portal accessible on the internet.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

 This information is not collected in any form, and therefore is not duplicated elsewhere.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 5 of OMB Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize.

This information collection does not have an impact on small businesses or other small entities.

6. Describe the consequence to Federal/FEMA program or policy activities if the collection of information is not conducted, or is conducted less frequently as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

If FEMA could not request and obtain this information, FEMA could not exercise comprehensive financial and programmatic management and ensure the efficient and effective use of Federal funds. If FEMA was not able to receive information collected from grant recipients, the agency could not fulfill monitoring requirements.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

1. Requiring respondents to report information to the agency more

often than quarterly.

No data collection elements are required more often than quarterly. Most collection elements are only required once per year per grant application.

 (b) Requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a

collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it.



There are no requirements for respondents to prepare a written response to this collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it.

3. Requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two

copies of any document.

 There are no requirements for a respondent to submit more than an original and two copies of any document.

3. Requiring respondents to retain records, other than health,

medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years.



Records must be retained for three years after close-out. If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit or other action involving the records has been started before the expiration of the three-year period, the records must be retained until completion of the action and resolution of all issues which arise from it, or until the end of the regular three-year period.

3. In connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to

produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study.



There is no statistical survey involved with this data collection.

 (f) Requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not

been reviewed and approved by OMB.

There is no use for statistical data classification in this data collection.

 (g) That includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by

authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use.



There is no pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation for this data collection.

 (h) Requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

 There are no requirements for respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information for this data collection.

8. Federal Register Notice:



 a. Provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.



A 60-day Federal Register Notice inviting public comments was published on May 28, 2013, 78 FR 31966. No comments were received. See attached copy of the published notice included in this package.

A 30-day Federal Register Notice inviting public comments was published on August 19, 2013, 78 FR 50433. No comments were received. See attached copy of the published notice included in this package.

 b. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.

FEMA consults with Federal, State, local, tribal and private sector partners on a regular basis throughout the year.  FEMA uses teleconferences, email communications, and issue-specific conferences to meet with representatives of key national associations (International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) and the National Emergency Managers Association (NEMA) as well as individual grantees and sub grantees. Other stakeholders we communicate with various federal agencies, such as the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) and a variety of tribal representatives such as the Seneca Nation of Indians, the San Carlos Apache, and the Florida Seminole among others. These consultations involve discussions regarding the nature of information needed by FEMA to manage the grant programs.

c. Describe consultations with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records. Consultation should occur at least once every three years, even if the collection of information activities is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.

FEMA consults on a regular basis with Federal, State, local, tribal stakeholders on a variety of issues. These consultations involve discussions regarding the nature of information needed by FEMA to manage the grant programs. Partners offer comments and suggestions about their reporting practices. 

FEMA staff review and adjudicate all comments, questions, and inquiries, received through stakeholder outreach efforts. These types of interactions can affect future iterations of the grant programs in several ways. For example, responses to questions posed by grantees at times result in formal “Frequently Asked Questions” (FAQ) documents which are circulated to wider stakeholder audiences. These FAQs are distributed at various times and venues, including program guidance release, award announcement, and after action conferences.

Additionally, questions may signal to FEMA leadership that clarification on a particular matter is warranted, and as a result, information bulletins are issued to stakeholders. As a result FEMA has developed the Stakeholder Engagement Plan to report on the processes it utilizes to incorporate stakeholder input for grant guidance development and award distribution.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.

FEMA does not provide payments or gifts to respondents in exchange for a benefit sought.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents. Present the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.



A Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) was completed and approved by DHS on August 13, 2013. The Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) is privacy sensitive and is covered by an existing Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), DHS/FEMA/PIA-013, Grant Management Programs, July 14, 2009 and an existing System of Records Notice (SORN), DHS/FEMA-004 Grant Management Information Files, August 7, 2009, 74 FR 39705.

There are no assurances of confidentiality provided to the respondents for this information collection.



11. Provide additional justification for any question of a sensitive nature (such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs and other matters that are commonly considered private). This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

There are no questions of sensitive nature.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:



 a. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated for each collection instrument (separately list each instrument and describe information as requested). Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desired. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

The NSGP is an existing grant program that uses the forms outlined in this collection. The NSGP provides funding support for target-hardening activities to nonprofit organizations that are at high risk of terrorist attack and are located within one of the specific UASI-eligible Urban Areas. The burden to collect the necessary information is estimated to be 94,875 total annual burden hours.

FEMA has estimated that approximately 1100 respondents will complete the FEMA Form 089-25 (NSGP Investment Justification and Selection Criteria). Each form is estimated to take 84 hours to complete. The total annual burden is estimated to be 1100 responses x 84 hours per response = 92,400 hours.

FEMA has estimated that approximately 33 respondents will complete the FEMA Form 089-24 (NSGP State – UAWG Prioritization of Investment Justification). Each form is estimated to take 75 hours to complete. The total annual burden is estimated to be 33 responses x 75 hours per response = 2,475 hours.

b. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.

c. Provide an estimate of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.

Table A.12: Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
Type of Respondent	Form Name / Form Number	No. of Respon-dents	No. of Respon-ses per Respon-dent	Total No. of Responses	Avg. Burden per Response (in hours)	Total Annual Burden (in hours)	Avg. Hourly Wage Rate*	Total Annual Respondent Cost
Not-for-profit Institutions	NSGP Investment Justification and Selection Criteria / FEMA Form 089-25	1,100	1	1,100	84 hrs.	92,400	$37.09	$3,427,116.00
State, Local or Tribal Government	NSGP Prioritization of the Investment Justifications / FEMA Form 089-24	33	1	33	75 hrs.	2,475	$48.13	$119,121.75
Total		1,133		1,133		94,875		$3,546,237.70

* Note: The “Avg. Hourly Wage Rate” for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.

According to the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Web site (www.bls.gov) the wage rate category for State Representatives is estimated to be $34.38 per hour; in addition, a 1.4 multiplier for benefits has been included, resulting in a total wage rate of $48.13.  The wage rate for Non-profit worker is estimated to be $26.49 per hour, with the addition of the 1.4 multiplier, the total wage rate is $37.09 for completing and submitting the FEMA grant information to FEMA for review and approval.  Therefore, the estimated total burden hour cost is estimated to $3,546,237.70 annually.

The Standard Forms listed in the table below are used in FEMA administration of grant programs collections of information. These burden estimates are captured under the OMB government-wide collections of information for Standard Forms (SF). Other data collection activities approved by OMB are also identified in the table below.

Type of Respon-dent	Form Name / Form Number		No. of Respon-dents		No. of Respons-es per Respon-dent		Total Number of Respons-es		Avg. Burden per Response (in hours)		Total Annual Burden (in hours)		Avg. Hourly Wage Rate ($)		Total Annual Respondent Cost ($)
Standard Forms
State, Local or Tribal Government	Application for Federal Assistance / SF 424		56		1		56		0.75		42
State, Local or Tribal Government	Budget Information - Non-Construction Programs / SF 424A		56		1		56		3		168
State, Local or Tribal Government	Assurances - Non-Constructions Program / SF 424B		56		1		56		0.25		14
State, Local or Tribal Government	SF 424C, Budget Information (Construction)		56		1		56		3		168
State, Local or Tribal Government	SF 424D, Standard Assurances (Construction)		56		1		56		0.25		14
State, Local or Tribal Government	Disclosure of Lobbying Activities / SF LLL		56		1		56		0.167		9
State, Local or Tribal Government	Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form / SF 1199A		56		1		56		0.167		9
State, Local or Tribal Government	Federal Financial Report / SF 425		56		4		224		1.5		336
Total							504				578
Other Departments/ Agencies Data Collection Activities
State, Local or Tribal Government		Preparedness Comprehensive Assessment Support Tool (PrepCAST) formerly known as the National Incident Management System Compliance Assistance Support Tool (NIMSCAST) / No Form Number; FEMA OMB Number 1660-0087		33		1		33
State, Local or Tribal Government		EHP - Environmental Screening Form / FEMA Form 024-0-1; FEMA OMB Number 1660-0115		33		1		33
State, Local or Tribal Government		FEMA Form 112-0-3C, Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment; Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters, and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements / OMB Collection 1660-0025		33		1		33
Total								66

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)

The cost estimates should be split into two components:

a. Operation and Maintenance and purchase of services component. These estimates should take into account cost associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred.

b. Capital and Start-up-Cost should include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software, monitoring sampling, drilling and testing equipment, and record storage facilities.

There are no record keeping, capital, start-up or maintenance costs associated with this information collection.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing and support staff), and any other expense that would have been incurred without this collection of information. You may also aggregate cost estimates for Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

The total cost to FEMA is $388,618.70. Approximately 15 staff members with an estimated grade level of GS-13 review and analyze the information collected by this program.

Annual Cost to the Federal Government

Item	Cost ($)
Contract Costs There are 2 contracts that support this effort: The Technical Assistance and Program Development Contract and the Grant Operations Support Contract. These contracts support the development of the programs & provide guidance/assistance to grantees, collect & review information, and the cost for these contracts are: Technical Assistance and Program Development: $119,192.00 Grant Operations Support: $86,880.00 Total: $206,072.00	$206,072.00
*Staff Salaries [ 15 GS-13 step 1 employees spending approximately 10% of time annually for this administrative and financial data collection] 15 x $86,927.00 = $1,303,905.00 x 1.4 = $1,825,467.00 x .10 = $182,546.70	$182,546.70
Facilities [cost for renting, overhead, etc. for data collection activity]
Computer Hardware and Software [cost of equipment annual lifecycle]
Equipment Maintenance [cost of annual maintenance/service agreements for equipment]
Travel
Printing [number of data collection instruments annually]
Postage [annual number of data collection instruments x postage]
Other
Total	$388,618.70

* Note: The “Avg. Hourly Wage Rate” for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.

 15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-I in a narrative form. Present the itemized changes in hour burden and cost burden according to program changes or adjustments in Table 5. Denote a program increase as a positive number, and a program decrease as a negative number.

A "Program increase" is an additional burden resulting from a Federal government regulatory action or directive. (e.g., an increase in sample size or coverage, amount of information, reporting frequency, or expanded use of an existing form). This also includes previously in-use and unapproved information collections discovered during the ICB process, or during the fiscal year, which will be in use during the next fiscal year.

A "Program decrease", is a reduction in burden because of: (1) the discontinuation of an information collection; or (2) a change in an existing information collection by a Federal agency (e.g., the use of sampling (or smaller samples), a decrease in the amount of information requested (fewer questions), or a decrease in reporting frequency).

Itemized Changes in Annual Burden Hours
Data collection Activity/Instrument	Program Change (hours currently on OMB Inventory)	Program Change (New)	Difference	Adjustment (hours currently on OMB Inventory)	Adjustment (New)	Difference
NSGP Investment Justification and Selection Criteria FEMA Form 089-25				92,400	92,400	0
NSGP State – UAWG Prioritization of Investment Justifications FEMA Form 089-24				2,475	2,475	0
Total(s)				94,875	94,875	0

Explain:

There are no changes to the annual hour burden previously reported and there has been no change to the information being collected.

Itemized Changes in Annual Cost Burden
Data collection Activity/Instrument	Program Change (cost currently on OMB Inventory)	Program Change (New)	Difference	Adjustment (cost currently on OMB Inventory)	Adjustment (New)	Difference
NSGP Investment Justification and Selection Criteria FEMA Form 089-25				$2,927,232.00	$0	-$2,927,232.00
NSGP State – UAWG Prioritization of Investment Justifications FEMA Form 089-24				$79,695.00	$0	-$79,695.00
Total(s)				$3,006,927.00	$0	-$3,006,927.00

Explain:

There is no change in the cost from the last submission; however the way cost is reported in this table is now changed as it comes from question 13 which has values of zero. Therefore, negative costs are now reflected to account for a change in how cost was previously recorded.

16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

FEMA does not intend to employ the use of statistics or the publication thereof for this information collection.

17. If seeking approval not to display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain reasons that display would be inappropriate.

FEMA  will display the expiration date for OMB approval of this information collection.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19 “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions,” of OMB Form 83-I.

FEMA does not request an exception to the certification of this information collection.

B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods.

There is no statistical methodology involved in this collection.