2010 JRFC Imputation documentation

Date:

September 8, 2013

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
From:

Natasha S. Isaac
Terri L. Craig
Statistical Methods Branch
Governments Division
Item

Title

Number

Reimbursable Surveys

1.

Project Manual

2.

Reference Year

3.

Chapter

Juvenile Residential Facility Census

4.

Subchapter

Imputation Procedures Documentation

5.

Document

2010 Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC)
Imputation Documentation

6.

Status

 Draft Version Number ____

10

 Final Version Number __1__

Author:

7.

Direct any questions to ==>

8.

Other instructions or comments:

9.

Signature of Clearance

10.

Distribution:
Name

JRFC
1

Page number(s):
-revised ____________
-added _____________
-deleted ____________

Natasha S. Isaac

Date: 9/8/13

Extension: 5938

Date:

For Office Reference Only
Division

# of Copies

Stephen Simoncini

GOVS

1

Joshua A Giunta

GOVS

1

Natasha S Isaac

GOVS

1

Name
Terri L Craig

Division
GOVS

# of Copies
1

2010 JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY
CENSUS (JRFC)

IMPUTATION DOCUMENTATION

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 4
FILES USED ................................................................................................................................. 4
2010 JRFC FILE ......................................................................................................................... 4
2010 CJRP FILE ......................................................................................................................... 4
2008 JRFC FILE ......................................................................................................................... 4
FACILITY TYPE DEFINITION ................................................................................................ 5
SINGLE-TYPE FACILITY ............................................................................................................. 5
MULTI-TYPE FACILITY .............................................................................................................. 5
FILE PREPARATION ................................................................................................................. 6
NON-RESPONSE FOLLOW-UP ...................................................................................................... 6
IMPUTATION FLAGS ASSIGNED TO THESE RECORDS ................................................................ 9
DEFINING IMPUTATION CELLS/CALCULATIONS.......................................................... 7
IMPUTATION CELLS DEFINED .................................................................................................... 7
COLLAPSING PROCEDURES ........................................................................................................ 7
CALCULATIONS (CELL MEAN GROWTH RATES/CELL MEDIAN/ CELL MEAN) ....................... 7
IMPUTATION PROCEDURES ................................................................................................. 8
CJRP OR JRFC DATA AVAILABLE AND IMPUTATION FLAG ASSIGNMENT ............................. 8
CJRP AND JRFC DATA NOT AVAILABLE AND IMPUTATION FLAG ASSIGNMENT .................. 8
IMPUTATION OF THE VARIABLE S1Q24, S1Q25, S1Q26 A-C .................................................... 8
FINAL FILE .................................................................................................................................. 9
ATTACHMENT 1 ........................................................................................................................ 11
ATTACHMENT 2 ........................................................................................................................ 14
ATTACHMENT 3 ........................................................................................................................ 16
ATTACHMENT 4 ........................................................................................................................ 19
ATTACHMENT 5 ........................................................................................................................ 22

Introduction
The 2010 Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) questionnaire obtains information
about services, staff, and persons assigned beds in juvenile residential facilities. The
questionnaire has seven sections: 1) General Facility Information, 2) Mental Health
Services, 3) Educational Services, 4) Substance Abuse Services, 5) Last Month,
6) The Last Year, and 7) General Information.
After the questionnaire data were collected and edited there were some facilities that
either did not respond to certain questions or did not respond at all (refusals). Refusals
were imputed. Respondents for whom only the critical items were obtained were run
through the critical item imputation program to impute non-critical item questions in
section 1 and also the imputation program to impute the other sections of the
questionnaire.
This document describes the imputation procedures and documents the imputation
results. The imputation procedure includes checks done prior to imputation, facility type
classifications that are used to define the imputation cells, collapsing the imputation cells,
critical item imputation, imputation using either 2010 Census of Juvenile Residential
Placement (CJRP) data, or 2008 JRFC data.

Files Used
2010 JRFC File
Two JRFC files were received from the Criminal Justice Statistics Branch (CJSB). The
first file had both respondents and partial non-respondents. There were 2519 records on
this file. The second file had total non-respondents (refusals). There were 26 records on
this file. The two files were merged to create the full 2010 JRFC file. The territories and
tribal facilities did not go through imputation. These 31 facilities were taken out of the
files prior to processing.

2010 CJRP File
The 2010 final imputed CJRP file was used for JRFC imputation. Only Section 1 data on
facility information and facility persons counts were used from this file. The file was
condensed to contain one record for each responding facility. There were 2,679 records
on the 2010 CJRP facility file used for imputation.
2008 JRFC File
There were 2,860 records on the 2008 JRFC file used for imputation. This file is used
when there is no 2010 CJRP data and for prior year JRFC data on non-critical section 1
questions.

−4−

Facility Type Definition
Single-Type Facility
Question 13 in Section 1 was used to determine the facility type. The respondent
was to mark all that applied from the ten choices. The ten choices were;
Detention Center, Training School/Long-Term Secure Facility, Reception or
Diagnostic Center, Group Home/Halfway House, Boot Camp, Residential
Treatment Center, Ranch/Forestry Camp/Wilderness or Marine Program, or Farm,
Runaway and Homeless Shelter, Other Type of Shelter, and Other-Specify. The
respondent that marked only one facility type was classified as a single-type
facility.
Multi-Type Facility
If more than one choice was selected in Question 13, then the respondent was
classified as a Multi-Type Facility.
Table 1 shows the breakdown by reported facility type on the file used for JRFC
imputation. The 21 records with facility type missing were the refusals. Five of
the refusals which were territory or tribal were taken out prior to processing. The
number in parenthesis shows the breakdown after using 2010 CJRP data, 2008
JRFC data, or information from CJSB to obtain facility type information for the
21 refusals.
There were 190 records for which only critical item data was obtained. The
response in the 2010 CJRP was checked for Section 1, Questions 10a, 10b, 11 and
12. If there were any responses to these questions, that data were carried forward.
Then the response box in Section 1 of the 2008 JRFC was checked, and if
available the response was carried forward. For records that did not have any
prior year data that could be carried forward, the responses were set to “9" - Don’t
Know.

−5−

Table 1 Frequency of Facility Type
Facility Type
Detention Center
Training School/long-term secure facility
Reception or diagnostic center
Group home/Halfway House
Boot Camp
Residential Treatment Center
Ranch/forestry camp/wilderness or marine program/or farm
Runaway and homeless shelter
Other type of shelter
Other Single-type Facility
Multi-type facility
Facility type Missing – Refusal

Frequency
597
(600)
109
(109)
24
(24)
538
(550)
6
(7)
652
(654)
48
(48)
46
(46)
66
(66)
23
(23)
384
(387)
21
(0)

File Preparation
Non-response Follow-up
In non-response follow-up interviewing, the Governments Division (GOVS)
attempted to get as much data as possible about the facility. At a minimum, they
asked for a response to the following questions:
S1Q5a and b S1Q6 S1Q7a and bS1Q8a and b S1Q9a and b S1Q13 S1Q17a S1Q22 S1Q23a and b S5Q2a -

S5Q2bS6Q1S6Q2-

One day count of persons assigned beds?
How many persons were age 21 or older?
How many young persons under age 21?
How many young persons under age 21 were delinquent
offenders?
How many young persons under age 21 were nondelinquent offender?
What type of residential facility is it?
Is this facility operated by a private non-profit or for-profit
agency or a government agency?
What is the total number of standard beds?
What is the number of makeshift beds in use?
Any young persons transported to a hospital emergency
room by facility staff, transportation staff or by an
ambulance?
Reason(s) why transported to a hospital emergency room.
How many persons died while at facility?
How many young persons died while assigned beds at
facility?

−6−

S6Q3 -

If persons died while at facility; cause of death, location of
death, age at death, sex, race, date of admission to facility
and date of death for each person.

Attachment 1 shows the response rate for each variable that needed imputation.

Defining Imputation Cells/Calculations
Imputation Cells Defined
The respondent and non-respondent records were sorted by state and facility type.
For each cell that had non-respondents there had to be at least 15 respondents and
a 75% response rate available for imputation. Otherwise, the cell has to be
collapsed with another cell.
Collapsing procedures
If there were not fifteen respondents and a 75% response rate then the cell was
collapsed with other cells to attempt to get fifteen respondents and a 75%
response rate. A cell was collapsed with cells that contain the same facility type
and were located in a state in the same Census division. In some situations it
might have been necessary to collapse the whole Census division. If there were
still not enough respondents and an adequate response rate after collapsing the
whole Census division, then that Census division would be collapsed with a state
in the same Census region. In some situations it might have been necessary to
collapse the whole Census region into one imputation cell. If there were still not
enough respondents after collapsing the whole Census region and another Census
region then the imputation cell would consist of all facilities of that type in the
U.S.
Attachment 2 shows the breakdown by imputation cell, of respondents and nonrespondents. Only the imputation cells that contain non-respondents are shown.
Calculations (Cell Mean Growth Rates/Cell Median/ Cell Mean)
Once the cells were defined, the growth rate, cell median and cell mean were
calculated. If reported CJRP data were available, the 2010 CJRP growth rate was
used in the imputation process. If reported 2010 CJRP data were not available,
then the 2008 JRFC was used in the imputation process. If no prior year data
were available, the cell median or cell mean was used in the imputation process.
Attachment 3, Table 1 shows for each imputation group the cell median for each
variable. Attachment 3, Table 2 shows for each imputation group the cell mean
for each variable. Attachment 3, Table 3 shows for each imputation group the cell
−7−

mean growth rate for each variable.
Imputation Procedures
CJRP or JRFC Data Available and Imputation Flag Assignment
If either of the variables S1Q5b (one day count of persons assigned beds) or
S1Q9b (how many young persons under age 21 were non-delinquent offender)
needed imputation and had reported CJRP data or reported JRFC data, they were
imputed using the reported CJRP data or the reported JRFC data. Variable S1Q6
(how many persons were age 21 or older) was set to zero per CJSB request
because all 21 refusals held no adults in their facility. The remaining variables,
S1Q7b (how many young person under age 21) and S1Q8b (how many young
persons under age 21 were delinquent offenders), were derived. S1Q7b is derived
by calculating S1Q5b minus S1Q6, and S1Q8b is derived by S1Q7b minus
S1Q9b.
The variable S1Q22 (number of standard beds) was imputed using the imputed
value of S1Q5b and the cell mean ratio of number of persons assigned beds to
number of standard beds. This variable has an imputation flag of 2.

CJRP and JRFC Data Not Available and Imputation Flag Assignment
If either of the variables S1Q5b or S1Q9b still needed imputing but there were no
reported CJRP data and no reported JRFC data, the variable was imputed using
the minimum of the cell mean or the cell median. Variable S1Q6 was set to 0, per
CJSB request, and the remaining variables, S1Q7b and S1Q8b were derived.
S1Q7b is derived by S1Q5b minus S1Q6 and S1Q8b is derived by S1Q7b minus
S1Q9b.
The variable S1Q22 (number of standard beds) was imputed using the imputed
value of S1Q5b and the cell mean ratio of number of persons assigned beds to
number of standard beds. This variable has an imputation flag of 2.
There were no refusals for which prior year data were not available.
Imputation of the variable S1Q24, S1Q25, S1Q26 a-c
The imputed value for S1Q24 and S1Q25 was the most commonly reported
response per imputation cell. We carried forward a prior year response if it was
available. The imputation flag was set to 7.

−8−

For S1Q26a, the prior year response is carried forward if available. Otherwise, a
yes/no response is randomly assigned. To randomly assign a yes/no response, the
frequency counts of the 'yes' responses and 'no' responses by imputation cell are
obtained. The frequency counts are used to get the percentage of responses that
are 'yes'. This percentage becomes the sampling rate for assigning units that will
be imputed with a 'yes' response. The units not selected using the sampling rate
are imputed with a 'no' response. If the imputed response to S1Q26a was 'yes',
variables S1Q26b and S1Q26c were imputed using the cell median and both
received imputation flags of 5. If the imputed response to S1Q26a was 'no',
variables S1Q26b and S1Q26c were imputed as missing.
Imputation Flags Assigned to These Records
After the records go through imputation, the variables that were imputed were
assigned an imputation flag. The imputation flag tells how the imputed value was
determined. The possible imputation flag values are listed below:
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Reported data
Value derived from response to other variables
Imputed using 2010 CJRP, 2008 JRFC data times a growth rate
Imputed using cell mean
Imputed using cell median
Imputed using distribution ratio or cell mean distribution ratio
Imputed using most commonly reported response
Imputed using respondent response rate
Imputed using analyst methodology

Final File

After the imputations were completed, the yes/no variables S1Q5a, S1Q7a,
S1Q8a, and S1Q9a were set. If the value of part b of these variables was greater
than zero, part a was set to 1 for ‘Yes’. If the value of part b was equal to zero
then part a was set to 2 for ‘No’.
The final file was created with only the variables from the 2010 JRFC Survey
form and the imputation flag variables. The territories and tribal facilities were
appended to the end of the file.
The final imputed 2010 JRFC file was given to CJSB in ASCII text format.

−9−

Attachments:
Attachment 1 shows the response rate for each variable that is imputed.
The next two attachments summarize the imputation information. Attachment 2
shows the imputation cells that contain units that require imputation. Attachment
3 shows the growth rates and ratios that were used in the imputations.
Attachment 4 shows the number of records reported and imputed by imputation
method for each variable.
Attachment 5 shows the number of records reported, the number of records
imputed, the percent of records imputed, the reported total, the imputed total, and
the percent of the total imputed for each variable.

−10−

Attachment 1
Response rate for each variable (S1Q5B, S1Q6, S1Q7B, S1Q8B, SQ9B, S1Q22, S1Q23B, S1Q26B,
S1Q26C)
Table 1:
S1Q5B: The number of persons assigned beds in the facility:
resp5
non-respondent
respondent

Frequency

Cumulative Cumulative
Percent Frequency
Percent

21

0.84

21

0.84

2493

99.16

2514

100.00

S1Q6: The number of persons 21 or older assigned a bed in this facility:

resp6
non-respondent
respondent

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

21

0.84

21

0.84

2493

99.16

2514

100.00

S1Q7B : Number of persons under 21 assigned a bed in this facility:
Cumulative Cumulative
resp7
Frequency Percent
Frequency
Percent
non-respondent
respondent

21

0.84

21

0.84

2493

99.16

2514

100.00

SIQ8B: Number of persons under 21 charged with or adjudicated for an offense that
are assigned a bed in this facility:

resp8
non-respondent
respondent

Frequency

Cumulative
Percent Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

21

0.84

21

0.84

2493

99.16

2514

100.00

−11−

SIQ9B: Number of persons under 21 that are assigned a bed for reasons other than
offenses in this facility:

resp9
non-respondent
respondent

Cumulative
Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

Frequency

Percent

21

0.84

21

0.84

2493

99.16

2514

100.00

SIQ22: Number of standard beds in this facility:

resp 22
non-respondent
respondent

Frequency Percent

Cumulative
Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

21

0.84

21

0.84

2493

99.16

2514

100.00

SIQ23B: Number of makeshift beds occupied the night of Wednesday,
October 27, 2010:

resp23b
non-respondent
respondent

Frequency

Cumulative
Percent Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

21

0.84

21

0.84

2493

99.16

2514

100.00

SIQ24: Number of actual occupants per sleeping room the night of,
Wednesday, October 27, 2010:

resp24
non-respondent
respondent

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative
Frequency

21

0.84

21

0.84

2493

99.16

2514

100.00

−12−

Cumulative
Percent

S1Q26A: Participation in large muscle activity required:

resp26a
non-respondent

Frequency Percent
2

0.08

Cumulative
Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

2

0.08

2512
99.92
2514
100.00
respondent
*Note- Only 2 non-respondents did not have prior year data, requiring them to go through
imputation.
S1Q26B: Number of minutes per day young persons are required to participate in
muscle activity at a location either inside or outside this facility:

resp26b
non-respondent
respondent

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative
Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

21

0.84

21

0.84

2493

99.16

2514

100.00

S1Q26C: Number of days per week young persons are required to participate in
large muscle activity at a location either inside or outside this facility:

resp26c
non-respondent
respondent

Frequency Percent

Cumulative
Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

21

0.84

21

0.84

2493

99.16

2514

100.00

\

−13−

Attachment 2
Category:

Imputation Cells
Needs=Needs Imputing; Donor=Respondent

Level of Imputation=Division 1: New England
Imputation Group Facility
Category
14
Group Home/ Halfway House donor
14
Group Home/ Halfway House needs
-------implevel

# of Records
23
4
-------27

% of Records
85.19
14.81

Level of Imputation=Division 3: South Atlantic
Imputation Group
36
36
311
311

Facility
Residential Treatment Center
Residential Treatment Center
Multi-type Facility
Multi-type Facility

Category
donor
needs
donor
needs

# of Records % of Records
78
97.50
2
2.50
39
98.96
1
1.04

-------implevel

-------120

Level of Imputation=Division 6: East North Central
Imputation Group
61
61

Facility
Detention Center
Detention Center

Category
donor
needs

# of Records % of Records
95
98.96
1
1.04

-------implevel

-------96

Level of Imputation=Division 8: Moutain
Imputation Group
811
811
-------implevel

Facility
Multi-type Facility
Multi-type Facility

Category
donor
needs

−14−

# of Records % of Records
40
97.56
1
2.44
-------41

Level of Imputation=National
Imputation Group
2210
2210
3010
3010
3012
3012
3013
3013
3014
3014
3015
3015

Facility
Bootcamp
Bootcamp
Group home/ Halfway House
Group home/ Halfway House
Multi-type Facility
Multi-type Facility
Group home/ Halfway House
Group home/ Halfway House
Detention Center
Detention Center
Group home/ Halfway House
Group home/ Halfway House

-------implevel

Category
donor
needs
donor
needs
donor
needs
donor
needs
donor
needs
donor
needs

# of Records % of Records
25
96.15
1
3.85
62
96.88
2
3.13
16
94.12
1
5.88
32
91.43
3
8.57
32
94.12
2
5.88
51
94.44
3
5.56
-------230

−15−

Attachment 3
Table 1:
observation
number

Cell Median

imputation median
median
group question 5b question 7b

median
median
question 26b question 26c

median
median ratio
question 9b question 22

1

14

7.0

7.0

50

5

5.0

1.00000

2

36

33.5

33.5

60

7

14.0

0.93923

3

61

24.0

24.0

60

7

1.0

0.67500

4

311

30.0

30.0

60

7

9.5

0.88889

5

811

13.0

13.0

60

7

4.0

0.79041

6

2210

11.0

11.0

45

6.5

8.0

0.88889

7

3010

6.0

6.0

120

5

4.0

1.00000

8

3012

24.5

24.5

60

7

1.0

0.57143

9

3013

6.0

6.0

30

7

5.0

0.65714

10

3014

8.0

8.0

55

7

3.5

0.58333

11

3015

8.0

8.0

60

5

4.0

0.85714

MDN(x)b=cell median for that question number in Section 1
mdrat22 is the cell median ratio of persons to beds

−16−

Table 2: Cell Means

observation imputation
number group

mean
question 5b

mean
question 7b

mean
mean
mean
question 9b question 26b question 26c

mean ratio
question
22

1

14

7.5652

7.5652

5.6471

53.0000

5.00000

0.87506

2

36

44.8077

44.7949

22.0000

65.2703

6.59459

0.86173

3

61

34.2000

34.2000

1.0000

60.8974

6.52564

0.69109

4

311

35.4872

35.4872

11.1667

61.5000

6.50000

0.83259

5

811

35.2500

35.2500

7.0625

65.7692

6.46154

0.69268

6

2210

15.9600

15.3600

10.9500

45.0000

6.50000

0.84139

7

3010

12.7742

12.7742

4.2857

92.1429

5.42857

0.87848

8

3012

32.3750

32.3750

11.0000

53.0000

6.60000

0.63564

9

3013

7.6875

7.6875

5.0000

47.5000

6.33333

0.61421

10

3014

16.0313

16.0313

3.5000

56.6667

6.06667

0.60682

11

3015

10.6667

10.6667

6.2258

52.9545

5.36364

0.80076

MN(x)b=cell mean for that question number in section 1
mnrat22 is the cell mean ratio of persons to beds

Table 3: Cell Mean Growth Rate (2010 CJRP) and (2008 JRFC)

observation number

Cell
Cell
Cell
Cell
Cell
Cell
mean
mean
mean
mean
mean
mean
growth growth growth growth growth growth
rate
rate
rate
rate
rate
rate
question question question question question question
5b
7b
9b
5b
7b
9b
imputation group (CJRP) (CJRP) (CJRP) (JRFC) (JRFC) (JRFC)

1

14 0.90763 0.90763 0.93051 0.99501 0.99501 0.89991

2

36 0.94582 0.94571 0.97081 0.89496 0.89496 0.97688

3

61 0.87394 0.87394 1.00000 0.80216 0.80216 0.99158

4

311 0.95015 0.95015 0.92171 0.95517 0.95517 0.96466

5

811 0.99667 1.00902 1.02777 0.85082 0.85082 0.94502

6

2210 1.04355 1.08695 0.96974 1.17161 1.17161 0.98207

7

3010 0.93927 0.93927 0.99630 0.87473 0.87473 0.96798

8

3012 0.89737 0.89737 0.93710 0.89153 0.89153 0.94908

9

3013 0.87159 0.87159 0.99175 0.70468 0.70468 0.93929

10

3014 0.67627 0.67627 1.00000 0.82955 0.82955 1.00000

11

3015 0.93614 0.93614 0.94263 0.83944 0.83944 0.91426

cgr_(x)b=2010 CJRP cell mean growth rate for that question number in Section 1
jgr_(x)b=2008 JRFC cell mean growth rate for that question number in Section 1

Attachment 4
Number of records imputed using each imputation method
S1Q5B- Number of persons assigned a bed in this facility:

impflag5b Frequency Percent

Cumulative Cumulative
Frequency
Percent

0

2493

99.16

2493

99.16

3

21

0.84

2514

100.00

S1Q6- Number of persons 21 or older assigned a bed in this facility
Cumulative Cumulative
impflag6 Frequency Percent Frequency
Percent
0

2493

99.16

2493

99.16

9

21

0.84

2514

100.00

S1Q7B- Number of persons under 21 assigned a bed in this facility:

impflag7b Frequency Percent

Cumulative Cumulative
Frequency
Percent

0

2493

99.16

2493

99.16

2

21

0.84

2514

100.00

S1Q8B- Number of persons under 21 charged with or adjudicated for an offense that are assigned a
bed in the facility:
impflag8b Frequency Percent

Cumulative Cumulative
Frequency
Percent

0

2493

99.16

2493

99.16

2

21

0.84

2514

100.00

S1Q9B- Number of persons under 21 that are assigned a bed for reasons other than offenses
in this facility:

impflag9b

Frequency Percent

Cumulative
Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

0

2493

99.16

2493

99.16

3

21

0.84

2514

100.00

S1Q22- Number of standard beds in this facility:

impflag22

Frequency Percent

Cumulative
Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

0

2493

99.16

2493

99.16

9

21

0.84

2514

100.00

S1Q23B- Number of makeshift beds occupied the night of Wednesday, October 27, 2010:
impflag23b Frequency Percent

Cumulative
Frequency

Cumulative
Percent

0

2493

99.16

2493

99.16

2

21

0.84

2514

100.00

S1Q26B- Number of minutes per day young persons are required to participate in large muscle
activity at a location either inside or outside this facility:

impflag26b Frequency Percent

Cumulative Cumulative
Frequency
Percent

0

2493

99.16

2493

99.16

5

21

0.84

2514

100.00

S1Q26C- Number of days per week young persons are required to participate in large muscle activity
at a location either inside or outside this facility:

impflag26C Frequency Percent

Cumulative Cumulative
Frequency
Percent

0

2493

99.16

2493

99.16

5

21

0.84

2514

100.00

0 = Reported Data
2 = Imputed Value Derived
3 = Imputed Using CJRP or Prior Year JRFC data with cell mean growth rate applied
4 = Imputed Using the Cell Mean
5 = Imputed Using the Cell Median
6 = Imputed Using Distribution Ratio or Cell Mean Distribution Ratio
7 = Imputed Using Most Commonly Reported Response (used only for questions new to the survey)
8 = Imputed Using Respondent Response Rate
9 = Imputed using analyst methodology

Attachment 5
For each variable, the number of records reported, the number of records imputed, the percent of
records imputed, the reported total, the imputed total, and the percent of total imputed.

Variable

Reported

# of
records
Imputed

2493

21

Total persons

Variable

Reported

Total 21 and
over

2493

21

Variable

Reported

Total
under 21

2493

21

Total under
21 offenders

0.84%

# of Persons
Imputed

Imputed

531

0.66%

79357

# of Persons
Reported
Imputed

%
Imputed

367

0

0.00%

% Imputed

Reported

# of Persons
Imputed

%
Imputed

0.84%

78990

531

0.67%

# of
records
Reported Imputed

2493

0.84%

# of
records
%
Imputed Imputed

# of
records
Imputed

Variable

% Imputed Reported

21

% Imputed

1.03%

# of Persons
Reported
Imputed

66322

332

%
Imputed

0.50%

Variable

Total under 21 nonoffenders

Variable

Total number of standard
beds

Variable

Total number of
makeshift beds

Reported

# of
records
Imputed

% Imputed

2493

21

0.84%

# of
records
Reported Imputed

2493

Reported

2493

21

% Imputed

0.84%

# of
Persons
Reported Imputed

12665

189

# of
beds
Reported Imputed

111425

531

# of
# of
records
%
beds
Imputed Imputed Reported Imputed

21

0.84%

225

0

% Imputed

1.47%

% Imputed

0.47%

% Imputed

0.00%