Evaluating the Retired Mentors for Teachers Program

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Form Attachment C Mento Evaluating the Retired Mentors for New Teachers Program	Form	New	Available
CE 4.4.3 OMB Clearance Supporting Statement B 1-14-14.docx	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2014-01-29	Available
60D_FRN_1850-NEW.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2013-11-07	Available
CE 4 4 3 Affidavit Attachment J.docx	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2014-01-30	Available
CE 4.4.3 OMB Clearance Attachment G 1-14-14.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2014-01-29	Available
OKCE_4.4.3_Attachement_H[1].doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2013-10-23	Available
CE 4.4.3 OMB Clearance Supporting Statement A 1-14-14.docx	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2014-01-29	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
210283	Evaluating the Retired Mentors for New Teachers Program	Form	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1850-0908	ICR Reference No: 201402-1850-003
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: ED/IES	Agency Tracking No: 2000.01
Title: Evaluating the Retired Mentors for Teachers Program
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 04/09/2014
	Date Received in OIRA: 02/05/2014
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	04/30/2017	36 Months From Approved
Responses	148	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	92	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: OMB clearance is requested for a comprehensive randomized control trial study of the Retired Mentors for New Teachers program for probationary teachers developed by the Aurora Public School District (APS), in Aurora Colorado. The program uses recently retired master teachers to provide one-on-one mentoring to probationary teachers in high poverty elementary schools. The program was developed by APS over a three year period from 2008-2011. The district has partnered with REL Central to conduct an RCT study of the program because it desires to understand program impacts on teacher retention, performance, and teacher evaluations. The district has committed resources to pay for the intervention as well as for teachers to participate in any data gathering activities, such as surveys or focus groups. This OMB clearance request is to collect data from 100 teachers and 8 teacher mentors. It does not include data collection from students.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 107 - 279 174 Name of Law: Education Science Reform Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	78 FR 66905	11/07/2013
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	79 FR 6889	02/05/2014
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Evaluating the Retired Mentors for New Teachers Program	Attachment C Mentor Focus Group, N/A, n/a, n/a	Attachment C Mentor Focus Group ,   Attachment E: Mentor Information and Informed Consent ,   Attachment D: Teacher Info and Informed Consent ,   Mentee Survey 2013

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	148	0	0	148	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	92	0	0	92	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This is a new collection

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $250,000

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 02/05/2014

---