Cooperative Weed Management Area Feedback

Forest Service Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

CWMA Customer Satisfaction Survey_v10012015

Cooperative Weed Management Area Program Delivery Feedback

OMB: 0596-0226

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

OMB 0596-0226

(Expires 04/2018)

Organization

How many partners are actively engaged in the work of the individual Cooperative Weed Management Agencies (CWMA)?

Fewer than 5

6-10

11-15

16-20

More than 20


Does the CWMA have a governing body?

Yes

No


Does the CWMA have a coordinator or established coordinator position?

Yes, paid

Yes, non-paid

No


How does the CWMA set priorities?

Provided priorities are set by an external body (Lake committee, watershed organization, government).

Priorities are established by governing body and/or coordinator for the CWMA.

Priorities are set through engaging interested citizen stakeholders, focus groups, or surveys.

Priorities are determined as threats are identified and resources are available.


How has the CWMA engaged in public outreach, e.g., brochures, workshops, farmer’s markets, news media? (Check all that apply.)

Hands-on outreach tools, such as active boat washing stations or boot brush stations

Brochures or citizen guides

Workshops or identification sessions

Booth or outreach at Farmer’s markets or public events

Connections with the news media on activities and articles of interest

Optional comments on CWMA organization needs and how Forest Service technical assistance could help.


[TEXT BOX]

Role of Forest Service Funds

What is the CWMA operating budget?


[TEXT BOX]


What percent of funding comes from federal sources, including Great Lakes Restoration funds from the Forest Service and other agencies?


[TEXT BOX]


How many acres of land is treated in the CWMA annually (public and private)?

Public lands: [TEXT BOX] thousand acres

Private lands: [TEXT BOX] thousand acres


Has follow-up monitoring occurred and demonstrated eradication of an invasive species from the CWMA using Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) funds?

No, we have not yet received GLRI funds.

No, not with GLRI funds, but sites funded through other means have observed eradication in monitoring reports

Not sure, we have received GLRI funds, but have not documented or formally monitored the treated sites

Yes, we have received GLRI funds, and have not seen the target invasive species in a monitoring visit.

Yes, we have received GLRI funds and recorded eradication through two or more monitoring checks.

What are the roles of early detection and rapid response networks and Forest Service support? (check all that apply)

Yes there is an early detection and rapid response network

We have received Forest Service funds for establishing a network

Data are being stored and shared across the network electronically

Periodic reports are made to keep the network informed invasive species news and accomplishments



Which Non-native invasive species are high priorities for the CWMA? (select up to three)

Giant Hogweed (H. mantegazzianum)

Reed Canarygrass (P. arundinacea)

Invasive strains of Phragmites australis

Purple Loosestrife (L. salicaria)

Wild Parsnip (P. sativa)

Lyme grass (L. arenarius)

Baby’s breath (G. paniculata)

Japanese knotweed (F. japonica)

Japanese barberry (B. thunbergii)

Garlic Mustard (A. petiolata)

Buckthorn (Rhamnus spp.)

Other [text BOX]

How many threatened, endangered, or sensitive plants are found in each CWMA, and are they threatened by invasive plant species?


[TABLE, 10 rows: Column 1, TEXT; Column 2, Yes No ]

Optional: Additional comments on Forest Service financial assistance to CWMA and how assistance could best meet CWMA objectives?


[TEXT BOX]



According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.  The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0596-0226.  The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorJeremy J. Peichel
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-27

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy