Form 991 20160 991USPTO Examiner Survey Draft

E-Government Website Customer Satisfaction Surveys

20160 991USPTO Examiner Survey Draft.xlsx

20160 991USPTO Examiner Survey Draft

OMB: 1090-0008

Document [xlsx]
Download: xlsx | pdf

Overview

How to read this file
Welcome and Thank You Text
Custom Questions


Sheet 1: How to read this file

Survey Invitation




This is the standard survey invitation. Default text is included. If you would like to modify this text please check with your analyst/client manager.










Welcome and Thank You Text




The text you see here will appear at the top and bottom of your survey. Default text is included and you may modify this text as needed.










Model Questions




As discussed during the kick-off call, the model questions are part of the ForeSee methodology. For consistency within the model, these questions are standardized and have been tested and validated. Standardization of model questions allows benchmarking across companies/industries, and these questions are used in calculating scores and impacts.




Focus on the future behaviors; I’ve started with some that I believe are a good fit but we can certainly make adjustments. These are desired customer outcomes that are impacted by customer satisfaction.










Custom Questions




When reviewing the custom questions tab, keep in mind these questions are used for segmentation analysis of the model data. It is suggested that you add, delete or change custom questions over time, as your needs or business objectives change.




Focus Area #1: Achieving Actionable Data
- Know what changes are being made based on the intelligence
- Change Custom Questions so that stakeholders see a clear “must do”





Focus Area #2: Aligning Data to Business Strategies
- Update your Custom Questions as business cycles change
- Integrate Executive Level questions to evaluate initiatives





Focus Area #3: Strategic and Tactical Value
- Influence Board Room Decisions
- Change Operational Approaches
- Mature Your Research











Making Changes




Simply make the change that you desire and highlight that change with a different color text. Red works well because it stands out.
If the change is "complicated" a brief explanation about what you would like to accomplish will help us understand your request and figure out the best way to implement. -Or- Just give us a call; talking through changes over the phone makes it quick and easy.







Sheet 2: Welcome and Thank You Text


The text you see here will appear at the top and bottom of your survey, examples below.


Default text is included and you may modify this text as needed.








Welcome and Thank You Text













Welcome Text







Thank you for choosing the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) form for your scheduling needs. We hope your experience was positive.

At this time, we would like to hear any feedback you may have regarding the interview scheduled through the USPTO AIR form. Your responses will help us improve both Applicant's and Examiner's interview experiences.

Your response to this survey is anonymous and results will be viewed and reported in aggregate format only.





































Thank You Text







Thank you for taking our survey - and for helping us serve you better.









































Example Desktop
























































































































































Sheet 3: Custom Questions

Model Name
USPTO Examiner Survey


Red & Strike-Through: Delete


Model ID
New


Underlined & italicised: Re-order

Partitioned
No Model


Pink: Addition

Date
10.13.2016


Blue: Reword












QID QUESTION META TAG Skip From Question Text Answer Choices Skip To Required
Y/N
Type Special Instructions CQ Label



Did the interview occur? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* Interview - Occurred




No A





A Please select the reason(s) why the interview did not occur: No longer necessary
Y Checkbox, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* Interview - Why Canceled




Unavailability of the applicant A2







Unavailability of the examiner A2

randomise




Other, please specify: A1

Anchor Answer Choice


A1 Why did the interview not occur?

N Text field, <100 char Skip Logic Group* Interview - Cancellation Other


A2 Was the applicant flexible in attempting to arrange a mutually convenient date and time for the interview? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* Interview - Flex Reschedule




No







What type of interview was held? Telephone only
Y Radio button, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* Method




Face-to-face A





A How did you meet? In Person (USPTO campus)
Y Radio button, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* Method - F2F




Video Conference (via WebEx) A1





A1 Please elaborate: Applicant was on the USPTO campus; Examiner was remote
Y Radio button, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* Method - WebEx




Examiner was on the USPTO campus; Applicant was remote








None of the parties were on the USPTO campus







Was a proposed detailed agenda sent to the examiner prior to the interview? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* Agenda




No A





A Why was an agenda not provided? Examiner did not request an agenda
Y Checkbox, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* Agenda - Why Not




Examiner requested an agenda, but the applicant denied








Applicant unable to submit an agenda A2

randomise




Other, please specify: A1

Anchor Answer Choice


A1 Why was an agenda not provided?

N Text field, <100 char Skip Logic Group* Agenda - Why Not Other


A2 Why was the applicant unable to submit an agenda?

N Text field, <100 char Skip Logic Group* Agenda - Applicant Unable, Why



Was a Supervisory Patent Examiner (SPE) or another examiner present at the interview? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* SPE




No A





A Was the SPE or other examiner prepared (e.g. equipment setup, documents ready) at the scheduled time and date? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* SPE - Prepared




No






A Did the SPE or other examiner understand the inventive concept? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical Skip Logic Group* SPE - Understanding




No







Was the applicant prepared (e.g. equipment setup ,documents ready) at the scheduled time and date? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical
Applicant - Prepared




No







Did the applicant understand and effectively explain the inventive concept? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical
Applicant - Understanding




No







Was the applicant adequately prepared to explain the difference(s) between the claimed invention and prior art? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical
Applicant - Thorough




No







Did the applicant assist the examiner in identifying ways to overcome the rejections on record? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical
Objections - Overcoming




No







Did the interview provide adequate time to address all issues? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical
Adequate time




No







Were the applicant's positions presented with decorum, courtesy, and professionalism? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical
Applicant - Professionalism




No







What was your overall satisfaction with this interview? Very satisfied
Y Radio button, one-up vertical
Overall Satisfaction




Satisfied








Neither satisfied or dissatisfied








Dissatisfied








Very dissatisfied







Thinking about the process as a whole; was this an effective interview? Yes
Y Radio button, one-up vertical
Effective




No







Please provide any additional comments that might help us improve your experience:

N Text field, <100 char
Additional Improvements
File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy