ADDS TAF Customer Survey

NOAA Customer Surveys

TAF Survey update final 10-13-15 v2.1

Aviation Digital Data Service (ADDS)Terminal Aerodrome Forecast Customer Survey

OMB: 0648-0342

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

OMB Control No. 0648-0342

Expiration Date: 5/31/2018

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 12 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other suggestions for reducing this burden to Michael J. Bettwy, National Weather Service (NWS) Aviation Weather Center (AWC), 7220 Northwest 101st Terrace #118, Kansas City, MO 64153.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of the law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subjected to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.

Survey Instructions: Your responses to this survey will help support Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) improvements by helping us identify any known issues. For comments, please provide specific examples. Please note: your anonymity is assured and you will not be identified with any response given.


TAF Survey



  1. TAF Forecast Accuracy/Performance


Using a scale from 1-10 (10 highest quality) please rate and comment on the quality of TAF accuracy/performance. When commenting, please provide specific examples related to any accuracy issues or comments such as: TAF(s) used; location; weather element; and time of flight.


Comment box


  1. TAF Usability/Ease of Use


Using a scale from 1-10 (10 highest quality) please rate the quality of the following usability elements of the TAF. Please use the comment boxes to provide specific examples or suggestions for improvement.

    1. Interpretation (i.e. symbols, text, graphics, codes, legends)


Comment box



    1. Timeliness/update frequency



Comment box


    1. Upload time (i.e. Java tool, web-interface, TAF regional views)



Comment box


    1. Display interface (i.e. color coding, readability, accessibility)



Comment box


    1. Navigation (i.e. ability to easily move around the site)



Comment box


    1. General – Please provide any additional comments and/or suggestions you may have for improving TAF usability



Comment box


  1. What TAF features did you find useful?


Comment box


  1. What TAF features did you not find useful?


Comment box


  1. Using a scale from 1-10 (10 highest importance) how would you rate the importance of TAFs in support of your flight planning decisions?



Comment box


  1. How frequently do you use TAFs for flight planning? Please select one:

    1. All of the time

    2. Most of the time

    3. Sometimes

    4. Hardly ever

    5. Never

Comment box


  1. How would you describe yourself as a TAF user? (Please select all that apply)

If “other”, please explain.

GA Pilot

Commercial Pilot

HEMS Pilot

Business Jet Pilot

Air Taxi Pilot

Cargo Pilot

Flight Instructor

Student Pilot

Researcher

Federal Government Employee/Contractor

Other


Comment box



  1. Please provide any additional comments regarding TAFs, and/ or suggestions for TAF improvement.

Comment box


Submission of your name, e-mail, and address is voluntary. If you choose to provide this information, it will be used only to verify comments/suggestions if necessary.



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorCynthia Grzywinski
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy