Supporting Statememt

IC Template 3170-0024 vs3_SEV - PRA 7.21.16 - FINAL (2).pdf

Generic Information Collection Plan for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Bureau Service Delivery

Supporting Statememt

OMB: 3170-0024

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Request for Approval under the “Generic Information Collection Plan for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on the Service Delivery of the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau” (OMB Control Number: 3170-0024)
1. TITLE OF INFORMATION COLLECTION:
Spanish Ask CFPB - User Testing
2. PURPOSE:
We seek to understand the ease of use and difficulties faced by users as they work through the Spanish Ask CFPB tool,
given its content, design, and functionality. We will use the information we collect to decide the future design and
content change recommendations for the Spanish Ask tool.

3. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONDENTS:
Respondents are adults who primarily speak Spanish at home, have sought information for a question about financial
products and/or services in the past six months, and visit financial websites to find answers to their questions.
Respondents

4. TYPE OF COLLECTION (ADMINISTRATION OF THE INSTRUMENT):
a.

How will you collect the information? (Check all that apply)

[X] Web-based or other forms of Social Media
[X] In-person
[ ] Small Discussion Group
[X] Other, Explain ____UX Study_____________

[ ] Telephone
[ ] Mail
[ ] Focus Group

b. Will interviewers or facilitators be used?
[X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
5. FOCUS GROUP OR SURVEY:
If you plan to conduct a focus group or survey, please provide answers to the following
questions:
a. Do you have a customer list or something similar that defines the universe of potential
respondents and do you have a sampling plan for selecting from this universe?
[X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
b. If the answer is yes, please provide a description below. If the answer is no, please
provide a description of how you plan to identify your potential group of respondents and
how you will select them?
Page 1 of 4

The contractor has a database that covers the universe of potential respondents. According to the
requirements listed in the screener we provided, Fors Marsh Group will contact those within their
database that best match our request.
We are asking Fors Marsh Group to recruit a pool of participants that is diverse with respect to
national origin to account for possible differences in terminology and comprehension among
Spanish-speakers of different national origins.
6. PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION:
a. Is personally identifiable information (PII) collected? [X ] Yes [ ] No
b. If Yes, is the information that will be collected included in records that are subject to
the Privacy Act of 1974? [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
If applicable, what is the link to the Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)?
http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201406_cfpb_consumer-experience-research_pia.pdf

c. If Applicable, has a System or Records Notice (SORN) been published?
[X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
If yes, cite the SORN.
Title: CFPB.021- CFPB Consumer Education and Engagement
Records

79 FR _78839______________.

7. INCENTIVES:
a. Is an incentive provided to participants? [X] Yes [ ] No
b. If Yes, provide the amount or value of the incentive? $_75.00____.
c. If Yes, provide a statement justifying the use and amount of the incentive.
While sessions will last 60-90 minutes, participants are required to arrive 10 minutes early to sign in, and to
ensure sessions begin as scheduled. Upon completion of the session, participants are required to sign out
and receive their incentive. Thus, they are in the office for a total of 75-120 minutes. Further, many
participants have to travel 30-60 minutes to and from the facility. In our experience, a $75 incentive for a
60-90 minute session allows for successful recruitment by reducing the amount of time required to recruit
(i.e., it is more difficult and takes longer to recruit participants when we offer a lower incentive) and
simultaneously increasing the attendance rate.
When considering the potential estimated time and cost of participating in this test, such costs as childcare,
transportation, and potential lost wages could result in a high no show rate. For example, a conservatively
estimated childcare cost of $25, transportation cost $35, and potential lost wages of $18 amounts to an
estimated $78 cost of participation. The basis for our participant cost analysis is outlined below:
Summary of Estimated Participant Costs
• Child Care: $25 ($10 per hour / per child with up to 1 hour commuting + 1.5 hours at test site =
2.5 hours of child care)
• Transportation: $35 (2015 Federal mileage rate of 57.5 cents per mile @ an average of 60 miles).
• Lost Wages: $18 (Federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour x (1 hour commuting + 1.5 hours at
Page 2 of 4

test site) = 2.5 hours of potential lost wages)
Total: $78 (Estimated participant cost)
Child Care: We found that nationally the babysitting rate is typically around $8 - $12 per hour with an
average of $10 per hour. While some participants will have multiple children who will require childcare,
others will have none. Therefore, we are taking a conservative estimate of only one child.
Transportation: We used the IRS mileage rate of 57.5 cents per mile with a potential of 60 miles of travel.
Lost Wages: We have no specific data on the hourly wage of potential participants; therefore, in order to
estimate the potential lost wages of participants, we took a very conservative approach and based this
estimate on the Federal minimum wage.
In summary, given the difficulties of recruiting the desired population and the potential costs of
participation, we believe that $75 is the minimum incentive necessary to recruit and retain the desired test
population. There is also a concern that if the incentive is not attractive enough to participants, there may be
a high no show rate and the test would need to be redone in order to obtain quality results. Redoing the test
would be much costlier than an effective incentive. For example, at the $75 incentive level, total incentives
would be $1,125 (15 participants x $75) verses a test redo at a cost of approximately $40,000.

8. BURDEN ESTIMATES:
Information Collection

Number of
Respondents

Web-based Screener

Response
Time
(hours)

Number of
Annual
Responses

Frequency
(Responses
per
Respondent)

Burden
Hours

140

1

140

.08

11

Phone-based Screener

80

1

80

.05

4

User Testing Sessions

9

1

9

1.5

14

229 ////////////////////////////

29

Totals

140* //////////////////////

*Note: Respondents to the Phone-based screeners and Testing sessions are a subset of those who respond to
the Web-based screeners.

9. FEDERAL COST: The estimated annual cost to the Federal government is

$95,000

Page 3 of 4

10. CERTIFICATIONS:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 5 CFR 1320.9, AND THE RELATED PROVISIONS
OF 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3) :
By submitting this document, the Bureau certifies the following to be true:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to
respondents;
(d) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and
recordkeeping practices;
(e) It indicates the retention period for recordkeeping requirements;
(f) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3):
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(g) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and
effective management and use of the information to be collected;
(h) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and
(i) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

CERTIFICATION FOR INFORMATION COLLECTIONS SUBMITTED UNDER A
GENERIC INFORMATION COLLECTION PLAN










By submitting this document, the Bureau certifies the following to be true:
The collection is voluntary.
The collection is low-burden for respondents and low-cost for the Federal Government.
The collection is non-controversial and does not raise issues of concern to other federal
agencies.
The results are not intended to be disseminated to the public.
Information gathered will not be used for the purpose of substantially informing influential
policy decisions.
The collection is targeted to the solicitation of opinions from respondents who have
experience with the program or may have experience with the program in the future.
The data collection is not statistically significant, the sample is not intended to be
representative, and the results will not be used to make inferences beyond the survey
sample.
The results will not be used to measure regulatory compliance or for program
evaluation.

Page 4 of 4


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleRequest for Approval under the “Generic Information Collection Plan for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on the Service De
Author558022
File Modified2016-07-22
File Created2016-07-22

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy