Supporting Statement - Appraisal Complaint Form 2-17-16

Supporting Statement - Appraisal Complaint Form 2-17-16.doc.docx

Interagency Appraisal Complaint Form

OMB: 1557-0314

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Interagency Appraisal Complaint Form


Supporting Statement

OMB Control No. 1557-0314

A. Justification


  1. Circumstances that make the collection necessary:


Section 1473(p) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act1 provides that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) shall establish and operate a national hotline (ASC Hotline) to receive complaints of non-compliance with the appraisal independence standards of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) if the ASC determines, six months after enactment of that section (i.e., January 21, 2011), that no such hotline exists. The statute requires that the ASC Hotline shall include a toll-free telephone number and an email address. Section 1473(p) further directs the ASC to refer complaints received through the ASC Hotline to the appropriate government bodies for further action, which may include referrals to the Agencies, the Federal Reserve Board (Board), the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and State agencies. On January 12, 2011, the ASC determined that a national appraisal hotline did not exist, and a notice of that determination was published in the Federal Register on January 28, 2011 (76 FR 5161). As a result, the ASC established a hotline to refer complaints to appropriate state and Federal regulators.


Representatives from the Agencies, the Board, the NCUA, and the CFPB met and established a process to facilitate the referral of complaints received through the ASC Hotline to the appropriate Federal financial institution regulatory agency or agencies. The Agencies, the Board, and the NCUA developed the Interagency Appraisal Complaint Form (IACF) to collect information necessary to take further action on the complaint. The CFPB incorporated the process into one of their existing systems.


2. Use of the Information:


The IACF was developed for use by those who wish to file a formal, written complaint that an entity subject to the jurisdiction of one or more Agencies, the Board, or the NCUA has failed to comply with the appraisal independence standards or USPAP. The IACF is designed to collect the information necessary for one or both of the Agencies, the Board, or the NCUA to take further action on a complaint from an appraiser, other individual, financial institution, or other entities. The Agencies, the Board, and the NCUA use the information to take further action on the complaint to the extent the complaint relates to an issue within their jurisdiction. The Board and the NCUA are renewing their forms separately.



3. Consideration of the use of improved information technology:


Respondents may use any method of improved technology that meets the requirements of the collection.


4. Efforts to identify duplication:


The required information is unique and is not duplicative of any other information already collected.


5. Methods used to minimize burden if the collection has a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities:


Not applicable.


6. Consequences to the Federal program if the collection were conducted less frequently:


Collecting the information less frequently would prevent the Agencies from implementing Section 1473(p) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.2


7. Special Circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with 5 CFR part 1320:


Not applicable.


8. Efforts to consult with persons outside the agency:


On December 4, 2015, the Agencies published a notice regarding the collection for 60 days of comment, 80 FR 75896. No comments were received.

9. Payment or gift to respondents:

Not applicable.


10. Any assurance of confidentiality:


The information collection request will be kept private to the extent permitted by law.


11. Justification for questions of a sensitive nature:


Not applicable.




12. Burden estimate:


Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,500.

Estimated Burden per Response: 0.5 hours.

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 750 hours.


Cost of Hour Burden


750 hours x $101 = $75,750.


To estimate average hourly wages we reviewed data from May 2014 for wages (by industry and occupation) from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for depository credit intermediation (NAICS 522100). To estimate compensation costs associated with the rule, we use $101 per hour, which is based on the average of the 90th percentile for seven occupations adjusted for inflation (2 percent), plus an additional 30 percent to cover private sector benefits. Thirty percent represents the average private sector costs of employee benefits.


13. Estimate of total annual costs to respondents (excluding cost of hour burden in Item #12):


14. Estimate of annualized costs to the Federal government:


Not applicable.


15. Change in burden:


Prior Burden: 1,000 hours.

Current Burden: 750 hours.

Change: -250


The decrease in burden is due to the decrease in the number of regulated entities.


16. Information regarding collections whose results are to be published for statistical use:


There are no publications.


17. Reasons for not displaying OMB approval expiration date:

Nhe cy icy is not seekingn date ot applicable.


18. Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions


There are no exceptions to the certification.





B. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods


Not applicable.


1 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act section 1473, Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, July 21, 2010; 12 U.S.C. 3351(i).

2 Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, July 2010.

4


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Authorjuanmanuel.vilela
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-24

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy