Document
Abt Single-Sided Body Template
ICR 201606-0970-006 · OMB 0970-0462 · Object 65615501.
This document may belong to an older filing. More recent activity for OMB 0970-0462:
Document Viewer [docx]
Document Metadata
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
|---|---|
| File Title | Abt Single-Sided Body Template |
| Keywords | Single-Sided, body, Templates |
| Author | Katheleen Linton |
| Last Modified By | Writer |
| File Modified | 2015-05-11 |
| File Created | 2026-11-02 |
| Conversion State | complete |
Extracted Text
Attachment A: References Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). National Compensation Survey: Average hourly wage of college teachers, social scientists, legislators, and public administration officials. Cantor, D., O'Hare, B. C., & O'Connor, K. S. (2008). The Use of Monetary Incentives to Reduce Nonresponse in Random Digit Dial Telephone Surveys. Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, 471-498. John Wiley and Sons. Church, A. H. (1993). Estimating the effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(1), 62-79. Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Clarke, M., DiGuiseppi, C., Pratap, S., Wentz, R., and Kwan, I. 2002. Increasing Response Rates to Postal Questionnaires: Systematic Review. British Medical Journal 324:1883-85. Fein, D., & Beecroft, E. (2006). College as a job advancement strategy: final report on the New Visions Self-Sufficiency and Lifelong Learning Project. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc. Gibson, C. M. (2003). Privileging the participant: The importance of sub-group analysis in social welfare evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation 24 (4): 443-69. Matus-Grossman, L., & Gooden, S. (2002). Students' perspectives on juggling work, family, and college. New York, NY: MDRC. Michalopoulos, C., & Schwartz, C. (2001). What works best for whom: impacts of 20 welfare-to-work programs by subgroup. New York, NY: MDRC. Peck, Laura R. (2007). “What are the Effects of Welfare Sanction Policies? Or, Using Propensity Scores as a Subgroup Indicator to Learn More from Social Experiments.” American Journal of Evaluation, 28(3), 256-274. Singer, E., Van Hoewyk, J., & Maher, M. P. (2000). Experiments with Incentives in Telephone Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(2), 171-188. Yammarino, F. J., Skinner, S. J., & Childers, T. L. (1991). Understanding Mail Survey Response Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(4), 613-639.