Alaska Region Gear Identification Requirements

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Request for Replacement of IFQ Sablefish Pot Gear Tags or Lost Gear Affidavit	Form	Unchanged	Available
Request for IFQ Sablefish Pot Gear Tags	Form	Unchanged	Available
0353 resub Supporting Statement (BF42) 110416.docx	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2016-11-04	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
4332	Groundfish Hook-and-line marker buoys		Unchanged
220854	Marking of longline pot gear		Unchanged
220852	Request for Replacement of IFQ Sablefish Pot Gear Tags or Lost Gear Affidavit	Form	Unchanged
220849	Request for IFQ Sablefish Pot Gear Tags	Form	Unchanged

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0648-0353	ICR Reference No: 201611-0648-004
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201603-0648-020
Agency/Subagency: DOC/NOAA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Alaska Region Gear Identification Requirements
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 01/04/2017
	Date Received in OIRA: 11/04/2016
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	04/30/2017	04/30/2017	04/30/2017
Responses	7,360	0	7,350
Time Burden (Hours)	1,841	0	1,225
Cost Burden (Dollars)	11,310	0	9,800

---

Abstract: Fishermen have proposed using longline pot gear to protect captured sablefish from whale depredation. Depredation negatively impacts the sablefish IFQ fleet through reduced catch rates and increased operating costs. Depredation negatively impacts whales through increased risk of vessel strike, gear entanglement, and altered foraging strategies. Depredation also increases sablefish mortality and the uncertainty of sablefish abundance indicies. Potential benefits of longline pot gear for sablefish fishing include: mitigation of whale interaction with fishing gear, reduced mortality of seabirds, reduced bycatch of non-target fish species, reduced overall halibut mortality when targeting sablefish, and better accounting of total sablefish fishing mortality. Using longline pots versus single pots will maximize fishing efficiency and ex-vessel value of the fishery. Single pots are heavy and their deployment results in lost gear and resultant ghost fishing. Handling of lighter pot longline gear enhances crew safety, particularly on smaller vessels. Fishermen who voluntarily adopt the use of pot longline gear will face some additional recordkeeping and reporting requirements. The owners of vessels on which pot longline gear is used must register to receive pot tags and must submit an affidavit in order to receive a replacement for lost tags.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 94 - 265 303 Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
0648-BF42	Final or interim final rulemaking	81 FR 95435	12/28/2016

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 4

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Groundfish Hook-and-line marker buoys
Request for IFQ Sablefish Pot Gear Tags	NA	Request for IFQ Sablefish Pot Gear Tags
Request for Replacement of IFQ Sablefish Pot Gear Tags or Lost Gear Affidavit	NA	Pot tag replacement
Marking of longline pot gear

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	7,360	7,350	0	10	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	1,841	1,225	0	3	613	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	11,310	9,800	0	1,510	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Changing Regulations

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: Program changes Request for Pot Tags [new] an increase of 4 respondents, 4 instead of 0 an increase of 4 responses, 4 instead of 0 an increase of 1 hour, 1 hr instead of 0 hr an increase of $ 37 personnel cost, $37 instead of $ 0 an increase of $ 1,470 miscellaneous cost, $ 1,470 instead of $ 0 Replace Pot Tags [new] an increase of 2 respondents and responses, 2 instead of 0 an increase of 1 hour, 1 hr instead of 0 hr an increase of $37 personnel cost, $37 instead of $ 0 Longline Pot Marker Buoys [new] an increase of 4 respondents and responses, 4 instead of 0 an increase of 1 hour, 1 hr instead of 0 hr an increase of $ 37 personnel cost, $ 37 instead of $ 0 an increase of $ 40 miscellaneous cost, $ 40 instead of $ 0 Adjustment Groundfish Marker Buoys an increase of 613 hours, 1,838 hr instead of 1,225 hr an increase of $ 15,320 personnel cost, $ 27,570 instead of $ 12,250

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $185

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 11/04/2016

---