Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Office of Enforcement’s Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) Program
Participant Questionnaire
Please help us assess the NRC’s ADR Program by:
Answering the following questions and
Returning this questionnaire to the: NRC Office of Enforcement’s ADR Program, [email protected].
Questions? Please contact Nicole Coleman, 301-287-9007
Check the appropriate box that best answers each question.
Select the point in the process that you entered into ADR.
□ Early ADR
□ Enforcement ADR (Prior to a predecisional enforcement conference)
□ Post Enforcement Action□
What was your role in this case?
□ Employee (current/former/prospective)
□ Licensee/Contractor (current/former/prospective)
□ Representative for Employee
□ Representative for Licensee/Contractor
□ Other (Please specify: ___________________)
Were you represented by legal counsel? □ YES □ NO
Have you participated in mediations prior to this one? □ YES □ NO
This case: □ Settled □ Did not settled
Turn page to complete questionnaire.
OMB NO. 3150-0217 EXPIRES: January 31, 2017
The estimated burden to respond to this voluntary information collection is 5 minutes. The information provided will be used to determine areas of improvement for the ADR program. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person not required to respond to, the information collection.
How satisfied were you with: (CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX)
I. Case Management Process |
||||
|
Unsatisfied |
Neutral |
Satisfied |
|
The time it took to resolve the concern. |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
The effectiveness of case administration and scheduling. |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
The amount of aid and respect given by the program administrator. |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
The program administrator’s performance overall. |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. Mediator’s Performance |
||||
|
Unsatisfied |
Neutral |
Satisfied |
|
The neutrality of the mediator (Did they remain impartial throughout the process?) |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
The tone the mediator established and maintained during the process. |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
The mediator’s performance overall. |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. Mediation Session and Process |
||||
|
Unsatisfied |
Neutral |
Satisfied |
|
The resolution of your concerns. |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
The fairness of the mediation process. |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
The opportunity to share your views on the matter. |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
The control you had over the outcome. |
□ |
□ |
□ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would you use the ADR process in the future? |
□ Yes |
□ No |
□ Possibly |
|
Do you have any suggestions to help the mediator and/or program administrator improve their performance? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have any general comments that would assist the NRC in improving its ADR program? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Coleman, Nicole |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-23 |