| Noridian Redeterminations Feedback Survey FCG IA number: 30628
 | 
 | 
	
		| 
 | 
	
		| Question Text | Answer Text | 
 | 
	
		| Q1. Rate your experience with the redetermination process. | Start rating ( 5 stars) | 
 | 
	
		| Q2. In the last six months, have you submitted a redetermination (appeal) request? | Yes | 
 | 
	
		| No | 
 | 
	
		| Q2a. Approximately how many requests have you submitted during this timeframe? | None | skip logic to target only those answering "yes" | 
	
		| Less than 50 | 
 | 
	
		| 51-250 | 
 | 
	
		| 250 or more | 
 | 
	
		| Q3. Redeterminations (Appeals) recently implemented a new process to call for additional documentation. Do you feel this initiative increased the ease of redeterminations and/or reduced provider burden? | I have not received a call. | 
 | 
	
		| I have not received a call, but I feel this would reduce provider burden. | 
 | 
	
		| I have received a call, and I do find them valuable/helpful. | 
 | 
	
		| I have received a call, but I do not find them helpful/valuable. | 
 | 
	
		| Q3a. Why are they not helpful/valuable? | (Open ended question) | Skip logic. If previous question was answered with "I have received a call, but I do not find them helpful/valuable" ask: | 
	
		| Q4. Rate the clarity of redetermination (appeal) decision explanations. | Start rating ( 5 stars) | 
 | 
	
		| Q5. Rate your redetermination functionality experience within Noridian Medicare Portal (NMP). | Start rating ( 5 stars) | 
 | 
	
		| Q6. What additional redetermination functionalities would you like to see offered within the Noridian Medicare Portal (NMP)? | (Open ended question) | 
 | 
	
		| Q7. Overall, you are satified with your experience using the "INSERT APPLICABLE WEBSITE SECTION HERE" section of our website. | Start rating ( 5 stars) | 
 | 
	
		| Q7a. Provide suggestions on how it could be improved. | (Open ended question) Apply skip logic feature | 
 |