Consolidated State Performance Report Part I and II

Consolidated State Performance Report Renewal (Part 1 and Part 2)

SY2018-19_SY2019-20_CSPR_Part_II_081319 _CLEAN

Consolidated State Performance Report Part I and II

OMB: 1810-0724

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf




CONSOLIDATED STATE PERFORMANCE REPORT

PART II



School Years 2018-19 and 2019-20







Due TBD


The Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) is the required annual reporting tool for each State, the Bureau of Indian Education, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico as authorized under Section 83031 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015(ESSA)2.




Paperwork Burden Statement


According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1810-0724. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 35.00 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain a benefit under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4537. If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission of this form, write directly to: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202.

Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATE PERFORMANCE REPORT 1

PART II 1

How to Use this Document

2.1 ACCOUNTABILITY 5

2.1.1 School Performance on Accountability Indicators New-ESS! 5

2.1.2 Schools Identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement New-ESS! 5

2.1.3 Schools Implementing Targeted Support and Improvement Plans New-ESS! 5

2.1.4 Section 1003 of the ESEA School Improvement Funds 6

2.1.4.1 Section 1003 of the ESEA Allocations to LEAs 6

2.1.4.2 Section 1003 of the ESEA Allocations to Schools New-ESS! 6

2.2 GRADUATION RATES AND POSTSECONDARY ENROLLMENT 7

2.2.1 Four Year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates Revised60! 7

2.2.2 Postsecondary Enrollment New-ESS! 8

2.3 TITLE I, PART A PROGRAM PARTICIPATION 9

2.3.1 Student Participation in Public Title I, Part A by Special Services or Programs 9

2.3.2 Student Participation in Public Title I, Part A by Racial/Ethnic Group 9

2.3.3 Student Participation in Title I, Part A by Grade Level 10

2.4 EDUCATION OF MIGRATORY CHILDREN 11

2.4.1 Migratory Child Counts 11

2.4.1.1 Category 1 Child Count (Eligible Migratory Children) 12

2.4.1.2 Category 1 Child Count Increases/Decreases 13

2.4.1.3 Birth through Two Child Count 13

2.4.2 Category 2 Child Count (Eligible Migratory Children Served by the MEP During the Summer/ Intersession Term) 14

2.4.2.1 Category 2 Child Count Increases/Decreases 15

2.4.2.2 Birth through Two Eligible Migratory Children Served by the MEP During the Summer/Intersession Term 15

2.4.3 Child Count Calculation and Validation Procedures 15

2.4.3.1 Methods Used to Count Children 15

2.4.3.2 Quality Control Processes Revised30! 16

2.4.4 Eligible Migratory Children 18

2.4.4.1 Priority for Services 18

2.4.4.2 English Learners (ELs) 19

2.4.4.3 Children with Disabilities (IDEA) 19

2.4.4.4 Qualifying Arrival Date (QAD) 20

2.4.5 Academic Status 21

2.4.5.1 Dropouts 21

2.4.5.2 HSED (High School Equivalency Diploma) 21

2.4.6 MEP Services - During the Performance Period 22

2.4.6.1 Priority for Services – During the Performance Period 23

2.4.6.2 Continuation of Services – During the Performance Period 23

2.4.6.3 Instructional Service – During the Performance Period 24

2.4.6.4 Type of Instructional Service – During the Performance Period 25

2.4.6.5 Support Services with Breakout for Counseling Services – During the Performance Period 26

2.4.7 School Data during the Regular School Year 27

2.4.7.1 Schools and Enrollment – During the Regular School Year 27

2.4.7.2 Schools Where MEP Funds Were Consolidated in SWPs – During the Regular School Year 27

2.5 PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH WHO ARE NEGLECTED, DELINQUENT, OR AT RISK 28

2.5.1 State Agency Title I, Part D Programs and Facilities – Subpart 1 29

2.5.1.1 Programs and Facilities - Subpart 1 29

2.5.1.2 Programs and Facilities That Reported - Subpart 1 29

2.5.1.3 Students Served – Subpart 1 30

2.5.1.4 Academic, Career and Technical Outcomes While in the State Agency Program/Facility or Within 90 Calendar Days after Exit 32

2.5.2 Academic Performance – Subpart 1 34

2.5.2.1 Academic Performance in Reading – Subpart 1 34

2.5.2.2 Academic Performance in Mathematics – Subpart 1 35

2.5.3 LEA Title I, Part D Programs and Facilities – Subpart 2 35

2.5.3.1 Programs and Facilities – Subpart 2 35

2.5.3.2 Programs and Facilities That Reported - Subpart 2 36

2.5.3.3 Students Served – Subpart 2 36

2.5.3.4 Academic, Career and Technical Outcomes While in the LEA Program/Facility or Within 90 Calendar Days After Exit 38

2.5.3.5 Academic Performance – Subpart 2 41

2.6   STUDENT SUPPORT AND ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT GRANTS (TITLE IV, PART A) New60! 42

2.7   FUNDING TRANSFERABILITY FOR STATE AND LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES (TITLE V, PART A) Revised60! 42

2.7.1  State Transferability of Funds 42

2.7.2  Local Educational Agency (LEA) Transferability of Funds 43

2.7.3      LEA Funds Transfers 43

2.8 RURAL EDUCATION ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM (REAP) Revised60! 44

2.8.1 LEA Use of Rural Low-Income Schools Program (RLIS) (Title V, Part B, Subpart 2) Grant Funds 44

2.8.2 RLIS Objectives and Outcomes 44

2.8.3 RLIS Technical Assistance 45

2.8.4 RLIS Subgrant Award Determination 45

45

2.8.5 RLIS State Administrative Funds 46

2.8.6 RLIS LEAs Awarded Funds 46

2.8.7 Small, Rural School Achievement (SRSA) Program, Alternative Fund Use Authority (AFUA) 46


Shape1

How to Use this Document


There are three documents included in the CPSR collection package to update the currently approved CSPR (1810-0724). The CSPR is being updated to align with the reporting requirements of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act, which became law in December 2015. The three documents are:


  1. SY 2017-18 CSPR Part I: A complete listing of the items included in the currently approved package and the proposed changes.


  1. SY 2017-18 CSPR Part II (this document): A complete listing of the items included in the currently approved package and the proposed changes.


  1. Response to 60-day Comments: Contains the details of the comments received during the 60-day public comment period and related responses.



This document contains the details of the data that are collected from state educational agencies (SEAs). The CSPR data are collected as part of the EDFacts Submission System (ESS) and the CSPR data collection system. The data collected through ESS are already approved through OMB control number 1850-0925.


This document contains the following changes from the currently approved CSPR (1810-0724):


  1. Items marked as New60! are new items from the currently approved CSPR


  1. Items marked as Revised60! are revised from the currently approved CSPR and those marked as Revised30! are revised from the 60-day package.


  1. Items marked with a current EDFacts file specification (ex. “FS185”) already have approval through the EDFacts OMB Collection Package (1850-0925).






2.1 ACCOUNTABILITY


2.1.1 School Performance on Accountability Indicators


The following indicators are collected through ESS and compiled into a report via the EDFacts Reporting System (ERS) and will be posted as an accompanying report for every State:

  • LEA Name

  • NCES LEA ID

  • State LEA ID

  • School Name

  • NCES School ID

  • State School ID

  • Title I School Status - DG 22 (FS129)

  • Academic achievement indicator status – DG 835 (FS200)

  • Other academic indicator status DG 836 (FS201)

  • Graduation rate indicator status – DG 834 (FS199)

  • Progress achieving English language proficiency indicator status - DG 837 (FS205)

  • School quality or student success indicator status – DG 838 (FS202)


2.1.2 Schools Identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement


In the table below, provide the number of schools identified for comprehensive support and improvement, overall and by reason identified.



Number of Schools

Number of Title I Schools

Number of non-Title I Schools

Lowest performing five percent of Title I schools

FSTBD



High schools failing to graduate one third or more of their students

FSTBD



Title I schools that have received additional targeted support under Section 1111(d)(2)(C) of the ESEA and that have not exited that status after a State-determined number of years

FSTBD



Total Identified

(Auto Calculated)





2.1.3 Schools Implementing Targeted Support and Improvement Plans


In the table below, provide the number of schools implementing targeted support and improvement plans.



Number of Schools

Number of Title I Schools

Number of non-Title I Schools

Schools with One or More Consistently Underperforming Subgroups of Students

FSTBD

FSTBD

FSTBD

Schools in which any Subgroup of Students, on its own, would lead to Identification Under ESEA Section 1111(c)(4)(D)(i)(I) (i.e., Schools Receiving Additional Targeted Support)

FSTBD

FSTBD

FSTBD



2.1.4 Section 1003 of the ESEA School Improvement Funds


In the tables below, provide the amount of Section 1003 funds of the ESEA allocated to each district and school.


2.1.4.1 Section 1003 of the ESEA Allocations to LEAs


For each LEA receiving a 1003(a) allocation, list the amount of the allocation. The data for this question are reported through EDFacts files and compiled in the EDEN012 "Section 1003 Allocations to LEAs and Schools" report in the EDFacts Reporting System (ERS).


Name of LEA with One or More Schools Provided Assistance through Section 1003(a) of the ESEA Funds in SY 2017-18

NCES LEA ID

Amount of LEA’s Section 1003(a) of the ESEA Allocation

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132


2.1.4.2 Section 1003 of the ESEA Allocations to Schools


For each school receiving a Section 1003(a) allocation of the ESEA, list the amount of the allocation. The data for this question are reported through EDFacts files and compiled in the EDEN012 "Section 1003 Allocations to LEAs and Schools" report in the EDFacts Reporting System (ERS).




Name of School Provided Assistance through Section 1003(a) of the ESEA Funds in SY 2017-18

NCES School ID

Amount of School’s Section1003(a) of the ESEA Allocation

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132

FS132



2.2 GRADUATION RATES AND POSTSECONDARY ENROLLMENT


This section collects data on graduation rates and rates of postsecondary enrollment.


2.2.1 Four Year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates


In the table below, provide the state’s four year adjusted cohort graduation rates for the current reporting period.


Student Group

# Students in Cohort

# of Graduates

Graduation Rate

All students

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

American Indian or Alaska Native

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

Asian or Pacific Islander

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

Asian

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

Black or African American

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

Hispanic or Latino

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

White

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

Two or more races

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

Children with disabilities (IDEA)

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

English Learners

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

Economically disadvantaged students

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

Children in foster care

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)

Children who are homeless

FS151

FS150

(Auto Calculated)


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on graduation rates:

What is the adjusted cohort graduation rate? The adjusted cohort graduation rate is described in sections 8101(23) and 8101(25) of the ESEA.

The response is limited to 8,000 characters.




2.2.2 Postsecondary Enrollment


In the table below, provide counts of students who enrolled in programs of postsecondary education during the current reporting period. If data are missing or incomplete, please explain in the comments.



# Enrolled in an IHE

# Not enrolled in an IHE

# for which data are unavailable

Total


All students

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

American Indian or Alaska Native

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

Asian or Pacific Islander

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

Asian

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

Black or African American

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

Hispanic or Latino

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

White

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

Two or more races

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

Children with disabilities (IDEA)

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

English Learners

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

Economically disadvantaged students

FS160

FS160

FS160

(Auto Calculated)

The response is limited to 8,000 characters.





2.3 TITLE I, PART A PROGRAM PARTICIPATION


The following sections collect data on students participating in Title I, Part A by various student characteristics.


2.3.1 Student Participation in Public Title I, Part A by Special Services or Programs

In the table below, provide the number of public school students served by either Public Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWPs) or Targeted Assistance programs (TAS) at any time during the regular school year for each category listed. Count each student only once in each category even if the student participated during more than one term or in more than one school or district in the State. Count each student in as many of the categories that are applicable to the student. Include pre-kindergarten through grade 12. Do not include the following individuals: (1) adult participants of adult literacy programs funded by Title I, (2) private school students participating in Title I programs operated by local educational agencies, or (3) students served in Part A local neglected programs.



Special Services or Programs

# Students Served

Children with disabilities (IDEA)

FS037

English learners

FS037

Homeless students

FS037

Migrant students

FS037


2.3.2 Student Participation in Public Title I, Part A by Racial/Ethnic Group



In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of public school students served by either Title I SWP or TAS at any time during the regular school year. Each student should be reported in only one racial/ethnic category. Include pre-kindergarten through grade 12. The total number of students served will be calculated automatically.

Do not include: (1) adult participants of adult literacy programs funded by Title I, (2) private school students participating in Title I programs operated by local educational agencies, or (3) students served in Part A local neglected programs.


Race/Ethnicity

# Students Served

American Indian or Alaska Native

FS037

Asian

FS037

Black or African American

FS037

Hispanic or Latino

FS037

Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander

FS037

White

FS037

Two or more races

FS037

Total

(Auto calculated)


2.3.3 Student Participation in Title I, Part A by Grade Level



In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of students participating in Title I, Part A programs by grade level and by type of program: Title I public TAS, Title I SWP, private school students participating in Title I programs (private), and Part A local neglected programs (local neglected). The totals column by type of program will be automatically calculated.



Age /Grade

Public TAS

Public SWP

Private

Local Neglected

Total

Age Birth through 2

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

K

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

1

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

2

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

3

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

4

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

5

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

6

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

7

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

8

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

9

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

10

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

11

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

12

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

Ungraded

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

FS134

TOTALS

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)




2.4 EDUCATION OF MIGRATORY CHILDREN


This section collects data on the Migrant Education Program (MEP) (Title I, Part C) for the performance period of September 1, 2017 through August 31, 2018. This section is composed of the following subsections:

  • Population data of eligible migratory children

  • Academic data of eligible migratory students

  • Data of migratory children served during the performance period

  • School data

  • Project data

  • Personnel data



Report a child in the age/grade category in which the child spent the majority of their time while residing in the State during the performance period.


There are two exceptions to this rule:

  1. A child who turns 3 during the performance period is reported as “Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten),” only if the child’s residency in the state was verified after the child turned 3.

  2. A child who turns 22 years of age during the performance is reported at the appropriate age/grade category for the performance period.



2.4.1 Migratory Child Counts


This section collects the Title I, Part C, MEP child counts which States are required to provide and may be used to determine the annual State allocations under Title I, Part C. The child counts should reflect the performance period of September 1, 2017 through August 31, 2018. This section also collects a report on the procedures used by States to produce true, reliable, and valid child counts.


To provide the child counts, each State Education Agency (SEA) should have implemented sufficient procedures and internal controls to ensure that it is counting only those children who are eligible for the MEP. Such procedures are important to protecting the integrity of the State's MEP because they permit the early discovery and correction of eligibility problems and thus help to ensure that only eligible migratory children are counted for funding purposes and are served. If an SEA has reservations about the accuracy of its child counts, it must disclose known data limitations to the Department, and explain how and when it will resolve data quality issues through corrective actions in the box below, which precedes Section 2.3.1.1 Category 1 Child Count.


Note: In submitting this information, the Authorizing State Official must certify that, to the best of his/her knowledge, the State has taken action to ensure that the child counts and information contained in the report are true, reliable, and valid and that any false Statement provided is subject to fine or imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1001.


FAQs on Child Count:


  1. How is “out-of-school” defined? Out-of-school means children up through age 21 who are entitled to a free public education in the State but are not currently enrolled in a K-12 institution. This term could include students who have dropped out of school, youth who are working on a high school equivalency diploma (HSED) outside of a K-12 institution, and youth who are “here-to-work” only. It would not include children in preschool, nor does it include temporary absences (e.g., summer/intersession, suspension or illness). Enrollment in school is not a condition affecting eligibility for the MEP. Therefore, out-of-school youth who meet the definition of a “migratory child” are eligible for the MEP.

  2. How is “ungraded” defined? Ungraded means the children are served in an educational unit that has no separate grades. For example, some schools have primary grade groupings that are not traditionally graded or ungraded groupings for children with learning disabilities (IDEA). In some cases, ungraded students may also include special education children (IDEA), transitional bilingual students, students working on a HSED through a K-12 institution, or those in a correctional setting. (Do not count students working on a HSED outside of a K-12 institution as ungraded; these students are counted as out-of-school youth.)

  3. How is reporting a child “in the age/grade category in which s/he spent the majority of his/her time while residing in the State” defined? A State must report a child in only one age/grade category in which the child spent the majority of his/her time while residing in the State. For example, a migratory child resided in State A for three months and in State B for nine months in SY 2017-18. While in State A, the child enrolled in ninth grade for two months and in tenth grade for one month. Therefore, State A will report the child in the age/grade category of ninth grade, because the child spent the majority of his/her time in ninth grade in State A. In State B, the child enrolled in eighth grade for one month and in ninth grade for eight months. Therefore, State B will report the child in the age/grade category of ninth grade, because the child spent the majority of his/her time in ninth grade in State B.


In the space below, discuss any concerns about the accuracy of the reported child counts or the underlying eligibility determinations on which the counts are based and how and when these concerns will be resolved.


The response is limited to 8,000 characters







2.4.1.1 Category 1 Child Count (Eligible Migratory Children)


In the table below, enter the unduplicated statewide number by age/grade of eligible migratory children age 3 through 21 who, within 3 years of making a qualifying move, resided in your State for one or more days during the performance period of September 1, 2017 through August 31, 2018. This figure includes all eligible migratory children who may or may not have received MEP services. Count a child who moved from one age/grade level to another during the performance period only once in the age/grade category in which s/he spent the majority of his/her time while residing in the State, during the performance period. The unduplicated statewide total count is calculated automatically.


Do not include children age birth through 2 years.



Age/Grade

Eligible Migratory Children

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS121

K

FS121

1

FS121

2

FS121

3

FS121

4

FS121

5

FS121

6

FS121

7

FS121

8

FS121

9

FS121

10

FS121

11

FS121

12

FS121

Ungraded

FS121

Out-of-school

FS121

Total

(Auto-calculated)

2.4.1.2 Category 1 Child Count Increases/Decreases


In the space below, explain any increases or decreases from last year in the number of students reported for Category 1 greater than 10 percent.


The response is limited to 8,000 characters.






2.4.1.3 Birth through Two Child Count


In the table below, enter the unduplicated statewide number of eligible migratory children from birth through age 2 who, within 3 years of making a qualifying move, resided in your State for one or more days during the performance period of September 1, 2017 through August 31, 2018.



Age/Grade

Eligible Migratory Children

Age Birth through 2

FS121



2.4.2 Category 2 Child Count (Eligible Migratory Children Served by the MEP During the Summer/ Intersession Term)


In the table below, enter by age/grade the unduplicated statewide number of eligible migratory children age 3 through 21 who, within 3 years of making a qualifying move, were served for one or more days in a MEP-funded project conducted during either the summer term or during intersession periods that occurred within the performance period of September 1, 2017 through August 31, 2018. Count a child who moved from one age/grade level to another during the performance period only once in the age/grade category in which s/he spent the majority of his/her time while residing in the State, during the performance period. Count a child who moved to different schools within the State and who was served in both traditional summer and year-round school intersession programs only once. The unduplicated statewide total count is calculated automatically.


Do not include:

  • Children age birth through 2 years

  • Children who received only referred services (non-MEP funded).



Age/Grade

Eligible Migratory Children Served by the MEP During the Summer/Intersession Term

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS122

K

FS122

1

FS122

2

FS122

3

FS122

4

FS122

5

FS122

6

FS122

7

FS122

8

FS122

9

FS122

10

FS122

11

FS122

12

FS122

Ungraded

FS122

Out-of-school

FS122

Total

(Auto-calculated)


2.4.2.1 Category 2 Child Count Increases/Decreases


In the space below, explain any increases or decreases from last year in the number of students reported for Category 2 greater than 10 percent.


The response is limited to 8,000 characters.







2.4.2.2 Birth through Two Eligible Migratory Children Served by the MEP During the Summer/Intersession Term   


In the table below, enter the unduplicated statewide number of eligible migratory children from age birth through 2 who, within 3 years of making a qualifying move, were served for one or more days in a MEP-funded project conducted during either the summer term or during intersession periods that occurred within the performance period of September 1, 2017 through August 31, 2018.  Count a child who moved to different schools within the State and who was served in both traditional summer and year-round school intersession programs only once.


Do not include:

  • Children who received only referred services (non-MEP funded).


Age/Grade

Eligible Migratory Children Served by the MEP During the Summer/Intersession Term

Age Birth through 2

FS122


2.4.3 Child Count Calculation and Validation Procedures


The following questions request information on the State’s MEP child count calculation and validation procedures.

2.4.3.1 Methods Used to Count Children

In the space below, please describe the procedures and processes at the State level used to ensure all eligible children, ages 3-21 are reported. In particular, describe how the State includes and counts only:

  • The unduplicated count of eligible migratory children, ages 3-21. Only include children two years of age whose residency in the state has been verified after turning three.

  • Children who met the program eligibility criteria (e.g., were within 3 years of a qualifying move, engaged or had parents engage in migratory agricultural or fishing work, and were entitled to a free public education through grade 12 in the State, or preschool children below the age and grade level at which the agency provides free public education). Children who were resident in your State for at least 1 day during the performance period (September 1 through August 31).

  • Children who graduated from high school or attained a High School Equivalency Diploma (HSED) during the performance period and ensures that these children are not counted in the subsequent performance period’s child count.

  • Children who—in the case of Category 2—were served for one or more days in a MEP-funded project conducted during either the summer term or during intersession periods.

  • Children once per age/grade level for each child count category.

  • Children who had an SEA approved Certificate of Eligibility (COE) and were entered in the State’s migratory student database.


The response is limited to 8,000 characters.







Does the State ensure that the system that transmits migrant data to the Department accurately accounts for all the migratory children in every EDFacts data file? See the Office of Migrant Education’s CSPR Rating Instrument for the criteria needed to address this question. Please respond in the table below.


Accuracy of EDFacts Data Files

Yes

No

The State deployed a process that ensured that it transmits accurate migrant data to the Department in every required EDFacts data file.


Yes


No



Use of MSIX to Verify Data Quality

Yes

No

Does the State use data in the Migrant Student Information Exchange (MSIX) to verify the quality of migrant data?


Yes


No


If MSIX is utilized, please explain how.


The response is limited to 8,000 characters.






2.4.3.2 Quality Control Processes


In the space below, describe the results of any re-interview processes used by the SEA during the performance period to test the accuracy of the State’s MEP eligibility determinations.


Results

#

The number of eligibility determinations sampled.


The number of eligibility determinations sampled for which a re-interview was completed.


The number of eligibility determinations sampled for which a re-interview was completed and the child was found eligible.




Procedures

What was the most recent year that the MEP conducted independent prospective re-interviews (i.e., interviewers were neither SEA or LEA staff members responsible for administering or operating the MEP, nor any other persons who worked on the initial eligibility determinations being tested)? If independent prospective re-interviews were not administered in any of the three performance periods, please provide an explanation in the “Comment” row at the end of this table.

SY 2017-18

SY 2016-17

SY 2015-16


Comment:





FAQ on independent prospective re-interviews:


  1. What are independent prospective re-interviews? Independent prospective re-interviews allow confirmation of your State’s eligibility determinations and the accuracy of the numbers of migratory children in your State reports. Independent prospective interviews should be conducted at least once every three years by an independent interviewer, performed on the current year’s identified migratory children.


Obtaining Data from Families

Yes

No

Check the applicable box to indicate how the re-interviews were conducted:

  • Face-to-face re-interviews

  • Phone Interviews

  • Both



Was there a protocol for verifying all information used in making the original eligibility determination?


Yes


No

Were re-interviewers independent from the original interviewers?


Yes


No


If you did conduct independent re-interviews in this reporting period, describe how you ensured that the process was independent. Only enter a response if your State completed independent re-interviews in SY 2017-18.



The response is limited to 8,000 characters.







In the space below, refer to the results of any re-interview processes used by the SEA, and if any of the migratory children were found ineligible, describe those corrective actions or improvements that will be made by the SEA to improve the accuracy of its MEP eligibility determinations.


The response is limited to 8,000 characters.







In the space below, please respond to the following question:


Does the state collect all the required data elements and data sections on the National Certificate of Eligibility (COE)?


□Yes


□ No



2.4.4 Eligible Migratory Children



2.4.4.1 Priority for Services

In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of eligible migratory children who have been classified as having “Priority for Services.” The total is calculated automatically.

Age/Grade

Priority for Services During the Performance Period

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS121

K

FS121

1

FS121

2

FS121

3

FS121

4

FS121

5

FS121

6

FS121

7

FS121

8

FS121

9

FS121

10

FS121

11

FS121

12

FS121

Ungraded

FS121

Out-of-school

FS121

Total

(Auto-calculated)



FAQ on priority for services:

Who is classified as having “priority for service?” Migratory children who have made a qualifying move within the previous 1-year period and who1) are failing, or most at risk of failing to meet challenging State academic standards, or 2) have dropped out of school.

2.4.4.2 English Learners (ELs)

In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of eligible migratory children who are also ELs. The total is calculated automatically.



Age/Grade

ELs During the Performance Period

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS121

K

FS121

1

FS121

2

FS121

3

FS121

4

FS121

5

FS121

6

FS121

7

FS121

8

FS121

9

FS121

10

FS121

11

FS121

12

FS121

Ungraded

FS121

Out-of-school

FS121

Total

(Auto-calculated)



2.4.4.3 Children with Disabilities (IDEA)

In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of eligible migratory children who are also children with disabilities (IDEA) under Part B or Part C of the IDEA. The total is calculated automatically.

Age/Grade

Children with Disabilities (IDEA) During the Performance Period

Age Birth through 2

FS121

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS121

K

FS121

1

FS121

2

FS121

3

FS121

4

FS121

5

FS121

6

FS121

7

FS121

8

FS121

9

FS121

10

FS121

11

FS121

12

FS121

Ungraded

FS121

Out-of-school

FS121

Total

(Auto-calculated)

2.4.4.4 Qualifying Arrival Date (QAD)

In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of eligible migratory children whose QAD occurred within 12 months from the last day of the performance period, August 31, 2018 (i.e., QAD during the performance period). The total is calculated automatically.

Age/Grade

QAD During the Performance Period

Age Birth through 2

FS121

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS121

K

FS121

1

FS121

2

FS121

3

FS121

4

FS121

5

FS121

6

FS121

7

FS121

8

FS121

9

FS121

10

FS121

11

FS121

12

FS121

Ungraded

FS121

Out-of-school

FS121

Total

(Auto-calculated)

2.4.5 Academic Status


The following questions collect data about the academic status of eligible migratory students.

2.4.5.1 Dropouts

In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of eligible migratory students who dropped out of school. The total is calculated automatically.



Grade

Dropouts During the Performance Period

7

FS032

8

FS032

9

FS032

10

FS032

11

FS032

12

FS032

Ungraded

FS032

Total

(Auto-calculated)

FAQ on Dropouts:

How is “dropouts” defined? The term used for students, who, (1) were enrolled in a school for at least one day during the 2017-18 performance period, (2) were not enrolled at the beginning of the current (2018-19) performance period, (3) who have not graduated from high school or completed a State- or district-approved educational program, and (4) who do not meet any of the following exclusionary conditions:  (a) transfer to another school district, private school or State- or district-approved educational program (including correctional or health facility programs), (b) temporary absence due to suspension or school-excused illness or (c) death. Students who dropped out-of-school prior to the 2017-18 performance period should not be reported in this item.

2.4.5.2 HSED (High School Equivalency Diploma)


In the table below, provide the total unduplicated number of eligible migratory students who obtained a High School Equivalency Diploma (HSED) by passing a high school equivalency test that your state accepts (e.g. GED, HiSET, TASC).



Obtain HSED

#

Obtained a HSED in your State During the Performance Period







2.4.6 MEP Services - During the Performance Period


The following questions collect data about MEP services provided to migratory children during the performance period.


FAQ on Services:

What are services? Services are a subset of all allowable activities that the MEP can provide through its programs and projects. “Services” are those educational or educationally related activities that: (1) directly benefit a migratory child; (2) address a need of a migratory child consistent with the SEA’s comprehensive needs assessment and service delivery plan; (3) are grounded in scientifically based research or, in the case of support services, are a generally accepted practice; and (4) are designed to enable the program to meet its measurable outcomes and contribute to the achievement of the State’s performance targets/annual measurable objectives. Activities related to identification and recruitment activities, parental involvement, program evaluation, professional development, or administration of the program are examples of allowable activities that are not considered services. Other examples of an allowable activity that would not be considered a service would be the one-time act of providing instructional packets to a child or family, and handing out leaflets to migratory families on available reading programs as part of an effort to increase the reading skills of migratory children. Although these are allowable activities, they are not services because they do not meet all of the criteria above.


In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of eligible migratory children who received MEP-funded instructional or support services at any time during the performance period. Do not count the number of times an individual child received a service intervention. The total number of students served is calculated automatically.


Age/Grade

Served During the Performance Period

Age Birth through 2

FS054

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS054

K

FS054

1

FS054

2

FS054

3

FS054

4

FS054

5

FS054

6

FS054

7

FS054

8

FS054

9

FS054

10

FS054

11

FS054

12

FS054

Ungraded

FS054

Out-of-school

FS054

Total

(Auto-calculated)


2.4.6.1 Priority for Services – During the Performance Period


In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of eligible migratory children who have been classified as having “priority for services” and who received MEP-funded instructional or support services during the performance period. The total is calculated automatically.


Age/Grade

Priority for Services During the Performance Period

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS054

K

FS054

1

FS054

2

FS054

3

FS054

4

FS054

5

FS054

6

FS054

7

FS054

8

FS054

9

FS054

10

FS054

11

FS054

12

FS054

Ungraded

FS054

Out-of-school

FS054

Total

(Auto-calculated)


2.4.6.2 Continuation of Services – During the Performance Period

In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of migratory children who received MEP-funded instructional or support services during the performance period under the continuation of services authority Section 1304(e)(2–3). Do not include children served under Section 1304(e)(1), which are children whose eligibility expired during the school term. The total is calculated automatically.


Age/Grade

Continuation of Services During the Performance Period

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS054

K

FS054

1

FS054

2

FS054

3

FS054

4

FS054

5

FS054

6

FS054

7

FS054

8

FS054

9

FS054

10

FS054

11

FS054

12

FS054

Ungraded

FS054

Out-of-school

FS054

Total

(Auto-calculated)


FAQ on Continuation of Services:

What is Continuation of Services? The “continuation of services” provision found in Section 1304(e) of the ESEA provides that: (1) a child who ceases to be a migratory child during a school term shall be eligible for services until the end of such term; (2) a child who is no longer a migratory child may continue to receive services for one additional school year, but only if comparable services are not available through other programs; and (3) secondary school students who were eligible for services in secondary school may continue to be served through credit accrual programs until graduation.


2.4.6.3 Instructional Service – During the Performance Period

In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of eligible migratory children who received any type of MEP-funded instructional service during the performance period. Include children who received instructional services provided by either a teacher or a paraprofessional. Children should be reported only once regardless of the frequency with which they received a service intervention. The total is calculated automatically.


Age/Grade

Instructional Service During the Performance Period

Age Birth through 2

FS145

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS145

K

FS145

1

FS145

2

FS145

3

FS145

4

FS145

5

FS145

6

FS145

7

FS145

8

FS145

9

FS145

10

FS145

11

FS145

12

FS145

Ungraded

FS145

Out-of-school

FS145

Total

(Auto-calculated)


2.4.6.4 Type of Instructional Service – During the Performance Period

In the table below, provide the number of eligible migratory children reported in the table above who received MEP-funded reading instruction, mathematics instruction, or high school credit accrual during the performance period. Include children who received such instructional services provided by a teacher only. Children may be reported as having received more than one type of instructional service in the table. However, children should be reported only once within each type of instructional service that they received regardless of the frequency with which they received the instructional service. The totals are calculated automatically.


Age/Grade

Reading Instruction During the Performance Period

Mathematics Instruction During the Performance Period

High School Credit Accrual During the Performance Period

Age Birth through 2

FS145

FS145


Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS145

FS145


K

FS145

FS145


1

FS145

FS145


2

FS145

FS145


3

FS145

FS145


4

FS145

FS145


5

FS145

FS145


6

FS145

FS145


7

FS145

FS145


8

FS145

FS145

FS145

9

FS145

FS145

FS145

10

FS145

FS145

FS145

11

FS145

FS145

FS145

12

FS145

FS145

FS145

Ungraded

FS145

FS145

FS145

Out-of-school

FS145

FS145

FS145

Total

(Auto-calculated)

(Auto-calculated)

(Auto-calculated)


FAQ on Types of Instructional Services:

What is “high school credit accrual”? MEP-funded instruction, funded in whole or in part by MEP funds, in courses that accrue credits needed for high school graduation provided by a teacher for students on a regular or systematic basis, usually for a predetermined period of time. High school credit accrual includes correspondence courses taken by a student under the supervision of a teacher. High school credit accrual may include the age/grade categories of Grade 8 through Grade 12. NOTE: Children receiving a MEP-funded high school credit accrual service should be reported only once, regardless of frequency.

2.4.6.5 Support Services with Breakout for Counseling Services – During the Performance Period


In the table below, in the column titled Support Services, provide the unduplicated number of eligible migratory children who received any MEP-funded support service during the performance period. In the column titled Breakout of Counseling Services During the Performance Period, provide the unduplicated number of eligible migratory children who received a counseling service during the performance period. Children should be reported only once in each column regardless of the frequency with which they received a support service intervention. The totals are calculated automatically.


Age/Grade

Support Services During the Performance Period

Breakout of Counseling Services During the Performance Period

Age Birth through 2

FS145

FS145

Age 3 through 5 (not Kindergarten)

FS145

FS145

K

FS145

FS145

1

FS145

FS145

2

FS145

FS145

3

FS145

FS145

4

FS145

FS145

5

FS145

FS145

6

FS145

FS145

7

FS145

FS145

8

FS145

FS145

9

FS145

FS145

10

FS145

FS145

11

FS145

FS145

12

FS145

FS145

Ungraded

FS145

FS145

Out-of-school

FS145

FS145

Total

(Auto-calculated)

(Auto-calculated)


FAQs on Support Services:

  1. What are support services? These MEP-funded educationally-related services are provided to students. These services include, but are not limited to, health, nutrition, counseling, and social services for migratory children; necessary educational supplies, and transportation. Activities related to identification and recruitment, parental involvement, professional development, program evaluation, and the one-time act of providing instructional or informational packets to a child or family does not constitute a support service.

  2. What are counseling services? Services to help a student to better identify and enhance his or her educational, personal, or occupational potential; relate his or her abilities, emotions, and aptitudes to educational and career opportunities; utilize his or her abilities in formulating realistic plans; and achieve satisfying personal and social development. These activities take place between one or more counselors and one or more students as counselees, or between students and students in MEP peer-to-peer counseling activities, or between students and MEP-funded staff members. The services can also help the child address life problems or personal crisis that result from the culture of migrancy. NOTE: Children who receive a MEP-funded counseling service should be reported only once, regardless of frequency.


2.4.7 School Data during the Regular School Year


The following questions are about the enrollment of eligible migratory children in schools during the regular school year.

2.4.7.1 Schools and Enrollment – During the Regular School Year


In the table below, provide the number of public schools that enrolled eligible migratory children at any time during the regular school year. Schools include public schools that serve school age (e.g., grades K through 12) children. Also, provide the number of eligible migratory children who were enrolled in those schools. Since more than one school in a State may enroll the same migratory child at some time during the regular school year, the number of children may include duplicates.



Schools

#

Number of schools that enrolled eligible migratory children

FS165

Number of eligible migratory children enrolled in those schools

FS165


2.4.7.2 Schools Where MEP Funds Were Consolidated in SWPs – During the Regular School Year



In the table below, provide the number of schools where MEP funds were consolidated in an SWP. Also, provide the number of eligible migratory children who were enrolled in those schools at any time during the regular school year. Since more than one school in a State may enroll the same migratory child at some time during the regular school year, the number of children may include duplicates.


Schools

#

Number of schools where MEP funds were consolidated in a schoolwide program

FS165

Number of eligible migratory children enrolled in those schools

FS165




2.5 PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH WHO ARE NEGLECTED, DELINQUENT, OR AT RISK


This section collects data on programs and facilities that serve students who are neglected, delinquent, or at risk under Title I, Part D, and characteristics about and services provided to these students.


Throughout this section:

  • Report data for the program year of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018.

  • Count programs/facilities based on how the program was classified to ED for funding purposes.

  • Do not include programs funded solely through Title I, Part A.

  • Use the definitions listed below:

    • Adult Corrections: An adult correctional institution is a facility in which persons, including persons 21 or under, are confined as a result of conviction for a criminal offense.

    • At-Risk Programs: Programs operated (through LEAs) that target students who are at risk of academic failure, dependency adjudication, or delinquency adjudication, have a drug or alcohol problem, are pregnant or parenting, have been in contact with the juvenile justice or child welfare system in the past, are at least 1 year behind the expected age/grade level, are English learners, are gang members, have dropped out of school in the past, or have a high absenteeism rate at school.

    • Juvenile Corrections: An institution for delinquent children and youth that is a public or private residential facility other than a foster home that is operated for the care of children and youth who have been adjudicated delinquent or in need of supervision. Include any programs serving adjudicated youth (including non-secure facilities and group homes) in this category.

    • Juvenile Detention Facilities: Detention facilities are shorter-term institutions that provide care to children who require secure custody pending court adjudication, court disposition, or execution of a court order, or care to children after commitment.

    • Neglected Programs: An institution for neglected children and youth is a public or private residential facility, other than a foster home, that is operated primarily for the care of children who have been committed to the institution or voluntarily placed under applicable State law due to abandonment, neglect, or death of their parents or guardians.

    • Other: Any other programs, not defined above, that receive Title I, Part D funds and serve non-adjudicated children and youth.



2.5.1 State Agency Title I, Part D Programs and Facilities – Subpart 1


The following questions collect data on Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 programs and facilities.


2.5.1.1 Programs and Facilities - Subpart 1


In the table below, provide the number of State agency Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 programs and facilities that serve neglected and delinquent students and the average length of stay by program/facility type, for these students. Report only programs and facilities that received Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 funding during the reporting year. Count a facility once if it offers only one type of program. If a facility offers more than one type of program (i.e., it is a multipurpose facility), then count each of the separate programs. The total number of programs/facilities will be automatically calculated. Below the table is a FAQ about the data collected in this table.


State Program/Facility Type

# Programs/Facilities

Average Length of Stay in Days

Neglected programs



Juvenile detention



Juvenile corrections



Adult corrections



Other



Total

(Auto calculated)





FAQ on Programs and Facilities - Subpart I:

How is average length of stay calculated? The average length of stay should be weighted by number of students and should include the number of days, per visit, for each student enrolled during the reporting year, regardless of entry or exit date. Multiple visits for students who entered more than once during the reporting year can be included. The average length of stay in days should not exceed 365.

2.5.1.2 Programs and Facilities That Reported - Subpart 1


In the table below, provide the number of State agency Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 programs/facilities that reported data on neglected and delinquent students.


The total row will be automatically calculated.


State Program/Facility Type

# Reporting Data

Neglected programs


Juvenile detention


Juvenile corrections


Adult corrections


Other


Total

((Auto calculated))


2.5.1.3 Students Served – Subpart 1


In the tables below, provide the number of neglected and delinquent students served in State agency Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 programs and facilities. Report only students who received Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 services during the reporting year. In the first table, provide in row 1 the unduplicated number of students served by each program, and in row 2, the total number of students in row 1 who are long-term. In the subsequent tables provide the number of students served by disability (IDEA) and EL status, by race/ethnicity, by sex, and by age. The total number of students by race/ethnicity, by sex and by age will be automatically calculated.


# of Students Served

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Adult Corrections

Other Programs

Total Unduplicated Students Served

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

Total Long Term Students Served

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119


Provide the number of students served by special populations


Student Subgroups

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Adult Corrections

Other Programs

Children with disabilities (IDEA)

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

English Learners (ELs)

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119


Provide the number of students served by race/ethnicity.


Race/Ethnicity

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Adult Corrections

Other Programs

American Indian or Alaska Native

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

Asian

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

Black or African American

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

Hispanic or Latino

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

White

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

Two or more races

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

Total

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)


Provide the number of students served by gender.


Sex

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Adult Corrections

Other Programs

Male

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

Female

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

Total

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)


Provide the number of students served by age.


Age

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Adult Corrections

Other Programs

3 through 5

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

6

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

7

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

8

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

9

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

10

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

11

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

12

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

13

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

14

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

15

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

16

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

17

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

18

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

19

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

20

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

21

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

FS119

Total

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)


If the total number of students differs by demographics, please explain in comment box below.


This response is limited to 8,000 characters.







FAQ on Unduplicated Count:

What is an unduplicated count? An unduplicated count is one that counts students only once, even if they were admitted to a facility or program multiple times within the reporting year.


FAQ on long-term:

What is long-term? Long-term refers to students who were enrolled for at least 90 consecutive calendar days from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018.


2.5.1.4 Academic, Career and Technical Outcomes While in the State Agency Program/Facility or Within 90 Calendar Days after Exit


In the tables below, for each program type, provide the number of students who attained academic, career, and technical outcomes.

The first table includes outcomes a student is able to achieve only after exit. In this table, provide the unduplicated number of students who enrolled, or planned to enroll, in their local district school within 90 calendar days after exiting. A student may be reported only once, per program type.

The second table includes outcomes a student is able to achieve only one time. In this table, provide the unduplicated number of students who attained the listed outcomes either in the while enrolled in the State agency program/facility column (“in fac.”) or in the within 90 calendar days after exiting column. A student may be reported only once across the two time periods, per program type.

The third table includes outcomes a student may achieve more than once. In the “in fac.” column, provide the unduplicated number of students who attained academic, career and technical outcomes while enrolled in the State agency program/facility. In the “90 days after exit” column provide the unduplicated number of students who attained academic, career, and technical outcomes within 90 calendar days after exiting. If a student attained an outcome once in the program/facility and once during the 90–day transition period, that student may be reported once in each column.


Outcomes

(once per student, only after exit)

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Adult Corrections

Other Programs

# of Students Who Enrolled in their local district school 90 days after exit

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181


Outcomes

(once per student)

Neglected Programs

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Juvenile Corrections

Adult Corrections

Adult Corrections

Other Programs

Other Programs

# of Students Who

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90 days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

Earned a GED

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

Obtained high school diploma

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181









Outcomes

(once per student per time period)

Neglected Programs

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Juvenile Corrections

Adult Corrections

Adult Corrections

Other Programs

Other Programs

# of Students Who

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90 days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

Earned high school course credits

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

Enrolled in a GED program

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

Accepted and/or enrolled into post-secondary education

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

Enrolled in job training courses/programs

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

Obtained employment

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181


In the text box below, please account for any missing or incomplete data after exit.


This response is limited to 4,000 characters.

Shape2








2.5.2 Academic Performance – Subpart 1


The following questions collect data on the academic performance of neglected and delinquent long-term students served by Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 in reading and mathematics.


2.5.2.1 Academic Performance in Reading – Subpart 1


In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of long-term students served by Title I, Part D, Subpart 1, who participated in reading pre-and post-testing. Students should be reported in only one of the four change categories.


Report only information on a student’s most recent testing data. Students who were pre-tested prior to July 1, 2017, may be included if their post-test was administered during the reporting year. Students who were post-tested after the reporting year ended should be counted in the following year. Below the table is an FAQ about the data collected in this table.



Performance Data (Based on most recent pre/post-test data)

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Adult Corrections

Other Programs

Long-term students with negative grade level change from the pre- to post-test exams

FS113

FS113

FS113

FS113

FS113

Long-term students with no change in grade level from the pre- to post-test exams

FS113

FS113

FS113

FS113

FS113

Long-term students with improvement up to one full grade level from the pre- to post-test exams

FS113

FS113

FS113

FS113

FS113

Long-term students with improvement of more than one full grade level from the pre- to post-test exams

FS113

FS113

FS113

FS113

FS113

Total students pre/post-tested

FS113

FS113

FS113

FS113

FS113


FAQ on long-term students:

What is long-term? Long-term refers to students who were enrolled for at least 90 consecutive calendar days from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018.

2.5.2.2 Academic Performance in Mathematics – Subpart 1

This section is similar to 2.4.2.1. The only difference is that this section collects data on mathematics performance.


2.5.3 LEA Title I, Part D Programs and Facilities – Subpart 2


The following questions collect data on Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 programs and facilities.

2.5.3.1 Programs and Facilities – Subpart 2



In the table below, provide the number of LEA Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 programs and facilities that serve neglected and delinquent students and the yearly average length of stay by program/facility type for these students. Report only the programs and facilities that received Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 funding during the reporting year. Count a facility once if it offers only one type of program. If a facility offers more than one type of program (i.e., it is a multipurpose facility), then count each of the separate programs. The total number of programs/ facilities will be automatically calculated. Below the table is an FAQ about the data collected in this table.


LEA Program/Facility Type

# Programs/Facilities

Average Length of Stay (# days)

At-risk programs



Neglected programs



Juvenile detention



Juvenile corrections



Other



Total

(Auto calculated)



FAQ on average length of stay:

How is average length of stay calculated? The average length of stay should be weighted by number of students and should include the number of days, per visit for each student enrolled during the reporting year, regardless of entry or exit date. Multiple visits for students who entered more than once during the reporting year can be included. The average length of stay in days should not exceed 365.

2.5.3.2 Programs and Facilities That Reported - Subpart 2


In the table below, provide the number of LEA Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 programs and facilities that reported data on neglected and delinquent students.


The total row will be automatically calculated.


LEA Program/Facility Type

# Reporting Data

At-risk programs


Neglected programs


Juvenile detention


Juvenile corrections


Other


Total

(Auto calculated)


2.5.3.3 Students Served – Subpart 2


In the tables below, provide the number of neglected and delinquent students served in LEA Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 programs and facilities. Report only students who received Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 services during the reporting year. In the first table, provide in row 1 the unduplicated number of students served by each program, and in row 2, the total number of students in row 1 who are long-term. In the subsequent tables, provide the number of students served by disability (IDEA), and EL status, by race/ethnicity, by sex, and by age. The total number of students by race/ethnicity, by sex, and by age will be automatically calculated.


# of Students Served

At-Risk Programs

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Other Programs

Total Unduplicated Students Served

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

Total Long Term Students Served

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127


Provide the number of students served by special populations.


Student Subgroups

At-Risk Programs

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Other Programs

Children with disabilities (IDEA)

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

ELs

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127


Provide the number of students served by race/ethnicity.


Race/Ethnicity

At-Risk Programs

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Other Programs

American Indian or Alaska Native

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

Asian

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

Black or African American

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

Hispanic or Latino

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

White

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

Two or more races

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

Total

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)


Provide the number of students served by sex.


Sex

At-Risk Programs

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Other Programs

Male

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

Female

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

Total

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)


Provide the number of students served by age.


Age

At-Risk Programs

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Other Programs

3 through 5

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

6

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

7

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

8

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

9

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

10

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

11

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

12

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

13

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

14

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

15

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

16

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

17

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

18

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

19

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

20

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

21

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

FS127

Total

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)

(Auto calculated)


If the total number of students differs by demographics, please explain. The response is limited to 8,000 characters.


Comments:



FAQ on Unduplicated Count:

What is an unduplicated count? An unduplicated count is one that counts students only once, even if they were admitted to a facility or program multiple times within the reporting year.



FAQ on long-term:

What is long-term? Long-term refers to students who were enrolled for at least 90 consecutive calendar days from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018.


2.5.3.4 Academic, Career and Technical Outcomes While in the LEA Program/Facility or Within 90 Calendar Days After Exit


In the tables below, for each program type, provide the number of students who attained academic, career and technical outcomes.


The first table includes outcomes a student is able to achieve only after exit. In this table, provide the unduplicated number of students who enrolled, or planned to enroll, in their local district school within 90 calendar days after exiting. A student may be reported only once, per program type.


The second table includes outcomes a student is able to achieve only one time. In this table, provide the unduplicated number of students who attained the listed outcomes either in the while enrolled in the LEA program/facility column (“in fac.”) or in the within 90 calendar days after exiting column. A student may be reported only once across the two time periods, per program type.


The third table includes outcomes a student may achieve more than once. In the “in fac.” column, provide the unduplicated number of students who attained academic, career and vocational outcomes while enrolled in the LEA program/facility. In the “90 days after exit” column provide the unduplicated number of students who attained academic, career and vocational outcomes within 90 calendar days after exiting. If a student attained an outcome once in the program/facility and once during the 90 day transition period, that student may be reported once in each column.


Outcomes

(once per student, only after exit)

At-Risk Programs

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Other Programs

# of Students Who Enrolled in their local district school 90 days after exit

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181







Outcomes

(once per student)

At-Risk Programs

At-Risk Programs

Neglected Programs

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Juvenile Corrections

Other Programs

Other Programs

# of Students Who

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90 days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

Earned a GED

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

Obtained high school diploma

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181


Outcomes

(once per student per time period)

At-Risk Programs

At-Risk Programs

Neglected Programs

Neglected Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Juvenile Corrections

Other Programs

Other Programs

# of Students Who

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

In

fac.

90 days after exit

In

fac.

90

days after exit

Earned high school course credits

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

Enrolled in a GED program

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

Accepted and/or enrolled into post-secondary education

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

Enrolled in job training courses/programs

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

Obtained employment

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181

FS180/ FS181


In the text box below, please account for any missing or incomplete data after exit.


This response is limited to 4,000 characters.

Shape3







2.5.3.5 Academic Performance – Subpart 2


The following questions collect data on the academic performance of neglected and delinquent long-term students served by Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 in reading and mathematics.

2.5.3.5.1 Academic Performance in Reading – Subpart 2


In the table below, provide the unduplicated number of long-term students served by Title I, Part D, Subpart 2, who participated in reading pre- and post-testing. Students should be reported in only one of the four change categories. Reporting pre- and post-test data for at-risk students in the table below is optional.


Report only information on a student’s most recent testing data. Students who were pre-tested prior to July 1, 2017, may be included if their post-test was administered during the reporting year. Students who were post-tested after the reporting year ended should be counted in the following year. Below the table is an FAQ about the data collected in this table.



Performance Data

(Based on most recent

pre/post-test data)

At-Risk Programs

Neglected

Programs

Juvenile Detention

Juvenile Corrections

Other Programs

Long-term students with negative grade level change from the pre- to post-test exams

FS125

FS125

FS125

FS125

FS125

Long-term students with no change in grade level from the pre- to post-test exams

FS125

FS125

FS125

FS125

FS125

Long-term students with improvement up to one full grade level from the pre- to post-test exams

FS125

FS125

FS125

FS125

FS125

Long-term students with improvement of more than one full grade level from the pre- to post-test exams

FS125

FS125

FS125

FS125

FS125

Total students pre/post-tested

FS125

FS125

FS125

FS125

FS125


FAQ on long-term:

What is long-term? Long-term refers to students who were enrolled for at least 90 consecutive calendar days from July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2018.


Is reporting pre/post-test data for at-risk programs required? No, reporting pre/post-test data for at-risk students is no longer required, but States have the option to continue to collect and report it within the CSPR.


2.5.3.5.2 Academic Performance in Mathematics – Subpart 2


This section is similar to 2.5.3.5.1. The only difference is that this section collects data on mathematics performance.


2.6   STUDENT SUPPORT AND ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT GRANTS (TITLE IV, PART A) New60!


2.6.1  Funds Spent Under Title IV, Part A


This section collects data on the amount of funds spent by LEAs on the three content areas under Title IV, Part A of the ESEA. The data are reported through the Annual Performance Reporting Tool.


Content Area

Amount of Funds Spent

Well-Rounded


Safe and Healthy Students


Effective Use of Technology



2.6.2  LEAs Who Spent Funds Under Title IV, Part A Revised30!


This section collects data on the number of LEAs who spent funds by the content areas under Title IV, Part A of the ESEA. For the “Any” category, report the number of LEAs that spent funds in any of the three content areas. An LEA should be included in the count of each content area it spent funds on (i.e. an LEA may be represented in more than one content area in the table below). The data are reported through the Annual Performance Reporting Tool.


Content Area

Number of LEAs Spending Funds

Well-Rounded


Safe and Healthy Students


Effective Use of Technology


Any Content Area




2.7   FUNDING TRANSFERABILITY FOR STATE AND LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES (TITLE V, PART A) Revised60!


2.7.1  State Transferability of Funds


In the table below, indicate whether the State transferred funds under the state transferability authority.


Did the State transfer funds under the State Transferability authority of Section 5103(a) during

SY 2017-18?

YES

NO

Yes                

No


2.7.2  Local Educational Agency (LEA) Transferability of Funds


In the table below, indicate the number of LEAs that notified the State that they transferred funds under the LEA transferability authority.


LEA Transferability of Funds

#

LEAs that notified the State that they were transferring funds under the LEA Transferability authority of Section 5103(b).





2.7.3      LEA Funds Transfers


In the table below, provide the total number of LEAs that transferred funds from an eligible program to another eligible program.


Program


# LEAs Transferring Funds FROM Eligible Program

# LEAs Transferring Funds TO Eligible Program

Supporting Effective Instruction (Title II, Part A)

[1.1.]

[1.2.]

Student Support and Enrichment Grants (Title IV, Part A)

[2.1.]

[2.2.]

Improving Basic Programs Operated by LEAs (Title I, Part A)


.]

Education of Migratory Children (Title I, Part C)



Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk (Title I, Part D)



English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act (Title III, Part A)


[5.2.]

Rural Education Initiative (Title V, Part B)




In the table below provide the total amount of FY 2017 appropriated funds transferred from and to each eligible program.


Program


Total Amount of Funds Transferred FROM Eligible Program

Total Amount of Funds Transferred TO Eligible Program

Supporting Effective Instruction (Title II, Part A)

[1.1.]

[1.2.]

Student Support and Enrichment Grants (Title IV, Part A)

[2.1.]

[2.2.]

Improving Basic Programs Operated by LEAs (Title I, Part A)


.]

Education of Migratory Children (Title I, Part C)



Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk (Title I, Part D)



English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act (Title III, Part A)


[5.2.]

Rural Education Initiative (Title V, Part B)






2.8 RURAL EDUCATION ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM (REAP) Revised60!

This section collects data on the Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP) Title V, Part B, Subparts 1 and 2.


2.8.1 LEA Use of Rural Low-Income Schools Program (RLIS) (Title V, Part B, Subpart 2) Grant Funds

In the table below, provide the number of eligible LEAs that used RLIS funds during SY2017-18 for each of the listed purposes.


Purpose

# LEAs


Activities authorized under Part A of Title I



Activities authorized under Part A of Title II



Activities authorized under Title III



Activities authorized under Part A of Title IV



Parental involvement activities



2.8.2 RLIS Objectives and Outcomes


In the space below, describe the progress the State has made in meeting the objectives and outcomes for the Rural Low-Income School (RLIS) Program as described in the State’s most current Consolidated State Application. If providing quantitative data along with your narrative, please ensure all data is converted to text format.



The response is limited to 8,000 characters.






2.8.3 RLIS Technical Assistance


In the space below, describe the progress the State has made in providing technical assistance for RLIS LEA sub-grantees as described in the State’s most current Consolidated State Application. If providing quantitative data along with your narrative, please ensure all data is converted to text format.

Response is limited to 8,000 characters.

Shape4







2.8.4 RLIS Subgrant Award Determination


Please report the method the SEA used to award grants to eligible LEAs. If the SEA used a competitive process, please describe that process and include a description of the methods and criteria the SEA used to review applications, award funds to LEAs, and how the LEAs were notified of the process. If the SEA used a formula besides one based on the number of students in average daily attendance served by eligible LEAs in the State, please describe that formula, including an explanation of how this alternative formula enables the SEA to allot grant funds in a manner that serves equal or greater concentrations of children from families with incomes below the poverty line, relative to the concentration that would be served if the SEA used a formula based on the number of students in average daily attendance served by eligible LEAs in the State.


Response is limited to 8,000 characters.

Shape5







2.8.5 RLIS State Administrative Funds


In the table below, provide information on state administrative funds.


Question

Percentage

What percentage of the RLIS grant funds were retained for State-level administration?


What percentage of those funds retained for State-level administration were used specifically for technical assistance?




2.8.6 RLIS LEAs Awarded Funds

Please list the NCES LEA ID and name of each LEA that received RLIS funds and the amount each received. This information will be collected from SEAs outside of the CSPR collection tool.


NCES LEA ID

LEA Name

RLIS Award Amount























2.8.7 Small, Rural School Achievement (SRSA) Program, Alternative Fund Use Authority (AFUA)



Number

Percentage

What number and percentage of SRSA- and Dual-eligible LEAs informed their SEA of an intent to utilize SRSA’s AFUA, under Section 5211 of the ESEA.

FS131

(Auto-calculated)





1 SEC.8303. Consolidated Reporting – (a) In general: In order to simplify reporting requirements and reduce reporting burdens, the Secretary shall establish procedures and criteria under which a State educational agency, in consultation with the Governor of the State, may submit a consolidated State annual report. (b) Contents: The report shall contain information about the programs included in the report, including the performance of the State under those programs, and other matters as the Secretary determines are necessary, such as monitoring activities. (c) Replacement: The report shall replace separate individual annual reports for the programs included in the consolidated State annual report.

2 All citations to the ESEA in this document are to the ESEA, as amended by the ESSA.



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy