TUES Explanation

AttachmentK1_2016 TUES_updated 20151030.doc

Education and Human Resources Program Monitoring Data Collections

TUES Explanation

OMB: 3145-0226

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf






















Attachment K1


Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)

Monitoring System

Table of Contents



TUES: Crosswalk


Common

Collection

Categories



Questions

Award Category

Staff and Project Participant Characteristics1

Project Implementation

Characteristics2

Project Outputs3

Single

Lead Collaborative

Non-Lead Collaborative

Notes:

  • The System presents only those questions that are logically relevant to the type of award and previously answered questions. All questions pertain to the current reporting period’s participants, implementation, and outputs. All requested questions are required.


  • Three major categories drive the tailoring of the system to the award type. We have included columns to indicate these, which are:

  • Single Award

  • Lead Collaborative Award (most questions)

  • Non-Lead Collaborative Award(fewest questions)


  • For most questions respondents have the option to select a "don’t know” option or can enter "DK."


  • For most questions respondents have the option to add comments. The data elements associated with these comments are not shown in the crosswalk because the comments are entirely optional.







i. Confirm Award Information

Note: If any of the respondent’s answers in this section are inconsistent with the type of award that was preloaded, the data submission will be placed on hold. The respondent will receive the following notice: “This basic project information must be correct before you can begin entering data for this project. The TUESWeb Support Desk will contact you to find out what needs to be updated.”







Is [PI Name] the lead PI on Award No. [NSF Award Number]?

  • Yes

  • No

x

x

x


X


What type of proposal was submitted for this award?

  • A Single Proposal that resulted in only this award (possibly including subawards for collaborating organizations)

  • A Collaborative Proposal that included simultaneous linked proposals from investigators at different organizations, with each organization receiving its own TUES/CCLI award.

x

x

x


X


Was this the Lead Award on the collaborative proposal?

  • Yes

  • No


x

x


X









  1. Tell Us About Your Awards







    1. Award Details

Award information in this section is preloaded and displayed for verification purposes. PIs can contact the technical support team to report data that should be updated, but they cannot edit this data directly via the data collection instrument. Because some awards have supplemental awards, there may be more than one award associated with each report. The “embedded” awards are listed on each screen, but are not mentioned in the main questions.







NSF Award No.

x

x

x


X


Award Title

x

x

x


X


PI Organization

x

x

x

X



Official Grantee Institution

This data element appears only if it differs from the PI Organization.

x

x

x

X



Phase or Type

The system will list one of the following types:

  • Phase 1/Type 1

  • Phase 2/Type 2

  • Phase 3/Type 2

  • Central Resource Project

x

x

x


X


Award Start Date

x

x

x


X


For consolidated awards: First Award’s Start Date

x

x

x


X


Award End Date

x

x

x


X


Lead PI’s Name

x

x

x

X



Lead PI’s Discipline

x

x

x

X



TUES/CCLI Awards in this collaborative project:

[[PI]], [[PI Organization]] – Lead Award

[[PI a]], [[PI Organization a]] – Collaborating Award

[[PI n]], [[PI Organization n]] – Collaborating Award


x

x


X


Do you need to update any of this information?

  • Yes

  • No

x

x

x


X


If yes, please describe the details you’d like to update:

x

x

x


X


    1. About Your Institution







Type of institution:

[PI institution name], [City], [State]

has the following classification in the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS):

[Institution Type]

[Other specify value if present]

If you believe this is incorrect, you can change it below. If you are not sure, use the IPEDS classification:

  • 2-year Institution

  • 2-year Institution on a 4-year College or University Campus

  • Bachelor’s degree granting institution

  • Master’s degree granting institution

  • Doctoral degree granting institution

  • Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs Type

  • Don’t know

If Other: Please specify: ____________________

OR

Type of Organization: (mark one or more)

Academic Consortium

Business

Consultant

National Laboratory

Museum

Nonprofit

Professional Society

Research Institute

Other (please specify): ____________________


x

x

x

X

X


    1. Subawards







Were subaward funds expended or transferred from this award to any subawardees during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

x

x

x


X


Enter information for a subaward organization

Provide the following information for the CCLI/TUES subaward institution. This subsection repeats for each institution







What type of organization received this subaward?

  • Academic institution (not including academic consortiums)

  • Other type of organization

x

x

x


X


Academic Subaward Institution







What is the name of the institution?

x

x

x

X



Type of institution:

[PI institution name], [City], [State]

has the following classification in the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS):

[Institution Type]

[Other specify value if present]

If you believe this is incorrect, you can change it below. If you are not sure, use the IPEDS classification:

  • 2-year Institution

  • 2-year Institution on a 4-year College or University Campus

  • Bachelor’s degree granting institution

  • Master’s degree granting institution

  • Doctoral degree granting institution

  • Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs Type

  • Don’t know

If Other: Please specify: ____________________

x

x

x

X



How many faculty from this institution were involved?

x

x

x


X


How many students from this institution were involved?

x

x

x


X


Other Type of Subaward Organization







Which of the following describes this organization? (mark one or more)

Academic Consortium

Business

Consultant

National Laboratory

Museum

Nonprofit

Professional Society

Research Institute

Other (please specify): __________________________

Don’t Know

x

x

x

X



All Subaward Organization Types







Approximately what amount of subaward funds did your award transfer to this organization during the current reporting period?

x

x

x


X


Checkbox option (matching how this question can also be answered elsewhere in the instrument.)

This organization houses or plans to house any laboratory instruments that BOTH:

1) Cost more than $5,000 each, AND

2) Were purchased with TUES/CCLI funds during the current reporting period?

x

x

x



X

    1. Other Participating Organizations







We are interested in the types of institutions that participate in TUES/CCLI projects. Did any other organizations participate significantly in your project during the current reporting period (not including your subawardees or other awardees in the collaborative project)?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don’t know


If no or don’t know, skip the questions in this section.

x

x

x


X


Which of the following types of organizations participated significantly in your project? Put a check beside each type that participated. Then, for each type, indicate the number of organizations participating, numbers of faculty/professionals participating, and numbers of students that participated altogether for that type. It is okay to count the same organization or individual in multiple categories.

  • DO NOT include your organization, subawardee organizations, or organizations that should be independently reported by collaborating awardees.

  • Include organizations that received project funds, as well as organizations that did not.

  • Enter 0 for none. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.


The column headers for these tables are:

  1. How many of this type of organization participated significantly?

  2. How many faculty or professionals from this type of organization participated?

  3. How many students from this type of organization participated?









A

B

C

U.S. academic institutions by highest degree granted:




2-year Institutions




2-year Institutions on a 4-year College or University Campus




Bachelor’s Degree Granting Institutions




Master’s Degree Granting Institutions




Doctoral Degree Granting Institutions




Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs type(s) (please specify):____________________





x

x

x


X



A

B

C

U.S. academic institutions by enrollment demographics:




Institutions with High Disabilities Enrollment (>3% Undergraduates)




Institutions with High American Indian or Alaska Native Enrollment (25% or more) – Not Tribally Controlled




Institutions with High Black or African American Enrollment (non-Hispanic) (25% or more)




Institutions with High Hispanic Enrollment (25% or more)




Institutions with High Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Enrollment (25% or more)





x

x

x


X



A

B

C

U.S. academic institutions with special designations:




Historically Black Colleges or Universities




American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges or Universities





x

x

x


X







A

B

C

Nonacademic organizations




Businesses




Consultants




National Laboratories




Museums




Non-profits




Professional Societies




Other type(s) of Nonacademic organizations (please specify): ____________________





x

x

x


X


    1. Uses of Award Funds







Student Support







During this reporting period, were funds from this award used to support students (undergraduate, graduate, or postdocs)?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don’t know

If no or don’t know, skip the remaining questions in this section

x

x

x



X

If yes, how many students were paid to work on the project using funds from this award?

  • Number of undergraduate students paid:

  • Number of graduate students paid:

  • Number of postdocs paid:

x

x

x



X

Laboratory Instrument Purchases







Did you purchase scientific instruments for laboratory improvement with this award during this reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don’t know

If no or don’t know, skip the remaining questions in this section

x

x

x



X

Total price of all laboratory instruments purchased with this award during this reporting period:

If <$5,000, skip the remaining questions in this section.

x

x

x



X

Number of instruments purchased with this award that cost more than $5,000:

If 0, skip the next question.

x

x

x



X

Where are these new laboratory instruments (that cost $5,000 or more) housed? (Or if they have not been received yet, where will they be housed?) (mark one or more)

At [name of PI’s institution]

At [name of lead institution]

At [name of collaborating institution 1]

At [name of collaborating institution 2]

[…list all collaborating institutions]

At [name of subawardee institution 1]

At [name of subawardee institution 2]

[…list all subawardee institutions]

At other participating institutions

Other (please specify): ___________________

Don’t know

x

x

x



X

    1. Project Management and Evaluation







Were any project evaluations conducted during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don’t Know

If no or don’t know, skip the next question.

x

x

x


X


If Yes, How did you use the information from your project’s evaluation? (mark one or more)

To improve the project

To document accomplishments

To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of undergraduate students

To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of graduate students

To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of faculty

None of the above (if so, skip the next question)

Other (please specify): ___________________

Don’t know (if so, skip the next question)

x

x

x


X


Were the project activities supported by this award implemented in courses or course-related laboratory sections during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don’t Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x

x



X

In how many courses or course-related lab sections were project activities implemented during the current reporting period?

x

x

x



X

In all these courses or lab sections combined, approximately how many undergraduate students were exposed to the project’s materials or instructional strategies?

x

x

x



X

In all these courses or lab sections combined, what percentage of students received a passing grade

x

x

x



X

    1. Reflection







What is the single most important project accomplishment for the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

x

x

x



X

What is the single most significant challenge that the project faced during the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

x

x

x


X


What changes were made to the project, as outlined in the proposal, during the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

x

x

x


X









  1. Tell Us About Your Project’s Activities

x






Tell Us About The Project as a Whole


x





Tell Us About Your Award's Independent

Project Activities



x




2.01. TUES/CCLI Program Components







During the current reporting period, did your institution, or any of your subawardee institutions, engage in any project activities or project work independent of the other awardee institutions in your TUES/CCLI Collaborative Project?

  • Yes, we or our subawardees engaged in independent project work.

  • No, all our work involved collaboration with other awardees in the TUES/CCLI Collaborative Project (if no, skip the rest of this section, but to ensure accurate counts please be sure that the Lead PI knows about your involvement in any collaborative project activities, particularly if there are any where the Lead Organization was not directly involved)




x


X


What is the primary way that your project contributes to the development of exemplary undergraduate STEM education? (mark one)

  • Assessing and evaluating student achievement

  • Conducting research on undergraduate STEM education

  • Developing or adapting learning materials

  • Developing, adapting, or implementing new instructional strategies

  • Developing faculty expertise

x

x



X


What other ways does your project contribute to the development of exemplary undergraduate STEM education? (mark one or more)

Assessing and evaluating student achievement

Conducting research on undergraduate STEM education

Developing or adapting learning materials

Developing, adapting, or implementing new

instructional strategies

Developing faculty expertise

None of the above

x

x



X


Did the independent project activities supported by your award(s) during the current reporting period include developing or adapting any of the following:

Instructional materials

Instructional strategies

Assessment instruments or processes to assess student

achievement

None of the above



x



X

Does a significant aspect of the project include the introduction of new disciplinary knowledge into undergraduate curricula?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

x

x




X

Did the project administer any publicly available assessment instruments (e.g., SALG, FCI, NSSE)?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x




X

If yes, please list them here: (limit 500 characters)

x

x




X

2.02. Disciplinary Focus







What is the primary disciplinary focus of the project? (mark one)

  • Interdisciplinary

  • Astronomy

  • Biological Sciences

  • Chemistry

  • Computer Sciences

  • Engineering

  • Engineering Technology

  • Geosciences

  • Mathematical Sciences

  • Physics

  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

  • Other, please specify: ___________________

  • Don't Know

x

x



X


What are the additional disciplinary focuses of the project? (mark one or more)

  • Interdisciplinary

  • Astronomy

  • Biological Sciences

  • Chemistry

  • Computer Sciences

  • Engineering

  • Engineering Technology

  • Geosciences

  • Mathematical Sciences

  • Physics

  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

  • Other, please specify: ___________________

  • None

  • Don't Know

x

x



X


2.03. Target Audiences







What course levels does your project address? (mark one or more)

Upper division

Lower division

Developmental

Don’t Know

x

x



X


What groups are the primary focus of your project? (mark one or more)

Faculty (e.g., developing faculty expertise)

Preservice teachers

Instructional staff (e.g., graduate students, lab assistants,

lab technicians, adjunct faculty)

Undergraduate STEM majors

Undergraduate majors other than STEM

Other (please specify): ____________________

Don’t Know

x

x



X


Does the project foster scientific and/or technical literacy among students who are in majors other than STEM majors?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

x

x




X

2.04 Publications and Presentations







Publications

x

x




X

Please provide the number of project-related outputs that were accepted for publication during the current reporting period for each of the categories described below. All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

Publication types

Number accepted

Formats produced

Peer-reviewed journal articles accepted for publication during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format

Peer-reviewed conference papers or abstracts accepted for inclusion in conference proceedings during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format

Conference papers or abstracts accepted without peer review during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format

Book chapters in edited volumes accepted for publication during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format

Monographs or books accepted for publication during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format

Other publications (e.g., newsletters, magazines) accepted for publication during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format


x

x




X

Presentations







How many presentations or workshops on the project were delivered during the current reporting period? (Include presentations that were conducted by individuals trained by the project.) All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

Presentation types

No. of presentations

Peer-reviewed conference presentations


Invited conference or meeting presentations


Invited faculty development workshops



x

x




X

2.05 Honors and Awards







Did the project receive any honors or awards during the current reporting period? (Include individuals recognized for their contributions to the project.)

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x




X

What honors or awards were received?







Honor or Award Form







Title

x

x




X

Year

x

x




X

Presenting Organization

x

x




X

Reason for the honor or award

x

x




X

2.06. Institutionalization







Are there plans to sustain the project after NSF funding ends?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x



X


  • During the current reporting period, were steps taken to sustain the project’s activities after NSF funding ends?

  • Yes, some steps to sustain the project were taken.

  • Yes, all of the necessary steps to sustain the project were completed.

  • No, no steps to sustain the project were taken during the current reporting period.
    If no, when does the project plan to start? (enter month and year) ____ / ____

  • Don't Know

x

x



X


2.07. Dissemination







Where else are the project’s materials, strategies, faculty development activities, or assessment instruments/processes being used? (mark one or more)

At lead, collaborative, or subawardee institutions by

people not directly involved with the project

At the project’s other participating institutions by people

not directly involved with the project

At other institutions across the U.S.

At international institutions

None of the above

Don’t know

x

x




X

2.08. Instructional Materials







Did the project develop or adapt instructional materials during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x




X

What types of instructional materials did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

Case studies

Demonstrations

Educational games

Field activity guides or manuals

Instructor materials for adapting project activities or

procedures to new settings

Instructor guides or manuals to guide student activities

Laboratory guides or manuals

Lesson plans

Practice problems or exercises for students

Simulations

Software tools including web-enhanced tools

Student handbooks or workbooks

Textbooks

Tutorials

Visualizations

Workshop materials for training faculty

Workshop materials for training students

Other instructional materials (please specify): ________

x

x




X

Note to reviewers: The system will show the user the list of instructional materials above. The user will choose the materials from the list that apply to his or her project. For each item chosen, the system will display the following questions:

Sample instructional material

During the current reporting period, our project:

Developed or revised our own [[material type]]

Adapted [[material type]] created by others

In these formats:

print online other electronic format


x

x




X

2.09. Instructional Strategies







Did the project develop or adapt instructional strategies during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x




X

What types of instructional strategies did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

Case-based learning strategies

Cooperative or collaborative learning strategies

Design activities

Field studies

Hands-on activities (e.g., building or testing objects)

Integrated courses

Intelligent tutoring systems

Laboratory experiences

Learning communities (e.g., student cohorts)

Lectures

Linked courses

Real-time modification strategies based on student

performance (e.g., Just-in-Time Teaching)

Peer-instruction strategies (e.g., peer tutoring, peer

mentoring)

Personal response systems (e.g., “clickers”)

Problem-based learning strategies

Quantitative computational approaches

Strategies involving real-world examples, problems, or

contexts

Strategies involving remote laboratories

Strategies involving formal research experience in

classroom laboratories

Service-learning strategies

Studio-based strategies

Web-enabled homework submission and grading

systems

Web-enabled instruction strategies

Web-enabled repositories

Web-enabled student collaboration/social networking

tools

Other instructional strategies (please specify): _______

x

x




X

Note to reviewers: The system will show the user the list of instructional strategies above. The user will choose the materials from the list that apply to his or her project. For each item chosen, the system will display the following questions:

Sample instructional strategy

During the current reporting period, our project:

Developed or revised our own [[strategy type]]

Adapted [[strategy type]] created by others

x

x




X

2.10. Assessment Instruments and Processes







Did the project develop or adapt assessment instruments or processes during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x




X

What types of assessment instruments or processes did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

Assessment of general knowledge or skill (e.g., critical

thinking skills, problem-solving skills)

Cognitive protocol interviews

Concept inventories

Course exams

Standardized tests (e.g., Fundamentals of Engineering,

American Chemical Society examinations)

Performance assessment of skills (e.g., observation and

rating of skills)

Students’ perceptions of their own learning

Expert review

Other instruments and processes to determine outcomes

(please specify): ______________

x

x




X

Note to reviewers: The system will show the user the list of instructional materials above. The user will choose the materials from the list that apply to his or her project. For each item chosen, the system will display the following questions:

Sample assessment instrument or process

During the current reporting period, our project:

Developed or revised our own [[assessment type]]

Adapted [[assessment type]] created by others

In these formats:

print online other electronic format


x

x




X








2.11. Research On Undergraduate STEM Education







Did the project conduct research on undergraduate STEM education during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

x

x



X


What is the topic of your research on undergraduate STEM education? (limit 500 characters)

x

x



X


What type of research does your project employ? (mark one)

  • Qualitative research design

  • Quantitative research design

  • Mixed method research design

  • Don't Know

x

x



X


2.12. Faculty Professional Development Component







Did the project include a faculty professional development component (e.g., seminar, workshop, meeting session) that shared project approaches with other faculty members during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

x

x



X


If YES: With whom were these approaches shared during the current reporting period? (mark one or more)


Graduate students or postdocs

Faculty

Instructional staff

Other or unknown individuals

At the lead, collaborating, or subawardee institutions

At other institutions


x

x


X



If YES: which disciplines were the focus of the project’s faculty professional development efforts during the current reporting period? (mark one or more)

  • Interdisciplinary

  • Astronomy

  • Biological Sciences

  • Chemistry

  • Computer Sciences

  • Engineering

  • Engineering Technology

  • Geosciences

  • Mathematical Sciences

  • Physics

  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

  • Other, please specify: ____________________

  • Don't Know

  • None

x

x



X


If YES: What types of institutions were represented at these efforts during the current reporting period (mark one or more)

2-year Institutions

Bachelor’s degree granting institutions

Master’s degree granting institutions

Doctoral degree granting institutions

Nonacademic organizations

Other (please specify): ____________________

Don’t know

None

x

x


X



If YES: Did the institutions represented at the project’s faculty professional development efforts have any of the following demographics or special institutional designations? If yes, what types? (mark one or more)

Historically Black College or University

American Indian Tribally Controlled College or University

Institution with High Disabilities Enrollment (>3%

Undergraduates)

Institution with High American Indian or Alaska Native

Enrollment (25% or more) – Not Tribally Controlled

Institution with High Black or African American Enrollment

(non-Hispanic) (25% or more)

Institution with High Hispanic Enrollment (25% or more)

Institution with High Native Hawaiian or Other

Pacific Islander Enrollment (25% or more)

None

Not Reported/Don’t Know

x

x


X



2.13. Involvement with Project Materials, Strategies, Instruments and Processes







Do you know approximately how many students, faculty, and staff were impacted by your award’s efforts, or the joint efforts of collaborating awardees, during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No (if no, skip the rest of this section)

x

x

x


X


Student Counts







All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of students

Number of students from 2-year institutions

Number of students from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

How many undergraduate students used the project’s instructional materials?




How many undergraduate students were taught using the project’s instructional strategies?




How many undergraduate students’ knowledge, skills, or attitudes were assessed using the project’s assessment instruments?











Faculty Counts







All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of faculty

Number of faculty from 2-year institutions

Number of faculty from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

How many project faculty worked on the project’s instructional materials?




How many project faculty worked on the project’s instructional strategies?




How many project faculty worked on the project’s assessment instruments or processes?





x

x

x

X

X

X

Staff Counts







All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of staff

Number of staff from 2-year institutions

Number of staff from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

How many non-instructional professional staff worked on the project? (e.g., lab technicians, professional staff associated with Centers for Teaching and Learning and Centers for Institutional Research, Centers for Institutional Evaluation professional staff)?




How many non-instructional professional staff used the project’s materials, strategies, or assessment instruments with students?





x

x

x

X

X

X








We are interested in whether participants who receive funding to attend faculty professional development activities are more or less likely to implement what they learn. Please estimate how many faculty professional development participants received funds from the project or their institution to attend. Of each group, please also indicate approximately how many are implementing the ideas shared.



Participants funded by the project

Participants funded by their institution (if known)

All other participants

Number of faculty members




Number of institutions represented by those faculty members




Number of faculty implementing what they learned





Note: Your response to this question is optional this year, but may be required in future years

x

x


X

X

X

2.14. Involvement with Faculty Professional Development







Faculty Professional Development Events







During the current reporting period, were any faculty professional development events conducted [, either by your award or jointly among collaborating awardees]?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

If YES: All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

x

x

x



X

Faculty Professional Development Events Conducted


During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of events

Number of events held at 2-year institutions

Number of events held at institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

How many faculty professional development events were supported by the project?





x

x

x


X

X

Faculty Involvement in Professional Development Events


The following 8 questions appear in a table with the columns shown below:

  • How many faculty were involved in creating the project’s faculty professional development events?

  • How many faculty were involved in leading the project’s faculty professional development events?

  • How many faculty participated as learners in the project’s faculty professional development events?

      • How many academic institutions do these learners represent?

  • How many faculty learners received project funding to attend the project’s faculty professional development events?

      • How many academic institutions do these learners represent?

  • How many faculty learners at the project’s events went on to implement what they learned?

      • How many academic institutions do these learners represent?


During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of faculty

Number of faculty from 2-year institutions

Number of faculty from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

Sample Question






x

x

x

X


X

Graduate Student and Postdoc Involvement in Professional Development Events


During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of graduate students and postdocs

Number of graduate students and postdocs from 2-year institutions

Number of graduate students and postdocs from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

How many graduate students and postdocs were involved in creating the project’s faculty professional development events?




How many graduate students and postdocs were involved in leading the project’s faculty professional development events?




How many graduate students and postdocs participated as learners in the project’s faculty professional development events?





x

x

x

X


X

Nonacademic Involvement in the Project’s Faculty Professional Development Events


During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of nonacademic learners

How many representatives from nonacademic organizations (e.g., professional societies, industry, community organizations) participated as learners in your project’s faculty professional development events?


How many organizations do these learners represent?



x

x

x



X







  1. Submit your report to NSF







Congratulations! Your report appears complete. We have one last question:

Approximately how many person-hours were required to complete this report? ________ person-hours (round up to a whole hour)

x

x

x



X








  1. Create New User Account

Note: This data is only collected for participants who must use TUESWeb (usually only the PI and a data entry assistant). The data is collected in order to provide adequate technical support; it is not considered part of the data collection instrument.







E-mail Address

x

x

x

X



Project Role

  • Co- primary Investigator

  • Data Entry Personnel

  • Project Coordinator

  • Other

x

x

x


X


Name:

Honorific

First

Middle

Last

Suffix

x

x

x

X



Phone

x

x

x

X



Organization

x

x

x

X



Alternate E-mail

x

x

x

X



Alternate Phone

x

x

x

X



Access Privileges (mark all that apply)

Can View Data

Can Edit Data

Can Manage User Access

Receives Reminders (automatically set to "yes" if

Role=Project Coordinator)

(button): Remove from this report

Note: The Lead PI’s privileges are automatically set to “yes” for all privileges.

x

x

x


X



TUES: Number of Respondents, Frequency of Response, and Annual Hour Burden


The estimated average number of annual respondents is 686, with an estimated average annual response burden of 2,744 hours. The Web-based collection is an annual activity of the TUES program. There were approximately 686 active respondents as of April 21, 2015. We anticipate that no new awards will be added, thus, the number of respondents will decline over time. The estimated average annual hour burden per respondent was determined using the burden information reported by respondents in the last two collection cycles.


The burden estimate is outlined below:


Respondent
Type

Estimated Average Annual No. of Respondents

Estimated Average Annual Burden Hours Per Respondent

Estimated Annual Burden Hour Total

PIs

686

4

2,744





Total

686


2,744


TUES: Hour Burden Estimates by Each Form and Aggregate Hour Burdens


Respondents will be project PIs. The estimated total annual response burden is 2,744 hours. The annual burden by form was calculated as follows:


Form

Type

Respondent Type

No. of Respondents

Burden Hours Per Respondent

Total Burden Hours

TUES data collection form

PIs

686

4

2,744

Total

 

686

 

2,744



TUES: Estimates of Annualized Cost to Respondents for the Hour Burdens


The overall annualized cost to the respondents is estimated to be $115,248. The following table shows the annualized estimates of costs to PI respondents, who are generally university professors. The estimated hourly rate is based on a report from the American Association of University Professors, “Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession, 2014-15,” Academe, March–April 2015, Survey Report Table 4. According to this report, the average salary across all academic ranks and across all types of doctoral-granting institutions (public, private-independent, religiously affiliated) was $87,838. When divided by the number of standard annual work hours (2,080), this calculates to approximately $42 per hour.


Respondent
Type

No. of Respondents

Burden Hours Per Respondent

Average Hourly Rate

Estimated Annual

Cost

PIs

686

4

$42

$115,248

Total

686

 

 

$115,248



TUES: Estimates of Costs to Federal Government


Computing the annualized cost to NSF for the TUES data collection was done by taking the budget for the most recent year and calculating the costs for each of the following operational activities involved in producing, maintaining, and conducting the data collection:



Operational Activities

Cost Over Three Years

System Development (includes initial development of the database and Web-based application, and later changes requested by the program, e.g., increased reporting tools, additional validations)

$309,585

System Maintenance, Updates, and Technical Support (the system requires updates each year before opening the collection; maintenance is required to keep the system current with technology, e.g., database servers, operating systems)

$133,547

Data Collection Opening and Support (e.g., online and telephone support to respondents and contacting respondents to encourage completion of the questions), Reporting (as defined by DUE), and Followup Activities (e.g., providing data to other consultants)

$163,898

Three-Year Total for All Operational Activities

$607,030



The annualized cost was computed as one-third of the total three-year costs; thus, the annualized cost to NSF for the TUES data collection is $202,343.



TUES: Questions



Award Category


Single

Lead Collaborative

Non-Lead Collaborative

Notes:

  • The System presents only those questions that are logically relevant to the type of award and previously answered questions. All questions pertain to the current reporting period’s participants, implementation, and outputs. All requested questions are required.


  • Three major categories drive the tailoring of the system to the award type. We have included columns to indicate these, which are:

  • Single Award

  • Lead Collaborative Award (most questions)

  • Non-Lead Collaborative Award(fewest questions)


  • For most questions respondents have the option to select a "don’t know” option or can enter "DK."


  • For most questions respondents have the option to add comments. The data elements associated with these comments are not shown in the crosswalk because the comments are entirely optional.




i. Confirm Award Information

Note: If any of the respondent’s answers in this section are inconsistent with the type of award that was preloaded, the data submission will be placed on hold. The respondent will receive the following notice: “This basic project information must be correct before you can begin entering data for this project. The TUESWeb Support Desk will contact you to find out what needs to be updated.”




Is [PI Name] the lead PI on Award No. [NSF Award Number]?

  • Yes

  • No

x

x

x

What type of proposal was submitted for this award?

  • A Single Proposal that resulted in only this award (possibly including subawards for collaborating organizations)

  • A Collaborative Proposal that included simultaneous linked proposals from investigators at different organizations, with each organization receiving its own TUES/CCLI award.

x

x

x

Was this the Lead Award on the collaborative proposal?

  • Yes

  • No


x

x





  1. Tell Us About Your Awards




    1. Award Details

Award information in this section is preloaded and displayed for verification purposes. PIs can contact the technical support team to report data that should be updated, but they cannot edit this data directly via the data collection instrument. Because some awards have supplemental awards, there may be more than one award associated with each report. The “embedded” awards are listed on each screen, but are not mentioned in the main questions.




NSF Award No.

x

x

x

Award Title

x

x

x

PI Organization

x

x

x

Official Grantee Institution

This data element appears only if it differs from the PI Organization.

x

x

x

Phase or Type

The system will list one of the following types:

  • Phase 1/Type 1

  • Phase 2/Type 2

  • Phase 3/Type 2

  • Central Resource Project

x

x

x

Award Start Date

x

x

x

For consolidated awards: First Award’s Start Date

x

x

x

Award End Date

x

x

x

Lead PI’s Name

x

x

x

Lead PI’s Discipline

x

x

x

TUES/CCLI Awards in this collaborative project:

[[PI]], [[PI Organization]] – Lead Award

[[PI a]], [[PI Organization a]] – Collaborating Award

[[PI n]], [[PI Organization n]] – Collaborating Award


x

x

Do you need to update any of this information?

  • Yes

  • No

x

x

x

If yes, please describe the details you’d like to update:

x

x

x

    1. About Your Institution




Type of institution:

[PI institution name], [City], [State]

has the following classification in the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS):

[Institution Type]

[Other specify value if present]

If you believe this is incorrect, you can change it below. If you are not sure, use the IPEDS classification:

  • 2-year Institution

  • 2-year Institution on a 4-year College or University Campus

  • Bachelor’s degree granting institution

  • Master’s degree granting institution

  • Doctoral degree granting institution

  • Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs Type

  • Don’t know

If Other: Please specify: ____________________

OR

Type of Organization: (mark one or more)

Academic Consortium

Business

Consultant

National Laboratory

Museum

Nonprofit

Professional Society

Research Institute

Other (please specify): ____________________


x

x

x

    1. Subawards




Were subaward funds expended or transferred from this award to any subawardees during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

x

x

x

Enter information for a subaward organization

Provide the following information for the CCLI/TUES subaward institution. This subsection repeats for each institution




What type of organization received this subaward?

  • Academic institution (not including academic consortiums)

  • Other type of organization

x

x

x

Academic Subaward Institution




What is the name of the institution?

x

x

x

Type of institution:

[PI institution name], [City], [State]

has the following classification in the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS):

[Institution Type]

[Other specify value if present]

If you believe this is incorrect, you can change it below. If you are not sure, use the IPEDS classification:

  • 2-year Institution

  • 2-year Institution on a 4-year College or University Campus

  • Bachelor’s degree granting institution

  • Master’s degree granting institution

  • Doctoral degree granting institution

  • Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs Type

  • Don’t know

If Other: Please specify: ____________________

x

x

x

How many faculty from this institution were involved?

x

x

x

How many students from this institution were involved?

x

x

x

Other Type of Subaward Organization




Which of the following describes this organization? (mark one or more)

Academic Consortium

Business

Consultant

National Laboratory

Museum

Nonprofit

Professional Society

Research Institute

Other (please specify): __________________________

Don’t Know

x

x

x

All Subaward Organization Types




Approximately what amount of subaward funds did your award transfer to this organization during the current reporting period?

x

x

x

Checkbox option (matching how this question can also be answered elsewhere in the instrument.)

This organization houses or plans to house any laboratory instruments that BOTH:

1) Cost more than $5,000 each, AND

2) Were purchased with TUES/CCLI funds during the current reporting period?

x

x

x

    1. Other Participating Organizations




We are interested in the types of institutions that participate in TUES/CCLI projects. Did any other organizations participate significantly in your project during the current reporting period (not including your subawardees or other awardees in the collaborative project)?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don’t know


If no or don’t know, skip the questions in this section.

x

x

x

Which of the following types of organizations participated significantly in your project? Put a check beside each type that participated. Then, for each type, indicate the number of organizations participating, numbers of faculty/professionals participating, and numbers of students that participated altogether for that type. It is okay to count the same organization or individual in multiple categories.

  • DO NOT include your organization, subawardee organizations, or organizations that should be independently reported by collaborating awardees.

  • Include organizations that received project funds, as well as organizations that did not.

  • Enter 0 for none. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.


The column headers for these tables are:

  1. How many of this type of organization participated significantly?

  2. How many faculty or professionals from this type of organization participated?

  3. How many students from this type of organization participated?






A

B

C

U.S. academic institutions by highest degree granted:




2-year Institutions




2-year Institutions on a 4-year College or University Campus




Bachelor’s Degree Granting Institutions




Master’s Degree Granting Institutions




Doctoral Degree Granting Institutions




Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs type(s) (please specify):____________________





x

x

x


A

B

C

U.S. academic institutions by enrollment demographics:




Institutions with High Disabilities Enrollment (>3% Undergraduates)




Institutions with High American Indian or Alaska Native Enrollment (25% or more) – Not Tribally Controlled




Institutions with High Black or African American Enrollment (non-Hispanic) (25% or more)




Institutions with High Hispanic Enrollment (25% or more)




Institutions with High Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Enrollment (25% or more)





x

x

x


A

B

C

U.S. academic institutions with special designations:




Historically Black Colleges or Universities




American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges or Universities





x

x

x






A

B

C

Nonacademic organizations




Businesses




Consultants




National Laboratories




Museums




Non-profits




Professional Societies




Other type(s) of Nonacademic organizations (please specify): ____________________





x

x

x

    1. Uses of Award Funds




Student Support




During this reporting period, were funds from this award used to support students (undergraduate, graduate, or postdocs)?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don’t know

If no or don’t know, skip the remaining questions in this section

x

x

x

If yes, how many students were paid to work on the project using funds from this award?

  • Number of undergraduate students paid:

  • Number of graduate students paid:

  • Number of postdocs paid:

x

x

x

Laboratory Instrument Purchases




Did you purchase scientific instruments for laboratory improvement with this award during this reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don’t know

If no or don’t know, skip the remaining questions in this section

x

x

x

Total price of all laboratory instruments purchased with this award during this reporting period:

If <$5,000, skip the remaining questions in this section.

x

x

x

Number of instruments purchased with this award that cost more than $5,000:

If 0, skip the next question.

x

x

x

Where are these new laboratory instruments (that cost $5,000 or more) housed? (Or if they have not been received yet, where will they be housed?) (mark one or more)

At [name of PI’s institution]

At [name of lead institution]

At [name of collaborating institution 1]

At [name of collaborating institution 2]

[…list all collaborating institutions]

At [name of subawardee institution 1]

At [name of subawardee institution 2]

[…list all subawardee institutions]

At other participating institutions

Other (please specify): ___________________

Don’t know

x

x

x

    1. Project Management and Evaluation




Were any project evaluations conducted during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don’t Know

If no or don’t know, skip the next question.

x

x

x

If Yes, How did you use the information from your project’s evaluation? (mark one or more)

To improve the project

To document accomplishments

To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of undergraduate students

To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of graduate students

To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of faculty

None of the above (if so, skip the next question)

Other (please specify): ___________________

Don’t know (if so, skip the next question)

x

x

x

Were the project activities supported by this award implemented in courses or course-related laboratory sections during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don’t Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x

x

In how many courses or course-related lab sections were project activities implemented during the current reporting period?

x

x

x

In all these courses or lab sections combined, approximately how many undergraduate students were exposed to the project’s materials or instructional strategies?

x

x

x

In all these courses or lab sections combined, what percentage of students received a passing grade

x

x

x

    1. Reflection




What is the single most important project accomplishment for the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

x

x

x

What is the single most significant challenge that the project faced during the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

x

x

x

What changes were made to the project, as outlined in the proposal, during the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

x

x

x





  1. Tell Us About Your Project’s Activities

x



Tell Us About The Project as a Whole


x


Tell Us About Your Award's Independent

Project Activities



x

2.01. TUES/CCLI Program Components




During the current reporting period, did your institution, or any of your subawardee institutions, engage in any project activities or project work independent of the other awardee institutions in your TUES/CCLI Collaborative Project?

  • Yes, we or our subawardees engaged in independent project work.

  • No, all our work involved collaboration with other awardees in the TUES/CCLI Collaborative Project (if no, skip the rest of this section, but to ensure accurate counts please be sure that the Lead PI knows about your involvement in any collaborative project activities, particularly if there are any where the Lead Organization was not directly involved)




x

What is the primary way that your project contributes to the development of exemplary undergraduate STEM education? (mark one)

  • Assessing and evaluating student achievement

  • Conducting research on undergraduate STEM education

  • Developing or adapting learning materials

  • Developing, adapting, or implementing new instructional strategies

  • Developing faculty expertise

x

x


What other ways does your project contribute to the development of exemplary undergraduate STEM education? (mark one or more)

Assessing and evaluating student achievement

Conducting research on undergraduate STEM education

Developing or adapting learning materials

Developing, adapting, or implementing new

instructional strategies

Developing faculty expertise

None of the above

x

x


Did the independent project activities supported by your award(s) during the current reporting period include developing or adapting any of the following:

Instructional materials

Instructional strategies

Assessment instruments or processes to assess student

achievement

None of the above



x

Does a significant aspect of the project include the introduction of new disciplinary knowledge into undergraduate curricula?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

x

x


Did the project administer any publicly available assessment instruments (e.g., SALG, FCI, NSSE)?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x


If yes, please list them here: (limit 500 characters)

x

x


2.02. Disciplinary Focus




What is the primary disciplinary focus of the project? (mark one)

  • Interdisciplinary

  • Astronomy

  • Biological Sciences

  • Chemistry

  • Computer Sciences

  • Engineering

  • Engineering Technology

  • Geosciences

  • Mathematical Sciences

  • Physics

  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

  • Other, please specify: ___________________

  • Don't Know

x

x


What are the additional disciplinary focuses of the project? (mark one or more)

  • Interdisciplinary

  • Astronomy

  • Biological Sciences

  • Chemistry

  • Computer Sciences

  • Engineering

  • Engineering Technology

  • Geosciences

  • Mathematical Sciences

  • Physics

  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

  • Other, please specify: ___________________

  • None

  • Don't Know

x

x


2.03. Target Audiences




What course levels does your project address? (mark one or more)

Upper division

Lower division

Developmental

Don’t Know

x

x


What groups are the primary focus of your project? (mark one or more)

Faculty (e.g., developing faculty expertise)

Preservice teachers

Instructional staff (e.g., graduate students, lab assistants,

lab technicians, adjunct faculty)

Undergraduate STEM majors

Undergraduate majors other than STEM

Other (please specify): ____________________

Don’t Know

x

x


Does the project foster scientific and/or technical literacy among students who are in majors other than STEM majors?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

x

x


2.04 Publications and Presentations




Publications

x

x


Please provide the number of project-related outputs that were accepted for publication during the current reporting period for each of the categories described below. All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

Publication types

Number accepted

Formats produced

Peer-reviewed journal articles accepted for publication during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format

Peer-reviewed conference papers or abstracts accepted for inclusion in conference proceedings during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format

Conference papers or abstracts accepted without peer review during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format

Book chapters in edited volumes accepted for publication during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format

Monographs or books accepted for publication during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format

Other publications (e.g., newsletters, magazines) accepted for publication during the current reporting period


Print

Online

Other electronic format


x

x


Presentations




How many presentations or workshops on the project were delivered during the current reporting period? (Include presentations that were conducted by individuals trained by the project.) All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

Presentation types

No. of presentations

Peer-reviewed conference presentations


Invited conference or meeting presentations


Invited faculty development workshops



x

x


2.05 Honors and Awards




Did the project receive any honors or awards during the current reporting period? (Include individuals recognized for their contributions to the project.)

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x


What honors or awards were received?




Honor or Award Form




Title

x

x


Year

x

x


Presenting Organization

x

x


Reason for the honor or award

x

x


2.06. Institutionalization




Are there plans to sustain the project after NSF funding ends?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x


  • During the current reporting period, were steps taken to sustain the project’s activities after NSF funding ends?

  • Yes, some steps to sustain the project were taken.

  • Yes, all of the necessary steps to sustain the project were completed.

  • No, no steps to sustain the project were taken during the current reporting period.
    If no, when does the project plan to start? (enter month and year) ____ / ____

  • Don't Know

x

x


2.07. Dissemination




Where else are the project’s materials, strategies, faculty development activities, or assessment instruments/processes being used? (mark one or more)

At lead, collaborative, or subawardee institutions by

people not directly involved with the project

At the project’s other participating institutions by people

not directly involved with the project

At other institutions across the U.S.

At international institutions

None of the above

Don’t know

x

x


2.08. Instructional Materials




Did the project develop or adapt instructional materials during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x


What types of instructional materials did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

Case studies

Demonstrations

Educational games

Field activity guides or manuals

Instructor materials for adapting project activities or

procedures to new settings

Instructor guides or manuals to guide student activities

Laboratory guides or manuals

Lesson plans

Practice problems or exercises for students

Simulations

Software tools including web-enhanced tools

Student handbooks or workbooks

Textbooks

Tutorials

Visualizations

Workshop materials for training faculty

Workshop materials for training students

Other instructional materials (please specify): ________

x

x


Note to reviewers: The system will show the user the list of instructional materials above. The user will choose the materials from the list that apply to his or her project. For each item chosen, the system will display the following questions:

Sample instructional material

During the current reporting period, our project:

Developed or revised our own [[material type]]

Adapted [[material type]] created by others

In these formats:

print online other electronic format


x

x


2.09. Instructional Strategies




Did the project develop or adapt instructional strategies during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x


What types of instructional strategies did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

Case-based learning strategies

Cooperative or collaborative learning strategies

Design activities

Field studies

Hands-on activities (e.g., building or testing objects)

Integrated courses

Intelligent tutoring systems

Laboratory experiences

Learning communities (e.g., student cohorts)

Lectures

Linked courses

Real-time modification strategies based on student

performance (e.g., Just-in-Time Teaching)

Peer-instruction strategies (e.g., peer tutoring, peer

mentoring)

Personal response systems (e.g., “clickers”)

Problem-based learning strategies

Quantitative computational approaches

Strategies involving real-world examples, problems, or

contexts

Strategies involving remote laboratories

Strategies involving formal research experience in

classroom laboratories

Service-learning strategies

Studio-based strategies

Web-enabled homework submission and grading

systems

Web-enabled instruction strategies

Web-enabled repositories

Web-enabled student collaboration/social networking

tools

Other instructional strategies (please specify): _______

x

x


Note to reviewers: The system will show the user the list of instructional strategies above. The user will choose the materials from the list that apply to his or her project. For each item chosen, the system will display the following questions:

Sample instructional strategy

During the current reporting period, our project:

Developed or revised our own [[strategy type]]

Adapted [[strategy type]] created by others

x

x


2.10. Assessment Instruments and Processes




Did the project develop or adapt assessment instruments or processes during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

x

x


What types of assessment instruments or processes did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

Assessment of general knowledge or skill (e.g., critical

thinking skills, problem-solving skills)

Cognitive protocol interviews

Concept inventories

Course exams

Standardized tests (e.g., Fundamentals of Engineering,

American Chemical Society examinations)

Performance assessment of skills (e.g., observation and

rating of skills)

Students’ perceptions of their own learning

Expert review

Other instruments and processes to determine outcomes

(please specify): ______________

x

x


Note to reviewers: The system will show the user the list of instructional materials above. The user will choose the materials from the list that apply to his or her project. For each item chosen, the system will display the following questions:

Sample assessment instrument or process

During the current reporting period, our project:

Developed or revised our own [[assessment type]]

Adapted [[assessment type]] created by others

In these formats:

print online other electronic format


x

x






2.11. Research On Undergraduate STEM Education




Did the project conduct research on undergraduate STEM education during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

x

x


What is the topic of your research on undergraduate STEM education? (limit 500 characters)

x

x


What type of research does your project employ? (mark one)

  • Qualitative research design

  • Quantitative research design

  • Mixed method research design

  • Don't Know

x

x


2.12. Faculty Professional Development Component




Did the project include a faculty professional development component (e.g., seminar, workshop, meeting session) that shared project approaches with other faculty members during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

x

x


If YES: With whom were these approaches shared during the current reporting period? (mark one or more)


Graduate students or postdocs

Faculty

Instructional staff

Other or unknown individuals

At the lead, collaborating, or subawardee institutions

At other institutions


x

x


If YES: which disciplines were the focus of the project’s faculty professional development efforts during the current reporting period? (mark one or more)

  • Interdisciplinary

  • Astronomy

  • Biological Sciences

  • Chemistry

  • Computer Sciences

  • Engineering

  • Engineering Technology

  • Geosciences

  • Mathematical Sciences

  • Physics

  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

  • Other, please specify: ____________________

  • Don't Know

  • None

x

x


If YES: What types of institutions were represented at these efforts during the current reporting period (mark one or more)

2-year Institutions

Bachelor’s degree granting institutions

Master’s degree granting institutions

Doctoral degree granting institutions

Nonacademic organizations

Other (please specify): ____________________

Don’t know

None

x

x


If YES: Did the institutions represented at the project’s faculty professional development efforts have any of the following demographics or special institutional designations? If yes, what types? (mark one or more)

Historically Black College or University

American Indian Tribally Controlled College or University

Institution with High Disabilities Enrollment (>3%

Undergraduates)

Institution with High American Indian or Alaska Native

Enrollment (25% or more) – Not Tribally Controlled

Institution with High Black or African American Enrollment

(non-Hispanic) (25% or more)

Institution with High Hispanic Enrollment (25% or more)

Institution with High Native Hawaiian or Other

Pacific Islander Enrollment (25% or more)

None

Not Reported/Don’t Know

x

x


2.13. Involvement with Project Materials, Strategies, Instruments and Processes




Do you know approximately how many students, faculty, and staff were impacted by your award’s efforts, or the joint efforts of collaborating awardees, during the current reporting period?

  • Yes

  • No (if no, skip the rest of this section)

x

x

x

Student Counts




All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of students

Number of students from 2-year institutions

Number of students from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

How many undergraduate students used the project’s instructional materials?




How many undergraduate students were taught using the project’s instructional strategies?




How many undergraduate students’ knowledge, skills, or attitudes were assessed using the project’s assessment instruments?








Faculty Counts




All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of faculty

Number of faculty from 2-year institutions

Number of faculty from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

How many project faculty worked on the project’s instructional materials?




How many project faculty worked on the project’s instructional strategies?




How many project faculty worked on the project’s assessment instruments or processes?





x

x

x

Staff Counts




All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of staff

Number of staff from 2-year institutions

Number of staff from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

How many non-instructional professional staff worked on the project? (e.g., lab technicians, professional staff associated with Centers for Teaching and Learning and Centers for Institutional Research, Centers for Institutional Evaluation professional staff)?




How many non-instructional professional staff used the project’s materials, strategies, or assessment instruments with students?





x

x

x





We are interested in whether participants who receive funding to attend faculty professional development activities are more or less likely to implement what they learn. Please estimate how many faculty professional development participants received funds from the project or their institution to attend. Of each group, please also indicate approximately how many are implementing the ideas shared.



Participants funded by the project

Participants funded by their institution (if known)

All other participants

Number of faculty members




Number of institutions represented by those faculty members




Number of faculty implementing what they learned





Note: Your response to this question is optional this year, but may be required in future years

x

x


2.14. Involvement with Faculty Professional Development




Faculty Professional Development Events




During the current reporting period, were any faculty professional development events conducted [, either by your award or jointly among collaborating awardees]?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

If YES: All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

x

x

x

Faculty Professional Development Events Conducted


During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of events

Number of events held at 2-year institutions

Number of events held at institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

How many faculty professional development events were supported by the project?





x

x

x

Faculty Involvement in Professional Development Events


The following 8 questions appear in a table with the columns shown below:

  • How many faculty were involved in creating the project’s faculty professional development events?

  • How many faculty were involved in leading the project’s faculty professional development events?

  • How many faculty participated as learners in the project’s faculty professional development events?

      • How many academic institutions do these learners represent?

  • How many faculty learners received project funding to attend the project’s faculty professional development events?

      • How many academic institutions do these learners represent?

  • How many faculty learners at the project’s events went on to implement what they learned?

      • How many academic institutions do these learners represent?


During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of faculty

Number of faculty from 2-year institutions

Number of faculty from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

Sample Question






x

x

x

Graduate Student and Postdoc Involvement in Professional Development Events


During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of graduate students and postdocs

Number of graduate students and postdocs from 2-year institutions

Number of graduate students and postdocs from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater

How many graduate students and postdocs were involved in creating the project’s faculty professional development events?




How many graduate students and postdocs were involved in leading the project’s faculty professional development events?




How many graduate students and postdocs participated as learners in the project’s faculty professional development events?





x

x

x

Nonacademic Involvement in the Project’s Faculty Professional Development Events


During the current reporting period approximately . . .

Total number of nonacademic learners

How many representatives from nonacademic organizations (e.g., professional societies, industry, community organizations) participated as learners in your project’s faculty professional development events?


How many organizations do these learners represent?



x

x

x




  1. Submit your report to NSF




Congratulations! Your report appears complete. We have one last question:

Approximately how many person-hours were required to complete this report? ________ person-hours (round up to a whole hour)

x

x

x





  1. Create New User Account

Note: This data is only collected for participants who must use TUESWeb (usually only the PI and a data entry assistant). The data is collected in order to provide adequate technical support; it is not considered part of the data collection instrument.




E-mail Address

x

x

x

Project Role

  • Co- primary Investigator

  • Data Entry Personnel

  • Project Coordinator

  • Other

x

x

x

Name:

Honorific

First

Middle

Last

Suffix

x

x

x

Phone

x

x

x

Organization

x

x

x

Alternate E-mail

x

x

x

Alternate Phone

x

x

x

Access Privileges (mark all that apply)

Can View Data

Can Edit Data

Can Manage User Access

Receives Reminders (automatically set to "yes" if

Role=Project Coordinator)

(button): Remove from this report

Note: The Lead PI’s privileges are automatically set to “yes” for all privileges.

x

x

x



1 Elements of these characteristics include: name, address, date of birth, gender, ethnicity, race, disability status, class, major, grade point average, yearly fellowship or stipend amount, and project role.

2 Elements of these characteristics include: sources and amount of funds, fellowships, scholarships, traineeships, partnerships, training, and research methods.

3 Elements of these characteristics include: research findings, publications, presentations, degrees granted, and educational materials.

Page 59 of 59

File Typeapplication/msword
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy