Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) (Renewal) | ||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Hours per Occurrence |
(B) Occurrences/ Respondent/ Year |
(C) Hours/ Respondent/ Year (A x B) |
(D) Respondents/ Yeara |
(E) Technical Hours/Year (C x D) |
(F) Managerial Hours/Year (E x 0.05) |
(G) Clerical Hours/Year (E x 0.10) |
(H) Cost/ Yearb |
||||
1. APPLICATIONS | NA | Labor Rates: | ||||||||||
2. SURVEY AND STUDIES | NA | Management | $147.40 | These rates were updated 2/4/19 to match the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2018, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group | ||||||||
3.ACQUISITION, INSTALLATION, AND UTILIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS | 16 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | Technical | $117.92 | ||
4. REPORT REQUIREMENTS | Clerical | $57.02 | ||||||||||
A. Familiarize with regulatory requirement | 1 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 40 | 2 | 4 | $5,239.68 | ||||
B. Required Activities | Number of kilns | |||||||||||
New, Reconstructed, Modified Sources - Testing c | New | 0 | ||||||||||
Initial PM Performance Test (kiln and cooler) | 24 | 2 | 48 | 4 | 192 | 9.6 | 19.2 | $25,150.46 | Reconstructed/modified | 4 | ||
Repeat PM Performance Test | 24 | 2 | 48 | 0.2 | 10 | 0.48 | 0.96 | $1,257.52 | Existing | 40 | ||
Initial D/F Performance Test (kiln) | 8 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 32 | 1.6 | 3.2 | $4,191.74 | ||||
Repeat D/F Performance Test | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0.2 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.16 | $209.59 | ||||
Initial THC/HAP Performance Test (kiln and dryer) | 8 | 2 | 16 | 4 | 64 | 3.2 | 6.4 | $8,383.49 | ||||
Repeat THC/HAP Performance Test | 8 | 2 | 16 | 0.2 | 3 | 0.16 | 0.32 | $419.17 | ||||
Initial Hg Performance Test (kiln) | 8 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 32 | 1.6 | 3.2 | $4,191.74 | ||||
Repeat Hg Performance Test | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0.2 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.16 | $209.59 | ||||
Initial HCl Performance Test (Method 321) (kiln) | 8 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 32 | 1.6 | 3.2 | $4,191.74 | ||||
Repeat HCl Performance Test | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0.2 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.16 | $209.59 | ||||
Initial Opacity Performance Test (mills) | 8 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 32 | 1.6 | 3.2 | $4,191.74 | ||||
Repeat Opacity Performance Test | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0.2 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.16 | $209.59 | ||||
Existing Sources - Annual Testing d | ||||||||||||
Annual PM Performance Test (kiln and cooler) | 24 | 2 | 48 | 40 | 1,920 | 96 | 192 | $251,504.64 | ||||
Repeat PM Performance Test | 24 | 2 | 48 | 2 | 96 | 4.8 | 9.6 | $12,575.23 | ||||
Annual Hg Performance Test (kiln) | 8 | 1 | 8 | 40 | 320 | 16 | 32 | $41,917.44 | ||||
Repeat Hg Performance Test | 8 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 16 | 0.8 | 1.6 | $2,095.87 | ||||
Annual HCl Performance Test (Method 321) (new, modified, reconstructed kilns) | 8 | 1 | 8 | 40 | 320 | 16 | 32 | $41,917.44 | ||||
Repeat HCl Performance Test | 8 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 16 | 0.8 | 1.6 | $2,095.87 | ||||
New and Existing Sources - Monitoring e | ||||||||||||
Daily Calibration Drift Tests - Hg CEMS | 0.3 | 330 | 99 | 40 | 3,960 | 198 | 396 | $518,728.32 | ||||
Monthly Opacity Checks (Method 22) (mills) | 0.5 | 12 | 6 | 40 | 240 | 12 | 24 | $31,438.08 | ||||
C. Create Information (Included in 4B) | See 4B | |||||||||||
D. Gather Existing Information (Included in 4E) | See 4E | |||||||||||
E. Write Report | ||||||||||||
New, Reconstructed, Modified Sources | ||||||||||||
Notification of construction/reconstruction | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | $1,047.94 | ||||
Notification of actual startup | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | $1,047.94 | ||||
Physical or Operational Change | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | $1,047.94 | ||||
Notification of Demonstration of CEMS | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | $1,047.94 | ||||
Notification of Opacity Observations | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | $1,047.94 | ||||
Notification of Initial Performance Test | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | $1,047.94 | ||||
Report of Performance Tests | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | $1,047.94 | ||||
Semi-Annual Reports | 24 | 2 | 48 | 4 | 192 | 9.6 | 19.2 | $25,150 | ||||
Existing Sources | ||||||||||||
Notification of Demonstration of CEMS | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40 | 80 | 4 | 8 | $10,479.36 | ||||
Notification of Annual Performance Test | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40 | 80 | 4 | 8 | $10,479.36 | ||||
Report of Annual Performance Test Results | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40 | 80 | 4 | 8 | $10,479.36 | ||||
Semi-Annual Reports | 2 | 2 | 4 | 40 | 160 | 8 | 16 | $20,958.72 | ||||
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements | 9,176 | $1,045,211 | ||||||||||
5. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS | ||||||||||||
A. Familiarize with regulatory requirement | See 4A | |||||||||||
B. Plan Activities | See 4B | |||||||||||
C. Implement Activities | See 4B | |||||||||||
D. Record Data | NA | |||||||||||
E. Time to Transmit or Disclose Information | ||||||||||||
Existing Sources | ||||||||||||
Data Collection | 0.1 | 330 | 33 | 40 | 1,320 | 66 | 132 | $172,909.44 | ||||
Records of Startups, Shutdowns, malfunctions, etc | 0.1 | 330 | 33 | 40 | 1,320 | 66 | 132 | $172,909.44 | ||||
New Sources | ||||||||||||
Data Collection | 1.5 | 330 | 495 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | ||||
Records of Startups, Shutdowns, malfunctions, etc | 0.1 | 330 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | ||||
Coal mill parameter monitoring | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | ||||
F. Time to Train Personnel | 80 | 1 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | ||||
G. Time for Audits | NA | |||||||||||
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements | 3,036 | $345,819 | ||||||||||
Total Labor Burden and Cost (rounded) f | 12,200 | $1,390,000 | 58 | hr/response | ||||||||
Total Capital and O&M Cost (rounded) f | $4,730,000 | |||||||||||
Grand TOTAL (rounded) f | $6,100,000 | |||||||||||
a We have assumed that there are approximately 40 respondents operating kilns and that 10% of the existing facilities will have new construction/reconstruction. | ||||||||||||
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $147.40 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $117.92 per hour for Technical labor, and $57.02 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2018, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total Compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. | ||||||||||||
c New kilns test for PM, D/F, Hg, HCl, and THC or Total Organic HAP. New raw and finish mills test for opacity. New coolers test for PM. New dryers test for THC or Total Organic HAP. All times for testing include calibration of the CEMS, COMS, or CPMS (temperature, pressure drop, air flow rate, sorbent flow rate, activated carbon injection rate) monitors on this equipment. We have assumed that 5 percent of respondents would repeat initial performance test due to failure. | ||||||||||||
d The rule requires existing kilns re-test annually for PM and Hg. New kilns and kilns that were modified or reconstructed after the rule was promulgated must also re-test annually for HCl. All times for testing include calibration of the CEMS or CPMS (pressure drop, air flow rate, sorbent flow rate, activated carbon injection rate) monitors on this equipment. We have assumed that 5 percent of respondents would repeat annual performance test due to failure. | ||||||||||||
e Opacity checks are required monthly. Calibration drift checks on the air flow sensor on the Hg CEMS are performed daily. | ||||||||||||
f Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. |
Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost - NESHAP for Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) (Renewal) | ||||||||||||
Activity | (A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | (E) | (F) | (G) | (H) | ||||
EPA person- hours per occurrence | No. of occurrences per plant per year | EPA person- hours per plant per year | Plants per year a | Technical person- hours per year | Management person-hours per year | Clerical person-hours per year | Cost, $ b | |||||
(C=AxB) | (E=CxD) | (Ex0.05) | (Ex0.1) | Labor Rates: | ||||||||
Initial performance tests c | 24 | 1 | 24 | 4 | 96.0 | 4.8 | 9.6 | $5,248.66 | Management | $65.71 | These rates were updated 2/4/19 to match the rates from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2018 General Schedule. | |
Repeat performance test d | 24 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | Technical | $48.75 | ||
Report Review | Clerical | $26.38 | ||||||||||
Notification of construction | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 4 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | $109.35 | ||||
Notification of actual startup | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 4 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | $109.35 | ||||
Notification of performance test e | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.55 | 44 | 24.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | $1,323.10 | ||||
Notification of Physical or Operational Change |
0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 4 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | $109.35 | ||||
Review test results/CEMS Results e | 8 | 1 | 8 | 44 | 352.0 | 17.60 | 35.20 | $19,245.07 | ||||
Review semi-annual summary report | 8 | 2 | 16 | 40 | 640 | 32.0 | 64.0 | $34,991.04 | ||||
TOTAL (rounded) f | 1,290 | $61,100 | ||||||||||
Assumptions: | ||||||||||||
a We have assumed that there are approximately 40 respondents with kilns and that 10% of the existing facilities will be re-constructed or modified. | ||||||||||||
b This cost is based on the following labor rates which incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: Managerial rate of $65.71 (GS-13, Step 5, $41.07 + 60%), Technical rate of $48.75 (GS-12, Step 1, $30.47 + 60%), and Clerical rate of $26.38 (GS-6, Step 3, $16.49 + 60%). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2018 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay. | ||||||||||||
c We have assumed that EPA personnel will attend the initial performance tests for facilities that are re-constructed or modified, but will not attend the annual performance tests for existing facilities. | ||||||||||||
d We have assumed that 5 percent of respondents would repeat performance test due to failure, but that EPA would not attend repeat performance tests. | ||||||||||||
e Modified or reconstructed facilities conduct initial testing, and existing facilities (kilns and coolers) conduct annual testing. | ||||||||||||
f Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. |
NESHAP for Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) (Renewal) | ||||||
Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs | ||||||
(A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | (E) | (F) | (G) |
Continuous Monitoring Device | Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent | Number of New Respondents | Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) | Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent | Number of Respondents with O&M | Total O&M, (E X F) |
Continuous Emission Monitors | $604,456 | 0 | $0 | $116,459 | 40 | $4,658,360 |
Initial CEMS testing | $131,222 | 0 | $0 | |||
Flow monitoring device for coal mills | $35,780 | 0 | $0 | $2,589 | 26 | $67,314 |
Coal mill testing | $50,800 | 0 | $0 | |||
TOTAL | $0 | $4,730,000 | ||||
Toal Capital and O&M | $4,730,000 |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 0000-00-00 |