HPMS Supporting Statement 2019 Final

HPMS Supporting Statement 2019 Final.doc

Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS)

OMB: 2125-0028

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf


Supporting Statement

Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS)



INTRODUCTION: This is to request the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) renewed three-year approved clearance for the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) information collection, OMB No. 2125-0028. This information collection was last cleared on May 4, 2016 and is due to expire on May 31, 2019.



A. Justification


1. Circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.


The reports and procedures outlined in the attached "HPMS Field Manual for the Continuing Analytical and Statistical Data Base" (attachment uploaded in ROCIS) are authorized under 23 U.S.C. 315 (attachment uploaded in ROCIS), which places the responsibility on the Secretary of Transportation for management decisions which affect transportation. In addition, 23 CFR 1.5 (Attachment uploaded in ROCIS) and 49 CFR 1.48 (Attachment uploaded in ROCIS) provide the Federal Highway Administrator with authority to request such information deemed necessary to administer the Federal-aid highway program. Estimates of future highway needs of the Nation are mandated by Congress on a biennial basis (23 U.S.C 502(g)--Attachment uploaded in ROCIS). Data are used for assessing highway system performance under FHWA’s strategic planning and performance reporting process in accordance with requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA, Sections 3 and 4) [Attachment uploaded in ROCIS] and for apportioning Federal-aid highway funds under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141, enacted July 6, 2012, and FAST Act. Also, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 along with Executive Order 12906 (attached) established the USDOT as the lead agency for the transportation theme of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) which covers all public roads. Finally, 23 CFR 420.105(b) requires States to provide data that support FHWA’s responsibilities to the Congress and the public (Attachment uploaded in ROCIS).


The HPMS is not only a data collection and reporting system, but an analytical system that consists of a series of interrelated simulation models designed to serve the needs of the policy decision-making process of the agency. The HPMS data base, in concert with the inventory of the Nation's structures, consists of the continuing source of data used to prepare the legislatively mandated biennial report to Congress, Status of the Nation's Surface Transportation System: Condition and Performance. In addition, the HPMS serves as the single continuing data source used to carry out a host of special studies and operational functions including:


-- Various State management systems.

-- Vehicle size and weight studies.

-- Federal-aid program apportionments and allocations.

-- Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA’s) Section 187, VMT Forecasting and Tracking Guidance and Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR Parts 51 and 93-Attachment uploaded in ROCIS) for urbanized areas that are National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) non-attainment or maintenance areas.

-- FHWA publications including Highway Statistics and Our Nation's Highways.


Length and lane-mile data are also used for the apportionment and allocation of Federal-aid funds [23 U.S.C. 104(b)-Attachment uploaded in ROCIS]. Numerous special travel data reports are prepared in response to requests from within the FHWA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Offices from within the Department of Transportation, EPA, Department of Defense, Congress, State governors and legislators, and numerous organizations and individuals in the private sector, as well as the general public, also request these data. The data collected in accordance with the HPMS Field Manual are unique in that they directly tie together roadway physical, operational, use (travel), pavement, condition, and performance data that can be analyzed and summarized at the sub-State, statewide, regional, and national levels. The HPMS is also unique in that it makes effective use of statistically based sampling. These data are not obtainable from any other known source.


This information collection supports the DOT Strategic Goals of Mobility and Safety. The HPMS data is used as a basis for developing improvements to the overall highway system. The resulting improvements facilitate the mobility of the highway users while enhancing the economic growth and trade opportunities on the part of providers of goods and services and consumers.


2. How, by whom, and for what purpose is the information used.


The HPMS data is used by FHWA to assess the performance of the Nation’s highway transportation system as well as identify future highway system needs. HPMS data are extensively used by various agencies of the Federal, State, and local governments, institutions of higher learning, industry, consultants, professional organizations, and the public for a host of purposes. Data are used for assessing highway system performance under FHWA’s strategic planning and performance reporting process developed in accordance with requirements of the GPRA and for apportioning Federal-aid highway funds under MAP-21 and the FAST Act. The HPMS data collected are essential to FHWA and Congress in evaluating effectiveness of the Federal-aid highway program providing miles, lane-miles, and travel components of apportionment formulae. The information is used by FHWA to develop and implement legislation and by State and Federal transportation officials to adequately plan, design, and administer effective, safe, and efficient transportation systems.


The vehicle-miles of travel data, which represent annual travel on the Nation's highways, serve as the basis for FHWA estimation of annual travel (use) by truck type and for highway allocation among the various vehicle classes. Estimates of travel by vehicle type and vehicular weight are the basis for the estimation of pavement loadings (equivalent axle loadings) and are the fundamental input to pavement design, pavement management and administration of vehicular weight enforcement laws.


HPMS full extent data are essential to comprehensive evaluations of the National Highway System (NHS) and are needed for the entire Principal Arterial System (PAS) to enable tracking of the system to determine whether it is providing service to all areas warranting NHS service. This is a necessity because of changing demographics, industrialization, market places, and other strategic activities.

The sample data collected via the HPMS are essential to the HPMS Highway Economic Requirement System (HERS), which are extensively used for the development of the legislatively mandated biennial report to Congress, Status of the Nation's Surface Transportation System: Condition and Performance. In general, the models are used to:


-- Estimate backlog and future accruing highway system deficiencies (needs).

-- Estimate the cost of overcoming deficiencies.

-- Test alternative investment levels and strategies.

-- Establish highway investment/performance relationships.

-- Calculate related impacts.


Analytical tools of this nature, which rely upon the HPMS data base as input, are essential to sound prudent policymaking practices and are paramount to efficient and effective program evaluation and development activities. In addition, HPMS sample data serve as the basic input to the Highway Economic Requirement System-State version (HERS-ST) model, which selects and prioritizes simulated highway improvements (needs) on the basis of benefit-cost relationships for use by individual States.


Information received from the current collection have been used for:


  1. Measuring performance (including Transportation Performance Management subsequent rule-making outcomes) /FHWA and DOT programs

  2. FHWA apportionment purposes.

  3. Status of the Nation’s Surface Transportation System: Condition and Performance; used for appropriations.

  4. Highway Statistics (5,000+ recipients): used for planning, programming, budgeting, etc.

  5. Internet data base.

  6. State/private sector/academic/general public analysis purposes.

  7. Our Nation’s Highways, Selected Facts and Figures.

  8. Cost Allocation Study.

  9. Truck size and weight study


3. Extent of automated information collection.


All information for the HPMS is submitted electronically via the Internet to the FHWA by the State highway agencies. Reliance on electronic reporting of data was adopted in order to extend the power of dwindling staff resources at both the State and Federal levels. With the large data file requirements of the HPMS, electronic submission has become unavoidable. The HPMS enhancements also include the use of additional, up-to-date information technology including the ability to append HPMS data with Geographical Information System (GIS) Linear Reference System (LRS) information to operate in the GIS environment.


All data summarization, processing, modeling, etc., are fully automated via state-of-the-art personal computers and file servers. An HPMS specific software package has been developed and is occasionally modified and updated for use by State highway agencies, MPO, FHWA field offices, and Headquarters to accommodate the data requested in the HPMS Field Manual.


The HPMS is a dynamic system that undergoes periodic reassessment to assure that each data element collected continues to be needed and that the data collected is sensitive to emerging agency needs, goals and issues. This is sometimes a result of legislative action such as passage of a new highway authorization bill, for example. A significant reassessment activity for the HPMS has been recently completed and resulting changes are described in detail under item 15 below.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication.


The identification and elimination of duplication are two critical goals in managing the HPMS. Continued HPMS coordination throughout the transportation community has ensured that duplication does not exist. Over time, several HPMS Working Groups have been used to address various HPMS data issues, including avoidance of duplication, urban congestion, HPMS redevelopment, pavement data needs, etc. The Working Groups included representatives of State highway agencies, MPOs, AASHTO, the National Association of Regional Councils (NARC), FHWA field offices, and other Federal agencies and professional organizations. Current activities are directed at improving data partnerships between States, MPOs, and other local governments to implement a “collect it once, use it often” philosophy.


5. Efforts to minimize the impact on small businesses.


There is no impact on small businesses since the HPMS data is collected only from State governments.


6. Impact of less frequent collection of information.


It is essential that the HPMS data continue to be collected on an annual basis rather than less frequently. The annual collection of HPMS data is required to facilitate the FHWA’s continuous addressing of issues regarding the preservation of the Nation's highway transportation infrastructure, air quality, and EPA's requirements for NAAQS non-attainment areas to annually measure travel via HPMS. Less frequent data collection would fail to keep FHWA and EPA abreast of the continuing changes taking place on the Nation's streets and highways on a timely basis. The results of current Federal-aid highway program projects and actions, including activities designed to improve air quality, cannot be properly evaluated based on data that is collected less frequently. The determination of the consequence of future alternative changes in policies or programs would be made with out-of-date information.


Further, legal mandates for annual System length, lane-mile and travel data for the apportionment of Federal-Aid Highway Program funds, Clean Air Act requirements for travel tracking and conformity; fund transferability issues, etc., necessitate the continuation of annual HPMS data collection.


Highway conditions, travel, urban congestion, pavement deterioration, air quality, and many other highway use and performance indicators and statistics are constantly changing. Consequently, it is imperative that we continually monitor change to determine the effectiveness of Federal-aid highway programs. Urban highway congestion is an important national issue and its alleviation is of critical concern because of the economic costs of delay and the additional harmful emissions that are produced.


7. Special circumstances.


There are no special circumstances related to this information collection.


8. Compliance with 5 CFR 1320.8


The FHWA published a 60-day Federal Register Notice on March 27, 2019 (Volume 84, No: 59, pg. 11630). No response to the Notice was received regarding the HPMS portion?


9. Payment or gifts to respondents.


There will be no payments or gifts to the State and local government respondents.


10. Assurance of confidentiality.


The information to be collected is not confidential in nature; there is no need for an assurance of confidentiality.


11. Justification for collection of sensitive information.


The information to be collected is not sensitive in nature.


12. Estimate of burden hours for information requested.




Respondent


No. of

Respon-dents


Frequency

of Responses


Annual

Hour

Burden Per Respondent


Total Annual

Hour Burden


State Transportation Agencies, Wash., DC & Puerto Rico (Includes MPOs)


52


Annually


2,010


104,520


TOTAL


52




2,010


104,520


The estimated total annual burden hours on the 52 responding agencies for the collection of HPMS data is 104,520 hours. This respondent burden is based on the average annual activities necessary for the 50 States, Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico to comply with the HPMS data requirements.


13. Estimate of total annual costs to respondents.

There are no additional cost burdens to the responding agencies since the HPMS data are obtained from the normal business records maintained by the State and local governments that are a basic part of their day-to-day business activities.


The total annual salary cost to the 52 responding agencies is $6,344,364 based on an average of $60.70 per hour, as indicated in Table 3 of a recent Bureau of Labor Statistics published table (Attached).


The estimated cost to the data respondents has increased per the updating of the average hourly salary.


14. Estimate of annualized cost to the Federal Government.


The estimated annual cost to the Federal Government for this HPMS information collection is $797,375 which is calculated as follows:


(7) FHWA Headquarters staff x 2,000 hours each @ $60.70 per hour = $ 849,800


(60) FHWA field office staff x 48 hours each @ $60.70 per hour = $ 174,816

$ 1,024,616 (subtotal)

plus overhead @ 20% = $ 204,923

$ 1,229,539 (total)


The estimated cost to the Federal Government has increased per the updating of the average hourly salary as indicated in Table 3 of a recent Bureau of Labor Statistics published table (Attached).

15. Explanation of program changes or adjustments.


The estimated cost to the data respondents and the Federal Government have increased per the updating of the average hourly salary. For this request, the attached PDF document “HPMS Field Manual Summary of edits_PM2 RM (Final)” summarizes the changes have been made to the HPMS Field Manual since the previous clearance request which are mostly due to the implementation of Transportation Performance Management (TPM) final rules.



16. Publication of results of data collection.


The results of the data collected are published in the reports to Congress, and are also published in the Highway Statistics; and are posted on the Internet. The data to be submitted on

June 15 of each year is assembled and/or collected by the States and MPOs to reflect data as of December 31 of the previous year. The data received is processed by FHWA from the time the data are submitted with final data tables, charts, and graphs being readied for publication and release by the end of the calendar year. The publication is generally received from the printer and distributed/posted on the Internet by December 1. This is an annual activity.


17. Approval for not displaying the expiration date for OMB approval.


No such approval is being requested for this information collection.


18. Exceptions to the certification statement.


No exceptions to the certification statement are being requested.





7



File Typeapplication/msword
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy