3170-0001 60-day FRN (published)

3170-0001 60-day FRN (published).pdf

Terms of Credit Card Plans Survey and Consumer and College Credit Card Agreements

3170-0001 60-day FRN (published)

OMB: 3170-0001

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 97 / Friday, May 21, 2021 / Notices
Product(s)
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
MR 863—Lint Roller
MR 864—Lint Roller Refill
Designated Source of Supply: Alphapointe,
Kansas City, MO
NSN(s)—Product Name(s): MR 11480—Dust
Remover, Compressed Gas, 10 oz
Designated Source of Supply: The Lighthouse
for the Blind, St. Louis, MO
Mandatory For: The requirements of military
commissaries and exchanges in
accordance with the 41 CFR 51–6.4
Contracting Activity: Military Resale-Defense
Commissary Agency
Distribution: C-List

Deletions
The following product(s) are proposed
for deletion from the Procurement List:
Product(s)

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES

NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
8415–01–515–4289—Cover, Advanced
Combat Helmet System (ACH), w/o
Communications Flap, Arctic White,
Sm/Med
8415–01–515–4290—Cover, Advanced
Combat Helmet System (ACH), w/o
Communications Flap, Arctic White, Lg/
XLg
Designated Source of Supply: Mount Rogers
Community Services Board, Wytheville,
VA
Contracting Activity: DLA TROOP SUPPORT,
PHILADELPHIA, PA
NSN(s)—Product Name(s): 7520–01–484–
5254—Pen, Ball Point, Retractable,
Ergonomic, MD Executive Grip, Black
Barrel, Black Ink, Medium Point
Designated Source of Supply: Industries for
the Blind and Visually Impaired, Inc.,
West Allis, WI
Contracting Activity: GSA/FAS ADMIN
SVCS ACQUISITION BR(2, NEW YORK,
NY
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
8455–01–645–2728—Neck Lanyard, Cord
Style, J-Hook, Tan, 36″ x .25″
8455–01–645–2731—Neck Lanyard, Strap
Style, J-Hook, Tan, 36″ x .75″
Mandatory Source of Supply: West Texas
Lighthouse for the Blind, San Angelo, TX
Contracting Activity: GSA/FSS GREATER
SOUTHWEST ACQUISITI, FORT
WORTH, TX
NSN(s)—Product Name(s): 2640–00–052–
6724—Repair Kit, Puncture
Contracting Activity: DLA LAND AND
MARITIME, COLUMBUS, OH
Michael R. Jurkowski,
Deputy Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2021–10803 Filed 5–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:15 May 20, 2021

Jkt 253001

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
[Docket No. CFPB–2021–0011]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:

In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), the Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection (Bureau) is
requesting to revise an existing
information collection, titled ‘‘Report of
Terms of Credit Card Plans (Form FR
2572) and Consumer and College Credit
Card Agreements.’’
DATES: Written comments are
encouraged and must be received on or
before July 20, 2021 to be assured of
consideration.
SUMMARY:

You may submit comments,
identified by the title of the information
collection, OMB Control Number (see
below), and docket number (see above),
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: [email protected].
Include Docket No. CFPB–2021–0011 in
the subject line of the message.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Comment intake, Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection (Attention: PRA
Office), 1700 G Street NW, Washington,
DC 20552. Please note that due to
circumstances associated with the
COVID–19 pandemic, the Bureau
discourages the submission of
comments by mail, hand delivery, or
courier.
Please note that comments submitted
after the comment period will not be
accepted. In general, all comments
received will become public records,
including any personal information
provided. Sensitive personal
information, such as account numbers
or Social Security numbers, should not
be included.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Documentation prepared in support of
this information collection request is
available at www.regulations.gov.
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Suzan Muslu, Data
Governance Manager, at (202) 435–9276,
or email: [email protected]. If you
require this document in an alternative
electronic format, please contact CFPB_
[email protected]. Please do not
submit comments to these email boxes.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:

PO 00000

Frm 00016

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

27567

Title of Collection: Report of Terms of
Credit Card Plans (Form FR 2572) and
Consumer and College Credit Card
Agreements.
OMB Control Number: 3170–0001.
Type of Review: Revision of a
previously approved information
collection.
Affected Public: Business and other
for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
615.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 501.
Abstract: This collection incorporates
two information collections of credit
card data by the Bureau that used to be
collected under separate OMB Control
Numbers. OMB Control No. 3170–0052
is being incorporated into OMB Control
Number 3170–0001. Each collects
different forms of credit card data from
credit card issuers, as required by the
Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C.
1601, et seq. and implementing
regulations:
—Form FR 2572 collects data on credit
card pricing and availability from a
sample of at least 150 financial
institutions that offer credit cards.
The data enables the Bureau to
present information to the public on
terms of credit card plans;
—Sections 204 and 305 of the Credit
Card Accountability Responsibility
and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD
Act), amending TILA, and12 CFR
1026.57(d) and 226.58 require card
issuers to submit to the Bureau:
• Agreements between the issuer and
a consumer under a credit card account
for an open-end consumer credit plan;
and
• any college credit card agreements
to which the issuer is a party and
certain additional information regarding
those agreements.
The data collections enable the
Bureau to provide Congress and the
public with a centralized and searchable
repository for consumer and college
credit card agreements and information
regarding the arrangements between
financial institutions and institutions of
higher education.
Request for Comments: Comments are
invited on: (a) Whether the mandatory
collection of information, pursuant to
statute, is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Bureau, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the Bureau’s
estimate of the burden of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methods and the assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be

E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM

21MYN1

27568

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 97 / Friday, May 21, 2021 / Notices

collected; and (d) Ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Comments submitted in
response to this notice will be
summarized and/or included in the
request for OMB approval. All
comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: May 18, 2021.
Suzan Muslu,
Data Governance Manager, Bureau of
Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2021–10794 Filed 5–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Draft Legislative Environmental Impact
Statement for Training and Public Land
Withdrawal Extension, Fort Irwin,
California
Department of the Army,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:

The Department of the Army
announces the availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for Training and Public Land
Withdrawal Extension, Fort Irwin,
California. In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the Draft EIS analyzes the
potential environmental effects resulting
from modernization of training activities
and improvement of training facilities at
the National Training Center (NTC) at
Fort Irwin, California. The Army is also
issuing this notice to inform the public
that the EIS will serve as a Legislative
Environmental Impact Statement (LEIS)
to support the extension of the public
land withdrawal for portions of Fort
Irwin.
DATES: Comments must be received July
6, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be forwarded to the NEPA Planner, Fort
Irwin Directorate of Public Works,
Environmental Division, Building 602,
Fifth Street, Fort Irwin, CA 92310–5085,
email: [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Jason Miller, Fort Irwin Public Affairs
Office at 760–380–4511, Monday
through Friday from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00
p.m. or via email at usarmy.irwin.ntc
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fort Irwin
consists of approximately 753,537 acres
in the Mojave Desert in San Bernardino

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:15 May 20, 2021

Jkt 253001

County in southern California. The NTC
at Fort Irwin provides combined arms
training for maneuver Brigade Combat
Teams (BCTs), including the Army’s
Stryker BCTs and Armored BCTs.
Training also is provided for joint
military branches (Marine Corps, Navy,
and Air Force), Army Reserve, National
Guard units, and regular and
transitional law enforcement units, as
well as home station units. Because of
its size, design, and terrain, Fort Irwin
is one of the few places in the world
where brigade-size units (5,000+
soldiers) can test their combat readiness.
Fort Irwin’s mission is to train
Rotational Training Units (RTUs) and
joint, interagency, and multinational
partners to fight and win in a complex
world, while taking care of soldiers,
civilians, and family members. To
achieve this mission, NTC designs and
executes training exercises that prepare
brigade-level units for operational
deployments. Up to 12 BCT rotations
are executed per year.
The Draft EIS analyzes the potential
effects from the modernization of
training, the improvement of training
infrastructure, and the extension of the
existing land withdrawal. Training
changes are required to support new
training doctrine that focuses on large
Army formations operating against nearpeer adversaries. To reflect weapon
systems capabilities and evolving
mission requirements, improvements
need to be made to training
infrastructure.
Approximately 110,000 acres of Fort
Irwin training land areas are public land
that has been withdrawn from all types
of appropriation and reserved for
military purposes under Public Law
107–107 (2001). This public land
withdrawal terminates on December 28,
2026. The Army has identified a
continuing military need for the land
beyond the termination date and
intends to request that the U.S. Congress
extend the withdrawal for at least 25
years, or in the alternative, for an
indefinite period until there is no longer
a military need for the land. Upon a
separate application by the Army, the
Bureau of Land Management will file in
the Federal Register a separate notice of
withdrawal extension application. The
Final EIS will be submitted to the U.S.
Congress as an LEIS to support the
legislative request for extension of this
withdrawal and reservation.
The Draft EIS analyzes a range of
Proposed Mission Change Alternatives,
a No Mission Change Alternative, a
Withdrawal Extension Alternative, and
a No Withdrawal Extension Alternative.
The Mission Change Alternatives
consist of different magnitudes of

PO 00000

Frm 00017

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

changes in training and training
infrastructure; for Fort Irwin’s Western
Training Area, the EIS considers a range
of medium-to-heavy intensity training
alternatives. The No Mission Change
Alternative would continue military
training at the current level and would
result in no modernization of training or
improvement of training infrastructure
on Fort Irwin. The Army is the decision
maker regarding the Mission Change
Alternatives.
The Withdrawal Extension
Alternative would extend the current
withdrawal for 25 years or indefinitely
until there is no longer a military need
for the land. The No Withdrawal
Extension Alternative would result in
portions of the installation returning to
public domain. The U.S. Congress is the
decision maker regarding the
Withdrawal Alternatives.
All military activities under
consideration would be conducted
within the existing boundaries of the
installation. The Draft EIS evaluates the
potential direct, indirect, and
cumulative environmental and
socioeconomic effects of these
alternatives. Adverse effects would be
minimized to the extent possible
through the implementation of specified
avoidance, minimization, and
mitigation measures.
The Army Preferred Alternative has
not been determined at this time and
will be specified the Final EIS.
The resource areas analyzed in the
DEIS include air quality, transportation,
noise, water resources, geological
resources, biological resources, cultural
resources, noise, utilities, land use,
recreation, health and safety, and
hazardous materials and waste. The
effects on these resources may occur
from changing the scope or magnitude
of military training activities within the
current Fort Irwin boundaries. The
analysis also considers the potential for
cumulative environmental effects.
Both the Mission Change Alternatives
and the No Mission Change Alternative
would result in unavoidable
environmental effects. Under the No
Mission Change Alternative, there
would be less than significant effects on
all evaluated resources. The Mission
Change Alternatives would result in
minor-to-moderate adverse effects that
would be in addition to the effects of the
No Mission Change Alternative;
however, none of the effects would be
significant.
The environmental effects from the
Withdrawal Extension Alternative
would be comparable to those discussed
for the Mission Change Alternatives.
While the effects of the No Withdrawal
Extension Alternative are uncertain,

E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM

21MYN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2021-05-21
File Created2021-05-21

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy