EMAPS Collections 2019-20 to 2021-22 Summer 2020 Updates

Attachment C EMAPS Collections 2019-20 to 2021-22_summer 2020 Updates.docx

EDFacts Data Collection School Years 2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25 (With 2021-22 Continuation)

EMAPS Collections 2019-20 to 2021-22 Summer 2020 Updates

OMB: 1850-0925

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Attachment C


Annual Mandatory Collection of Elementary and Secondary

Education Data through EDFacts



August 2019

revised July 2020



Attachment C









EDFacts Metadata and Processing System (EMAPS) for School Years 2019-20, 2020-21, and 2021-22


OMB No. 1850-0925 v.6

Introduction

The EDFacts Metadata and Process System (EMAPS) is a web-based tool used to provide SEAs with an easy method of reporting and maintaining information on state policies, plans, and other metadata to aid in the analysis of data collected. It is also used for data collections that are better suited to a web-based collection.


In the tables below, the Reference column lists the section names and question numbers that are used to organize each question. This column also includes skip logic. These might be altered slightly to ensure that questions appear proper on web pages.


Changes from prior year are marked with “Revised!” and “New!” Changes are also summarized in the introduction to each collection.



Data collections

This section provides information about data collections using the EMAPS web-based tool.

IDEA part b dispute resolution

This data collection is authorized by Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 20 USC 1418 (a)(1)(F), 1418(a)(1)(H), 1418(a)(1)(G), and 1418(a)(3). This data collection requests information on the following: written, signed complaints; mediation requests; due process complaints; and expedited due process complaints.


There are no changes from SY 2018-19.


Reference

Data Collected / Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section A: Written, Signed Complaints



1

Total number of written signed complaints filed.

Calculated by system

1.1

Complaints with reports issued.

Integer or Missing

1.1.a

Reports with findings of noncompliance.

Integer (Count) or Missing

1.1.b

Reports within timelines.

Integer or Missing

1.1.c

Reports within extended timelines.

Integer or Missing

1.2

Complaints pending.

Integer or Missing

1.2.a

Complaints pending a due process hearing.

Integer or Missing

1.3

Complaints withdrawn or dismissed.

Integer or Missing

Section B: Mediation Requests



2

Total number of mediation requests received through all dispute resolution processes.

Calculated by system

2.1

Mediations held.

Integer or Missing

2.1.a

Mediations held related to due process complaints.

Integer or Missing

2.1.a.i

Mediation agreements related to due process complaints.

Integer or Missing

2.1.b

Mediations held not related to due process complaints.

Integer or Missing

2.1.b.i

Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints.

Integer or Missing

2.2

Mediations pending.

Integer or Missing

2.3

Mediations withdrawn or not held.

Integer or Missing

Section C: Due Process Complaints



3

Total number of due process complaints filed.

Calculated by system

3.1

Resolution meetings.

Integer or Missing

3.1.a

Written settlement agreements reached through resolution meetings.

Integer or Missing

3.2

Hearings fully adjudicated.

Integer or Missing

3.2.a

Decisions within timeline (include expedited).

Integer or Missing

3.2.b

Decisions within extended timeline.

Integer or Missing

3.3

Due process complaints pending.

Integer or Missing

3.4

Due process complaints withdrawn or dismissed (including resolved without a hearing).

Integer or Missing

Section D: Expedited Due Process Complaints (Related to Disciplinary Decision)



4

Total number of expedited due process complaints filed.

Calculated by system

4.1

Expedited resolution meetings.

Integer or Missing

4.1.a

Expedited written settlement agreements.

Integer or Missing

4.2

Expedited hearings fully adjudicated.

Integer or Missing

4.2.a

Change of placement ordered.

Integer or Missing

4.3

Expedited due process complaints pending.

Integer or Missing

4.4

Expedited due process complaints withdrawn or dismissed.

Integer or Missing

Optional

Comment

text

IDEA Part B Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Reduction and Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS)

This data collection is authorized by Section 618, Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 20 USC 1413(f)(4) and 1418(a)(3). This data collection requests the following information for every local educational agency (LEA) or educational service agency (ESA) that receives an IDEA Section 611 or 619 sub grant: LEA/ESA allocations; Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Reduction; provision of Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) and number of children receiving CEIS.



The reporting periods for the next three years are:

Report due

SY

FFY

Question A2C

Question D3

(Past two SYs)

May 2020

SY 2018-19

FFY 2018

FFY 2018

SY 2016-17 and SY 2017-18

May 2021

SY 2019-20

FFY 2019

FFY 2019

SY 2017-18 and SY 2018-19

May 2022

SY 2020-21

FFY 2020

FFY 2020

SY 2018-19 and SY 2019-20



Reference

Data Collected / Question

Format/Permitted Values


LEA Name

Text


Update Flag

Change to LEA/ESA Name
• LEA/ESA no longer used (no data reported)
• New LEA/ESA
• Change to NCESID #
• LEA/ESA no longer used (data reported)


NCESID

  • Seven-digit NCES ID (e.g. 1234567), no dash between state ID and LEA ID

  • Blank


Year used to make the LEA/ESA/SEA determinations

YYYY-YY

Section A LEA/SEA Allocations



A2A

Total LEA/ESA allocation for Section 611 of IDEA FFY 20XX

Dollar with cents

Not applicable

Missing

A2B

Total LEA/ESA allocation for Section 611 of IDEA FFY 20XX

Dollar with cents

Not applicable

Missing

A2C

Increase in LEA/ESA allocations for Section 611 from FFY 20TT to FFY 20XX

calculated by system

A3B

Total LEA/ESA allocation for Section 619 of IDEA FFY 20XX

Dollar with cents

Not applicable

Missing

A4

Total LEA/ESA allocations for Section 611 and 619 of IDEA for FFY 20XX

calculated by system

A5

15% of the total LEA/ESA allocations for Section 611 and 619 of IDEA for FFY 20XX

calculated by system

Section B Maintenance of Effort (MOE)



B2

Determination under 34 CFR 300.600(a)(2) that controls whether the LEA may be able to reduce MOE during SY 20XX-XX

meets the requirements and purposes of Part B,
• needs assistance in implementing the requirements for Part B,
• needs intervention in implementing the requirements for Part B.
• needs substantial intervention in implementing the requirements of Part B
• Not applicable or no determination
• Missing

B3

Reduction of local and/or state funds taken pursuant to Section 613(a)(2)(C) by the LEA/ESA during SY 20XX-YY

Dollar with cents

Not applicable

Missing

B4

Percent of the available reduction taken by LEA/ESA during SY 20XX-YY

calculated by system

B5

Did the State determine whether the LEA/ESA met the MOE compliance standard in FFY 20XX/SY 20XX-YY?

Yes
• No
• Missing
• Not applicable

B6

Did the LEA/ESA meet the MOE compliance standard in FFY 20XX/SY 20XX-YY?

Yes
• No
• Not applicable
• Missing

B7

By the date of this data submission, did the State return non-Federal funds to the Department based on the failure of the LEA/ESA to meet the MOE compliance standard in FFY 20XX/SY 20XX-YY?

Yes
• No
• Not applicable
• Missing

B8

What amount of non-Federal funds did the State return to the Department based on the failure of the LEA/ESA to meet the MOE compliance standard in FFY 20XX/SY 20XX-YY?

Dollar with cents
• Not applicable
• Missing

Section C Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) Provisions



C2A

Was the LEA/ESA required to use 15% of funds for CEIS due to significant disproportionality in SY 20XX-YY?

Yes
• No
• Not applicable
• Missing

C2A.1

Was the LEA/ESA identified as having significant disproportionality due to 'identification as a child with a disability'?

Yes
• No
• Not applicable
• Missing

C2A.2

Was the LEA/ESA identified as having significant disproportionality due to 'identification by disability category'?

Yes
• No
• Not applicable
• Missing

C2A.3

Was the LEA/ESA identified as having significant disproportionality due to 'placement in a particular educational setting'?

Yes
• No
• Not applicable
• Missing

C2A.4

Was the LEA/ESA identified as having significant disproportionality due to 'disciplinary action'?

Yes
• No
• Not applicable
• Missing

C2B

Required CEIS Amount reserved for required CEIS in the LEA /ESA in SY 20XX-YY

Dollar with cents

Not applicable

Missing

C2C

Required CEIS Percent taken for required CEIS in the LEA /ESA in SY 20XX-YY

calculated by system

C3A

Voluntary CEIS Did the LEA/ESA voluntarily use up to 15% of IDEA 611 and 619 fund for CEIS in SY 20XX-YY

Yes
• No
• Missing

C3B

Voluntary CEIS Amount reserved for voluntary CEIS in SY 20XX-YY

Dollar with cents

Not applicable

Missing

C3C

Voluntary CEIS Percent taken for voluntary CEIS during SY 20XX-YY

calculated by system

Section D Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) Children



D2

Total number of children receiving CEIS under the IDEA in the LEA/ESA during SY 20XX-YY

Integer
• Zero
• Not applicable
• Missing

D3

Total number of children who received CEIS under the IDEA anytime in the past two school years (including SY 20VV-WW, SY 20WW-XX and SY 20XX-YY) and received special education and related services in SY 20XX-YY

Integer
• Zero
• Not applicable
• Missing

metaData collections

Metadata are information to explain other data. Like all data collections, the EDFacts collection requires metadata. Metadata collected from a State Education Agency (SEA) aid the analysis and appropriate use of data. The metadata to be collected range from information to support data submissions (e.g., completeness) to capturing state policies surrounding data collection (e.g., student count dates). EDFacts minimizes the burden on SEAs to report metadata by rigorously evaluating the need for the information and prioritizing metadata that pertain to critical data items.


It is possible as EDFacts data are collected that the items in the EMAPS metadata collections will be altered slightly to ensure the proper metadata are collected to support ED’s understanding of the EDFacts data.

Common Core of Data (CCD) grades offered & graduates/completer Survey

This metadata collection relates to the following EDFacts Submission System (ESS) file specifications:

  • FS039 - Grades Offered, to be used to determine which states are subject to edits on the permitted values Ungraded, Grade 13, or Adult Education in file FS052 Membership

  • FS059 - Staff Full-Time Equivalent (FTE), to be used to determine which states are subject to edits on the permitted value Ungraded Teachers

  • FS040 - Graduates/Completers, to be used to determine which states are subject to edits on the permitted value Other High School Completion Credentials


Reference

Metadata collected / Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section Grades Offered (FS039)




Does your state offer ungraded instruction?

Yes/No


Does your state offer Grade 13 instruction, as it is defined in the file specification for FS052 (Membership)?

Yes/No


Does your state report Adult Education within its elementary and secondary structure?

Yes/No


Can you differentiate between grades offered and grades enrolled at the school level?

Yes/No


Can you differentiate between grades offered and grades enrolled at the district level?

Yes/No

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information

Text


Does your state offer ungraded instruction?

Yes/No

Section Staff FTE (FS059)




Are any teachers identified as teachers for ungraded classes?

Yes/No

Section Membership (FS052)




Please describe the student counts included in prekindergarten reporting for your state in the box below.

Text


Do the counts include students enrolled in Headstart, children with disabilities, or State-funded preschool programs?

Yes/No

Optional

If there are significant differences between the data reported at the school, LEA, and SEA level, please explain the reason for these differences.

Text

Section Graduates/Completers (FS040)




For which of the following does your state collect data?

Other high school completion credentials for meeting criteria other than the requirements for a regular diploma (i.e. certificate of completion, certificate of attendance).


Are there exit codes that allow a student to leave the school system without being classified as one of the following: dropout, diploma recipient, OHC recipient, transfer, death?

Yes/No

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

If Yes, please explain:

text


Does your state recognize and report dropouts below grade 7

Yes/No

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “No.”

If No, please explain

text

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information

text

gun free schools act (GFSA) survey

This metadata collection relates to the Gun Free Schools Act data collection. This information along with the data collected is used for the legislative required reporting on gun related incidents.

This metadata collection relates to the following EDFacts Submission System (ESS) file specifications:

  • FS086 - Students Involved with Firearms

  • FS163 - Discipline Data


Reference

Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section RESPONDENT INFORMATION




Name of Individual Completing this Report:

text


Title of Individual Completing this Report:

text


Fax:

xxx-xxx-xxxx

(include dashes)


Email Address:

text


Did your state submit all GFSA data via ESS (files # C086 and C163) for SY 20XX-YY

Yes/No

Section LEA COMPLIANCE WITH GFSA



1

List the name and address of each LEA that has not provided an assurance that it is in compliance with the State law that requires that a student who brings a firearm to school, or possesses a firearm at school, be expelled for one year.

None - If all LEAs have provided the necessary assurance

or
List one or more LEAs including names, NCES ID, state ID and Addresses

2

List the name and address of each LEA that has not provided an assurance that it is in compliance with the requirement in Section 4141(h) that an LEA receiving ESEA funds have in place a policy requiring referral to the criminal justice or juvenile delinquency system of any student who brings a firearm to a school, or possesses a firearm at school.

None - If all LEAs have provided the necessary assurance

or,
List one or more LEAs including names, NCES ID, state ID and Addresses

3 -Optional

If applicable, please provide information that explains any circumstances affecting the quality of data submitted to us. What information can the State share with us that will help us to more accurately interpret the data submitted on this GFSA report form (e.g., fewer than 100% LEAs responded to the State; figures reported included all weapons, not only firearms)?

text

Section STATE COMPLIANCE WITH GFSA



4

Please indicate whether your State law related to GFSA has changed in the past 12 months.

Yes, our state law has changed in the past 12 months
• No, our state law has not changed in the past 12 months

4.a Skip logic - Only required if response to 4 is “Yes.”

Summary of New/Revised Statute

text

5

How does your State law address the need for providing educational services in an alternative setting to students expelled from their regular school setting?

State law encourages LEAs to provide educational services to expelled students in an alternative setting.
• State law requires LEAs to provide educational services to expelled students in an alternative setting.
• State law does not address the need for educational services in an alternative setting.

6

Are any State funds used to support the implementation of educational services in alternative settings as it relates to students who have been expelled under the GFSA?

Yes, State funds are provided.
• No, State funds are not provided

IDEA state supplemental survey Revised!

This metadata collection relates to the current school year IDEA data collection.

This metadata collection relates to the following EDFacts Submission System (ESS) file specifications:

  • FS002 - Children with Disabilities (IDEA) School Age

  • FS005 - Children with Disabilities (IDEA) Removal to Interim Alternative Educational Setting

  • FS006 - Children with Disabilities (IDEA) Suspensions/Expulsions

  • FS007 - Children with Disabilities (IDEA) Reasons for Unilateral Removal

  • FS009 - Children with Disabilities (IDEA) Exiting Special Education

  • FS088 - Children with Disabilities (IDEA) Disciplinary Removals

  • FS089 - Children with Disabilities (IDEA) Early Childhood

  • FS099 - Special Education Related Services Personnel

  • FS143 - Children with Disabilities (IDEA) Total Disciplinary Removals

  • FS144 - Educational Services During Expulsion

The following is a change from SY 2018-19:

  • There is a follow up question on the ages of children when the response to the question “Please indicate whether your state permits the placement of children with disabilities (IDEA) ages (3 through 5) in the following educational environments” for ‘Residential Facility’ is ‘permit depending on age of the child’.

  • The minimum age for dropouts was removed.



Reference

Metadata / Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section EXITING



Subsection Reference Period




Does your state use the required reference period of July 1 to June 30 to report exiting data for IDEA?

Yes/No

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “No.”

What is the reference period used?

Start Date

Date, MM/DD/YYYY


End Date

Date, MM/DD/YYYY

Subsection Maximum Age for Services




What is the maximum age at which a student with disabilities (IDEA) can receive special education services?

18 years
• 19 years
• 20 years
• 21 years
• 22 years
• 23 years
• 24 years
• 25 years
• 26 years
• none

Optional

Comment

text

Subsection Alternate Diploma




Does your state offer a state-defined alternate diploma, defined in accordance with Section 8101(23) and (25) of ESEA(A)(ii)(I)(bb), as amended by the ESSA, that is for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities?

Yes/No

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

If yes, please provide the statutory/regulatory/policy citation(s) in your state.

text

Optional

Comment

text

Subsection Certificates




Can a student with disabilities (IDEA) exit an educational program by receiving a high school completion certificate, modified diploma, or similar document?

Yes/No

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

If yes, please provide the statutory/regulatory/policy citation(s) in your state.

text

Optional

Comment

text

Subsection Regular High School Diplomas




Is there a minimum age for graduation with a regular high school diploma in your state?

Yes/No

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

If yes, provide the minimum age for graduation with a regular high school diploma.

text

Moved, Known to be Continuing




When reporting counts under the "Moved, Known to be Continuing" reporting category in the IDEA Exiting data (i.e., total who moved out of the catchment area or otherwise transferred to another district and are KNOWN to be continuing in an educational program), what is your state's catchment area for SEA - Level Counts

Entire state (students moving out of state)
• Districtwide (students moving out of district)
• Other (specify)

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Other (specify).”

SEA-level Comment

Text


When reporting counts under the "Moved, Known to be Continuing" reporting category in the IDEA Exiting data (i.e., total who moved out of the catchment area or otherwise transferred to another district and are KNOWN to be continuing in an educational program), what is your state's catchment area for LEA - Level Counts

Entire state (students moving out of state)
• Districtwide (students moving out of district)
• Other (specify)

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Other (specify).”

LEA-level Comment

text

Optional

Comment

text

Section CHILD COUNT



Subsection Child Count Date




What date between October 1 and December 1 is your state's IDEA child count date?

Month dropdown

October

November

December


Day dropdown listing

1-31 for October

1-30 for November

1 for December

Subsection State Operated Programs




Does your state report data for all state-operated programs (SOPs) related to children with disabilities (IDEA)?

Yes, ALL SOPs are reported
• Yes, SOME SOPs are reported
• No, NONE of the SOPs are reported

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is "Yes, ALL SOPs are reported" or "Yes, SOME SOPs are reported."

SOPs are reported for which one of the following:

SEA and LEA levels
• SEA only
• LEA only

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is "No, NONE of the SOPs are reported."

Comment

text

Subsection Child Count




Please indicate all of the disability categories used by your state. Select Yes for each category that applies.



Autism

Yes/No


Deaf-Blindness

Yes/No


Developmental Delay

Yes/No


Emotional Disturbance

Yes/No


Hearing Impairment

Yes/No


Intellectual Disabilities

Yes/No


Multiple Disabilities

Yes/No


Orthopedic Impairment

Yes/No


Specific Learning Disability

Yes/No


Speech or Language Impairment

Yes/No


Traumatic Brain Injury

Yes/No


Visual Impairment

Yes/No


Other Health Impairment

Yes/No

Optional

Comment

text

Subsection Developmental Delay



Skip logic - Only displayed if previous selection is “Developmental Delay.”

What ages are included in your state's definition for developmental delay for children with disabilities (IDEA)



3 years

Yes/No


4 years

Yes/No


5 years

Yes/No


6 years

Yes/No


7 years

Yes/No


8 years

Yes/No


9 years

Yes/No

Optional

Comment

text

Section ENVIRONMENTS - SCHOOL AGE



Subsection Environments for School-Aged Children with Disabilities (IDEA)




Please indicate whether your state permits placement of children with disabilities (IDEA), ages 6 through 21, in each of the following educational environments.


*In School Year 2020-21 the age changes to “ages 5 (in kindergarten) through 21”

Regular Class
• Separate School
• Residential Facility
• Homebound/Hospital
• Correctional Facility
• Parentally Placed in Private Schools


Permitted?

permit for all age children
• permit depending on age of the child
• does not permit

Skip Logic – Only required if previous selection is “permit depending on age of child.”

What are the ages for which the educational environment is permitted for children with disabilities (IDEA), ages 6 through 21.


*In School Year 2020-21 the age changes to “ages 5 (in kindergarten) through 21”

6-11
• 12-17
• 18-21

Optional

If you responded “permit depending on age of child,” please enter the ages for which the educational environment is permitted for children with disabilities (IDEA), ages 6 through 21.


*In School Year 2020-21 the age changes to “ages 5 (in kindergarten) through 21”

Text

Subsection Early Childhood Environments for Children with Disabilities (IDEA)




Please indicate whether your state permits the placement of children with disabilities (IDEA) ages (3 through 5) in each of the following educational environments.


*In School Year 2020-21 the ages change to “ages 3 through 5 (not in kindergarten)”

Regular Early Childhood Program
• Separate Special Education Class
• Separate School
• Residential Facility
• Home
• Service Provider Location


Permitted?

permit for all age children
• permit depending on age of the child
• does not permit

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “permit depending on age of the child.”

Ages

3
• 4
• 5

Optional

If you responded "permit depending on age of child," please enter the ages for which the educational environment is permitted for children with disabilities (IDEA), ages 3 through 5.


*In School Year 2020-21 the ages change to “ages 3 through 5 (not in kindergarten)”

text

Section STAFFING



Subsection IDEA Staffing




Please indicate all related service personnel categories that are employed or contracted to provide related services to children with disabilities (IDEA), ages 3 through 21, in your state.



Psychologists

Yes/No


Social Workers

Yes/No


Occupational Therapists

Yes/No


Audiologists

Yes/No


Physical Education Teachers and Recreation and Therapeutic Recreation Specialists

Yes/No


Physical Therapists

Yes/No


Speech-Language Pathologists

Yes/No


Interpreters

Yes/No


Counselors and Rehabilitation Counselors

Yes/No


Orientation and Mobility Specialists

Yes/No


Medical/Nursing Service Staff

Yes/No

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “No” to any service personnel category

Comment

text

Section DISCIPLINE



Subsection Discipline




Does your state remove students with disabilities (IDEA) from their educational placement for disciplinary purposes for the remainder of the school year or longer?

Yes/No

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “No.”

If No, please provide the relevant statutory/regulatory/policy citation(s) that prohibit this practice.

text

Section ASSESSMENT



Subsection Assessment




Are children with disabilities (IDEA) who were English Learners and who were in the U.S. less than 12 months prior to the reading/language arts state assessment allowed to take the English language proficient (ELP) assessment in lieu of the regular reading/language arts assessment in your state?

Yes/No

Optional

Comment

text

Section STATE ADMINISTRATION



Subsection State Administration




How is your state's special education 618 data related to students (i.e., child count, educational environments, discipline, exiting, & assessment) integrated into your state's Student Information System (i.e., state data system used for all student data)?

All data components
• Some data components
• Not at all

Optional

Comment

text


How is your state's special education 618 data related to students (i.e., child count, educational environment, discipline, exiting, & assessment) integrated into your state's longitudinal data system?

All data components
• Some data components
• Not at all

Optional

Comment

text

Section IDEA - MOE Reduction & CEIS



Subsection MOE Reduction & CEIS




What is your state's definition of significant disproportionality?

text

state submission plan (SSP)

SEAs are responsible for maintaining a submission plan that provides details regarding its plans for reporting data via EDFacts. The plans indicate whether SEAs will submit files on time, the estimated number of educational units that will be submitted for each file level, and a status flag to indicate when the submission of data for each reporting level is complete and ready for ED’s review. This information is necessary in order to monitor state progress on file submissions, evaluate timeliness of submissions, and to provide a mechanism for SEAs to communicate to ED the completeness of the data they submitted.


For each file specification SEAs provide the information below.


Reference

Metadata Collected/Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section - Timeliness




Timely SEA

Yes/No


Timely LEA

Yes/No


Timely SCH

Yes/No

Skip logic - Only required when SEA timely response is “No.”

Expected Late Submission Date SEA

date mm/dd/yyyy

Skip logic - Only required when LEA timely response is “No.”

Expected Late Submission Date LEA

date mm/dd/yyyy

Skip logic - Only required when SCH timely response is “No.”

Expected Late Submission Date SCH

date mm/dd/yyyy

Skip logic - Only required when one of previous timely responses is “No.”

Not Timely Comment

text

Section – Status




Status SEA

No Data in ESS
• Not Required to Submit
• Data in ESS
• Submission Complete


Status LEA

No Data in ESS
• Not Required to Submit
• Data in ESS
• Submission Complete


Status SCH

No Data in ESS
• Not Required to Submit
• Data in ESS
• Submission Complete

Skip logic - Only required when one of previous status responses is “Not Required to Submit.”

Not Required to Submit Comments

text

Section – Data Quality




Data Anomaly SEA

Yes/No


Data Anomaly LEA

Yes/No


Data Anomaly SCH

Yes/No

Skip logic - Only required when one of previous data anomaly responses is “No.”

Data Anomaly Comments

text





ACCOUNTABILTY mETADATA New!

Due to the one-year waiver granted by ED, this metadata survey will not be collected in school year 2019-20.


This metadata collection relates to the collection of data on the accountability indicators for ESEA, as amended by ESSA. This metadata collection relates to the following EDFacts Submission System (ESS) file specifications:

  • FS 199 Graduation Rate Indicator Status

  • FS 200 Academic Achievement Indicator Status

  • FS 201 Other Academic Indicator Status

  • FS 202 School Quality or Student Success Indicator Status

  • FS 205 Progress Achieving English Language Proficiency Indicator Status

  • FS 160 High School Graduates Postsecondary Enrollment

For purposes of this metadata collection, an element is a component part of an indicator. For example, the academic achievement indicator could be composed of an element for mathematics and an element for reading/language arts.

This metadata collection includes information about collected performance levels for the elements of the indicators. Below is an example of metadata on performance levels for a nominal indicator:

Name of Performance Level

Range of Values (if applicable)

Description of Performance Level

Green


Meeting expectations

Yellow


Making progress

Red


Below expectations

ED proposes collecting this metadata survey manually for at least the first year to allow states more flexibility in responding to this collection.

Section - FS 199 Graduation Rate Indicator Status

Reference

Metadata collected / Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section - General Questions




Does the state have an alternate diploma?

Yes/No


Does the state include extended-year adjusted-cohort graduation rates as part of this indicator?

Yes/No


Has the indicator changed since the prior year in a way that would impact comparability?

Yes/No

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information.

Text

Section – Indicator Interpretation




What type of indicator?

Ordinal

Nominal

Interval

Other

Skip logic - Only required if the previous response is “Other.”

Please explain other.

Text


How many elements are included for this indicator?

1

2

3

4

More than 4

For each element the following questions will be asked




What is the element name?

Text


How many performance levels?

1

2

3

4

5

6

More than 6

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information about this element

Text

For each performance level the following questions will be asked

What is the name of the performance level?

Text


Please describe the performance level.

Text

Optional

Please provide the range of values for the performance level.

Text

Section FS 200 Academic Achievement Indicator Status

Reference

Metadata collected / Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section - General Questions




Do you report reading/language arts and mathematics separately?

Yes/No


Do you report separate measures per education level (elementary, middle, secondary)?

Yes/No


Has the indicator changed since the prior year in a way that would impact comparability?

Yes/No

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information

Text

Section – Indicator Interpretation




What type of indicator?

Ordinal

Nominal

Interval

Other

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Other.”

Please explain other.

Text


How many elements are included for this indicator?

1

2

3

4

More than 4

For each element the following questions will be asked




What is the element name?

Text


How many performance levels?

1

2

3

4

5

6

More than 6

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information about this element

Text

For each performance level the following questions will be asked

What is the name of the performance level?

Text


Please describe the performance level.

Text

Optional

Please provide the range of values for the performance level.

Text

FS 201 Other Academic Indicator Status

Reference

Metadata collected / Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section - General Questions




Do you report reading/language arts and mathematics separately?

Yes/No


Do you report separate measures per education level (elementary, middle, secondary)?

Yes/No


Do you report subgroups on a separate scale?

Yes/No


Has the indicator changed since the prior year in a way that would impact comparability?

Yes/No

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information.

Text

Section – Indicator Interpretation




What type of indicator?

Ordinal

Nominal

Interval

Other

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Other.”

Please explain other

Text


How many elements are included for this indicator?

1

2

3

4

More than 4

For each element the following questions will be asked




What is the element name?

Text


How many performance levels?

1

2

3

4

5

6

More than 6

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information about this element

Text

For each performance level the following questions will be asked

What is the name of the performance level?

Text


Please describe the performance level.

Text

Optional

Please provide the range of values for the performance level.

Text

FS 202 School Quality or Student Success Indicator Status

Reference

Metadata collected / Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section - General Questions




How many separate indictors are included in your State’s School Quality or Student Success Indicator?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9


Do you report separate measures per education level (elementary, middle, secondary)?

Yes/No


Do you report subgroups on a separate scale?

Yes/No


Has the indicator changed since the prior year in a way that would impact comparability?

Yes/No

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information.

Text

Section – Indicator Interpretation



For each indicator the following questions will be asked




What type of indicator?

Ordinal

Nominal

Interval

Other

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Other.”

Please explain other.

Text


How many elements are included for this indicator?

1

2

3

4

More than 4

For each element the following questions will be asked




What is the element name?

Text


How many performance levels?

1

2

3

4

5

6

More than 6

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information about this element

Text

For each performance level the following questions will be asked

What is the name of the performance level?

Text


Please describe the performance level.

Text

Optional

Please provide the range of values for the performance level.

Text

Section - FS 205 Progress Achieving English Language Proficiency Indicator Status

Reference

Metadata collected / Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section - General Questions




Do you report separate measures per education level (elementary, middle, secondary)?

Yes/No


Has the indicator changed since the prior year in a way that would impact comparability?

Yes/No

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information

Text

Section – Indicator Interpretation




What type of indicator?

Ordinal

Nominal

Interval

Other

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Other.”

Please explain other.

Text


How many elements are included for this indicator?

1

2

3

4

More than 4

For each element the following questions will be asked




What is the element name?

Text


How many performance levels?

1

2

3

4

5

6

More than 6

Optional

Please provide any relevant additional information about this element.

Text

For each performance level the following questions will be asked

What is the name of the performance level?

Text


Please describe the performance level.

Text

Optional

Please provide the range of values for the performance level.

Text

Section FS 160 High School Graduates Postsecondary Enrollment

Reference

Metadata collected / Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section - General Questions

What is the state’s definition of academic year for reporting postsecondary enrollment?



Start date

MM/DD/YY


End date

MM/DD/YY


Are private IHEs and out of state IHEs included in the postsecondary enrollment data?

Yes/No

assessment metadata survey REVISED!

Due to the one-year waiver granted by ED, this metadata survey will not be collected in school year 2019-20.


This metadata collection relates to the collection of data on statewide assessments. This information is collected annually and is used to evaluate assessment data.

This metadata collection relates to the following EDFacts Submission System (ESS) file specifications:

  • FS175 - Academic Achievement in Mathematics

  • FS178 - Academic Achievement in Reading (Language Arts)

  • FS179 - Academic Achievement in Science

  • FS185 - Assessment Participation in Mathematics

  • FS188 - Assessment Participation in Reading/Language Arts

  • FS189 - Assessment Participation in Science


Questions were added to evaluate the following assessment data:

  • FS137 - English Language Proficiency Test

  • FS138 - Title III English Language Proficiency Test

  • FS139 - English Language Proficiency Results


Reference

Metadata Collected/Question

Format/Permitted Values

Section – General Information




Does your state permit significant medical emergency as an exemption from the state assessments for all students?

Yes/No


Is your state exempting eighth-grade students who take the high school mathematics course associated with the end-of-course assessment from the mathematics assessment typically administered in eighth grade under section 1111(b)(2)(B)(v)(I)(aa) of the ESEA and, if so, ensuring that:

  1. The student instead is taking the end-of-course mathematics assessment the State administers to high school students under section 1111(b)(2)(B)(v)(I)(bb) of the ESEA;

  2. The student’s performance on the high school assessment is being used in the year in which the student takes the assessment for purposes of measuring academic achievement under section 1111(c)(4)(B)(i) of the ESEA and participation in assessments under section 1111(c)(4)(E) of the ESEA;

  3. In high school:

  1. The student is taking a State-administered end-of-course assessment or nationally recognized high school academic assessment as defined in 34 CFR § 200.3(d) in mathematics that is more advanced than the assessment the State administers under section 1111(b)(2)(B)(v)(I)(bb) of the ESEA;

  2. The State is providing for appropriate accommodations consistent with 34 CFR § 200.6(b) and (f); and

  3. The student’s performance on the more advanced mathematics assessment is being use for purposes of measuring academic achievement under section 1111(c)(4)(B)(i) of the ESEA and participation in assessments under section 1111(c)(4)(E) of the ESEA.”

Yes/No

Skip logic – Only required for Outlying Areas

Please submit a data note below indicating whether your entity is required to implement ESEA.

Text



To make this section easier to read, a column for row number has been added.

Row

Reference

Question

Permitted Values

1


Mathematics Grades 3-8


2


(Entities) For grades 3-8, provide the following information for Regular Assessments with and without Accommodations


3


Is more than one regular assessment (with or without accommodations) for Grades 3-8 offered?

Yes/No

4

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 7-25 for each assessment indicated in Row 4

How many regular assessments (with or without accommodations) for Grades 3-8 are offered?

Integer

5




6




7


Assessment Name

text

8


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

9


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

10


Grade Level

3

4

5

6

7

8

11


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

12

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

13


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


14


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

15

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

16


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

17

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1.D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

18


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

19

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

20


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

21

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

22


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

23

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

24


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

25

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

26


(Entities) For grades 3-8, provide the following information for Alternate Assessments based on Alternate Achievement Standards


27


Is more than one alternate assessment for Grades 3-8 offered?

Yes/No

28

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 29-48 for each assessment indicated in Row 28

How many alternate assessments (with or without accommodations) for Grades 3-8 are offered?

Integer

29


Assessment Name

text

30


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

31


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

32


Grade Level

3

4

5

6

7

8

33


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

34

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

35


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


36


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

37

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

38


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

39

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1.D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

40


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

41

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

42


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

43

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

44


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

45

Skip logic Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

46


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

47

Skip logic - Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

48

optional

Comment

text

49




50

Section - Mathematics Secondary



51


(Entities) For HS, provide the following information for Regular Assessments with and without Accommodations


52


Is more than one regular assessment (with or without accommodations) for HS grades offered?

Yes/No

53

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 54-72 for each assessment indicated in Row 53

How many regular assessments (with or without accommodations) for HS grades are offered?

Integer

54


Assessment Name

text

55


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

56


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

57


Grade Level

(states)

9

10

11

12

HS

(entities)

HS

58


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

59

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

60


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


61


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

62

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

63


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

64

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

65


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

66

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

67


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

68

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

69


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

70

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

71


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

72

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

73


(Entities) For HS, provide the following information for Alternate Assessments based on Alternate Achievement Standards

74


Is more than one alternate assessment for HS grades offered?

Yes/No

75

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 76-95 for each assessment indicated in Row 75

How many alternate assessments for HS grades are offered?

integer

76


Assessment Name

text

77


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

78


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

79


Grade Level

(states)

9

10

11

12

HS

(entities)

HS

80


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

81

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

82


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


83


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

84

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

85


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

86

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

87


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

88

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

89


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

90

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

91


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

92

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

93


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

94

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

95

optional

Comment

text

96




97


Reading / Language Arts Grades 3-8


98


(Entities) For grades 3-8, provide the following information for Regular Assessments with and without Accommodations


99


Is more than one regular assessment (with or without accommodations) for Grades 3-8 offered?

Yes/No

100

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 101-119 for each assessment indicated in Row 100

How many regular assessments (with or without accommodations) for Grades 3-8 are offered?


101


Assessment Name

text

102


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

103


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

104


Grade Level

3

4

5

6

7

8

105


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

106

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

107


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


108


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

109

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

110


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

111

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

112


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

113

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

114


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

115

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

116


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

117

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

118


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

119

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

120


(Entities) For grades 3-8, provide the following information for Alternate Assessments based on Alternate Achievement Standards


121


Is more than one alternate assessment for Grades 3-8 offered?

Yes/No

122

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 123-142 for each assessment indicated in Row 122

How many alternate assessments for Grades 3-8 are offered?

integer

123


Assessment Name

text

124


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

125


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

126


Grade Level

3

4

5

6

7

8

127


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

128

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

129


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


130


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

131

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

132


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

133

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1.D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

134


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

135

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

136


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

137

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

138


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

139

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

140


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

141

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

142

optional

Comment

text

143




144


Reading / Language Arts Secondary


145


(Entities) For HS, provide the following information for Regular Assessments with and without Accommodations


146


Is more than one regular assessment (with or without accommodations) for HS Grades offered?

Yes/No

147

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 148-166 for each assessment indicated in Row 147

How many regular assessments (with or without accommodations) for HS Grades are offered?

integer

148


Assessment Name

text

149


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

150


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

151


Grade Level

(states)

9

10

11

12

HS

(entities)

HS

152


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

153

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

154


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


155


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

156

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

157


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

158

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

159


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

160

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

161


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

162

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

163


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

164

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

165


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

166

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

167


(Entities) For HS, provide the following information for Alternate Assessments based on Alternate Achievement Standards

168


Is more than one alternate assessment for HS Grades offered?

Yes/No

169

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 170-189 for each assessment indicated in Row 147

How many alternate assessments for HS Grades are offered?

integer

170


Assessment Name

text

171


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

172


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

173


Grade Level

(states)

9

10

11

12

HS

(entities)

HS

174


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

175

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)Comment

text

176


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


177


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

178

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

179


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

180

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

181


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

182

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

183


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

184

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

185


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

186

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

187


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

188

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

189

optional

Comment

text

190




191


Science Grades 3-5 (states only)


192


For each grade 3-5, provide the following information for Regular Assessments with and without Accommodations


193


Is more than one regular assessment (with or without accommodations) for Grades 3-5 offered?

Yes/No

194

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 195-213 for each assessment indicated in Row 194

How many regular assessments (with or without accommodations) for Grades 3-5 are offered?

integer

195


Assessment Name

text

196


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

197


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

198


Grade Level

3

4

5

199


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

200

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

201


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


202


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

203

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

204


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

205

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

206


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

207

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

208


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

209

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

210


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

211

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

212


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

213

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

214


For each grade 3-5, provide the following information for Alternate Assessments based on Alternate Achievement Standards


215


Is more than one alternate assessment for Grades 3-5 offered?

Yes/No

216

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 217-236 for each assessment indicated in Row 216

How many alternate assessments for Grades 3-5 are offered?

integer

217


Assessment Name

text

218


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

219


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

220


Grade Level

3

4

5

221


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

222

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

223


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


224


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

225

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

226


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

227

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

228


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

229

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

230


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

231

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

232


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

233

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

234


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

235

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

236

optional

Comment

text

237




238


Science Grades 6-9 (states only)


239


For each grade 6-9, provide the following information for Regular Assessments with and without Accommodations


240


Is more than one regular assessment (with or without accommodations) for Grades 6-9 offered?

Yes/No

241

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 242-260 for each assessment indicated in Row 241

How many regular assessments (with or without accommodations) for Grades 6-9 are offered?

integer

242


Assessment Name

text

243


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

244


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

245


Grade Level

6

7

8

9

246


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

247

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

248


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


249


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

250

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

251


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

252

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

253


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

254

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

255


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

256

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

257


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

258

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

259


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

260

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

261


For each grade 6-9, provide the following information for Alternate Assessments based on Alternate Achievement Standards


262


Is more than one alternate assessment for Grades 6-9 offered?

Yes/No

263

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 264-288 for each assessment indicated in Row 263

How many alternate assessments for Grades 6-9 are offered?

integer

264


Assessment Name

text

265


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

266


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

267


Grade Level

6

7

8

9

268


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

269

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

270


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


271


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

272

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

273


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

274

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

275


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

276

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

277


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

278

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

279


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

280

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

281


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

282

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

283

optional

Comment

text

284




285




286


Science Secondary (states only)


287


For each grade 10-12 or HS, provide the following information for Regular Assessments with and without Accommodations


288


Is more than one regular assessment (with or without accommodations) for Grades 10-12 or HS offered?

Yes/No

289

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 290-308 for each assessment indicated in Row 289

How many regular assessments (with or without accommodations) for Grades 10-12 or HS are offered?

integer

290


Assessment Name

text

291


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

292


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

293


Grade Level

10

11

12

HS

294


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

295

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

296


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


297


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

298

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

299


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

300

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

301


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

302

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

303


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

304

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

305


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

306

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

307


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

308

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

309


For each grade 10-12 or HS, provide the following information for Alternate Assessments based on Alternate Achievement Standards

310


Is more than one alternate assessment for HS Grades offered?

Yes/No

311

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”


Add tables containing Rows 312-331 for each assessment indicated in Row 311

How many alternate assessments for HS Grades are offered?

integer

312


Assessment Name

text

313


Number of Performance Levels

2

3

4

5

6

314


Performance Level at or Above Proficiency

2

3

4

5

6

315


Grade Level

10

11

12

HS

316


End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC)

End of Grade (EOG)

End of Course (EOC)

Other

317

optional

End of Grade (EOG)/ End of Course (EOC) Comment

text

318


Questions regarding changes from prior year:


319


1. A. Did the state change its academic assessment?

Yes/No

320

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

321


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

322

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1.D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

323


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

324

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

325


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

326

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

327


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

328

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

329


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

330

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

school year 1

school year 2

school year 3

331

optional

Comment

text



The following questions are being added to support the reporting of English Language Proficiency assessments NEW!:

Row

Reference

Question

Permitted Values

332


Regular Grades K-12 Assessments with and without Accommodations- Assessment Name

text

333


1. A. Did the state change its ELP assessment?

Yes/No

334

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

335


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its ELP assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

336

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

text

337


2. A. Did the state make changes to achievement standards?

Yes/No

338

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

339


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its ELP achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

340

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

text

341


3. A. Did the state make changes to content standards?

Yes/No

342

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

343


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its ELP content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

344

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

text

345


Alternate Assessments based on Alternate Achievement Standards (K-12) - Assessment Name

text

346


1. A. Did the state change its alternate ELP assessment?


Yes/No

347

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

348


1. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its ELP assessment within the next three years?

Yes/No

349

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

1. D. If so, in what year?

text

350


2. A. Did the state make changes to ELP achievement standards?

Yes/No

351

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?


Yes/No

352


2. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its ELP achievement standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

353

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

2. D. If so, in what year?

text

354


3. A. Did the state make changes to alternate ELP content standards?

Yes/No

355

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. B. If so, did the change affect comparability?

Yes/No

356


3. C. Is the state planning to make changes to its alternate ELP content standards within the next three years?

Yes/No

357

Skip logic – Only required if previous response is “Yes.”

3. D. If so, in what year?

Text (SY XX-YYYY)



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleAttachment C with Standards
AuthorBeth Young
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2022-03-30

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy