Burden Calculations Tables

1801t14.xlsx

NESHAP for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart LLL) (Renewal)

Burden Calculations Tables

OMB: 2060-0416

Document [xlsx]
Download: xlsx | pdf

Overview

Summary
Table 1
Table 2
Capital O&M
Respondents
Responses


Sheet 1: Summary

ICR Summary Information
Hours per Response 54
Number of Respondents 91
Total Estimated Burden Hours 27,800
Total Estimated Costs $14,100,000
Annualized Capital O&M $10,800,000
Total Annual Responses 519
Form Number 5900-610

Sheet 2: Table 1

Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) (Renewal)














Burden Item (A)
Hours per Occurrence
(B)
Occurrences/ Respondent/ Year
(C)
Hours/ Respondent/ Year
(A x B)
(D)
Respondents/
Yeara
(E)
Technical Hours/Year
(C x D)
(F) Managerial Hours/Year
(E x 0.05)
(G)
Clerical Hours/Year
(E x 0.10)
(H)
Cost/ Yearb



1. APPLICATIONS NA







Labor Rates:
2. SURVEY AND STUDIES NA







Management $157.61
3.ACQUISITION, INSTALLATION, AND UTILIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS 16 1 16 0 0 0 0 $0
Technical $123.94
4. REPORT REQUIREMENTS








Clerical $62.52
A. Familiarize with regulatory requirement 1 1 1 91 91 4.55 9.1 $12,564.60


B. Required Activities









Number of kilns
New, Reconstructed, Modified Sources - Testing c








New 0
Initial PM Performance Test (kiln and cooler) 24 2 48 9.1 437 21.84 43.68 $60,310.07
Reconstructed/modified 9.1
Repeat PM Performance Test 24 2 48 0.455 22 1.092 2.184 $3,015.50
Existing 91
Initial D/F Performance Test (kiln) 8 1 8 9.1 73 3.64 7.28 $10,051.68


Repeat D/F Performance Test 8 1 8 0.455 4 0.182 0.364 $502.58


Initial THC/HAP Performance Test (kiln and dryer) 8 2 16 9.1 146 7.28 14.56 $20,103.36


Repeat THC/HAP Performance Test 8 2 16 0.455 7 0.364 0.728 $1,005.17


Initial Hg Performance Test (kiln) 8 1 8 9.1 73 3.64 7.28 $10,051.68


Repeat Hg Performance Test 8 1 8 0.455 4 0.182 0.364 $502.58


Initial HCl Performance Test (Method 321) (kiln) 8 1 8 9.1 73 3.64 7.28 $10,051.68


Repeat HCl Performance Test 8 1 8 0.455 4 0.182 0.364 $502.58


Initial Opacity Performance Test (mills) 8 1 8 9.1 73 3.64 7.28 $10,051.68


Repeat Opacity Performance Test 8 1 8 0.455 4 0.182 0.364 $502.58


Existing Sources - Annual Testing d










Annual PM Performance Test (kiln and cooler) 24 2 48 91 4,368 218.4 436.8 $603,100.68


Repeat PM Performance Test 24 2 48 4.55 218 10.92 21.84 $30,155.03


Annual Hg Performance Test (kiln) 8 1 8 91 728 36.4 72.8 $100,516.78


Repeat Hg Performance Test 8 1 8 4.55 36 1.82 3.64 $5,025.84


Annual HCl Performance Test (Method 321) (new, modified, reconstructed kilns) 8 1 8 91 728 36.4 72.8 $100,516.78


Repeat HCl Performance Test 8 1 8 4.55 36 1.82 3.64 $5,025.84


New and Existing Sources - Monitoring e










Daily Calibration Drift Tests - Hg CEMS 0.3 330 99 91 9,009 450.45 900.9 $1,243,895.15


Monthly Opacity Checks (Method 22) (mills) 0.5 12 6 91 546 27.3 54.6 $75,387.59


C. Create Information (Included in 4B) See 4B









D. Gather Existing Information (Included in 4E) See 4E









E. Write Report










New, Reconstructed, Modified Sources










Notification of construction/reconstruction 2 1 2 9.1 18.2 0.91 1.82 $2,512.92


Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 9.1 18.2 0.91 1.82 $2,512.92


Physical or Operational Change 2 1 2 9.1 18.2 0.91 1.82 $2,512.92


Notification of Demonstration of CEMS 2 1 2 9.1 18.2 0.91 1.82 $2,512.92


Notification of Opacity Observations 2 1 2 9.1 18.2 0.91 1.82 $2,512.92


Notification of Initial Performance Test 2 1 2 9.1 18.2 0.91 1.82 $2,512.92


Report of Performance Tests 2 1 2 9.1 18.2 0.91 1.82 $2,512.92


Semi-Annual Reports 24 2 48 9.1 436.8 21.84 43.68 $60,310


Existing Sources










Notification of Demonstration of CEMS 2 1 2 91 182 9.1 18.2 $25,129.20


Notification of Annual Performance Test 2 1 2 91 182 9.1 18.2 $25,129.20


Report of Annual Performance Test Results 2 1 2 91 182 9.1 18.2 $25,129.20


Semi-Annual Reports 2 2 4 91 364 18.2 36.4 $50,258.39


Subtotal for Reporting Requirements



20,876 $2,506,386


5. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS










A. Familiarize with regulatory requirement See 4A









B. Plan Activities See 4B









C. Implement Activities See 4B









D. Record Data NA









E. Time to Transmit or Disclose Information










Existing Sources










Data Collection 0.1 330 33 91 3,003 150.15 300.3 $414,631.72


Records of Startups, Shutdowns, malfunctions, etc 0.1 330 33 91 3,003 150.15 300.3 $414,631.72


New Sources










Data Collection 1.5 330 495 0 0 0 0 $0


Records of Startups, Shutdowns, malfunctions, etc 0.1 330 33 0 0 0 0 $0


Coal mill parameter monitoring 2 4 8 0 0 0 0 $0


F. Time to Train Personnel 80 1 80 0 0 0 0 $0


G. Time for Audits NA









Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements



6,907 $829,263


Total Labor Burden and Cost (rounded) f



27,800 $3,340,000
54 hr/response
Total Capital and O&M Cost (rounded) f






$10,800,000


Grand TOTAL (rounded) f






$14,100,000














a We have assumed that there are approximately 91 respondents operating kilns and that 10% of the existing facilities will have new construction/reconstruction.


b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $157.61 ($75.05 + 110%) per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $123.94 ($59.02 + 110%) per hour for Technical labor, and $62.52 ($29.77 + 110%) per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2021, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for varying industry wage rates and the additional overhead business costs of employing workers beyond their wages and benefits, including business expenses associated with hiring, training, and equipping their employees.


c New kilns test for PM, D/F, Hg, HCl, and THC or Total Organic HAP. New raw and finish mills test for opacity. New coolers test for PM. New dryers test for THC or Total Organic HAP. All times for testing include calibration of the CEMS, COMS, or CPMS (temperature, pressure drop, air flow rate, sorbent flow rate, activated carbon injection rate) monitors on this equipment. We have assumed that 5 percent of respondents would repeat initial performance test due to failure.


d The rule requires existing kilns re-test annually for PM and Hg. New kilns and kilns that were modified or reconstructed after the rule was promulgated must also re-test annually for HCl. All times for testing include calibration of the CEMS or CPMS (pressure drop, air flow rate, sorbent flow rate, activated carbon injection rate) monitors on this equipment. We have assumed that 5 percent of respondents would repeat annual performance test due to failure.


e Opacity checks are required monthly. Calibration drift checks on the air flow sensor on the Hg CEMS are performed daily.


f Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.



Sheet 3: Table 2

Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost - NESHAP for Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) (Renewal)






Activity (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H)


EPA person- hours per occurrence No. of occurrences per plant per year EPA person- hours per plant per year Plants per year a Technical person- hours per year Management person-hours per year Clerical person-hours per year Cost, $ b




(C=AxB)
(E=CxD) (Ex0.05) (Ex0.1)

Labor Rates:
Initial performance tests c 24 1 24 9.1 218.4 10.9 21.8 $12,827.07
Management $70.56
Repeat performance test d 24 1 24 0 0 0 0 $0
Technical $52.37
Report Review








Clerical $28.34
Notification of construction 0.5 1 0.5 9.1 4.6 0.2 0.5 $267.23


Notification of actual startup 0.5 1 0.5 9.1 4.6 0.2 0.5 $267.23


Notification of performance test e 0.5 1.1 0.55 100 55.0 2.8 5.5 $3,230.26


Notification of Physical or Operational
Change
0.5 1 0.5 9.1 4.6 0.2 0.5 $267.23


Notification of Demonstration of CEMS e 0.5 1 0.5 100 50.0 2.5 5.0 $2,936.60


Notification of Opacity Observations e 0.5 1 0.5 9.1 4.6 0.2 0.5 $267.23


Review test results/CEMS Results e 8 1 8 100 800.0 40.00 80.00 $46,985.60


Review semi-annual summary report f 8 2 16 91 1456 72.8 145.6 $85,513.79


TOTAL (rounded) g



2,990 $153,000














Assumptions:










a We have assumed that there are approximately 91 respondents with kilns and that 10% of the existing facilities will be reconstructed or modified.


b This cost is based on the following hourly labor rates: $70.56 (GS-13, Step 5, $44.10 + 60%) for Managerial, $52.37 (GS-12, Step 1, $32.73 + 60%) for Technical, and $28.34 (GS-6, Step 3, $17.71 + 60%) Clerical. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2022 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.


c We have assumed that EPA personnel will attend the initial performance tests for facilities that are re-constructed or modified, but will not attend the annual performance tests for existing facilities.


d We have assumed that 5 percent of respondents would repeat performance test due to failure, but that EPA would not attend repeat performance tests.


e Modified or reconstructed facilities conduct initial testing, and existing facilities (kilns and coolers) conduct annual testing.


f We have assumed that EPA will review two semiannual reports per year for the 91 respondents. Table 1 accounts for additional burden incurred for semiannual reporting requirements by facilities that are reconstructed or modified.


g Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.



Sheet 4: Capital O&M

Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs 

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)

Continuous Monitoring Device Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent Number of New Respondents Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent Number of Respondents with O&M Total O&M,
(E X F)


Kilns Using CMS for Compliance

Continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) a $604,456 0 $0 $116,459 91 $10,597,769

Initial CEMS testing b $131,222 0 $0 N/A N/A N/A

Kilns With Integrated Coal Mills With Stand-Alone Stacks

Flow monitoring device for coal mills c $35,780 0 $0 $2,589 59 $152,751

Coal mill testing $50,800 0 $0 $0 0 $0

Totals (rounded) d

$0

$10,800,000
$10,800,000









a The annual total capital (including startup) cost for CEMS will be used to monitor THC, Hg, HCl, and PM (plus flow CEMS) is $604,456 per kiln. The annual O&M costs for CEMS for these parameters is $116,459 per kiln per year. These costs are derived from EPA’s CEM.xls spreadsheet, Method 321 costs from EPA, and Hg costs from 69 FR 4694 (January 30, 2004). These costs would apply only to new respondents constructing new kilns.

b It is anticipated that new kilns will use CEMS for compliance with the THC, Hg, HCl (or Method 321 for scrubber-equipped kilns), and PM emission limits. The initial CEMS testing cost is estimated to be $131,222 per kiln, and would only apply to new respondents constructing new kilns.

c An estimated 59 kilns have integrated coal mills with stand-alone stacks. For these kilns, the capital costs are estimated at $35,780 per kiln for purchase and installation of a flow monitoring device, and $50,800 per kiln for HCl, THC, and Hg testing. These costs are only applicable to new respondents constructing new kilns. O&M costs for flow meters is $2,589 per year per facility. These costs are derived from 78 FR 10006 (February 2013).

d Totals have been rounded to 3 significant digits. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.


Sheet 5: Respondents

Number of Respondents

Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
Year Number of New Respondents a Number of Existing Respondents Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C-D)
1 9.1 91 0 9.1 91
2 9.1 91 0 9.1 91
3 9.1 91 0 9.1 91
Average 9.1 91 0 9.1 91
a New respondents include sources with constructed and reconstructed affected facilities.





Sheet 6: Responses

Total Annual Responses
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
Information Collection Activity Number of Respondents a Number of Responses Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D
New, Reconstructed, Modified Sources
Notification of construction/reconstruction a 9.1 1 0 9.1
Notification of actual startup a 9.1 1 0 9.1
Physical or Operational Change a 9.1 1 0 9.1
Notification of Demonstration of CEMS a 9.1 1 0 9.1
Notification of Opacity Observations a 9.1 1 0 9.1
Notification of Initial Performance Test a 9.1 1 0 9.1
Report of Initial Performance Test Results a 9.1 1 0 9.1
Semiannual Reports b 9.1 0 0 0
Existing Sources
Notification of Demonstration of CEMS 91 1 0 91
Notification of Annual Performance Test 91 1 0 91
Report of Annual Performance Test Results 91 1 0 91
Semiannual Reports 91 2 0 182



Total 519





a Approximately 10% of the 91 existing sources (9.1) are expected to undergo construction, reconstruction, or modification of equipment each year, resulting in notifications and reports for testing and evaluation of CEMS/COMS systems.
b The responses for semiannual reports for modified sources are accounted for in the responses shown for semiannual reports for existing sources.
File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy